NewEnergyNews: MONEY SPENT ON NEW ENERGY INCENTIVES PAYS FOR ITSELF: STUDY

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

Every day is Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • TTTA Thursday- HOW CLIMATE CHANGE DENIAL WORKS
  • TTTA Thursday-HOW WOMEN MAKE A DIFFERENCE
  • TTTA Thursday-POLITICS AND THE EPA
  • TTTA Thursday-THE ENORMOUS LED OPPORTUNITY
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE NEW INTELLIGENT ENERGY EFFICIENCY
  • QUICK NEWS, May 15: MINNESOTA’S SOLAR AMBITIONS IN CONTEXT; RHODE ISLAND’S FIGHT OVER OCEAN WIND; VC MONEY FOR SMART GRID STEADY

    THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: HOW OIL MARKETS ARE MANIPULATED
  • QUICK NEWS, May 14: HUGE BUFFETT WIND BUY IN IOWA; THE VALUE OF ARIZONA’S SUN; MINNESOTA LOVES WIND
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE VALUE OF SOLAR WITH STORAGE
  • QUICK NEWS, May 13: HOW BIG OIL USES REPUBLICANS; WIND SAVES MONEY FOR RATEPAYERS – STUDY; BRIGHTSOURCE EXEC TALKS SOLAR TOWER TECH & BIZ
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • Weekend Video: Senator Blasts Senator For Using Religion To Deny Climate Change
  • Weekend Video: The Remarkable Wind In Scotland
  • Weekend Video: The Sci Show Does Solar
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-SURF’S DOWN IN COMING CLIMATE CHANGED WORLD
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-$75 MIL TO CHEAPER-THAN-COAL WIND DOWN UNDER
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-VC MONEY SLIPPING AWAY FROM SUN
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-WORLD DEMAND RESPONSE MARKETS OPENING
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

  • Lies, damned lies and politicians (October 8, 2012) by Anne Butterfield (Boulder Daily Camera via NewEnergyNews)

    From the sparring at the first presidential debate, it's pretty sure that energy has become a divisive as well as a competitive issue. Both President Obama and Governor Romney want to be the triumphal producer of energy.

    However Romney likes to smear climate change concerns and clean energy investments, as if all of them go like Solyndra, where a half a billion in loan guarantees went down with the company, as he crowed that 50 percent of clean energy investments supported by the stimulus bill had gone belly up. This was dubbed the "lie of the night" by Michael Grunwald, author of a book about the stimulus bill, citing that maybe one percent of government backed clean energy ventures failed.

    Try getting that rate of safety in your investing. According to a new poll by Hart for the solar industry, voters seem to know that loan guarantees are a steadfast service of government and highly safe, as the Solyndra debacle was deemed unimportant by respondents. Ninety-two percent of registered voters found it important that solar be more widespread, with 70 percent believing that the federal government should be doing more to promote it with incentives (with 71 percent of swing voters feeling this way).

    And, sigh, with tens of thousands of wind power jobs on the chopping block already, Mitt Romney opposes the renewal of the Production Tax Credit. This, even as red states need it renewed, putting him in the dog house with GOP politicians such as Senator Chuck Grassely of Iowa whose state produces 20 percent of its power from wind, and Governor Brownback of Kansas who has made vigorous pleas for the extension of the credit, due to expire this at the end of this year.

    Didn't Romney get the memo? Republican governors are making hay with clean energy such as Haley Barbour and Chris Christie. To Mississippi, Barbour brought four solar sector firms to Mississippi along with two in biofuels plus a clean tech car venture with China. Christie made New Jersey a leading solar market in the nation, this year contending with California for first place.

    But Romney and other high priests of the GOP act as though the only real energy is the type that can be burned, and somehow, Obama has nibbled at this hemlock by constantly touting his success with fracking and his openness to the XL pipeline.

    A truly strange specter is that pipeline; it lets our heartland be used as a byway for tar sands products (which sink rather than float when spilled), so they can go straight to international markets. We get the downsides and none of the upsides -- even as the pipeline could increase gasoline prices in the Midwest, which would lose its existing access to tar sands products.

    One plausible upside of the pipeline being routed through the United States (where it might be built quickly, as would not happen in the alternative route through western Canada) is that it could strengthen the hand of President Obama in his suite of sanctions against Iran, including a worldwide boycott of Iranian oil. Our recent frack-mania allows our nation to resume oil production levels not seen for 15 years and thus strengthens our hand. Three weeks ago Iran admitted having problems selling oil due to U.S. and European sanctions; now the nation's currency is in free fall.

    One certainly hopes that tar sands will thrive mightily as a "psy-ops" against Iran and not as a chemical weapon against our climate, as Dr. James Hansen has sternly warned.

    Never bounded by his prior convictions about the climate, Romney crows that he would authorize the pipeline on day one and build it himself if need be (as if he in his wingtips could "John Wayne" his way around an oil field). It's all such a sham he-man rodeo.

    And no one mentioned the climate -- in spite of hundreds of thousands of petition signatures demanding the topic. Neither candidate pushed clean energy as the vote winner that poll after poll have shown it to be. Authors for DBL Investors in their study of green energy exclaim, "We all need to understand that green jobs are not the idle dreaming of a small group of partisan activists and insiders, but a source of livelihood for millions, literally in all parts of the country." The light shines in the darkness but the darkness of our politics has not understood it.

    Author's note: Want to support my work? Please "fan" me at Huffpost Denver, here (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-butterfield). Thanks.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Lies, damned lies and politicians (October 8, 2012)
  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Monday, June 23, 2008

    MONEY SPENT ON NEW ENERGY INCENTIVES PAYS FOR ITSELF: STUDY

    There is so much evidence of how valuable the development of wind energy is for the nation it is surprising anybody even thought to do this study: The tax credits the Congress keeps denying New Energy (6 times since December and kudos to the New Energy industries for refusing to take "no" for an answer) would pay for themselves in new tax revenues generated.

    The new study from GE shows that wind farms built in 2007 will bring $250 million into the U.S. Treasury. The cost from the incentives will be offset by income tax revenue from worker wages, project vendors and power output after the 10-year credit period ends.

    Bills with a variety of strategies to fund the production tax credits (PTCs) and investment tax credits (ITCs) for New Energy have been put forward (cuts to fossil fuels tax breaks, cuts to offshore hedge fund returns, etc.) but the recalcitrant Republican minority in the Senate has not accepted any of the plans.

    It is likely, if Congress does not extend the wind energy industry's PTCs (and the solar energy industry’s ITCs), the New Energy players with the necessary financial leverage will move out of the U.S. during 2009 and the smaller companies will suffer.

    Steve Taub, senior vice president of investment strategy, GE Energy Financial Services: "People are already putting the brakes on projects…"

    A solar company CEO recently confided to NewEnergyNews he expects 2009 to be a "lost" year. And why?

    This study shows it is not because funding New Energy costs taxpayers. And polls repeatedly show it is not because taxpayers oppose the development of wind and solar and electric vehicle transport. And science keeps showing it is not because the nation and the world don't NEED the development of clean energy.

    It is because a minority of fossil fools in the U.S. Senate continue to act in defense of a few wealthy patrons and an antiquated 20th century energy system.

    See the GE Financial Services powerpoint presentation
    PTC More than Pays for Itself

    (From the GE study - click to enlarge)

    Wind Farm Taxes Make Up Losses From Incentives – GE study
    Mark Peters, June 18, 2008 (Dow Jones via CNN Money)

    WHO
    GE Energy Financial Services

    WHAT
    Impact of 2007 Wind Farms on US Treasury, a GE Energy Financial Services study, finds wind energy’s production tax credit (PTC) would pay for itself in new revenues generated.

    (From the GE study - click to enlarge)

    WHEN
    - The Senate denied the extension of the investment tax credits (ITCs) and production tax credits (PTCs) for the 6th time on June 17.
    - The ITCs and PTCs expire January 1, 2009.
    - 2003: Congress let the PTCs expire; 2004: 77% drop in new U.S. wind capacity.

    WHERE
    - GE has 34 wind farms in 13 states.
    - It is the U.S.’ biggest wind turbine manufacturer and the 2nd biggest manufacturer in the world.

    WHY
    - GE had a vested interest in funding the study because it is heavily invested ($3 billion) in New Energy.
    - The PTC kicks back 2.1 cents/kilowatt-hour produced to wind energy builders for the first 10 years of a project’s life.

    (From the GE study - click to enlarge)

    QUOTES
    Michael Eckhart, president, American Council on Renewable Energy: "Too often, politics, rather than economics, has shaped the debate about extending the production tax credit…GE's new study identifying additional economic benefits of the wind industry should bring all parties together."

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home