NewEnergyNews: EXPERTS AT SEQUESTRATION CALL IT OFF/NOT VIABLE?/

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

The challenge now: To make every day Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT WEDNESDAY, August 23:

  • TTTA Wednesday-ORIGINAL REPORTING: The IRA And The New Energy Boom
  • TTTA Wednesday-ORIGINAL REPORTING: The IRA And the EV Revolution
  • THE DAY BEFORE

  • Weekend Video: Coming Ocean Current Collapse Could Up Climate Crisis
  • Weekend Video: Impacts Of The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Current Collapse
  • Weekend Video: More Facts On The AMOC
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

    WEEKEND VIDEOS, July 15-16:

  • Weekend Video: The Truth About China And The Climate Crisis
  • Weekend Video: Florida Insurance At The Climate Crisis Storm’s Eye
  • Weekend Video: The 9-1-1 On Rooftop Solar
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

    WEEKEND VIDEOS, July 8-9:

  • Weekend Video: Bill Nye Science Guy On The Climate Crisis
  • Weekend Video: The Changes Causing The Crisis
  • Weekend Video: A “Massive Global Solar Boom” Now
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

    WEEKEND VIDEOS, July 1-2:

  • The Global New Energy Boom Accelerates
  • Ukraine Faces The Climate Crisis While Fighting To Survive
  • Texas Heat And Politics Of Denial
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Founding Editor Herman K. Trabish

    --------------------------

    --------------------------

    WEEKEND VIDEOS, June 17-18

  • Fixing The Power System
  • The Energy Storage Solution
  • New Energy Equity With Community Solar
  • Weekend Video: The Way Wind Can Help Win Wars
  • Weekend Video: New Support For Hydropower
  • Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • WEEKEND VIDEOS, August 24-26:
  • Happy One-Year Birthday, Inflation Reduction Act
  • The Virtual Power Plant Boom, Part 1
  • The Virtual Power Plant Boom, Part 2

    Thursday, July 05, 2007

    EXPERTS AT SEQUESTRATION CALL IT OFF/NOT VIABLE?

    Very curious development. What do they know about injecting CO2 into geologic structures that we need to know? Of course it could be about how dry the oil field is. Either way, peaking oil or failing sequestration, the information behind this announcement would inform public debate.

    Statoil, Shell scrap ‘carbon capture’ plans
    June 29, 2007 (AFP via Yahoo News)

    WHO
    Statoil of Norway, Royal Dutch Shell
    one of the places Statoil developed expertise in geologic injection -- yet they're calling off the new project. why?

    WHAT
    Plans to a gas-fired power plant/methanol production facility and capture the CO2 for enhanced oil production injection have been set aside.

    WHEN
    Announcement June 29.
    Original announcement of undertaking was in March 2006, assigning completion to 2012.

    WHERE
    Announcement made in Oslo.
    The plant was to be in the central Norwegian city of Tjeldbergodden. The wells to be injected were in the Draugen and Heidrun offshore fields.

    WHY
    Shell is a pioneer at injection for enhanced oil recovery. Statoil is a pioneer at geologic sequestration of CO2 (North Sea Sleipner field, Barents Sea Snoehvit field, Algeria’s In Salah field).
    The implication of Statoil’s excuse for the project cancellation, that the cost of capturing and injecting the CO2 was greater than the return on the oil produced by injection, raises serious questions about the economic viability of carbon-capture-and-sequestration (CCS) in general.
    BP cancelled a similar proposed project at Peterhead in north-east Scotland.
    as oil peaks in any field, it gets harder to push what's left out. apparently this injection project wouldn't produce enough oil to pay for itself. why?

    QUOTES
    Statoil: “Use of CO2 for enhanced oil recovery on Draugen is not commercially defendable and thus will not make a positive contribution to the value chain…The extra oil volumes that the Draugen licence operator believes to be recoverable are too low to justify the necessary investments in the field…"

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home