NewEnergyNews: DETAILS OF A CAP-AND-TRADE SYSTEM

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

The challenge now: To make every day Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • SoCalEdison’s Newest Plan To Mitigate Wildfires
  • THE DAY BEFORE

  • Weekend Video: New Energy Means New Jobs
  • Weekend Video: Better Communication About The Climate Crisis
  • Weekend Video: VW Affirms Driving Is Ready To Go Electric
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-The Climate Crisis Is The World’s Biggest Worry – Survey
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Record New Energy Global Growth In 2020
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

    THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT WEDNESDAY, April 7:

  • TTTA Wednesday-ORIGINAL REPORTING: The Search For A Successor Solar Policy
  • TTTA Wednesday-Local Governments Still Driving New Energy
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • Monday Study: PG&E’s Plans To Mitigate Wildfires
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Founding Editor Herman K. Trabish

    --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT WEDNESDAY, April 14:
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: The Differences Between Energy Markets
  • Biden Admin To Ensure Jobs Plan Protects Equity – DOE Head

    Wednesday, April 25, 2007

    DETAILS OF A CAP-AND-TRADE SYSTEM

    These are the questions which MUST be answered, these are the problems which MUST be solved. Or should we just do a carbon tax? This is THE DEBATE OF OUR TIME. What is decided may LITERALLY determine the fate of the earth.

    Devil is in details of carbon cap system; Despite broad consensus, fault lines run through ‘cap and trade’ debate
    John W. Schoen, April 24, 2007 (MSNBC)

    WHO
    Affected: all US emitters of greenhouse gases. In the article: David Yarnold, executive vice president of Environmental Defense, Environmental Protection Agency, Chicago Climate Exchange, Michael Morris, CEO of American Electric Power, David Crane, CEO of NRG Energy, U.S. Climate Action Partnership, the US congress

    WHAT
    The article describes a U.S. carbon emissions “cap-and-trade” system, the benefits, pitfalls and questions. The basic idea: “Companies that produce emissions below a mandatory cap earn carbon credits — which they can then sell to companies that don’t meet the cap. This rewards those who invest in ways of reducing pollution and penalizing those who don’t.”

    WHEN
    Already operating in Europe and voluntary in the US (CCX), the system has been proposed by many political and business leaders and a decision about such a system seems eminent.
    EPA presently administers a successful cap-and-trade system that controls acid rain by limiting sulfur dioxide and nitrous oxide emissions.
    USCAP targets a 60-80% emission reduction by 2050.

    WHERE
    Nationally is necessary, internationally would be better.

    WHY
    Questions addressed by the article:
    How will carbon credits be allocated?
    How restrictive should carbon caps be?
    Will there be rewards for early adopters?
    What level of emissions will be grandfathered?
    Should companies be rewarded for investments made years ago?
    Also:
    How are caps enforced?
    When will they be instituted?
    How do they affect competition with emerging giants India and China?
    How do (non-emitting and government subsidized) nuclear plants fit in?
    Should congress follow the USCAP lead?

    QUOTES
    - David Yarnold/Environmental Defense: “One of the inevitable things about the democratic process is that everybody is going to look for their own version of fairness…”
    - Michael Morris, CEO, American Electric Power: “The timeline has to be right, and the reduction targets have to be achievable…It will serve no purpose for Congress to ask the utilities of the world to run a three-minute mile because it won’t happen.”
    - David Crane, CEO, NRG Energy: “If the nuclear and gas lobby gets their way and you tie it to megawatts of capacity. that is a windfall…A nuclear plant that was built under a rate-based mechanism with full recovery (of construction costs), and now suddenly gets a carbon benefit, that is a windfall for the nuclear plant. What behavior in the nuclear plant are you going to influence by giving them this carbon allocation?”
    - Yarnold: “There is a golden moment right now…There is a confluence of public opinion, of political will, of a level of understanding. And so the question now is not whether there will be climate legislation, but whether there will be climate legislation that gets over a high enough bar to have actually the necessary environmental benefit."
    - Morris: “I would expect that between the House and the Senate sometime in the next year or so well come up with a plan that will work."

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home