NewEnergyNews: CARBON: CAN’T BURY IT, CAN’T LIVE WITH IT

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

While the OFFICE of President remains in highest regard at NewEnergyNews, this administration's position on climate change makes it impossible to regard THIS president with respect. Below is the NewEnergyNews theme song until 2020.

The challenge now: To make every day Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • TODAY’S STUDY: The Value Of Offshore Wind
  • QUICK NEWS, April 24: Another ‘This Is It’ Moment For Climate Change; Here’s Why Wind Is A Winner; Solar For The Heartlands
  • THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: The Economic Impacts Of New England’s Carbon Trading Market
  • QUICK NEWS, April 23: “Letter From A Teenage Girl Who Has Had Enough”; The Many Values Of Ocean Wind; Solar For All
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • Weekend Video: Earth Day 2018
  • Weekend Video: A Daily Show Take On Earth Day
  • Weekend Video: First U.S. Ocean Wind
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Human Population And Global Weirding
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Global Wind Still Focused On Big Markets
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-New Energy-Powered High Seas Shipping From Japan
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-World’s Biggest Wave Energy For Bali
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

    THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT THURSDAY, April 19:

  • TTTA Thursday-Study Shows A Carbon Tax Can Work
  • TTTA Thursday-Wind Power Was 6.3% Of U.S. Power In 2017
  • TTTA Thursday-Global Solar Boom To Get Bigger In 2018
  • TTTA Thursday-U.S. Cities Are Getting More Efficient
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Founding Editor Herman K. Trabish

    --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • TODAY AT NewEnergyNews, April 25:

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Why Utilities Need To Respond Now To The EV Boom
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Transmission Developers Power Forward In West While California Stalls

    Tuesday, February 27, 2007

    CARBON: CAN’T BURY IT, CAN’T LIVE WITH IT

    Burying power plant CO2 has cost
    Hil Andersen, February 21, 2007 (UPI)
    - Burying the problem of carbon dioxide emissions from power plants is a particularly appealing response to climate change, but as with many a green energy idea, the concept of carbon sequestration still faces technical and financial hurdles…

    - Carbon sequestration has all of the appeal of sweeping dust under the rug; carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, is captured…[and] is then pumped deep underground into geological formations that trap it if not forever at least for years…
    - Assistant Secretary of Energy Jeffrey Jarrett…announced $450 million in assistance over the next 10 years for a slate of projects aimed at commercializing carbon sequestration.
    - Slashing the U.S. output of carbon dioxide is seen worldwide as critical…Calculations by Massachusetts Institute of Technology peg the CO2 emissions from a large 1,000-megawatt U.S. power plant burning pulverized coal at between 6 and 8 metric tons per year; a natural gas plant emits about half that level…
    - …the political winds in Washington have shifted…Major U.S. industrial groups have stepped up their proclamations that they are on board…and they are counting on Yankee ingenuity in the form of research into technologies such as carbon sequestration to lead the way…

    - …the development of carbon sequestration is considered to be in its infancy and not ready for prime time. The Energy Department estimates that using current sequestration technology would cost utilities $100-$200 for each ton of carbon emissions kept out of the atmosphere. MIT estimated that translates to another 1.5-3.0 cents per kilowatt hour of retail electricity -- the U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that the average power consumption per household in the United States was 4,410 KwH in 2005…So it isn't practical to assume power generators can simply start injecting CO2 into the ground…
    - The $450 million ante thrown in by Jarrett was aimed primarily at studying the ability of underground reservoirs to securely contain large volumes of CO2 without the buoyant gas rising to the surface through porous rock and seeping into the atmosphere. An unrelated study…by researchers at MIT included the good news that CO2 injected into deep reservoirs of salty water would indeed stay…
    - The costs of sequestration…can include the cost of installing equipment, converting the emissions into a compressed form of CO2, pumping it to the storage site and maintaining the site. There is also…the electricity needed to run the capture equipment…

    - A top priority…is refinement of the compounds used to strip the CO2 out of a power plant's overall emissions stream. The most popular material is monoethanol amine, a smelly and corrosive chemical made from ammonia that… must be replenished frequently.
    - The Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research at Purdue University stated in a report earlier this month that "CO2 capture and storage using amine-based scrubbers, the only proven process to date, can consume about one-third of the plant's power output and increase the cost of electricity by 60 to 80 percent."
    - Such numbers are definitely enough to throw cold water on the idea…although the drive for an effective method of doing so is heating up fast.

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home