NewEnergyNews: THE CASE FOR A CARBON TAX

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

The new challenge: To make every day Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: THE STATE OF THE U.S. WIND INDUSTRY (AND WHAT IT MEANS FOR UTILITIES)
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: HOW SACRAMENTO'S PUBLIC UTILITY IS GETTING IN THE RESIDENTIAL SOLAR BUSINESS
  • THE DAY BEFORE

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: HAS APS INVENTED A ROOFTOP SOLAR BUSINESS MODEL FOR UTILITIES?
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: THE GRID NEEDS INDEPENDENT DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM OPERATORS
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: HOW SHOULD UTILITIES VALUE SOLAR?
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: IS PUERTO RICO THE NEW POSTER CHILD FOR THE UTILITY DEATH SPIRAL?
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • Weekend Video: Reindeer Stresses
  • Weekend Video: Pink Fracking
  • Weekend Video: Fighting Duke For Solar
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: ARE NATURAL GAS AND RENEWABLES THE FUTURE OF TEXAS' POWER GRID?
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: COULD FERC PUT A PRICE ON CARBON?
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: CAN GEOTHERMAL REPLACE FOSSIL FUELS IN THE WEST?
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: WHAT THE E3 STUDY OF NEVADA NET ENERGY METERING REALLY SAYS
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is an occasional contributor to NewEnergyNews

    -------------------

    Some of Anne's contributions:

  • Another Tipping Point: US Coal Supply Decline So Real Even West Virginia Concurs (REPORT), November 26, 2013
  • SOLAR FOR ME BUT NOT FOR THEE ~ Xcel's Push to Undermine Rooftop Solar, September 20, 2013
  • NEW BILLS AND NEW BIRDS in Colorado's recent session, May 20, 2013
  • Lies, damned lies and politicians (October 8, 2012)
  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Friday, March 21, 2008

    THE CASE FOR A CARBON TAX

    Former Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo argues that global climate change presents an urgent need for mitigation requiring ethical choices about who will pay and when. He convincingly shows that only universal action will be effective and asserts that a carbon tax, left to each nation to administer in its own way, is the easiest and fairest way to reach that end and thinks other approaches too complicated: “If you're worried about climate change but don't like carbon taxes, think about the messy or even impossible alternatives!”

    President Zedillo advocates a tax that is flexibly administered: “…each country could then decide what to do with the tax revenue. Some might make their carbon tax revenue-neutral by reducing other taxes. The regime would allow countries (or associations of countries such as the EU) to comply with the internationally agreed-upon carbon price by means of their own national cap-and-trade systems. It would also let poor countries move toward the agreed trajectory of carbon prices more slowly than rich countries…”

    President Zedillo makes good sense except for the universally acknowledged problem of an emissions tax: Electorates don’t like taxes and they don’t like politicians who advocate taxes.

    President Zedillo may also be underestimating the messiness of a tax and overestimating the messiness of a cap-and-trade system.

    The subject is thoroughly worked at
    The Carbon Tax Center

    Putting a price on emissions takes two subsidies away from fossil fuels. (slide from the Carbon Tax Center - click to enlarge)

    Carbon Prices, Not Quotas
    Ernesto Zedillo, March 24, 2008 (Forbes)

    WHO
    Ernesto Zedillo, former President of Mexico/director, Yale Center for the Study of Globalization

    President Zedillo's proposal is more eloquent and less specific than this one from The Carbon Tax Center. (click to enlarge)

    WHAT
    Zedillo makes the case for universal action to mitigate climate change and argues that a tax is preferable to a cap-and-trade system.

    WHEN
    - Zedillo argues that the world community must act now to prevent harm to future generations but climate change presents a particularly difficult matter to get universal action on because the harm and potential benefits are in the far future.
    - Other occasions of unified world action were in times of immediate danger and short term resolution: The formation of the UN after WWII; The General Agreement on Tariffs & Trade (GATT) after the protectionism of the 1930s; The IMF after international monetary chaos; Actions against diseases and pandemics.

    A concrete proposal from The Carbn Tax Center. (click to enlarge)

    WHERE
    Zedillo acknowledges that nations do not like to forego sovereignty but there is a need for universal action on this matter.

    WHY
    - Zedillo asserts that there is scientific consensus on climate change and a need for universal action to mitigate it.
    - There are complicated ethics involved, weighing the needs of the future against the present and the rich against the poor.
    - Only an absolutely universal price on emissions will work. If any nations are allowed to opt out, it would cause “leakage” of emissions-intensive activity and likely result in trade wars.
    - Complicated systems are likely to fail.
    - Systems with costs too low to incentivize the development of New Energy are likely to fail.

    A tax is more complicated, and cap-and-trade more workable, than The Carbon Tax Center makes it seem but it's an important debate. (click to enlarge)

    QUOTES
    - Zedillo: “The reality is that a sacrifice of some sort will have to be incurred by the present generation for the sake of people who will exist many years from now, in richer societies than ours and, most probably, in countries not our own.”
    - Zedillo: “Frankly, a Kyoto-type framework--one with global quantitative emissions targets allocated among countries--that meets [all the necessary] conditions is not feasible…”

    2 Comments:

    At 3:22 PM, Blogger Richard Douthwaite said...

    The point that voters don't like taxes is well made. They particularly don't like taxes which will have to be increased each year to get emissions down, eventually, to close to zero. In Ireland, it has been estimated that a carbon tax would have to be somewhere between €200 and €400 per tonne of CO2 to bring about a 3% annual emissions reduction, the rate being required of Ireland by the European Commission.

    A much more politically feasible solution is a version of Cap and Trade called Cap and Share in which each person receives an equal share of the revenue received from selling carbon emissions permits to fossil fuel producers. Peter Barnes' Sky Trust has proposed this in the US and there is a very good chance that the Irish government will announce that it is to use Cap and Share to reduce the country's road transport emissions in its budget in December this year. If Cap and Share proves itself, it is then likely to be extended to all other Irish greenhouse emissions apart from those already controlled by the EU's Emissions Trading System.
    See www.capandshare.org

     
    At 9:04 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

    NewEnergyNews is honored to have a comment on this post from world-renowned economist Richard Douthwaite. He re-emphasizes Peter Barnes' Cap-and-Share alternative to cap-and-trade, an idea proposed to NewEnergyNews last week (see the post below) by Hazel Henderson.

     

    Post a Comment

    << Home

    *