ALKA-SELTZER FOR CLIMATE CHANGE
A slight caution: The scientists warn the plan is doable but expensive and there might be risks. So like you always tell yourself in the morning while you’re trying to tolerate the “roaring” of the alka-seltzer’s fizz, it would better not to create the problem to begin with.
This doctor’s advice: Treat the cause, not the symptom.
Scientists Enhance Mother Nature’s Carbon Handling Mechanism
November 8, 2007 (Penn State via Science Daily)
WHO
A Harvard and Penn State team of scientists (Daniel P. Schrag, director, Harvard University Center for the Environment/professor of Earth and planetary sciences; Michael J. Aziz, Gordon McKay professor of material sciences, Harvard University; Christopher H. House, associate professor of geosciences, Penn State, & his brother, Kurt Zenz House, graduate student, Earth and planetary sciences, Harvard University;)
WHAT
Using a process that mimics the natural weathering of volcanic silicate rocks, the scientists want to remove human-generated and natural emissions from the atmosphere by neutralizing the acidic CO2 with a chemically basic silicate gas.

WHEN
Reported in the November 7 issue of “Environmental Science and Technology”
WHERE
The neutralized CO2 would wind up in the oceans as salts and drift down into the seabed sediment.
WHY
- Silicates are basic and neutralize acidic CO2. In fresh water, it produces a weak carbonic acid. The acid bubbles through rock and soil turning more alkaline. By the time it gets to the ocean, it is salts. The salts dissolve and the carbon drops into the sea bed sediment.
- The scientists’ idea is to release a silicate-containing gas over remote oceans.
A byproduct of the neutralization is the likely protection of precious and presently endangered coral reefs. The reefs are now being eaten away when atmospheric CO2, unfiltered and acidic, overwhelms the oceans’ ability to neutralize it and eats away at the coral.

QUOTES
- Kurt House: "The technology involves selectively removing acid from the ocean in a way that might enable us to turn back the clock on global warming…Essentially, our technology dramatically accelerates a cleaning process that Nature herself uses for greenhouse gas accumulation."
- Kurt House: "In the engineered weathering process we have found a way to swap the weak carbonic acid with a much stronger one (hydrochloric acid) and thus accelerate the pace to industrial rates…"
- Christopher H. House: "This work shows how we can remove carbon dioxide on relevant timescales, but more work is be needed to bring down the cost and minimize other environmental effects…"
1 Comments:
I couldn't agree more that we have the capabilities to remove on an industrial scale the human contributed CO2 from the atmosphere, and potentially a significant portion coming from natural events such as forest fires. However I have reservations concerning the use of HCl in order to accelerate the natural weahering process. Would it not be more feasible to facilitate the natural weathering process, for example. Weathering is limited due to reactivity of HC03, exposed TSA of volcanic silicates and the presence or absence of water to facilitate the reaction. the natural process is slow, hwoever by increasing the potential in one of two key aspects, then a low budget, industrial carbon mopping process should be feasible. I would propose the use of pulverised volcanic silicates, (vastly increased TSA) and facilitated carbon dissolution (for example aerating pools with atmospheric air, and inserting into these pools a silicate coated structure with a vast surface area and minimal volume - akin to car radiator plumes but on an industrial scale).
Post a Comment
<< Home