NewEnergyNews: “CLEAN” COAL NOT READY - SWEDISH STUDY/

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

The challenge now: To make every day Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT WEDNESDAY, August 23:

  • TTTA Wednesday-ORIGINAL REPORTING: The IRA And The New Energy Boom
  • TTTA Wednesday-ORIGINAL REPORTING: The IRA And the EV Revolution
  • THE DAY BEFORE

  • Weekend Video: Coming Ocean Current Collapse Could Up Climate Crisis
  • Weekend Video: Impacts Of The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Current Collapse
  • Weekend Video: More Facts On The AMOC
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

    WEEKEND VIDEOS, July 15-16:

  • Weekend Video: The Truth About China And The Climate Crisis
  • Weekend Video: Florida Insurance At The Climate Crisis Storm’s Eye
  • Weekend Video: The 9-1-1 On Rooftop Solar
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

    WEEKEND VIDEOS, July 8-9:

  • Weekend Video: Bill Nye Science Guy On The Climate Crisis
  • Weekend Video: The Changes Causing The Crisis
  • Weekend Video: A “Massive Global Solar Boom” Now
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

    WEEKEND VIDEOS, July 1-2:

  • The Global New Energy Boom Accelerates
  • Ukraine Faces The Climate Crisis While Fighting To Survive
  • Texas Heat And Politics Of Denial
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Founding Editor Herman K. Trabish

    --------------------------

    --------------------------

    WEEKEND VIDEOS, June 17-18

  • Fixing The Power System
  • The Energy Storage Solution
  • New Energy Equity With Community Solar
  • Weekend Video: The Way Wind Can Help Win Wars
  • Weekend Video: New Support For Hydropower
  • Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • WEEKEND VIDEOS, August 24-26:
  • Happy One-Year Birthday, Inflation Reduction Act
  • The Virtual Power Plant Boom, Part 1
  • The Virtual Power Plant Boom, Part 2

    Sunday, May 25, 2008

    “CLEAN” COAL NOT READY - SWEDISH STUDY

    IF. The biggest little word in the English language. IF “clean” coal was actually clean and IF carbon-capture-and-sequestration (CCS) worked on a large scale at affordable prices and IF somebody figured out a way to safely store nuclear waste and IF the cost and complexities of making hydrogen fuel from water could beat just making electricity…IF all that was done, global climate change could take its place next to Y2K among distant memories of catastrophes that never were.

    But NONE of that IS. Perhaps the biggest surprises on the list are the ones about “clean” coal and CCS. Don’t political leaders keep saying “clean” coal will make it possible for the U.S. to become “the Saudi Arabia of coal” and for China and India to go on building coal plants and growing like weeds?

    The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) puts enormous hope in CCS, saying it could account for between 15% and 55% of world greenhouse gas (GhG) reductions by the end of this century. Some have even coined the phrase “sustainable coal.”

    Anders Hansson, doctoral candidate, Department of Technology and Social Change/Linköping University: “In full scale this technology only exists in the imaginations of the people developing it…It’s overly optimistic to place such great faith in it, considering all the uncertainties found in the scientific literature.”

    Scale matters. The amount of GhGs to be stored would make them the world’s biggest transported good, bigger than the amount of oil or the amount of food the world moves. A good idea is one thing. Executing it on such a scale is quite another.

    Caltech Professor Nate Lewis has half-jokingly pointed out that storing so much CO2 gas in the earth’s crust could be an added protection against the rising sea levels of global climate change by raising land elevations.

    The most immediate unknown is cost. Several experimental projects have been cancelled in the last year because the undertaking is just too expensive.

    Hansson’s basic conclusion is that much more needs to be known: “CCS needs to become known and be debated…Otherwise there is a risk of a backlash similar to what happened with nuclear power.”

    The first questions in the debate are just how clean and safe and desirable a continuing commitment to coal in any form really is. Hansson: “After all, we all agree that fossil fuels will run out. Renewable energy is the only long-term path. In that perspective, a large-scale commitment to CCS seems to be an unnecessary detour.”


    The basic idea. (click to enlarge)

    Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage: Grasping At Straws In The Climate Debate?
    May 9, 2008 (Linkoping University via Science Daily)

    WHO
    Anders Hansson, doctoral candidate, Department of Technology and Social Change/Linköping University; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

    DOE found out it's a complicated and expensive process. They had to bnack out of FutureGen. (click to enlarge)

    WHAT
    Hansson’s doctoral dissertation affirmed the extent to which carbon-capture-and-sequestration (CCS) technology is still unproven.

    WHEN
    - Small facilities in Norway have stored millions of tonnes of GhG emissions. The quantity it will be necessary to store is in the billions and billions of tonnes.
    - Another test project is scheduled to begin in eastern Germany in Summer 2008.
    - EU assumptions have CCS at full capacity within 15 years. Yet it is presently unproven.

    Even if the CO2 is captured, there are still environmental devastations. (click to enlarge)

    WHERE
    Linköping Universityis in Sweden.

    WHY
    - The ability to capture emissions may be overestimated and the risks associated with storing them may be grossly underestimated.
    - Hansson is not the first researcher to point the limited or flawed facts, unrealistic assumptions, and significant oversimplifications in CCS models.
    - Polls show barely 20% of the general public know anything about CCS.

    GreenPeace has decided coal is just not ever going to be "clean." (click to enlarge)

    QUOTES
    Hansson: “There are a number of small facilities, in Norway, for instance, where they capture and store a million tons of carbon dioxide per year. Swedish Vattenfall is starting a pilot facility in eastern German this summer.”

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home