NewEnergyNews: BALI TALKS CCS

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

Every day is Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • Weekend Video: Spray On Solar
  • Weekend Video: Wind In The Rural Landscape
  • Weekend Video: What Dark Snow Means
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-WHERE NEW ENERGY NEEDS TO BE
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-KUWAIT’S POSSIBLE SOLAR
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-WHAT INDIA WIND NEEDS
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • TTTA Thursday- HOW CLIMATE CHANGE DENIAL WORKS
  • TTTA Thursday-HOW WOMEN MAKE A DIFFERENCE
  • TTTA Thursday-POLITICS AND THE EPA
  • TTTA Thursday-THE ENORMOUS LED OPPORTUNITY
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE NEW INTELLIGENT ENERGY EFFICIENCY
  • QUICK NEWS, May 15: MINNESOTA’S SOLAR AMBITIONS IN CONTEXT; RHODE ISLAND’S FIGHT OVER OCEAN WIND; VC MONEY FOR SMART GRID STEADY

    AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: HOW OIL MARKETS ARE MANIPULATED
  • QUICK NEWS, May 14: HUGE BUFFETT WIND BUY IN IOWA; THE VALUE OF ARIZONA’S SUN; MINNESOTA LOVES WIND
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE VALUE OF SOLAR WITH STORAGE
  • QUICK NEWS, May 13: HOW BIG OIL USES REPUBLICANS; WIND SAVES MONEY FOR RATEPAYERS – STUDY; BRIGHTSOURCE EXEC TALKS SOLAR TOWER TECH & BIZ
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

  • Lies, damned lies and politicians (October 8, 2012) by Anne Butterfield (Boulder Daily Camera via NewEnergyNews)

    From the sparring at the first presidential debate, it's pretty sure that energy has become a divisive as well as a competitive issue. Both President Obama and Governor Romney want to be the triumphal producer of energy.

    However Romney likes to smear climate change concerns and clean energy investments, as if all of them go like Solyndra, where a half a billion in loan guarantees went down with the company, as he crowed that 50 percent of clean energy investments supported by the stimulus bill had gone belly up. This was dubbed the "lie of the night" by Michael Grunwald, author of a book about the stimulus bill, citing that maybe one percent of government backed clean energy ventures failed.

    Try getting that rate of safety in your investing. According to a new poll by Hart for the solar industry, voters seem to know that loan guarantees are a steadfast service of government and highly safe, as the Solyndra debacle was deemed unimportant by respondents. Ninety-two percent of registered voters found it important that solar be more widespread, with 70 percent believing that the federal government should be doing more to promote it with incentives (with 71 percent of swing voters feeling this way).

    And, sigh, with tens of thousands of wind power jobs on the chopping block already, Mitt Romney opposes the renewal of the Production Tax Credit. This, even as red states need it renewed, putting him in the dog house with GOP politicians such as Senator Chuck Grassely of Iowa whose state produces 20 percent of its power from wind, and Governor Brownback of Kansas who has made vigorous pleas for the extension of the credit, due to expire this at the end of this year.

    Didn't Romney get the memo? Republican governors are making hay with clean energy such as Haley Barbour and Chris Christie. To Mississippi, Barbour brought four solar sector firms to Mississippi along with two in biofuels plus a clean tech car venture with China. Christie made New Jersey a leading solar market in the nation, this year contending with California for first place.

    But Romney and other high priests of the GOP act as though the only real energy is the type that can be burned, and somehow, Obama has nibbled at this hemlock by constantly touting his success with fracking and his openness to the XL pipeline.

    A truly strange specter is that pipeline; it lets our heartland be used as a byway for tar sands products (which sink rather than float when spilled), so they can go straight to international markets. We get the downsides and none of the upsides -- even as the pipeline could increase gasoline prices in the Midwest, which would lose its existing access to tar sands products.

    One plausible upside of the pipeline being routed through the United States (where it might be built quickly, as would not happen in the alternative route through western Canada) is that it could strengthen the hand of President Obama in his suite of sanctions against Iran, including a worldwide boycott of Iranian oil. Our recent frack-mania allows our nation to resume oil production levels not seen for 15 years and thus strengthens our hand. Three weeks ago Iran admitted having problems selling oil due to U.S. and European sanctions; now the nation's currency is in free fall.

    One certainly hopes that tar sands will thrive mightily as a "psy-ops" against Iran and not as a chemical weapon against our climate, as Dr. James Hansen has sternly warned.

    Never bounded by his prior convictions about the climate, Romney crows that he would authorize the pipeline on day one and build it himself if need be (as if he in his wingtips could "John Wayne" his way around an oil field). It's all such a sham he-man rodeo.

    And no one mentioned the climate -- in spite of hundreds of thousands of petition signatures demanding the topic. Neither candidate pushed clean energy as the vote winner that poll after poll have shown it to be. Authors for DBL Investors in their study of green energy exclaim, "We all need to understand that green jobs are not the idle dreaming of a small group of partisan activists and insiders, but a source of livelihood for millions, literally in all parts of the country." The light shines in the darkness but the darkness of our politics has not understood it.

    Author's note: Want to support my work? Please "fan" me at Huffpost Denver, here (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-butterfield). Thanks.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Lies, damned lies and politicians (October 8, 2012)
  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Thursday, December 06, 2007

    BALI TALKS CCS

    The idea of carbon-capture-and-sequestration (CCS) is getting its biggest airing ever at the world climate change summit in Bali. Burning coal to generate electricity is the easiest solution to the world’s growing energy demand. Unfortunately, it also generates greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Prolifically. But if the emissions could be captured and put somewhere…

    It worked with the emissions from coal-burning power plants that were causing acid rain in the 1990s.

    It’s like the most popular solution to the problem of radioactive nuclear waste. Stick it in a hole under a mountain in Nevada. Problem solved.

    But efficiently capturing coal plant-generated GHGs is not as easy as capturing acid rain-inducing chemicals. It is less efficient and more expensive. And it doesn’t solve the problem of environmental degradation from coal mining or the problem of emissions generated from transporting coal.

    Why not just build New Energy infrastructure and invest in the technologies already nearly developed for storing wind and solar?

    John Wright, Australia's Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation: "We're still at an early time [on CCS]… The next five to 10 years will be a crucial time to test the validity of these various exercises."

    He thinks we’ve got 5 to 10 years?


    Race to Bury Carbon Emissions Heats Up Amid Climate Concerns
    Joseph Coleman, December 3, 2007 (AP via Yahoo Finance)
    and
    Carbon capture not on table at UN climate talks: UN official
    December 5, 2007 (AFP via Yahoo News)

    WHO
    10,000+ delegates of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) from 190+ nations

    WHAT
    - The climate change summit is probably the most important gathering of leaders and experts since the Kyoto summit. It is intended to develop a comprehensive strategy to deal with climate change subsequent to the closing of Phase 2 of the Kyoto Protocol.

    The long-running Norwegian Sleipner sequestration project in the North Sea. (click to enlarge)

    - Much discussion in the early days of the summit has been on the potential of “clean” coal technology and the effectiveness of the cap-and-trade system for emissions reduction.

    WHEN
    - Phase 2 of the Kyoto Protocols begins next year and runs through 2012.
    - The summit runs from December 3 through December 14.
    - Norway’s Sleipner offshore natural gas CCS project has been operational since 1996.
    - The US FutureGen CCS demonstration project is scheduled to go online in 2017.

    WHERE
    - The summit is taking place in Bali, Indonesia.
    - Norway has the first operational CCS plant (Sleipner, a natural gas facility) in the North Sea and more projects planned.
    - The US has a $1.5 commercial research project in planning.
    - Australia has 12+ projects indevelopment.
    - The EU has plans for 12 large demonstration projects.

    WHY
    - Coal is plentiful. Some consider it cheap, though when the cost of emissions on climate change, the cost of environmental degradation and the cost of public health problems is considered, it is not necessarily that cheap.
    - The idea of capturing the GHGs from coal-fired electricity plants is appealing but the technology has not been shown to be efficient at commercial scale.
    - There are also legitimate fears that the highly acidic GHGs would not safely be contained (sequestered).
    - At a recent gathering, OPEC delegates gave CCS a big boost by endorsing further development of it
    - Critics say the technology has little hope of having an impact for a decade or more.
    Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth in Kyoto is monitoring a pilot underground storage pilot project to see if the sequestered emissions move underground.

    Schematic of the US FutureGen capture project that will be ready for tesing in 2017. (click to enlarge)

    QUOTES
    - Yvo de Boer, executive secretary, UNFCCC, day 1: "I think carbon capture and storage will play an important part in a long-term response to climate change…Countries like China and India will continue to rely on abundantly available coal, and therefore you have to find a way of economically using that coal in a clean way."
    - Yvo de Boer, day 3: "I do not expect a decision at this conference on the inclusion of carbon capture and storage…I think further analytical work has to be done."
    - Gabriela von Goerne, Greenpeace Germany: "What we see is a diversion of money away from renewables toward CCS and coal, and that's not the way we want to see things move forward…The technology is not in place, it's under development, and we don't have time. We need to cut emissions right now and not in 15 or 10 years."

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home