NewEnergyNews: TRUTH ON CARBON CAPPING FROM CBO

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

The challenge now: To make every day Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • Weekend Video: New Energy Means New Jobs
  • Weekend Video: Better Communication About The Climate Crisis
  • Weekend Video: VW Affirms Driving Is Ready To Go Electric
  • THE DAY BEFORE

  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-The Climate Crisis Is The World’s Biggest Worry – Survey
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Record New Energy Global Growth In 2020
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

    THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT WEDNESDAY, April 7:

  • TTTA Wednesday-ORIGINAL REPORTING: The Search For A Successor Solar Policy
  • TTTA Wednesday-Local Governments Still Driving New Energy
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • Monday Study: PG&E’s Plans To Mitigate Wildfires
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • Weekend Video: Denial Goes Oh So Wrong
  • Weekend Video: Solar On Schools Can Pay For Teachers
  • Weekend Video: DOE Secretary of the Solutions Department Jennifer Granholm
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Founding Editor Herman K. Trabish

    --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • MONDAY’S STUDY AT NewEnergyNews, April 12:
  • SoCalEdison’s Newest Plan To Mitigate Wildfires

    Saturday, April 28, 2007

    TRUTH ON CARBON CAPPING FROM CBO

    Cap-and-Trade:
    1) lawmakers set an allowed cap on overall greenhouse gas emissions;
    2) the federal government regulates each emitter (coal suppliers and burners, oil importers and sellers, utilities and refineries, etc. )
    3) Emitters could buy credits to emit more from non-emitters

    This CBO report distinguishes between a cap-and-trade system which sells “allowed amounts of emissions” or assigns them without cost. Selling “allowed amounts of emissions” to businesses creates revenues to balance burdens on consumers, via reduced taxes or a balanced budget. Assigned and free “allowed amounts” likely gives more profit to energy producers without protecting consumers.

    click to enlarge

    US CBO Sees Carbon Cap Driving Up Costs For Poorer Households
    Maya Jackson Randall, April 26, 2007 (Dow Jones Newswire)

    WHO
    The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO); consumers, especially lower-income consumers; Federal policy-makers involved in developing legislation to limit greenhouse gas emissions

    WHAT
    The CBO finds that lower-income consumers would take a bigger cost hit from carbon capping.

    WHEN
    There are more pending legislative proposals on how to cap emissions than 2008 candidates for president right now. That’s a LOT of proposals.
    click to enlarge
    WHERE
    Capitol Hill is where the legislative action is, but the discussion on how to limit emissions without causing economic burden and inhibit growth is national, no, make that international.

    WHY
    - Emissions capping adds cost to the burning of fossil fuels to create energy. Even the brightest scenarios have much fossil fuel still being used to create electricity and power vehicles for the foreseeable future. This means higher energy prices. Energy prices are not easily avoided by those with lower incomes. They usually consume less energy for optional activities (water skiing) and more for necessary ones (commuting to work).
    - Higher energy costs likely mean some reduction in optional consumption and, thus, some reduced economic activity in energy fields and job losses in that sector.
    - The most likely emissions limiting legislation right now looks to be a cap-and-trade system. Costs would be directed at business but would inevitably be passed on to consumers.

    QUOTES
    “All consumers would face higher prices for electricity and gasoline, but those hikes would take up a greater portion of poorer households' income…”

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home