NewEnergyNews: WHY TAX CREDITS ARE NEEDED, WHY OIL SUBSIDIES ARE NOT

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

While the OFFICE of President remains in highest regard at NewEnergyNews, this administration's position on climate change makes it impossible to regard THIS president with respect. Below is the NewEnergyNews theme song until 2020.

The challenge now: To make every day Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • TODAY’S STUDY: The Value Of Transportation Elecrification
  • QUICK NEWS, December 12: The “Fight-Climate-Change” Diet; Market For Advanced EV Batteries To Quadruple By 2026; The Low Lifecycle Costs In New Energy
  • THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: How The New Energy Marketplace Is Growing And Shifting
  • QUICK NEWS, December 11: N.C. Millennial Women Unite For Climate Fight; The White House Threat To New Energy; What’s Bad News In The Tax Bill For New Energy
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • Weekend Video: Tesla Adds World’s Biggest Battery To Aussie Wind
  • Weekend Video: Solar And The Next Utilities
  • Weekend Video: Wind Builders On Wind
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-The Climate Change Gourmet
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-UK Study Says Yes To Solar-Powered Electric Trains
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-First Aussie Ocean Wind Project Gets $8BIL Funding
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-EU Solar Goes Digital To Open New Services
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

    THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT THURSDAY, December 7:

  • TTTA Thursday-City Mayors Unite To Fight Climate Change
  • TTTA Thursday-New Energy And Big Oil Unite Against Subsidies For Coal And Nuclear
  • TTTA Thursday-California Would Sell Only EVs After 2040
  • TTTA Thursday-Utilities In A Time Of Solar
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Founding Editor Herman K. Trabish

    --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • TODAY AT NewEnergyNews, December 13:

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: How California Is Easing Off NatGas With New Energy
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Illinois cloud computing debate could open utility rate reform

    Wednesday, March 26, 2008

    WHY TAX CREDITS ARE NEEDED, WHY OIL SUBSIDIES ARE NOT

    With expertise in both economics and energy, Severin Borenstein, E.T. Grether Professor of Business Administration and Public Policy in the Economic Analysis and Policy Group of the Haas School of Business at the University of California at Berkeley AND director of the University of California Energy Institute AND a faculty member in several other UC Berkeley departments, is the ideal expert to address the oil and gas industry’s objection to the U.S. House of Representatives’ plan to fund vital New Energy Production Tax Credits (PTCs) and Investment Tax Credits (ITCs) by shifting money away from what the New York Times called “wholly unnecessary” subsidies to oil and gas.

    First, the oil and gas industry position, reasonably stated by Ray Connolly, spokesman for the American Petroleum Institute: "We need to produce as much domestic energy of all types as possible, and that includes renewable energy…But the way to encourage it is not to change the tax law in such a way that provides a disincentive for domestic oil and natural gas development."

    Now Borenstein: “Oil companies don't need exploration tax breaks because the U.S. will never produce enough oil to affect the world market…And as long as Americans remain unwilling to pay the true cost of fossil fuels -- taking into account pollution, traffic congestion and greenhouse emissions, for example -- shifting the money into renewable energy is a good idea…It won't make a huge difference in the overall energy supply, but it will make a huge difference in whether renewables continue to grow…If we cut them off, it will choke the market."

    A recent report indicted that if the tax credits are not extended it could cost the U.S. up to 116,000 jobs and $1.9 billion in investments in 2009. Not a great plan under any circumstances, it would be downright stupid of the Senate to let that happen to a booming industry in a sluggish economy.

    Congressman Jerry McNerney (D-Ca): "Oil companies are making record profits. This allows us to shift a subsidy from a highly developed, established business that is highly profitable that doesn't need the tax subsidy."


    A lot of this investment goes to Europe and China without those tax credits. (click to enlarge)

    Solar, wind tax credits may expire
    Lisa Vorderbrueggen, March 25, 2008 (Contra Costa Times)

    WHO
    Congressman Jerry McNerney (D-Ca); Mark Tholke, project manager, wind energy company enXco;

    They don't provide the jobs but the Inheritor-Investor class likes the fossil fuels industries anyway. (chart from the Union of Concerned Scientists - click to enlarge)

    WHAT
    McNerney and New Energy industry representatives held a pre4ss conference March 24 to talk about the serious blow to the local economy the Senate’s refusal to extend Production Tax Credits (PTCs) and Investment Tax Credits (ITCs) to the New Energies.

    WHEN
    The current tax credits expire at the end of 2008.

    WHERE
    The press conference was held at Walnut Grove Elementary School in Pleasanton, Ca., but it could have been any community in the U.S. and the implications of the Senate’s refusal to fund the ITCs and PTCs would be relevant.

    Given the proper incentives, the Renewable Energy (RE) industries will provide a lot of jobs to a lot of Americans over the next quarter century. (click to enlarge)

    WHY
    The U.S. House of Representatives sent a bill to the Senate funding the PTCs and ITCs by shifting $17.65 billion from unnecessary subsidies to the oil and gas industry. The Senate seems determined to reject the bill on the grounds that subsidies established in the past to buoy a struggling oil and gas industry remain vital to an industry rolling in hundreds of billions in profits over the last 2 to 3 years.

    (slide from Bree Raum at AWEA - click to enlarge)

    QUOTES
    - Congressman McNerney: "Inconsistent support from the government is allowing this technology to go overseas…We want to make sure we institute policies right here in the U.S. that encourage and help renewable industries become settled."
    - Tholke, enXco: "It's crucial that the federal government deliver an extension…I can see no other route than layoffs if we can't get a production tax credit extension. It's so tremendously valuable to wind energy production and viability, and without it, we can't compete."

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home