NewEnergyNews: A CAR TO DETROIT’S RESCUE

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

Every day is Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • Holiday Weekend Reading: NEW ENERGY IN CHINA
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: INTEGRATING NEW ENERGY
  • QUICK NEWS, May 24: SO AFRICA TO BUILD A GIGAWATT OF WIND; LUCKY CORRIDOR FOR NEW MEXICO NEW ENERGY; MEGAWATT TEST OF CIGS THIN FILM
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE BENEFITS OF WIND AND SOLAR TOGETHER
  • QUICK NEWS, May 23: AN ‘UNPRECEDENTED’ MOVE TO NEW ENERGY; BRAINTRUST GOES AFTER SOLAR PRICE; INTERIOR APPROVES WIND ON INDIAN LAND
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: EUROPE’S PV TO 2016
  • QUICK NEWS, May 22: APPLE TURNS TO SUN; EU WIND CAN LEAD ECONOMIC RECOVERY; CHINA’S NEW GRID MAY ONLY MEET OLD NEEDS
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: BANKS ON COAL
  • QUICK NEWS, May 21: A FIGHT FOR SUN IN TEXAS; NRG LAYOFFS HERALD FADING PTC HOPES; WHAT WORRIES GRID OPERATORS MOST
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- CHINA STARTS WORLD’S BIGGEST TRANSMISSION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- SOLAR’S IMPACT ON GERMAN OCEAN WIND
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- INDIA WIND GETS A GOLDMAN SACHS BILLION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- HOW KOREA IS LIKE DENMARK
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Anne Butterfield (Huffington Post via New EnergyNews)

    Eventually those local moratoriums against fracking will expire in Boulder, Longmont and Erie. And residents will worry anew about toxic fracking operations inching up on schools and neighborhoods in pursuit of a product that goes "poof" the instant it's used. Nice value ~ not.

    And it's timely that the University of Colorado at Denver School of Public Health just announced a study which finds that air pollution within a half mile of frack-ops have toxic emissions five times over federal safety standards, causing elevated life time cancer risks and respiratory and neurological effects for nearby residents. Rep. Diana DeGette is now urging the Environmental Protection Agency to consider Colorado's study as they finalize air standards for fracking.

    It has also just come out that fracking is inching up on agriculture to compete for Colorado's water. Taking only .08 of a percent per year, it's a smidge for sure, but that water gets so polluted it must be disposed in a way that removes it from the hydrologic cycle. And that's not pretty when we're looking down the craw of a new drought kicked off with an historic climate change induced heat wave plus a horrifying wildfire this season.

    Permanently voiding precious Colorado water out of the hydrologic cycle feels even worse in view the fact such water can be lost for naught when the depletion rate on fracking wells is 63-85 percent in the first year, according to Dave Hughes of the Geological Survey of Canada. This can mean fruitless water waste when drilling down the slippery slope of diminishing marginal returns.

    But Colorado will need all the more gas, as the Clean Air Clean Jobs Act requires Xcel Eenrgy in Colorado to soon retire 900 megawatts of coal burning capacity. The act also requires that the natural gas used for recouping that coal-fired capacity comes from in state (see page 18 here). That puts upward pressure on fracking all over the state. This means more tangles between fracking and populated areas, and more permanent loss of precious Colorado water. It seems like Colorado may have backed itself into a box canyon, where residents are cornered with fracking risks to land, air, water and health.

    But there's an elegant pathway to reducing Colorado's need for natural gas -- by using the sun in a familiar technology that is at least two times more efficient than solar photovoltaics. It's good old fashioned solar thermal - those rooftop panels that heat water.

    Colorado could amend the CACJA to promote solar thermal as a jobs intensive domestic energy supply that works with natural gas to heat homes, buildings, water and industrial processes. This could free drilling companies to sell excess Colorado gas out of state for much higher prices (see page 8 here), possibly gaining crucial industry support for this intrusion of renewables into their market. Higher profitability, less contentious drilling and more renewable energy jobs is the hope.

    In all of North American, Colorado is "ground zero" for the best conditions for producing huge benefits from solar thermal. It's the sunshine, cold ground water, high heating loads, renewables-savvy population and existing industry that can, if the state takes on robust targets, lead the nation in an industry that swaps jobs and skills in place of burning money. And burning money is what we do when we burn costly fuels that go poof the instant they're used.

    A robust Colorado plan for solar thermal could put the clean air and clean jobs back into the so-called, gas-friendly Clean Air Clean Jobs Act.

    And in case anyone has forgotten ~ there are huge economic risks with shale gas, a.k.a. the fracking boom, as the resource is almost certainly not as profitable, resourceful or as clean as hyped by industry. On deeper review, it's promising to be an economic bubble.

    Fracking is supposedly going to make our nation 100 years of cheap gas, as, amnesiac members of Congress and the President are wont to say. But various geological experts such as the Potential Gas Committe have poured cold water all over that flaming hype, detailing how the supply could be as little as 21 or even 11 years. And Arthur Berman, a widely regarded petro-geologist has commented that the industry reminds him of the sub prime mortgage mess and wrote, "U.S. shale plays share many characteristics with the gold rushes.... Both phenomena result from extreme promotion. Anyone can join. Every participant believes that they will get rich. Great amounts of capital are destroyed as entrants try to get a position. The bonanza is exhausted sooner than most expected and few profit in the end."

    So if you are one of the thousands of Coloradans who are waking up to the nightmare of fracking in your community - go online and read the Colorado Solar Thermal Roadmap. Then find every political leader you can to talk about it. Colorado would be wise to use its natural solar resources to hedge against an over-reliance on gas, one that shall expand as the CACJA requires. And coal with its rising prices is on the wane nationwide as well, which means the demand for gas will be a pressure cooker loaded with risk for our energy security, economy, and environment.

    Author's note: Want to support my work? Please "fan" me at Huffpost Denver, here (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-butterfield). Thanks.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Friday, May 08, 2009

    A CAR TO DETROIT’S RESCUE

    Can electric cars save Detroit?
    Steve Everly, May 4, 2009 (Kansas City Star)

    SUMMARY
    General Motors handed out print materials about its Chevrolet Volt at a Disney World Alternative Fuels & Vehicles Institute conference. The print materials featured the slogan “Charge a Battery, Change the World.”

    The Volt may be the last hope for GM. It certainly represents the dream of President Obama, who campaigned on the promise to put a million plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) on U.S. highways by 2015.

    Other carmakers also have plans for PHEVs as well as entirely battery-powered battery electric vehicles (BEVs). Some believe a shift to BEVs is key to saving the world from the worst ravages of global climate change. GM’s leadership believes its PHEV will save save Detroit. But some believe that with the U.S. operating 250 million vehicles, the transition to BEVs will be too small and too slow to do either.

    From greenfuelsforecast via YouTube.

    Toyota believes the President’s goal of a million PHEVs by 2015 is “unrealistic.” Conservative auto industry analysts believe Detroit will sell no more than 100,000 PHEVs in that time span and even that level of sales will be due not to market factors but to unsustainable levels of federal subsidies.

    The question of how motivated to buy BEVs customers will be looms large. Most analysts admit there will be some deeply committed buyers for the Volt, as well as for other PHEVs and BEVs. They will be buying on ethical and/or environmental grounds. But many market-oriented analysts believe the bulk of buyers will only move when the cost of the car comes down and/or the cost of gas goes up.

    The Volt is expected to initially cost nearly $40,000. That’s a high price for a small, 4-passenger car. One market survey reportedly found the Volt doesn’t have much of a chance to sell at a mass market volume unless gas is close to $5/gallon.

    Does this look like a $40,000 car? (click to enlarge)

    The Obama administration will provide Volt buyers with a $7,500 tax credit but market analysts say that will not make the vehicle cost-competitive.

    The Disney World event drew other vehicles, including a hybrid electric car, a sampling of BEV and PHEV cars and trucks in the cue for the marketplace over the next 3-to-6 years, a natural gas-fueled car and a new generation of diesel gasoline vehicles. And next-generation ethanol, E-85 and biodiesel were popular topics.

    With last year’s rise in the pump price of gas, cleaner burning diesel cars and light trucks re-emerged and could triple to 9% of yearly new car sales by 2016. An environmental group named a diesel Volkswagen Jetta the 2009 Green Car of the Year. But as the economy comes back and gas prices start rising again, diesel’s popularity may wane.

    click for the full Kramer presentation

    COMMENTARY
    Hopes and dreams are what Disney World is all about. The car industry, not so much; the car industry is about steel and axle grease. And greenback dollars. The crucial question, in the words of the reporter who covered the Disney World event: How much is Tomorrowland and how much is Fantasyland?

    The Volt is a breakthrough, first-generation product. Rarely do such products succeed purely on their own. Typically, an entrepreneur must carry the product until it can adjust to the feedback it gets from its experience in the marketplace. Many products have died for lack of financing all the way through the process. The only way the Volt will get that financing is through the federal government.

    click for the full Kramer presentation

    If the federal government can subsidize a financial and environmental disaster like ethanol – and it is committed to do so until at least 2022 – there is no reason for it not to subsidize a good bet like the GM PHEV. There are those who would, however, point at the ethanol fiasco as ideal proof the government should not pick winners.

    BEVs will be especially challenged until the economy comes back and gas pump prices once again begin rising. Then the Volt’s extremely appealing fuel price advantage will drive interest.

    The Volt will use electricity at about the same rate as a refrigerator and cost about 2 cents/mile. A gas vehicle presently costs about 8-to-10 cents/mile and will get more expensive. The Volt will, therefore, save its average owner about $1,000/year.

    In addition, its ability to go 40 miles without drawing on its liquid fuel supply means that 75-to-80% of its owners will not have to use liquid fuel at all.

    Until gas prices go back up, the Obama administration appears committed to backing BEVs. There are $25 billion in production incentives and another $1 billion for battery improvements provided by the stimulus bill.

    click for the full Kramer presentation

    T. Boone Pickens is probably the world’s biggest compressed natural gas vehicle advocate but admits the large transport fleet will be the first to make the shift. He proposes the U.S. develop a “California” plan. California made it illegal for its trash hauling companies to buy new diesels and provided a $50,000 subsidy for the purchase of new trash trucks powered by compressed natural gas, a much cleaner-burning fuel than diesel. The state now has half its garbage trucks running on compressed natural gas.

    For the time being, compressed natural gas will serve truck fleets. (click to enlarge)

    QUOTES
    - Wesley Warre, Natural Resources Defense Council: “In just 100 days, President Obama has swung the door open on energy…”
    - Scott Gottlieb, fellow, American Enterprise Institute: “There’s going to be taxpayer subsidies one way or the other to make that fly…”
    - Obama Automotive Task Force report: “[The Volt] is projected to be much more expensive than its gasoline-fueled peers and will likely need substantial reductions in manufacturing cost in order to become commercially viable.”
    - General Wesley Clark, former Supreme Allied Commander of NATO and representative, pro-ethanol Growth Energy: “In the near term, ethanol is the closest thing we can do to reduce our reliance on foreign oil…”

    click for the full Kramer presentation

    - T. Boone Pickens, energy entrepreneur and compressed natural gas vehicle advocate: “It’s going to take a little time to get this thing going…”
    - Britta Gross, hydrogen/electrical infrastructure development manager, GM: “We need to be sure we get this right…”
    - Michael Omotoso, auto expert, J.D. Power & Associates: “We don’t expect [the Volt or other plug-ins to impact the U.S. vehicle sales] until the price comes down…We expect volume to be small.”

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home