NewEnergyNews: NO. CAROLINA: 1ST NEW ENERGY WIN IN SOUTH?/

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

The challenge now: To make every day Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT WEDNESDAY, August 23:

  • TTTA Wednesday-ORIGINAL REPORTING: The IRA And The New Energy Boom
  • TTTA Wednesday-ORIGINAL REPORTING: The IRA And the EV Revolution
  • THE DAY BEFORE

  • Weekend Video: Coming Ocean Current Collapse Could Up Climate Crisis
  • Weekend Video: Impacts Of The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Current Collapse
  • Weekend Video: More Facts On The AMOC
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

    WEEKEND VIDEOS, July 15-16:

  • Weekend Video: The Truth About China And The Climate Crisis
  • Weekend Video: Florida Insurance At The Climate Crisis Storm’s Eye
  • Weekend Video: The 9-1-1 On Rooftop Solar
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

    WEEKEND VIDEOS, July 8-9:

  • Weekend Video: Bill Nye Science Guy On The Climate Crisis
  • Weekend Video: The Changes Causing The Crisis
  • Weekend Video: A “Massive Global Solar Boom” Now
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

    WEEKEND VIDEOS, July 1-2:

  • The Global New Energy Boom Accelerates
  • Ukraine Faces The Climate Crisis While Fighting To Survive
  • Texas Heat And Politics Of Denial
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Founding Editor Herman K. Trabish

    --------------------------

    --------------------------

    WEEKEND VIDEOS, June 17-18

  • Fixing The Power System
  • The Energy Storage Solution
  • New Energy Equity With Community Solar
  • Weekend Video: The Way Wind Can Help Win Wars
  • Weekend Video: New Support For Hydropower
  • Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • WEEKEND VIDEOS, August 24-26:
  • Happy One-Year Birthday, Inflation Reduction Act
  • The Virtual Power Plant Boom, Part 1
  • The Virtual Power Plant Boom, Part 2

    Wednesday, June 20, 2007

    NO. CAROLINA: 1ST NEW ENERGY WIN IN SOUTH?

    North Carolinians are taking the fight to the enemy and the enemy is the utilities!

    Energy savings could be new N.C. law
    John Murawski, June 19, 2007 (Raleigh News & Observer via Charlotte Observer)

    WHO
    North Carolina Senate committee on Agriculture, Environment and Natural Resources
    state Rep. Pricey Harrison, Dem., Michael Shore, senior air policy analyst, Environmental Defense.

    WHAT
    The committee will debate a proposal for a state Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), a mandate for the state to obtain 12.5% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2015.
    Southern Company estimates of electricity costs (cents/kilowatt-hour): biomass can be competitive

    WHEN
    The debate will be June 21 and the committee could vote by the weekend. The proposal has been negotiated for 5 months.

    WHERE
    North Carolina

    WHY
    - Besides requiring 12.5% of electricity from renewables by 2015, the RPS places limits on costs to households: no more than $10/year in 2008 and rising to a maximum of $34/year in 2015.
    - The US Senate is considering a more demanding RPS this week of 15% renewables by 2020. The federal would defer to stronger standards in the states but supercede weaker ones.
    - The Edison Electric Institute, which represents Progress Energy and Duke Energy in No. Carolina, opposes the national RPS legislation, as does the No. Carolina Utilities Commission and the Southeastern Association of Utilities Commissioners. But Progress and Duke back the state’s proposal because it is weaker and has compromises giving them assistance for financing new plants.
    - No. Carolina environmentalists back the state version because it requires solar energy, swine waste and poultry droppings and prevents the utilities from avoiding energy development through the purchase of credits from other states. State enevironmentalists lobbied hard to get the 12.5% level and to impose requirements on the powerful utilities.
    No. Carolina wind -- it doesn't have to be everywhere in the state to be a viable resource (click to enlarge)

    QUOTES
    - Harrison: "It's a renewable energy bill, and they've got all these provisions in there that are making it easier to build new nuclear and coal-fired plants…That's seems unfortunate."
    - Shore: "We are close…It's an amazing thing."

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home