NewEnergyNews: BIG MONEY, LOTS OF JOBS IN NEW ENERGY, EFFICIENCY – REPORT

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

Every day is Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-WHERE NEW ENERGY NEEDS TO BE
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-KUWAIT’S POSSIBLE SOLAR
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-WHAT INDIA WIND NEEDS
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • TTTA Thursday- HOW CLIMATE CHANGE DENIAL WORKS
  • TTTA Thursday-HOW WOMEN MAKE A DIFFERENCE
  • TTTA Thursday-POLITICS AND THE EPA
  • TTTA Thursday-THE ENORMOUS LED OPPORTUNITY
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE NEW INTELLIGENT ENERGY EFFICIENCY
  • QUICK NEWS, May 15: MINNESOTA’S SOLAR AMBITIONS IN CONTEXT; RHODE ISLAND’S FIGHT OVER OCEAN WIND; VC MONEY FOR SMART GRID STEADY

    THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: HOW OIL MARKETS ARE MANIPULATED
  • QUICK NEWS, May 14: HUGE BUFFETT WIND BUY IN IOWA; THE VALUE OF ARIZONA’S SUN; MINNESOTA LOVES WIND
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE VALUE OF SOLAR WITH STORAGE
  • QUICK NEWS, May 13: HOW BIG OIL USES REPUBLICANS; WIND SAVES MONEY FOR RATEPAYERS – STUDY; BRIGHTSOURCE EXEC TALKS SOLAR TOWER TECH & BIZ
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • Weekend Video: Senator Blasts Senator For Using Religion To Deny Climate Change
  • Weekend Video: The Remarkable Wind In Scotland
  • Weekend Video: The Sci Show Does Solar
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

  • Lies, damned lies and politicians (October 8, 2012) by Anne Butterfield (Boulder Daily Camera via NewEnergyNews)

    From the sparring at the first presidential debate, it's pretty sure that energy has become a divisive as well as a competitive issue. Both President Obama and Governor Romney want to be the triumphal producer of energy.

    However Romney likes to smear climate change concerns and clean energy investments, as if all of them go like Solyndra, where a half a billion in loan guarantees went down with the company, as he crowed that 50 percent of clean energy investments supported by the stimulus bill had gone belly up. This was dubbed the "lie of the night" by Michael Grunwald, author of a book about the stimulus bill, citing that maybe one percent of government backed clean energy ventures failed.

    Try getting that rate of safety in your investing. According to a new poll by Hart for the solar industry, voters seem to know that loan guarantees are a steadfast service of government and highly safe, as the Solyndra debacle was deemed unimportant by respondents. Ninety-two percent of registered voters found it important that solar be more widespread, with 70 percent believing that the federal government should be doing more to promote it with incentives (with 71 percent of swing voters feeling this way).

    And, sigh, with tens of thousands of wind power jobs on the chopping block already, Mitt Romney opposes the renewal of the Production Tax Credit. This, even as red states need it renewed, putting him in the dog house with GOP politicians such as Senator Chuck Grassely of Iowa whose state produces 20 percent of its power from wind, and Governor Brownback of Kansas who has made vigorous pleas for the extension of the credit, due to expire this at the end of this year.

    Didn't Romney get the memo? Republican governors are making hay with clean energy such as Haley Barbour and Chris Christie. To Mississippi, Barbour brought four solar sector firms to Mississippi along with two in biofuels plus a clean tech car venture with China. Christie made New Jersey a leading solar market in the nation, this year contending with California for first place.

    But Romney and other high priests of the GOP act as though the only real energy is the type that can be burned, and somehow, Obama has nibbled at this hemlock by constantly touting his success with fracking and his openness to the XL pipeline.

    A truly strange specter is that pipeline; it lets our heartland be used as a byway for tar sands products (which sink rather than float when spilled), so they can go straight to international markets. We get the downsides and none of the upsides -- even as the pipeline could increase gasoline prices in the Midwest, which would lose its existing access to tar sands products.

    One plausible upside of the pipeline being routed through the United States (where it might be built quickly, as would not happen in the alternative route through western Canada) is that it could strengthen the hand of President Obama in his suite of sanctions against Iran, including a worldwide boycott of Iranian oil. Our recent frack-mania allows our nation to resume oil production levels not seen for 15 years and thus strengthens our hand. Three weeks ago Iran admitted having problems selling oil due to U.S. and European sanctions; now the nation's currency is in free fall.

    One certainly hopes that tar sands will thrive mightily as a "psy-ops" against Iran and not as a chemical weapon against our climate, as Dr. James Hansen has sternly warned.

    Never bounded by his prior convictions about the climate, Romney crows that he would authorize the pipeline on day one and build it himself if need be (as if he in his wingtips could "John Wayne" his way around an oil field). It's all such a sham he-man rodeo.

    And no one mentioned the climate -- in spite of hundreds of thousands of petition signatures demanding the topic. Neither candidate pushed clean energy as the vote winner that poll after poll have shown it to be. Authors for DBL Investors in their study of green energy exclaim, "We all need to understand that green jobs are not the idle dreaming of a small group of partisan activists and insiders, but a source of livelihood for millions, literally in all parts of the country." The light shines in the darkness but the darkness of our politics has not understood it.

    Author's note: Want to support my work? Please "fan" me at Huffpost Denver, here (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-butterfield). Thanks.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Lies, damned lies and politicians (October 8, 2012)
  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Tuesday, October 21, 2008

    BIG MONEY, LOTS OF JOBS IN NEW ENERGY, EFFICIENCY – REPORT

    Independent consultants’ research says so. Academic research says so. Anecdotal experience says so. Who DOESN’T?

    Says what?

    Says investing in New Energy and energy efficiency generates more jobs and revenues than it costs and provides emissions-free energy as a result.

    A new report from the University of California (UC) validates previous data from the California Air Resources Board (CARB) indicating California's investment in New Energy and energy efficiency from 1972 on earned back more money in revenues and jobs than its cost.

    From Sacramento to Washington, D.C., it’s time to pony up. The way to get this economy going again is to learn what every businessperson knows: You have to spend money to make money.

    Experts are whispering in the blogosphere: The UC and CARB calculations of California's savings probably dramatically underestimate what the state actually saved from its energy efficiency programs and what it can save by building New Energy infrastructure.

    To opponents of building New Energy: Which is the objectionable part, the high-quality new employment, the prosperity or the emissions-free energy?

    From
    Energy Efficiency, Innovation and Job Creation in California: “California’s legacy of energy policies and resulting economic growth provides evidence that innovation and energy efficiency can make essential contributions to economic growth and stability. Had the state not embarked on its ambitious path to reduce emissions over three decades ago, the California economy would be in a significantly more vulnerable position today. Looking ahead, California’s ambitious plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as mandated by the California Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32) puts the state on a more stable economic path by encouraging even greater investment in energy saving innovation. The current financial crisis reminds us of the importance of responsible risk management. The results of this study remind us that, in addition to energy price vulnerability and climate damage, the risks of excessive energy dependence include lower long-term economic growth. A lower carbon future for California is a more prosperous and sustainable future.”

    The study used the Berkeley Energy And Resources (BEAR) model (described as “the most detailed and comprehensive forecasting tool of its kind”) to make its predictions for future impacts.

    F. Noel Perry, founder, study-funder Next 10: "As the financial world's uncertainty continues to be the cause of anxiety and fear about the future, this report provides hard evidence that energy efficiency and innovation can pave the way to economic security and growth…Whether or not we take that path depends on policy to encourage it."


    click to enlarge

    New U.C. Report Finds Past and Future State Energy Policies Deliver Needed Economic Advantage; Provides Critical Evidence as CA Faces Global Financial Crisis
    October 20, 2008 (PR Newswrie/COMTEX via MarketWatch)

    WHO
    Center for Energy, Resources and Economic Sustainability/Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California (David Roland-Holst, author); Next 10; California Air Resources Board (CARB)

    WHAT
    Energy Efficiency, Innovation and Job Creation in California finds (1) California energy efficiency policies added 1.5 million fulltime jobs in the past 3½ decades and (2) state climate policies increasing efficiency at 1%/year going forward will grow the Gross State Product (GSP) by ~$76 billion, upping household incomes and adding more new jobs.

    The numbers tell the story. (click to enlarge)

    WHEN
    - 1972 thru 2006: The report examines historical data on job creation and revenues generated.
    - Through 2020: The report examines the impacts of AB32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act which requires the states emissions to be brought to 1990 levels by 2020.

    WHERE
    The report studied the state of California.

    WHY
    - The study was funded by Next 10.
    - California energy efficiency policies: added 1.5 million fulltime (FTE) jobs (total payroll: $45+ billion).
    - State policies improving energy efficiency 1%/year: increase GSP ~$76 billion, increase real household income ~$48 billion, increase jobs ~403,000.
    - The study examined household reductions in per capita electricity use as a catalyst for economic growth.
    - Household consumption = 70% of GSP and, therefore, household expenditure is the leading determinant of energy use and employment in California.
    - Historical findings:
    (1) Aggressive policies in the 1970s to reduce energy waste and increase energy production protected California from the current economic crisis;
    (2) 1.5 million FTE (with $45 billion payroll) because building energy and efficiency has a “multiplier” effect on employment saved consumers $56 billion in energy costs;
    (3) W/every lost job due to slowed growth in energy supply chains (oil, gas, electric power, etc.) 50 new jobs were created across the state's diverse economy, and
    (4) New jobs come from less energy intensive services, generating a more emissions-free economy.
    - The study validated recommendations made by CARB toward implementation of AB 32 but found bigger economic benefits likely because CARB assumed static technology.

    click to enlarge

    - Prognostications, using BEAR:
    (1) The state should achieve 100% of the goals set by AB 32 for greenhouse gas reductions and increase the GSP (~$76 billion), increase real household income (~$48 billion) and add jobs (~403,000);
    (2) A compounding effect is expected: The first 1.4% efficiency increase = ~181,000 jobs, the next 1% gain = ~222,000 jobs, etc.;
    (3) Increased jobs in efficiency sectors and a shift to an emissions-free economy will slow but not end job growth in Old Energy industries;
    (4) Efficiency growth of 1% will drive a win-win situation for industry and consumers;
    (5) Establishing a price for emissions with a cap-and-trade system will drive the favorable changes and growth;
    (6) Energy is the world’s highest-revenue sector so efficiency changes will “…revolutionize traditional practices and increase real living standards around the world…” and
    (7) The planned changes will drive California to world leadership in the sector as it transitions to an emissions-free economy.

    QUOTES
    - Roland-Holst, U.C.Professor and report author: "Our analysis provides solid evidence that California's legacy of energy policy has grown the economy, created jobs and put billions of dollars into the pockets of consumers…At this pivotal moment in history, as global markets teeter on the financial edge, our study reveals the economic power of energy innovation and efficiency, and the promise for California if the state redoubles its efforts as proposed in the Draft Scoping Plan to implement the Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32)."
    - Mike Splinter, president/CEO, Applied Materials: "The economy, energy and the environment are the great social and engineering challenges of our time…This report highlights the importance of smart policy to help accelerate adoption of future clean energy products and technologies and how they can truly make a difference to the future of our planet."

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home