NewEnergyNews: WAVE ENERGY NEEDS WORK, WILL GET IT AND BOOM

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

Every day is Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • Holiday Weekend Reading: NEW ENERGY IN CHINA
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: INTEGRATING NEW ENERGY
  • QUICK NEWS, May 24: SO AFRICA TO BUILD A GIGAWATT OF WIND; LUCKY CORRIDOR FOR NEW MEXICO NEW ENERGY; MEGAWATT TEST OF CIGS THIN FILM
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE BENEFITS OF WIND AND SOLAR TOGETHER
  • QUICK NEWS, May 23: AN ‘UNPRECEDENTED’ MOVE TO NEW ENERGY; BRAINTRUST GOES AFTER SOLAR PRICE; INTERIOR APPROVES WIND ON INDIAN LAND
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: EUROPE’S PV TO 2016
  • QUICK NEWS, May 22: APPLE TURNS TO SUN; EU WIND CAN LEAD ECONOMIC RECOVERY; CHINA’S NEW GRID MAY ONLY MEET OLD NEEDS
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: BANKS ON COAL
  • QUICK NEWS, May 21: A FIGHT FOR SUN IN TEXAS; NRG LAYOFFS HERALD FADING PTC HOPES; WHAT WORRIES GRID OPERATORS MOST
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- CHINA STARTS WORLD’S BIGGEST TRANSMISSION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- SOLAR’S IMPACT ON GERMAN OCEAN WIND
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- INDIA WIND GETS A GOLDMAN SACHS BILLION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- HOW KOREA IS LIKE DENMARK
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Anne Butterfield (Huffington Post via New EnergyNews)

    Eventually those local moratoriums against fracking will expire in Boulder, Longmont and Erie. And residents will worry anew about toxic fracking operations inching up on schools and neighborhoods in pursuit of a product that goes "poof" the instant it's used. Nice value ~ not.

    And it's timely that the University of Colorado at Denver School of Public Health just announced a study which finds that air pollution within a half mile of frack-ops have toxic emissions five times over federal safety standards, causing elevated life time cancer risks and respiratory and neurological effects for nearby residents. Rep. Diana DeGette is now urging the Environmental Protection Agency to consider Colorado's study as they finalize air standards for fracking.

    It has also just come out that fracking is inching up on agriculture to compete for Colorado's water. Taking only .08 of a percent per year, it's a smidge for sure, but that water gets so polluted it must be disposed in a way that removes it from the hydrologic cycle. And that's not pretty when we're looking down the craw of a new drought kicked off with an historic climate change induced heat wave plus a horrifying wildfire this season.

    Permanently voiding precious Colorado water out of the hydrologic cycle feels even worse in view the fact such water can be lost for naught when the depletion rate on fracking wells is 63-85 percent in the first year, according to Dave Hughes of the Geological Survey of Canada. This can mean fruitless water waste when drilling down the slippery slope of diminishing marginal returns.

    But Colorado will need all the more gas, as the Clean Air Clean Jobs Act requires Xcel Eenrgy in Colorado to soon retire 900 megawatts of coal burning capacity. The act also requires that the natural gas used for recouping that coal-fired capacity comes from in state (see page 18 here). That puts upward pressure on fracking all over the state. This means more tangles between fracking and populated areas, and more permanent loss of precious Colorado water. It seems like Colorado may have backed itself into a box canyon, where residents are cornered with fracking risks to land, air, water and health.

    But there's an elegant pathway to reducing Colorado's need for natural gas -- by using the sun in a familiar technology that is at least two times more efficient than solar photovoltaics. It's good old fashioned solar thermal - those rooftop panels that heat water.

    Colorado could amend the CACJA to promote solar thermal as a jobs intensive domestic energy supply that works with natural gas to heat homes, buildings, water and industrial processes. This could free drilling companies to sell excess Colorado gas out of state for much higher prices (see page 8 here), possibly gaining crucial industry support for this intrusion of renewables into their market. Higher profitability, less contentious drilling and more renewable energy jobs is the hope.

    In all of North American, Colorado is "ground zero" for the best conditions for producing huge benefits from solar thermal. It's the sunshine, cold ground water, high heating loads, renewables-savvy population and existing industry that can, if the state takes on robust targets, lead the nation in an industry that swaps jobs and skills in place of burning money. And burning money is what we do when we burn costly fuels that go poof the instant they're used.

    A robust Colorado plan for solar thermal could put the clean air and clean jobs back into the so-called, gas-friendly Clean Air Clean Jobs Act.

    And in case anyone has forgotten ~ there are huge economic risks with shale gas, a.k.a. the fracking boom, as the resource is almost certainly not as profitable, resourceful or as clean as hyped by industry. On deeper review, it's promising to be an economic bubble.

    Fracking is supposedly going to make our nation 100 years of cheap gas, as, amnesiac members of Congress and the President are wont to say. But various geological experts such as the Potential Gas Committe have poured cold water all over that flaming hype, detailing how the supply could be as little as 21 or even 11 years. And Arthur Berman, a widely regarded petro-geologist has commented that the industry reminds him of the sub prime mortgage mess and wrote, "U.S. shale plays share many characteristics with the gold rushes.... Both phenomena result from extreme promotion. Anyone can join. Every participant believes that they will get rich. Great amounts of capital are destroyed as entrants try to get a position. The bonanza is exhausted sooner than most expected and few profit in the end."

    So if you are one of the thousands of Coloradans who are waking up to the nightmare of fracking in your community - go online and read the Colorado Solar Thermal Roadmap. Then find every political leader you can to talk about it. Colorado would be wise to use its natural solar resources to hedge against an over-reliance on gas, one that shall expand as the CACJA requires. And coal with its rising prices is on the wane nationwide as well, which means the demand for gas will be a pressure cooker loaded with risk for our energy security, economy, and environment.

    Author's note: Want to support my work? Please "fan" me at Huffpost Denver, here (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-butterfield). Thanks.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Friday, April 17, 2009

    WAVE ENERGY NEEDS WORK, WILL GET IT AND BOOM

    Marine power not ready for prime time, experts say
    Colin Sullivan, April 14, 2009 (NY Times)

    SUMMARY
    The hydrokinetic energies, experts say, lag behind wind, solar geothermal and other New Energies, are still in an early research and development phase and are not yet commercially viable. The potential, the experts agree, is big.

    Hydrokinetic energies come from waves, tides and currents.

    Factors delaying the hydrokinetic energies from reaching technological maturity: Uncertainty about environmental effects, poor economics, jurisdictional tieups and scattered progress by the few leading entrepreneurs.

    Roger Bedard, head of the Electric Power Research Institute wave power research unit, says the U.S. is 5-to-10 years away from a commercial ocean energy project. But its hydrokinetic potential is enormous: It could have10 gigawatts of wave energy from its coasts and 3 gigawatts of tidal and current energies from coasts and rivers by 2025.

    click to enlarge

    80 ocean, tidal and river technologies are being tested by start-ups. They have limited capital and no guarantee of long-term access to continued development. The investment community remains dubious and unsupportive.

    But the hydrokinetic energies could be poised to surprise the experts.

    Jurisdictional tieups are about to be resolved and that could lead to clarification of how to proceed without harmful environmental impacts. That could lead to long-term permits which could lead to more supportive venture financing.

    click to enlarge

    The biggest opportunity is on the West Coast. The continental shelf falls off into deep waters quickly there, allowing waves rolling across the Pacific to hit with the full force of their energy intact. Alaska, California. Oregon, Washington and Hawaii could reap big gains when hydrokinetic forces reach commercial readiness.

    COMMENTARY
    Progress (Not): (1) Finavera Renewables recently canceled all of its wave projects and closed out the its permit, the first wave power permit ever issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). (2) The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) denied a Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (PG&E) power purchase agreement (PPA) application for a Finavera Renewables project on the central California coast, judging the technology "immature." (3) The only wave energy device connected to the U.S. power grid is a single buoy at a Marine Corps base in Hawaii. (5) The first tidal project, in New York's East River, took 5 years to get permitted by FERC and has several missteps despite its very limited scale. (6) Most other U.S. tidal energy projects have yet to make it out of the prototype stage.

    click to enlarge

    Sorting out jurisdictional disputes: The Department of the Interior (DOI) is in the process of developing a comprehensive plan for all offshore energies and Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar is himself actively engaged. According to the terms of a recently written Memorandum of Understanding, DOI will manage everything within 3 miles of the shoreline. Outside 3 miles, DOI’s Minerals Management Service (MMS) will issue leases for hydrokinetic projects but the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) will license projects. MMS will retain exclusive jurisdiction over offshore wind and solar projects.

    Crucial but yet to be determined: If DOI has determined how long the MMS leases will be issued for, it isn’t saying. Typical MMS leases are 2,3 or 5 years. Hydrokinetic projects require longer time frames to develop.

    click to enlarge

    QUOTES
    - Edwin Feo, partner, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy: "It's basically not commercially financeable yet…They are still a long ways from getting access to the capital and being deployed, because they are simply immature technologies…Most of these companies are start-ups…From a project perspective, that doesn't work. People who put money into projects expect long-term returns."

    click to enlarge

    - William Douros, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA): "You would think offshore wave energy projects are a given…And yet, from our perspective, from within our agency, there are still a lot of questions."
    - Maurice Hill, leasing program official, MMS/DOI: "These next couple of months are really exciting times, especially on the OCS…We don't know how they'll work…We're testing at this stage."
    - Feo: "[2-, 3- or 5-year leases] just won't work…Sooner or later, you have to get beyond pilot projects."

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home