Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

The challenge now: To make every day Earth Day.



  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Arizona Climate Deniers Using The Law
  • New Energy Going Up, NatGas Use, Emissions Going Down


  • Monday’s Study: Keeping The Lights On In Texas

  • Weekend Video: The Water-Wanting West
  • Weekend Video: Never Mind Water In The Idiocracy Future
  • Weekend Video: The American Clean Power Association Takes Center Stage

  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-The Climate Crisis Will Cost Two COVIDs
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Follow The Money To New Energy


  • TTTA Wednesday-ORIGINAL REPORTING: California Reaches Out To The Rest Of The West
  • TTTA Wednesday-New Energy Taking Over
  • --------------------------


    Founding Editor Herman K. Trabish



    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart




      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.


    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • FRIDAY WORLD, June 18:
  • Better Ways To Talk About The Climate
  • The World’s Huge New Energy Need

    Monday, February 27, 2012


    Knowledge is power; Driving smarter energy usage through consumer education
    Michael Valocchi and John Juliano , February 2012 (IBM Institute for Business Value)

    Consumers have tremendous expectations for future energy services. However, they are largely unaware that they need to take a more active role in managing energy decisions for their visions to become reality. In many cases, consumers lack even the basic knowledge necessary to accomplish this. Utilities and other smart grid advocates need to improve information transfer to consumers to build broader support and the customer engagement that can follow. Delivered through trusted and generation-appropriate channels, this information must address consumers’ specific knowledge levels, most important motivating influences and current perceptions of providers.

    Expectations have been running high for what smart meters and smart grid technology will provide to residential energy consumers in the long run. In the minds of consumers, gaining more control over energy use, improving environmental impacts and managing costs have been firmly associated with the term “smart grid.”

    Communications and media coverage related to government economic stimulus packages and environmental priorities have played a role in building these perceptions…Further boosts have come from consumer-focused magazines like one whose cover page featured “Extraordinary Solutions for a Clean-Energy Century” and lists like the one that ranked smart meters one of the top 20 green technology concepts…Even the numerous consumer surveys focused on consumers’ future energy wants and needs, including our own 2007 and 2009 Global Utility Consumer Surveys, may have contributed to expectation setting through questions about a future rich with data, tools for energy usage control, and new products and services…

    In the past two years, smart meter deployments have begun in some places and moved into final planning stages in others. In the process, this rosy view of the future often became clouded by uncertainty and confusion, driven by more imminent concerns and by influencers with a variety of messages. Some consumers are now raising questions: Are smart meters really accurate? Is the collection of energy data a threat to my privacy? Will criminals know more about me and my family through my smart meter readings?

    What has been in many ways absent from the picture is the question of how people feel about the paths that would have to be traversed to get to an attractive future state where smart grids and smart meters provide improvements in energy use, environmental impacts and cost management. From our prior surveys, we know that consumers like the idea of having cleaner power options and more control and efficiency at their fingertips. But have they assumed these benefits would be accessible immediately once a smart meter was attached to their homes? Do they have sufficient understanding that, in order to optimize these benefits, changes in energy consumption patterns and more permission to access information about that energy usage might be required?

    With questions like these in mind, we prepared our 2011 Global Utility Consumer Survey for launch to more than 9,000 respondents in 15 countries…This time, our primary focus was not the compelling products and services consumers want to see emerge in the future. Similarly, we did not highlight useful energy efficiency actions they might be able to take with better technology and data. Instead, we sought to discover the key set of interconnections that define a consumer’s current expectations: What perceptions are driving these expectations? How much underlying knowledge is behind the key perceptions? Finally, who or what factors are the strongest influences in developing that critical knowledge?

    click to enlarge

    We found that the following factors contribute most strongly to an environment of long-term expectations conflicting with short-term reluctance:

    •• Consumer perceptions established early on – such as saving money and reducing environmental impact – remain strong, but energy independence and national economic benefits, among others, are now getting similar levels of attention.

    •• A newer perception – that of a privacy threat posed by the increased availability of energy data – has emerged strongly, shaping attitudes along several dimensions.

    •• Consumers’ knowledge about their energy transactions with their providers is strongly correlated with perceptions that impact willingness to embrace smart meters and change energy consumption patterns.

    •• Despite its importance, the level of knowledge consumers have today about energy and their providers – even at the most basic levels – is unsatisfactory.

    These factors are best explained in the context of a consumer energy experience chain, which recognizes that:

    •• Expectations are driven by perceptions

    •• Perceptions are created by retained knowledge

    •• Knowledge is retained in the context of core personal influences and passed on by trusted influencers.

    More fundamental information must be provided to consumers to increase this knowledge base – but through both traditional and new influencers, and with specific messages and channels tailored to suit different age groups.

    click to enlarge

    Perception: The first link in the consumer energy experience chain

    Reining in energy expenditures and mitigating the environmental impact of power generation have been the most prominent perceptions driving consumers’ vision of benefits from the smart grid ecosystem. We noted these in 2007 when we conducted our first survey and reconfirmed them in 2009. By then, in fact, the impact of the global economic crisis strongly reinforced the emphasis on cost, particularly related to personal and family expenditures. See, for example, the drop in willingness to spend for “green products and services”…

    As 2012 begins, the influence of other perceptions is building. About 60 percent of our surveyed consumers with an opinion expect smart grid technologies to benefit their family and foster energy independence for their nations. Over half also believe that these technologies will improve household energy awareness and control, lowering total costs for household energy usage…

    click to enlarge

    A little knowledge is a good thing

    Perceptions about new technologies and programs in general are driven in large part by the level of knowledge consumers have, and smart meters are no exception. There is a strong correlation between basic knowledge and willingness to change behavior patterns to meet broad goals (for example, help reduce peak demand by changing the time when energy is used). Similarly, overall approval of smart grid programs that are being deployed or proposed locally is directly related to the knowledge level of the respondent. For example, among consumers with very little knowledge of common industry terms, only 43 percent approve of technology deployment programs, versus 50 percent for those with moderate knowledge and 61 percent with strong knowledge. Similar correlations can be seen in responses to questions about whether these programs will benefit consumers’ families and if they are likely to change energy use patterns. In fact, the patterns were stunningly consistent for virtually all measures of a consumer’s likelihood of positively embracing changes…

    However, this pattern is reversed where privacy is concerned. Here, the more knowledge consumers had about energy, the more concerned they were with privacy issues with home energy usage data. Less than a quarter of those with low to moderate levels of knowledge have privacy concerns; among high-knowledge respondents, the number is 38 percent…However, the elevated privacy concerns do not adversely impact the favorability of these high-knowledge consumers toward new deployments and programs. The support for smart meter programs and data sharing among high-knowledge respondents who expressed privacy concerns was virtually identical to that of those high-knowledge consumers who had no concerns or a neutral opinion…

    click to enlarge

    Missing the consumer education target

    The fact that knowledge leads to positive consumer actions is the “good news” side of the results. The bad news is that such knowledge, even for basic concepts, is severely lacking. For example, when asked if they understand the standard pricing unit for consumption (for example, cents or euro per kWh), over 30 percent of consumers reported that they had never heard of the unit or do not know what it means. This has major implications for the implementation of programs like time-of-use pricing (a term which half of those surveyed did not recognize at all). Over 60 percent didn’t know what “smart meter” and “smart grid” mean, and “customer energy portal” had no meaning to more than three in four respondents…

    In some markets, this void in understanding has been aggressively tackled by forces both pro- and anti-change with messages delivered through a wide variety of channels. Many of these messages addressed valid areas of concern and presented important parts of the debate. However, some of the messages focused on negative outcomes that are highly unlikely with adequate protections in place. Others focused on more positive outcomes for which the timing and availability are not yet known with certainty. In combination, consumers are often getting conflicting messages that do not present a clear picture of the future.

    click to enlarge

    Driving behavior patterns

    Influences that drive a consumer’s expectations take two forms: messages that most strongly influence motivations for change and sources that provide the strongest channels of delivery of knowledge and opinion. Each is important separately, but because of strong differences in their impacts on different age groups, their interaction is critical as well.

    Saving money remains the strongest behavioral influence overall. However, the importance of other influences is on the rise. In about half of the countries surveyed, motivations to change energy consumption behavior to help keep the national economy strong and improve energy security outweighed motivations based on improving impact on the environment. This was particularly true in the United Kingdom, the United States and Poland. In the other half, environmental concerns did outweigh economic ones, with Denmark, Canada and Chile leaning most strongly in that direction.

    Regardless of which influence played a stronger role in motivating change, the age of the respondent is a strong driver of what is important. Those 45 or older were as much as 40 percent more driven by concerns related to cost control, energy security and the impact of energy prices on the national economy. Conversely, among younger consumers – particularly the under-25 group – the influence of environmental concerns was much higher than for the 45-and-older group.

    Beyond this month’s bill

    If consumers are to be better informed and influences more targeted, what are the best ways to deliver the messages? The most effective channels of influence differ across age groups as well. Not surprisingly, the youngest age group we evaluated – age 18 to 24 – had some of the most distinctive factors. In this age group, people gravitate to energy information they can find online (particularly social media-based) to a much greater degree than older consumers. Online social networking was twice as often reported to be a primary source of information for respondents under 25 than for those 25 to 34, and six times more than for those 35 and older. Similarly, online video content was cited as a primary source of information five times more than for those 18 to 24 than for those 25 to 34, and nine times more than for those 35 and older.

    The most significant finding about messages and influences, however, comes from looking at the aggregate contribution of sources that have significant influence on consumers’ knowledge and perceptions. In this year’s survey, the percentage reporting that they use an information source that is not under the control of the consumer’s provider exceeds the percentage that uses a source directly under the control of the provider…This finding points to a major shift in messaging power.

    Consumers are now relying less on information that comes from their own energy provider and more on other influences. The effect increases when looking at the emerging economies and is stronger for younger consumers than for older ones. These findings seem in line with the diffusion of information and opinion via the Internet, mobile applications and social media – a phenomenon that is changing the way companies in almost every industry engage their customers.

    click to enlarge

    Making choices: Too much of a good thing?

    As part of our ongoing research into the future of residential energy service, experts in consumer marketing and behavioral economics from IBM and academia participated in a workshop to examine the intersection of influences, messaging campaigns and decision making. One of the more important ideas discussed in the workshop was the role of “decision frames” – psychological structures that people create to organize and simplify the world around them…

    Often, industry advertising campaigns focus strongly on a particular long-term impact that smart meters and smart grid technology may have on the individual – such as cost, environmental impact, reliability or reduced dependence on nondomestic energy sources. These core themes are often deployed across a broad media spectrum and centered on a simple, easy-to-understand message addressed to the broadest audience possible within the entire consumer base.

    However, the role of these impacts as decision frames for energy in consumers’ minds makes this very difficult to achieve. A simple message can miss the mark with a very high percentage of consumers either because it simply does not resonate with them, or worse, it is in direct conflict with the decision frames in which they view energy-related decisions…

    click to enlarge


    In general, energy providers and utilities have done a good job of painting a vision – getting consumers, regulators and the media to imagine what possibilities new energy technologies lend to the future. They have also garnered a sense of what new products and services might create the greatest value and satisfaction. However, this successful communication of the broad societal case for smart grid and smart meter technologies may have created an environment in which the long-term possible benefits have come to represent the immediate expectation of benefits. This has created an opening for influential parties – who now have a stronger voice than ever due to consumers’ increasing reliance on sources outside their providers’ control – to paint this gradual build-up of capabilities and benefits as a failure to provide them at all.

    Without a good core knowledge level on which they can rely, consumers can only work with what they learn through their most trusted channels, even if inaccurate. This is why it is critical to recognize that almost half of consumers are deficient in even basic knowledge. The good news that comes out of this survey is if that knowledge core can be improved, higher levels of approval and willingness to engage are likely to follow, and system and societal goals can be easier to meet.

    Regardless of their knowledge bases, consumers have perceptions that result from existing influences and knowledge levels must be taken seriously, as they are the most important factors driving expectations and willingness to engage. It will be critical for energy providers, governments and other parties with a stake in the future of the smart grid to discuss perceptions in an honest and complete manner, regardless of source or context. For example, perceptions on privacy are critical; tell consumers how each of them is being addressed in meter and data deployment and oversight plans. Even unrealistic perceptions should be addressed with an honest explanation of how any negative outcomes will be avoided or mitigated. Examples across other consumer impacts – such as meter accuracy, total costs and health effects – need to get the same scrutiny and care in communication.

    Companies involved with the planning for, deployment of and business development related to smart grid and smart meter technologies should consider the following actions to address critical gaps in the influence-knowledge-perception-expectation chain:

    •• Recognize that certain motivators and channels of delivery hit specific demographic categories most effectively; align messages and channels to optimize impact.

    •• Leverage key lessons from behavioral science and economics to better align consumer response with knowledge resources and provider messages.

    •• In the short term, forego the push to educate consumers on the details of smart meters and smart grids. Instead, renew focus on the most basic information for the majority, including assuring that data privacy protections are in place. Provide self-learning resources for those who are ready for more complex ideas.

    •• Consider a more social strategy for communicating knowledge and success stories to reach groups where traditional communication via bill inserts and advertising fails to connect with important groups of customers. This is particularly true for consumers with strong family dynamics and consumers younger than 25.

    •• To help address the knowledge gaps and areas of concern for smart meters, learn from and employ marketing techniques being used in other industries facing technological and
    consumer engagement upheaval.

    Navigating the consumer energy experience chain will be one of the core competencies in coming years that will help determine how smoothly smart meter and smart grid deployment will go and how engaged consumers will be. The industry needs to understand and manage the expectations of consumers by driving perceptions that are realistic in impact and timing of availability. This can only be done successfully if providers and retailers provide much-needed knowledge at the right level of sophistication – from very basic to fairly advanced – and do so through the most effective influencers for specific groups of consumers. If analyzed within the context of local demographics and dominant decision frames, this chain can build much-needed engagement and help ensure the right messages are reaching the right people through their trusted channels.


    Post a Comment

    << Home