NewEnergyNews: CARBON TAX: AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

While the OFFICE of President remains in highest regard at NewEnergyNews, this administration's position on climate change makes it impossible to regard THIS president with respect. Below is the NewEnergyNews theme song until 2020.

The challenge now: To make every day Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • TODAY’S STUDY: How Get The Stacked Values Of Battery Storage
  • QUICK NEWS, October 16: Worse Than ‘The New Normal’; New Energy To The Rescue; How Rooftop Solar Cuts Everybody’s Power Bills
  • THE DAY BEFORE

  • Weekend Video: Bloomberg To Colbert – New Energy Is The Answer
  • Weekend Video: Global New Energy Keeps Coming On
  • Weekend Video: The Long Reach Of New Energy
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Why Geoengineering Has Comes With Big Risks
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-The Immense Potential Of Ocean Wind
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-The Best Place To Build New Energy Is China – Survey
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Japan’s Mitsubishi Sees EV Price Beating Gas Cars
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

    THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT THURSDAY, October 12:

  • TTTA Thursday-Big Work Now Ahead On Climate Change
  • TTTA Thursday-New Energy Ready To Take Over In The New South
  • TTTA Thursday-How The Ocean Can Store New Energy
  • TTTA Thursday-Indiana Nun Fights For Solar
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: New Hampshire Makes A New Energy Compromise That was ‘Worth It’
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Survey Shows Utilities Expect New Energy Expansion
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: Why Big Buyers Buy New Energy
  • QUICK NEWS, October 10: Why Tariffs On Solar Will Backfire On The President; Private Sector Seizes Wind Opportunity; The EV Boom Needs 1000s More Plugs
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Founding Editor Herman K. Trabish

    --------------------------

    --------------------------

    click image for more info about the Sunstock Solar Festival

    Research Associate and Contributing Editor Jessica R. Wunder

    --------------------------

    --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • TODAY AT NewEnergyNews, October 17:

  • TODAY’S STUDY: Global Nuclear Now
  • QUICK NEWS, October 17: Top 5 Climate Change Solutions; EVs To Lead By 2030; Diversity In Solar

    Tuesday, September 18, 2007

    CARBON TAX: AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

    On the subject of cap-and-trade, Mankiw’s analysis is skewed to make his point. (Why wouldn’t it be? Cap-and-trade is the main competitor with his tax idea as an answer to controlling emissions.) Mankiw seems to assume allowances would be given to power companies and big emitters while it has been proven a portion of the credits must be not given but auctioned. He contends that international trading systems have failed whereas the EU’s system has not yet entered Phase 2, where it will prove itself. His point about the necessity of participation by China and India is correct, though their willingness to comply might change if and when the US seizes the initiative. Why he thinks a global “carbon tax” would necessarily be easier to administer than a global cap-and-trade system is not clear: They would both be massive undertakings. But so is global climate change.

    One Answer to Global Warming: A New Tax
    N. Gregory Mankiw, September 15, 2007 (NY Times)

    WHO
    policy wonks (British economist Arthur Pigou, chief Reagan economist Martin Feldstein and Harvard economics professor/President Bush-Mitt Romney adviser N. Gregory Mankiw) vs. political consultants

    There is nothing simple about a "carbon tax." It works in some cases but not in others. It is probably not politically possible. (click to enlarge)

    WHAT
    Policy wonks advocate the use of a tax on emissions (aka “carbon tax”) as the obvious way to mediate climate change. It is not a politically viable idea.

    WHEN
    Pigou proposed the idea of corrective taxes (“Pigovian taxes”) in the early 20th century. Feldstein proposed a “carbon tax” in 1992.

    WHERE
    - Republican consultants: use “tax” only before the word “cut”
    - Democratic consultants: use “tax” only before the words “on the rich”

    WHY
    - A “carbon tax” would affect everyone who drives a car or uses fossil fuel-generated electricity but wonk Gilbert Metcalfe (economist, Tufts) has shown how the revenues could be used to cut payroll taxes: $15/ ton of carbon + payroll tax rebate on workers’ 1st $3660 earnings.
    - Would a legislated requirement for better auto fuel efficiency work better? Carmakers would pass the cost to car buyers without generating revenues to offset the burden on lower incomes. Fuel cost savings would be dependent on irrational consumer choices and lead to more driving, more road congestion and more accidents.
    - Cap-and-trade is dependent on the handling of allowances and problematic in the absence of participation by China and India.

    There are a lot of emissions trading programs going on right now. Some are working better than others. (click to enlarge)

    QUOTES
    - Mankiw: “Among policy wonks like me, there is a broad consensus. The scientists tell us that world temperatures are rising because humans are emitting carbon into the atmosphere. Basic economics tells us that when you tax something, you normally get less of it. So if we want to reduce global emissions of carbon, we need a global carbon tax. Q.E.D.” (NewEnergyNews: Whenever anybody ends a point with “Q.E.D." it is very likely an oversimplification. Especially in discussions about climate change.)
    - Mankiw: “Mr. Feldstein has devoted much of his career to studying how high tax rates distort incentives and impede economic growth. But like most other policy wonks, he appreciates that some taxes align private incentives with social costs and move us toward better outcomes.”

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home