NewEnergyNews: BET ON WIND IN 2010

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

Every day is Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • Holiday Weekend Reading: NEW ENERGY IN CHINA
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: INTEGRATING NEW ENERGY
  • QUICK NEWS, May 24: SO AFRICA TO BUILD A GIGAWATT OF WIND; LUCKY CORRIDOR FOR NEW MEXICO NEW ENERGY; MEGAWATT TEST OF CIGS THIN FILM
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE BENEFITS OF WIND AND SOLAR TOGETHER
  • QUICK NEWS, May 23: AN ‘UNPRECEDENTED’ MOVE TO NEW ENERGY; BRAINTRUST GOES AFTER SOLAR PRICE; INTERIOR APPROVES WIND ON INDIAN LAND
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: EUROPE’S PV TO 2016
  • QUICK NEWS, May 22: APPLE TURNS TO SUN; EU WIND CAN LEAD ECONOMIC RECOVERY; CHINA’S NEW GRID MAY ONLY MEET OLD NEEDS
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: BANKS ON COAL
  • QUICK NEWS, May 21: A FIGHT FOR SUN IN TEXAS; NRG LAYOFFS HERALD FADING PTC HOPES; WHAT WORRIES GRID OPERATORS MOST
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- CHINA STARTS WORLD’S BIGGEST TRANSMISSION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- SOLAR’S IMPACT ON GERMAN OCEAN WIND
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- INDIA WIND GETS A GOLDMAN SACHS BILLION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- HOW KOREA IS LIKE DENMARK
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Anne Butterfield (Huffington Post via New EnergyNews)

    Eventually those local moratoriums against fracking will expire in Boulder, Longmont and Erie. And residents will worry anew about toxic fracking operations inching up on schools and neighborhoods in pursuit of a product that goes "poof" the instant it's used. Nice value ~ not.

    And it's timely that the University of Colorado at Denver School of Public Health just announced a study which finds that air pollution within a half mile of frack-ops have toxic emissions five times over federal safety standards, causing elevated life time cancer risks and respiratory and neurological effects for nearby residents. Rep. Diana DeGette is now urging the Environmental Protection Agency to consider Colorado's study as they finalize air standards for fracking.

    It has also just come out that fracking is inching up on agriculture to compete for Colorado's water. Taking only .08 of a percent per year, it's a smidge for sure, but that water gets so polluted it must be disposed in a way that removes it from the hydrologic cycle. And that's not pretty when we're looking down the craw of a new drought kicked off with an historic climate change induced heat wave plus a horrifying wildfire this season.

    Permanently voiding precious Colorado water out of the hydrologic cycle feels even worse in view the fact such water can be lost for naught when the depletion rate on fracking wells is 63-85 percent in the first year, according to Dave Hughes of the Geological Survey of Canada. This can mean fruitless water waste when drilling down the slippery slope of diminishing marginal returns.

    But Colorado will need all the more gas, as the Clean Air Clean Jobs Act requires Xcel Eenrgy in Colorado to soon retire 900 megawatts of coal burning capacity. The act also requires that the natural gas used for recouping that coal-fired capacity comes from in state (see page 18 here). That puts upward pressure on fracking all over the state. This means more tangles between fracking and populated areas, and more permanent loss of precious Colorado water. It seems like Colorado may have backed itself into a box canyon, where residents are cornered with fracking risks to land, air, water and health.

    But there's an elegant pathway to reducing Colorado's need for natural gas -- by using the sun in a familiar technology that is at least two times more efficient than solar photovoltaics. It's good old fashioned solar thermal - those rooftop panels that heat water.

    Colorado could amend the CACJA to promote solar thermal as a jobs intensive domestic energy supply that works with natural gas to heat homes, buildings, water and industrial processes. This could free drilling companies to sell excess Colorado gas out of state for much higher prices (see page 8 here), possibly gaining crucial industry support for this intrusion of renewables into their market. Higher profitability, less contentious drilling and more renewable energy jobs is the hope.

    In all of North American, Colorado is "ground zero" for the best conditions for producing huge benefits from solar thermal. It's the sunshine, cold ground water, high heating loads, renewables-savvy population and existing industry that can, if the state takes on robust targets, lead the nation in an industry that swaps jobs and skills in place of burning money. And burning money is what we do when we burn costly fuels that go poof the instant they're used.

    A robust Colorado plan for solar thermal could put the clean air and clean jobs back into the so-called, gas-friendly Clean Air Clean Jobs Act.

    And in case anyone has forgotten ~ there are huge economic risks with shale gas, a.k.a. the fracking boom, as the resource is almost certainly not as profitable, resourceful or as clean as hyped by industry. On deeper review, it's promising to be an economic bubble.

    Fracking is supposedly going to make our nation 100 years of cheap gas, as, amnesiac members of Congress and the President are wont to say. But various geological experts such as the Potential Gas Committe have poured cold water all over that flaming hype, detailing how the supply could be as little as 21 or even 11 years. And Arthur Berman, a widely regarded petro-geologist has commented that the industry reminds him of the sub prime mortgage mess and wrote, "U.S. shale plays share many characteristics with the gold rushes.... Both phenomena result from extreme promotion. Anyone can join. Every participant believes that they will get rich. Great amounts of capital are destroyed as entrants try to get a position. The bonanza is exhausted sooner than most expected and few profit in the end."

    So if you are one of the thousands of Coloradans who are waking up to the nightmare of fracking in your community - go online and read the Colorado Solar Thermal Roadmap. Then find every political leader you can to talk about it. Colorado would be wise to use its natural solar resources to hedge against an over-reliance on gas, one that shall expand as the CACJA requires. And coal with its rising prices is on the wane nationwide as well, which means the demand for gas will be a pressure cooker loaded with risk for our energy security, economy, and environment.

    Author's note: Want to support my work? Please "fan" me at Huffpost Denver, here (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-butterfield). Thanks.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Thursday, June 11, 2009

    BET ON WIND IN 2010

    US Wind Power Markets and Strategies: 2009–2020
    May 2009 (Emerging Energy Research)

    SUMMARY
    The question is this: Can the U.S. wind industry sustain its unprecedented 4-year growth trend in spite of the economic downturn? If not, when will it come back?

    According to US Wind Power Markets and Strategies: 2009–2020 by Emerging Energy Research (EER), the latest numbers suggest the wind industry, though faring far better than other U.S. industries, will not sustain in 2009 the kind of growth it has seen for the last 4 years.

    From 2004 to 2006, the industry doubled its installed capacity and then, defying all likelihood, doubled its installed capacity again from 2006 to 2008.

    click to enlarge

    At the end of 2008, the U.S. had 25.5 gigawatts of total wind power capacity installed. 2008 was the industry’s biggest year of growth, with 8.5 gigawatts added.

    Overall, the industry has had a remarkable 40% compound annual growth rate since 2004, when relative certainty in federal regulatory policy began.

    But the 2008 economic downturn cut off the wind industry’s sources of financing. It lost most of its third-party tax equity investors, such as Lehman Brothers. What project debt financing remains comes at high interest rates that erode wind project rates of return. Growth has dramatically slowed.

    click to enlarge

    Prior to 2008, wind’s growth was largely based on monetizing the Production Tax Credit (PTC). After 2008 that was almost impossible. Recognizing the problem, the Obama Administration and the US Congress created a Treasury cash grant program in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) economic stimulus package.

    EER reports that favorable policies like the Treasury grant are generating a momentum in the industry, setting the stage for tremendous long-term growth once economic recovery takes hold and the financial sector is ready to let its liquidity once again flow.

    When that happens, according to EER, the wind industry can be expected to grow well into the next decade, driven by the new federal incentives, state Renewable Elecricity Standards (RESs) and a developing national transmission superhighway.

    EER’s estimates of near-term growth (2009 thru 2011) in 3 forecast scenarios vary by as much as 4 gigawatts because it is not yet possible to be sure about (1) the rate and efficiency of stimulus implementation, (2) the speed that liquidity will return to the wind project debt, equity, and tax equity markets, and (3) what the trends will be in the price of natural gas power generation.

    In all three forecast scenarios, 2011 is seen as the likely point at which growth from the stimulus bill’s Treasury cash grant will certainly have a noticeable impact. The Treasury cash grant applies to projects that start construction after the beginning of 2010 and go on line by the end of 2012. Many new wind projects will, therefore, likely begin construction in the second half of 2010 and be activated in 2011.

    click to enlarge

    COMMENTARY
    Proposed and enacted federal policy initiatives will be a foundation for long-term, stable US wind market growth. They include the pending national Renewable Electricity Standard (RES), the pending Waxman-Markey energy/climate legislation and the enacted but only just now becoming available benefits in the Stimulus Packages of late 2008 and early 2009.

    The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) economic stimulus package provides the Treasury grant option as an alternatitve to the PTC. The grant (1) eliminates the risk assumed by project owners using the PTC and (2) is directly relative to an eligible wind farm’s capital expenditures and indirectly proportional to a wind farm’s capacity or estimated production. For wind farms with relatively high capital costs and relatively low wind resources planned for construction in 2009, the new ARRA Treasury cash grant option offers an improved rate of return on investment.

    The wind industry will pick up when the Obama administration Treasury Department works through the details and processing and makes the grant money available. That probably means a temporary postponement of 2009 projects until 2010.

    click to enlarge

    Unfortunately, Treasury has no experience dispersing cash grants to energy projects. Bureaucratic red tape will slow the process down, especially because the ARRA gives little guidance on the grant’s implementation or disbursement. The Treasury Department currently expects to finalize the application process by June-July 2009, making early autumn 2009 the earliest the use of the monies is likely to be seen.

    Momentum will pick up in January of 2010 because eligible projects must have begun by the end of next year. Construction is expected, therefore, to be fast and furious in the 2010's second half.

    Other factors:

    (1) Some traditional financing from large institutions, through the PTC, has returned to the wind industry, underscoring the impression of the 2009 disruption as a temporary phenomenon resulting from the financial crisis.

    (2) The Waxman-Markey energy/climate bill now making its way through the House of Representatives and its counterpart in the Senate being sheparded by Senator Bingaman both provide for a national Renewable Electricity Standard (RES) requiring regulated utilities to obtain ~15% of their power from New Energy sources by 2020. Democratic Congressional leaders and the White House are driving for enactment of this legislation by December, though it could be blocked by a filibuster in the Senate. Either way, it cannot impact the wind industry in 2009 and will only reinforce a returning expansion in the 2010-11 period.

    (3) Competition and consolidation are expected to characterize the wind industry in 2009, with developers, independent power producers (IPPs) and utilities moving cautiously to survive the short-term recessionary circumstances. A company's access to capital and experience with building transmission will be sustaining factors.

    A wide range of companies, equally active in the U.S. wind market, remain capable of emerging as leaders. At the end of 2008, the top 25 U.S. wind industry asset owners owned 22.8 gigawatts of the total 25.5 gigawatts of installed capacity, ~89% of the total US wind. NextEra continued to lead the U.S. wind market, with 6.29 gigawatts of cumulative installed capacity and 1.22 gigawatts of 2008 installed capacity, but only 200 megawatts of capacity separated #12 Shell WindEnergy and #25 NRG Energy.

    click to enlarge

    (5) So far, the dominant survival strategy appears to be vertical integration. Successful IPPs are now supply-chain owners, developers and installation owner-operators. They tend to be backed by financial resources from a big utility or generation player and in-house national pipeline-building teams with expertise in permitting and siting.

    (6) 2008 changes in the supply chain reflected unequivocally (a) the shift of the wind industry to North America and (b) the growing scale of the North American wind industry. 99% of the supply chain in 2008 was dedicated to turbines larger than 1 megawatt. 27% went to turbines larger than 2 megawatts. 14 manufacturers opened or planned new North American supply chain facilities in the last year.

    (7)Though offshore wind is an increasingly important part of the European wind industry, offshore wind will account for no more than 3% of the U.S. market during the coming expansion.

    (8) 2008 expansion shifted from predominantly in Texas and California to the broader Midwest, Southwest and Pacific Northwest.

    (9) One additional uncertainty is the price of natural gas, wind’s main competition in the new generation arena. A protracted worldwide economic recession could suppress demand for natural gas, keeping prices low. This would lower the cost of gas-powered electricity in several important U.S. wind regions, leaving wind generation less competitive. Less investment capital would flow to it and there would be continued slow growth. But larger demographic trends make almost inevitable a rise in world energy demand, virtually guaranteeing the eventual return of wind's competitiveness.

    click to enlarge

    QUOTES
    - From the EER paper: “The United States wind energy market has been growing rapidly for the past four years, nearly doubling in cumulative installed capacity between 2004 and 2006, and more than doubling again between 2006 and 2008. This explosive growth is poised to continue into the next decade…To reach such levels of growth, however, the industry must first overcome the near-term negative impacts of the global financial crisis and the economic recession, which have sent shock waves through the US wind project development market in 2009. While the next one to two years may prove difficult to weather for US wind companies…accelerating policy momentum is setting the stage for tremendous long-term growth potential once liquidity returns to the financial sector and once the level of economic activity recovers.

    click to enlarge

    - From the EER paper: “By the end of 2008 approximately two-thirds of total US retail electricity sales were covered by existing state renewable portfolio standards (RPS), establishing a foundation upon which any federal renewable energy mandate may be considered. Momentum to enact a federal renewable energy
    mandate has been building quickly since the Obama Administration took office…If passed and enacted…[such legislation could] nearly triple what the current 28 state RPS mandates in aggregate will require by [2020]…Although much positive momentum exists in the Obama Administration and the US Congress for a federal RPS, it remains uncertain…In the current economic recession, many members of Congress have concerns that a federal RPS would result in higher retail electricity prices for consumers…In addition, utilities in the US Southeast region with relatively few indigenous renewable energy resources strongly oppose the proposal for a federal RPS, with any ultimate legislation likely to include provisions that placate this important lobby segment.”

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home