NewEnergyNews: THE CASE FOR A CARBON TAX

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

While the OFFICE of President remains in highest regard at NewEnergyNews, this administration's position on climate change makes it impossible to regard THIS president with respect. Below is the NewEnergyNews theme song until 2020.

The challenge now: To make every day Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • Weekend Video: Colbert On The Newest Climate Fiasco
  • Weekend Video: Consumer Reports’ Tesla Vs. Bolt Face-Off
  • Weekend Video: All About The Eclipse And The Power Grid
  • THE DAY BEFORE

  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Is ‘Game Of Thrones’ About Climate Change?
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Surprises In The New Global Solar Rankings
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Denmark’s Vestas Wins Mexico’s Biggest Wind Deal
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Supervolcanoes Could Grow Cars With Plugs
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

    THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT THURSDAY, August 17:

  • TTTA Thursday-Is The White House Hiding DOE’s Grid Study?
  • TTTA Thursday-Will The White House Hide The Climate Report?
  • TTTA Thursday-Crucial Transmission Line For Wind Denied
  • TTTA Thursday-Wind And Solar Are Saving Lives
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Organizing California’s Distributed Energy Efforts
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: A Deep Look At Evolving U.S. Efforts To Support Solar
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: Big Growth In Customer-Sited Wind
  • QUICK NEWS, August 15: New Forest To Offset Bad U.S. Climate Policies Has 120,000 Pledges; Wind Becoming The Go-To Power; 88,000 Jobs And The Fight Over Solar Imports
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: The Work On Tomorrow’s Grid So Far
  • QUICK NEWS, August 14: Climate Is The Elephant In The Room; Long-Term, NatGas Is Not The Answer; Why Wind Is Such A Good Choice
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Founding Editor Herman K. Trabish

    --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Research Associate and Contributing Editor Jessica R. Wunder

    --------------------------

    --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • TODAY AT NewEnergyNews, August 21:

  • TODAY’S STUDY: The Wind Market Now
  • QUICK NEWS, August 21: Gore’s ‘Inconvenient Sequel’ Is A ‘Teaching Tool’; Target Targets Big Wind Buy; Michigan Grows Its Solar Garden

    Friday, March 21, 2008

    THE CASE FOR A CARBON TAX

    Former Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo argues that global climate change presents an urgent need for mitigation requiring ethical choices about who will pay and when. He convincingly shows that only universal action will be effective and asserts that a carbon tax, left to each nation to administer in its own way, is the easiest and fairest way to reach that end and thinks other approaches too complicated: “If you're worried about climate change but don't like carbon taxes, think about the messy or even impossible alternatives!”

    President Zedillo advocates a tax that is flexibly administered: “…each country could then decide what to do with the tax revenue. Some might make their carbon tax revenue-neutral by reducing other taxes. The regime would allow countries (or associations of countries such as the EU) to comply with the internationally agreed-upon carbon price by means of their own national cap-and-trade systems. It would also let poor countries move toward the agreed trajectory of carbon prices more slowly than rich countries…”

    President Zedillo makes good sense except for the universally acknowledged problem of an emissions tax: Electorates don’t like taxes and they don’t like politicians who advocate taxes.

    President Zedillo may also be underestimating the messiness of a tax and overestimating the messiness of a cap-and-trade system.

    The subject is thoroughly worked at
    The Carbon Tax Center

    Putting a price on emissions takes two subsidies away from fossil fuels. (slide from the Carbon Tax Center - click to enlarge)

    Carbon Prices, Not Quotas
    Ernesto Zedillo, March 24, 2008 (Forbes)

    WHO
    Ernesto Zedillo, former President of Mexico/director, Yale Center for the Study of Globalization

    President Zedillo's proposal is more eloquent and less specific than this one from The Carbon Tax Center. (click to enlarge)

    WHAT
    Zedillo makes the case for universal action to mitigate climate change and argues that a tax is preferable to a cap-and-trade system.

    WHEN
    - Zedillo argues that the world community must act now to prevent harm to future generations but climate change presents a particularly difficult matter to get universal action on because the harm and potential benefits are in the far future.
    - Other occasions of unified world action were in times of immediate danger and short term resolution: The formation of the UN after WWII; The General Agreement on Tariffs & Trade (GATT) after the protectionism of the 1930s; The IMF after international monetary chaos; Actions against diseases and pandemics.

    A concrete proposal from The Carbn Tax Center. (click to enlarge)

    WHERE
    Zedillo acknowledges that nations do not like to forego sovereignty but there is a need for universal action on this matter.

    WHY
    - Zedillo asserts that there is scientific consensus on climate change and a need for universal action to mitigate it.
    - There are complicated ethics involved, weighing the needs of the future against the present and the rich against the poor.
    - Only an absolutely universal price on emissions will work. If any nations are allowed to opt out, it would cause “leakage” of emissions-intensive activity and likely result in trade wars.
    - Complicated systems are likely to fail.
    - Systems with costs too low to incentivize the development of New Energy are likely to fail.

    A tax is more complicated, and cap-and-trade more workable, than The Carbon Tax Center makes it seem but it's an important debate. (click to enlarge)

    QUOTES
    - Zedillo: “The reality is that a sacrifice of some sort will have to be incurred by the present generation for the sake of people who will exist many years from now, in richer societies than ours and, most probably, in countries not our own.”
    - Zedillo: “Frankly, a Kyoto-type framework--one with global quantitative emissions targets allocated among countries--that meets [all the necessary] conditions is not feasible…”

    2 Comments:

    At 3:22 PM, Blogger Richard Douthwaite said...

    The point that voters don't like taxes is well made. They particularly don't like taxes which will have to be increased each year to get emissions down, eventually, to close to zero. In Ireland, it has been estimated that a carbon tax would have to be somewhere between €200 and €400 per tonne of CO2 to bring about a 3% annual emissions reduction, the rate being required of Ireland by the European Commission.

    A much more politically feasible solution is a version of Cap and Trade called Cap and Share in which each person receives an equal share of the revenue received from selling carbon emissions permits to fossil fuel producers. Peter Barnes' Sky Trust has proposed this in the US and there is a very good chance that the Irish government will announce that it is to use Cap and Share to reduce the country's road transport emissions in its budget in December this year. If Cap and Share proves itself, it is then likely to be extended to all other Irish greenhouse emissions apart from those already controlled by the EU's Emissions Trading System.
    See www.capandshare.org

     
    At 9:04 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

    NewEnergyNews is honored to have a comment on this post from world-renowned economist Richard Douthwaite. He re-emphasizes Peter Barnes' Cap-and-Share alternative to cap-and-trade, an idea proposed to NewEnergyNews last week (see the post below) by Hazel Henderson.

     

    Post a Comment

    << Home