Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

The challenge now: To make every day Earth Day.


  • TODAY’S STUDY: The Way To Grow EVs
  • QUICK NEWS, April 25: Private Sector Takes Over The Climate Fight; How Sea Level Rise Would Change The Map; Wind Jobs Top 100,000 As Wind Energy Booms

  • TODAY’S STUDY: The Risk Of Natural Gas Vs. The Risk Of Wind
  • QUICK NEWS, April 24: The Health Impacts Of Climate Change; New Energy Is Everywhere; Study Shows LA Does Not Need Aliso Canyon

  • Weekend Video: How To Win Friends For New Energy
  • Weekend Video: The Electric Vehicle Highway
  • Weekend Video: Wind And The Economy

  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-A Deeper Look At The Heat
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Wind Gets Market Tough
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-UK Gets Utility-Led Solar Plus Storage
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Germany’s VW Talking Its EV To China


  • TTTA Thursday-U.S. Military Affirms Climate Change-War Link
  • TTTA Thursday-Solar Plus Hydro Drive Wholesale Power Cost Sub-Zero
  • TTTA Thursday-Wind Boom Goes On Growing Midwest Wealth
  • TTTA Thursday-More Kentucky Jobs In New Energy Than In Coal

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Rocky Mountain compromise: Inside Xcel's landmark Colorado solar settlement
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Fixed charge battle looms in Texas as regulators tackle rate design reform
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: No time to think: How utilities are handling the deluge of grid data



    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, f is an occasional contributor to NewEnergyNews


    Some of Anne's contributions:

  • Another Tipping Point: US Coal Supply Decline So Real Even West Virginia Concurs (REPORT), November 26, 2013
  • SOLAR FOR ME BUT NOT FOR THEE ~ Xcel's Push to Undermine Rooftop Solar, September 20, 2013
  • NEW BILLS AND NEW BIRDS in Colorado's recent session, May 20, 2013
  • Lies, damned lies and politicians (October 8, 2012)
  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns


    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart




      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.


    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • TODAY AT NewEnergyNews, April 26:

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Mixed-ownership models spur utility investment in microgrids
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: How the wind industry can continue its boom into the 2020s
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Rhode Island targets a common perspective on DER values

    Sunday, March 22, 2009


    Solar energy giants discovering Ontario
    Tyler Hamilton, March 19, 2009 (Toronto Star)

    As a result of Ontario’s Green Energy Act, instituting the first large scale Feed-in Tariff (FiT) for New Energies in North America, major solar energy producers are flocking to the province. First Solar (from Arizona) and Recurrent Energy (from California) have acquired and are planning major installations and Nanosolar (from California) is considering building a solar module assembly plant and is studying the province’s New Energy potential with EDF Energies Nouvelles, France’s energy multinational.

    The Ontario FiT (reported on earlier in STABILITY MATTERS - NEW ENERGY IN ONTARIO...), as administered by the Ontario Power Authority, guarantees 80.2 cents per kilowatt-hour generated by residential rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV) systems for 20 years. Larger rooftop systems, up to 100kilowatts, earn 71.3 cents. Systems between 100 and 500 kilowatts earn 63.5 cents per kilowatt-hour. Systems bigger than 500 kilowatts, like those on schools, commercial buildings and big-box stores, earn 53.9 cents.

    click to enlarge

    Ground-mounted PV power plants up to 10 megawatts earn at the rate of 44.3 cents per kilowatt-hour.

    Recurrent Energy is especially excited about the new Ontario rates because it just purchased 350 megawatts of planned solar installations from UPC Solar, much of which is in the province.

    10% of the 2,000 planned megawatts First Solar recently purchased from OptiSolar in a $400 million deal are in Ontario.

    The Green Energy Act’s tariff levels remain subject to revision and the energy ministry is requesting input.

    click to enlarge

    - Canada’s most populous province would not warrant so much attention if its means for generating a New Energy boom was not such a hot topic. The FiT is Europe’s most successful and, at the same time, most controversial tool for driving New Energy growth. Ontario’s is the first state-sized application of an FiT in North America.

    click to enlarge

    - The FiT was developed and improved in Germany and is acknowledged as the incentive that made Germany the biggest solar energy producer in the world. It is the incentive currently driving growth in Spain, Italy, Portugal and France and is part of the solar energy renaissance being planned in Japan.

    click to enlarge

    - The difficulty with the FiT is getting the details right. Some solar professionals complain that Ontario rates are not high enough, especially for solar power plant-sized systems in the currently credit-constrained economy. On the other hand, Spain's 2007-08 rates were so high they drove too much growth, tipped the government program into financial problems, created supply shortages that led to cost increases and generally wrought havoc until the tariff was cut back.
    - The big advantage of the FiT is that, unlike tax credits, it guarantees investors long-term certain cash returns.
    - Bottom line: There will be much more about the FiT as enthusiasm for it grows on this side of the Atlantic.

    click to enlarge

    - Martin Roscheisen, Founder/CEO, Nanosolar: "The Ontario policies are very promising and we are now actively tracking this…[The new prices] could tip the balance in favour of investment in Ontario."
    - Arno Harris, CEO, Recurrent Energy: "Adding a pipeline like this to our business increases our bargaining power," said Harris, explaining that economies of scale allow the company to lower costs by placing bulk orders for solar modules. "Our goal is to develop over 100 megawatts and get it into commercial operation by 2012."

    click to enlarge

    - Ron Mantay, country manager, SunEdison Canada "It's just a bit low at this point…It's the utility scale projects that are the key to job creation and cost reduction, and the current proposed rules might not be enough to motivate manufacturers to shop here in Ontario."
    - Amy Tang, spokeswoman, Ontario energy ministry: "Anyone having concerns with the proposed pricing should provide their feedback to the agency…"
    - Roscheisen, Nanosolar: "[A feed-in tariff] makes the market predictable and thus investible for the kinds of long-term, fundamental technology improvements and investments that will ultimately make solar a mainstream energy source…We congratulate Ontario for its forward-looking thinking…"


    Post a Comment

    << Home