NewEnergyNews: EMISSIONS TRADING: THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE CHINESE

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

Every day is Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE BEST UTILITIES FOR SUN
  • QUICK NEWS, May 20: INSURANCE COMPANIES PREPARE FOR CLIMATE CHANGE; UK’S GREEN BANK BRINGS THE BIG BUCKS; UTILITY GOES FOR BETTER SUN, WIND FORECASTS
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • Weekend Video: Spray On Solar
  • Weekend Video: Wind In The Rural Landscape
  • Weekend Video: What Dark Snow Means
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-WHERE NEW ENERGY NEEDS TO BE
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-KUWAIT’S POSSIBLE SOLAR
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-WHAT INDIA WIND NEEDS
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TTTA Thursday- HOW CLIMATE CHANGE DENIAL WORKS
  • TTTA Thursday-HOW WOMEN MAKE A DIFFERENCE
  • TTTA Thursday-POLITICS AND THE EPA
  • TTTA Thursday-THE ENORMOUS LED OPPORTUNITY
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE NEW INTELLIGENT ENERGY EFFICIENCY
  • QUICK NEWS, May 15: MINNESOTA’S SOLAR AMBITIONS IN CONTEXT; RHODE ISLAND’S FIGHT OVER OCEAN WIND; VC MONEY FOR SMART GRID STEADY

    THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: HOW OIL MARKETS ARE MANIPULATED
  • QUICK NEWS, May 14: HUGE BUFFETT WIND BUY IN IOWA; THE VALUE OF ARIZONA’S SUN; MINNESOTA LOVES WIND
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

  • NEW BILLS AND NEW BIRDS in Colorado's recent session (May 20, 2013) by Anne Butterfield (Boulder Daily Camera via NewEnergyNews)

    Out with the old and in with a new. Gone are the five feet of snow from April and May - and in with this sudden summer heat. The feeder and fountain in view from this keyboard are graced with migratory birds such as Evening Grosbeak, Spotted Towhee and one Ruby-Throated hummingbird that loved on that sugar water when all fragrant things were cloaked by heavy snow. And in Denver, flown from the coop are all our state legislators from their tightly compressed legislative session. What have they gotten done?

    “This has been an extraordinary legislature,” said a seasoned Democratic fundraiser in Denver, Sallyanne Ofner by Facebook message. The range of work was wide:

    For civil unions came a meaningful redress of the wrong-headed vote of 2006 to limit marriage to one man and one woman. Now LGBT couples can commit for life and legally reap respect and due benefits.

    Firearm safety has been enhanced with popular universal background checks on purchases plus size limits on high capacity magazines.

    On behalf of rape victims, parental rights of attackers over the children they spawn have been severed, and sexual assault victims have access to a payment program for their medical needs.

    One gripping disappointment was the failure to repeal the costly and conspicuously racist death penalty in Colorado.

    Also disheartening: the failure to pass seven out of nine bills to regulate hydraulic fracturing. A notable failure was minimum fines for serious spills -- needed apparently because spills now don’t invoke the maximum fines allowed. The 30-hour spill that erupted in mid-February near Fort Collins still has not been fined, according to the Colorado Oil and Gas Association. The Governor has ordered a formal review of how fines are imposed.

    Also targeted was a ban on energy industry employees from serving on the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission to regulate their own companies - failed. Lawmakers also failed to require more frequent inspections at Colorado’s tens of thousands of wells, though they did secure budgeting for 11 more inspectors and a lower spill amount threshold at which companies must report. More health and water testing around fracking areas? Also failed.

    Visiting The Camera this week, representatives from the Colorado Oil and Gas Association lamented the session as being polarized, and that legislators with no knowledge of industry surprised them with a slew of bills that COGA hadn’t seen much less collaborated on. This came off poorly as they and their 23 lobbyists certainly know that the session is compressed and filled with the slew of matters just mentioned.

    Coming this fall is still more action on fracking, in a rule making session by the Air Quality Control Commission. Judging by the Governor’s oft-stated goal to see “zero” fugitive emissions from natural gas infrastructure, let’s hope the AQCC can screw some new regulations to the sticking point.

    On the bright side for clean energy, Boulder’s own Will Toor is uniquely proud of a suite of successful bills for electric vehicles that led his agency, South West Energy Efficient Project, to launch Colorado to a leading grade of A- among six western states for EV’s. New bills included extended rebates for private purchases of EV’s and conversions of hybrids. For state and local governments to purchase EV’s, life cycle costs may now be considered as well as contracting through energy service companies to have EV’s paid for through fuel savings. PACE financing for commercial buildings and parking lots was expanded to cover charging stations. Also, apartment buildings and HOA’s will have to allow charging stations. And to address an old sore spot, a decal program will have EV owners pay a $50 tax per year for road maintenance and the construction of more public charging stations.

    We will see more charging stations – this comes with nice timing as Consumer Reports just named the Tesla Model S the best car. And as Colorado’s electric power sector cleans its emissions, the use of EV’s will leverage reductions in emissions from transportation.

    But that electric sector still has serious business leftover. Colorado has until June 7th to persuade the Governor to act on the gloriously debated SB 252 that would require rural electric providers to get 20 percent of their power from renewables. Since coal costs have about doubled over 10 years and Tri-States’ coal-rich power expenses have risen four times faster than sales, SB252 needs to pass for pocketbooks and to deal with that horrific new 400 ppm of CO2 in our atmosphere.

    Author's note: Want to support my work? Please "fan" me at Huffpost Denver, here (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-butterfield). Thanks.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Lies, damned lies and politicians (October 8, 2012)
  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Friday, May 09, 2008

    EMISSIONS TRADING: THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE CHINESE

    Originally posted May 4.
    European investment banking giant Fortis NV expects world emissions trading markets to hit $100 billion in value this year and $400 billion by 2012 or 2015, when the U.S. is expected to be fully involved.

    Shane Spurway, director of Asian emissions banking, Fortis: "We expect the American market to be around four times the size of Europe…(The United States) will join an emissions trading agreement, where carbon will be a global commodity currency."

    A new study suggests Australia's cap-and-trade system, expected by 2012, could put an undue burden on that nation's working poor because they rely on auto transport but live in lower cost, outlying urban regions. Auto transport fuel is expected to cost impactfully more when a price is put on emissions.

    This could be an argument against cap-and-trade - but not a strong enough one to prevent it in the face of global climate change. It is, however, is a good reason to look at ways to make cap-and-trade more equitable. A good place to start would be
    cap and share, a “…scalable framework for climate stabilization…” in which “…responsibilities are shared around the world in a responsible way…” but the permits would start in the hands of citizens and then work their way into the marketplace.

    From the "cap-and-trade is coming" file: Surprisingly, China is opening a branch of Chicago Climate Exchange, the voluntary emissions trading platform, in its Binhai New Area in Tianjin, near Beijing. The present U.S. administration insists Beijing is the obstacle to a world emissions trading system and yet China opens a voluntary exchange - huh?

    This just shows how wrong-headed perceptions about the "inscrutable" east can be. China saw an opportunity to win an international client to its new, state-of-the-art business center so it signed on with CCX. What is emissions trading about? It is about turning a crisis (global climate change) into an opportunity (global emissions cap-and-trade).

    In this instance, China sees an opportunity in playing. Emissions trading, as it is presently practiced in Europe, would be in the best long term interests of the U.S. and the RIGHT world emissions trading scheme will be an opportunity for everybody. When are folks going to get that?


    Cap and Share might be more equitable than cap-and-trade AND be as effective. (click to enlarge)

    Interview – Fortis sees global carbon market up 67% in 2008
    Rujun Shen (w/Edmund Klamann), April 24, 2008 (Reuters)
    and
    Carbon trading to hit poor hard
    Reid Sexton, April 27, 2008 (The Age)
    and
    China to tie up with Chicago carbon emissions bourse
    April 25, 2008 (AFP via Yahoo News)

    WHO
    Belgian-Dutch financial group Fortis NV (Shane Spurway, director of Fortis carbon banking in Asia); Point Carbon; United Nations (UN) Clean Development Mechanism (CDM); Brotherhood of St. Laurence (BSL) (Janet Stanley, report co-author); Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX)

    click to enlarge

    WHAT
    Fortis’ Spurway sees emissions trading markets booming around the world and soon starting up in Asia and the U.S. At the same time, a Brotherhood of St Laurence report Carbon Use in Poor Victorian Households by Local Government Area finds the working poor to be among the hardest hit by the costs imposed by a trading system on emissions. And China announced it will participate in a voluntary emissions trading market.

    WHEN
    - Spurway sees the world emissions trading market valued at $100 billion by the end of 2008. He sees it getting to $400 billion by 2012 to 2015.
    - Spurway expects Asian emissions markets by 2009. Most of the UN CDM registered projects are in Asia.
    - Australia expects to institute a cap-and-trade system by 2012.

    The working poor in outer suburbs generate emissions just getting to and from work. (click to enlarge)

    WHERE
    - Fortis is based in Belgium and Holland.
    - Singapore, Hong Kong and Tokyo are potential emissions trading centers.
    - The BSL report focused on the working poor in the Australian state of Victoria but is thought to be generalizable.
    - China’s CCX trading center will be in the city of Tianjin, near Beijing

    WHY
    - World emissions trading was 2.7 billion tonnes last year, valued at $60 billion. These numbers were 64% higher than the previous year.
    - 1 Certified Emission Reduction (CER) is issued for each tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) cut by a UN CDM certified project
    - A credit trades at 10 to 15 euros ($15.80-23.80).
    - A tonne of CO2e cut from voluntary projects trades at $2 to $3.
    - The BSL study found that urban poor working households in cities w/o good public transport will pay as much as $1220/year with a $35/tonne price on emissions while those in inner and middle areas with good public transport would only pay around $900 to $1000 extra. Rural working poor without public transport will pay $1300+.
    - Because of Australia’s lack of public transport, many families earning less than $500/week require 2 cars.
    - The first value China gets from joining the CCX voluntary emissions trading platform is a new international client in its Binhai New Area in Tianjin.

    Cap and trade is the most likely way to do it. (click to enlarge)

    QUOTES
    - Spurway, director of Asian carbon banking, Fortis: "In Asia, apart from Japan, no country has compliance targets, so it's very hard to set up a trading system here until you have a good range of buyers and sellers…"
    - Spurway, on current voluntary emissions trading markets: "Because it's hard to verify, because it's not very transparent, because there's no neutral or independent measuring authority involved in it, the quality of these projects is risky…"
    - Spurway, on where and how emissions trading will meet the financial marketplace: "We would tend to think that it would be the CER that would be transferred between America, Europe and Japanese buyers…"
    - Janet Stanley, co-author, BSL report: "It suggests a strong argument for better public transport services around those suburbs…These people need to get to work, they need to get to the doctor … these people have no choice but to pay out extra money for mobility…It's at a cost to other things in their life. It could be their child can't afford to go on a school camp or they can't afford the school uniform."

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home