NewEnergyNews: “CLEAN” COAL TESTS MOVE FORWARD

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

The new challenge: To make every day Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: A UTILITY IN THE MAKING: THE MUNICIPALIZATION OF BOULDER, COLORADO
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: WHAT HAPPENED TO THAT NATIONAL HIGH VOLTAGE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM?
  • THE DAY BEFORE

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: THE STATE OF THE U.S. WIND INDUSTRY (AND WHAT IT MEANS FOR UTILITIES)
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: HOW SACRAMENTO'S PUBLIC UTILITY IS GETTING IN THE RESIDENTIAL SOLAR BUSINESS
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: HAS APS INVENTED A ROOFTOP SOLAR BUSINESS MODEL FOR UTILITIES?
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: THE GRID NEEDS INDEPENDENT DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM OPERATORS
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: HOW SHOULD UTILITIES VALUE SOLAR?
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: IS PUERTO RICO THE NEW POSTER CHILD FOR THE UTILITY DEATH SPIRAL?
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • Weekend Video: Reindeer Stresses
  • Weekend Video: Pink Fracking
  • Weekend Video: Fighting Duke For Solar
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: ARE NATURAL GAS AND RENEWABLES THE FUTURE OF TEXAS' POWER GRID?
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: COULD FERC PUT A PRICE ON CARBON?
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is an occasional contributor to NewEnergyNews

    -------------------

    Some of Anne's contributions:

  • Another Tipping Point: US Coal Supply Decline So Real Even West Virginia Concurs (REPORT), November 26, 2013
  • SOLAR FOR ME BUT NOT FOR THEE ~ Xcel's Push to Undermine Rooftop Solar, September 20, 2013
  • NEW BILLS AND NEW BIRDS in Colorado's recent session, May 20, 2013
  • Lies, damned lies and politicians (October 8, 2012)
  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Wednesday, November 07, 2007

    “CLEAN” COAL TESTS MOVE FORWARD

    Many consider "clean" coal to be an oxymoron, like military intelligence. It is called "carbon capture and sequestration" but not all the carbon is actually captured (sometimes less than a third) and permanent sequestration is only theoretical. Still, it is a breakthrough technology...if...

    Tests on Capturing, Storing Carbon Dioxide Move Forward; Technology plays key role in reducing greenhouse gases worldwide
    Cheryl Pellerin, October 30, 2007 (USINFO/Department of State)

    WHO
    Department of Energy (DOE), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

    Moving methodically, if glacially slow -- while actual glaciers melt away. click to enlarge)

    WHAT
    - The Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership will begin its first large-scale “clean” coal demonstration projects. Carbon (dioxide) capture and sequestration (storage) (CCS) is thought to have the potential of removing one of the most harmful greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (CO2) from industrial and power plants. The dirty gases are captured and injected into geologic formations.

    WHEN
    - The project has been researched in small-scale operations since 1997.
    - The agencies announced in October they are ready to move forward and published the results of Phase I.
    - Regulations expected to be ready in Summer 2008.
    - Operation -- ???
    - Other projects around the world have been ongoing since 1996.

    WHERE
    - 3 projects in the US and Canada, across 27 states and the provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba.
    - Other commercial-scale CO2 capture and storage projects: Sleipner West natural gas field in the North Sea (1996); the Weyburn CO2 Flood Project in southern Saskatchewan, Canada (1997); In Salah gas field in the Algerian desert (2004).

    WHY
    - DOE will spend $197 million. Project partners will spend $121 million.
    EPA will write guidelines.
    - Captured carbon dioxide will be stored in geologic sandstone/limestone saline aquifers that will neutralize the acidic gases.
    - CO2 has been captured and injected into oil wells to “enhance” the oil’s viscosity and allow more to be pumped to the surface for 70 years. Engineers expect the sequestered (stored) CO2 to be held in saline aquifers for “geologic” time spans but science is not yet sure the acidic gas will not leech from the geologic structures into underground water or contaminate soils.
    - The projects:
    (1) The Plains CO2 Reduction Partnership: geologic CO2 storage in the Alberta and Williston basins. Partners: North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Montana, Wyoming, Nebraska, Iowa, Missouri and Wisconsin and the provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba.
    (2) The Southeast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership: CO2 storage in the lower Tuscaloosa Formation Massive Sand Unit, which stretches from Texas to Florida. Partners are Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana and southeast Texas.
    (3) The Southwest Regional Partnership for Carbon Sequestration: CO2 injection into the Jurassic-age Entrada Sandstone Formation in the southwestern United States. Partners are New Mexico, Oklahoma, Kansas, Colorado and Utah, and portions of Texas, Wyoming, and Arizona.

    click to enlarge

    QUOTES
    - Robert Kane, technical adviser, DOE Office of Fossil Energy: “EPA is looking to us for our research and development experience, and we’re looking to them for their regulatory experience…When one is based on the other, that makes an awful lot of sense.”
    - Jason Burnett, EPA: “We believe the time is right to begin creating the regulatory framework for commercial-scale carbon sequestration technology…Currently, about 35 million tons of CO2 are sequestered in the United States…primarily for enhanced oil recovery. We expect that to increase, by some estimates, by 400-fold by 2100.”
    - Kane: “We’ve contributed small amounts of money…so we could participate in [CO2] monitoring at Sleipner, Weyburn and In Salah, and we’ve learned by doing.”

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home

    *