NewEnergyNews: THE NEW ENERGY ECONOMY MEANS BUSINESS

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

Every day is Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • Holiday Weekend Reading: NEW ENERGY IN CHINA
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: INTEGRATING NEW ENERGY
  • QUICK NEWS, May 24: SO AFRICA TO BUILD A GIGAWATT OF WIND; LUCKY CORRIDOR FOR NEW MEXICO NEW ENERGY; MEGAWATT TEST OF CIGS THIN FILM
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE BENEFITS OF WIND AND SOLAR TOGETHER
  • QUICK NEWS, May 23: AN ‘UNPRECEDENTED’ MOVE TO NEW ENERGY; BRAINTRUST GOES AFTER SOLAR PRICE; INTERIOR APPROVES WIND ON INDIAN LAND
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: EUROPE’S PV TO 2016
  • QUICK NEWS, May 22: APPLE TURNS TO SUN; EU WIND CAN LEAD ECONOMIC RECOVERY; CHINA’S NEW GRID MAY ONLY MEET OLD NEEDS
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: BANKS ON COAL
  • QUICK NEWS, May 21: A FIGHT FOR SUN IN TEXAS; NRG LAYOFFS HERALD FADING PTC HOPES; WHAT WORRIES GRID OPERATORS MOST
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- CHINA STARTS WORLD’S BIGGEST TRANSMISSION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- SOLAR’S IMPACT ON GERMAN OCEAN WIND
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- INDIA WIND GETS A GOLDMAN SACHS BILLION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- HOW KOREA IS LIKE DENMARK
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Anne Butterfield (Huffington Post via New EnergyNews)

    Eventually those local moratoriums against fracking will expire in Boulder, Longmont and Erie. And residents will worry anew about toxic fracking operations inching up on schools and neighborhoods in pursuit of a product that goes "poof" the instant it's used. Nice value ~ not.

    And it's timely that the University of Colorado at Denver School of Public Health just announced a study which finds that air pollution within a half mile of frack-ops have toxic emissions five times over federal safety standards, causing elevated life time cancer risks and respiratory and neurological effects for nearby residents. Rep. Diana DeGette is now urging the Environmental Protection Agency to consider Colorado's study as they finalize air standards for fracking.

    It has also just come out that fracking is inching up on agriculture to compete for Colorado's water. Taking only .08 of a percent per year, it's a smidge for sure, but that water gets so polluted it must be disposed in a way that removes it from the hydrologic cycle. And that's not pretty when we're looking down the craw of a new drought kicked off with an historic climate change induced heat wave plus a horrifying wildfire this season.

    Permanently voiding precious Colorado water out of the hydrologic cycle feels even worse in view the fact such water can be lost for naught when the depletion rate on fracking wells is 63-85 percent in the first year, according to Dave Hughes of the Geological Survey of Canada. This can mean fruitless water waste when drilling down the slippery slope of diminishing marginal returns.

    But Colorado will need all the more gas, as the Clean Air Clean Jobs Act requires Xcel Eenrgy in Colorado to soon retire 900 megawatts of coal burning capacity. The act also requires that the natural gas used for recouping that coal-fired capacity comes from in state (see page 18 here). That puts upward pressure on fracking all over the state. This means more tangles between fracking and populated areas, and more permanent loss of precious Colorado water. It seems like Colorado may have backed itself into a box canyon, where residents are cornered with fracking risks to land, air, water and health.

    But there's an elegant pathway to reducing Colorado's need for natural gas -- by using the sun in a familiar technology that is at least two times more efficient than solar photovoltaics. It's good old fashioned solar thermal - those rooftop panels that heat water.

    Colorado could amend the CACJA to promote solar thermal as a jobs intensive domestic energy supply that works with natural gas to heat homes, buildings, water and industrial processes. This could free drilling companies to sell excess Colorado gas out of state for much higher prices (see page 8 here), possibly gaining crucial industry support for this intrusion of renewables into their market. Higher profitability, less contentious drilling and more renewable energy jobs is the hope.

    In all of North American, Colorado is "ground zero" for the best conditions for producing huge benefits from solar thermal. It's the sunshine, cold ground water, high heating loads, renewables-savvy population and existing industry that can, if the state takes on robust targets, lead the nation in an industry that swaps jobs and skills in place of burning money. And burning money is what we do when we burn costly fuels that go poof the instant they're used.

    A robust Colorado plan for solar thermal could put the clean air and clean jobs back into the so-called, gas-friendly Clean Air Clean Jobs Act.

    And in case anyone has forgotten ~ there are huge economic risks with shale gas, a.k.a. the fracking boom, as the resource is almost certainly not as profitable, resourceful or as clean as hyped by industry. On deeper review, it's promising to be an economic bubble.

    Fracking is supposedly going to make our nation 100 years of cheap gas, as, amnesiac members of Congress and the President are wont to say. But various geological experts such as the Potential Gas Committe have poured cold water all over that flaming hype, detailing how the supply could be as little as 21 or even 11 years. And Arthur Berman, a widely regarded petro-geologist has commented that the industry reminds him of the sub prime mortgage mess and wrote, "U.S. shale plays share many characteristics with the gold rushes.... Both phenomena result from extreme promotion. Anyone can join. Every participant believes that they will get rich. Great amounts of capital are destroyed as entrants try to get a position. The bonanza is exhausted sooner than most expected and few profit in the end."

    So if you are one of the thousands of Coloradans who are waking up to the nightmare of fracking in your community - go online and read the Colorado Solar Thermal Roadmap. Then find every political leader you can to talk about it. Colorado would be wise to use its natural solar resources to hedge against an over-reliance on gas, one that shall expand as the CACJA requires. And coal with its rising prices is on the wane nationwide as well, which means the demand for gas will be a pressure cooker loaded with risk for our energy security, economy, and environment.

    Author's note: Want to support my work? Please "fan" me at Huffpost Denver, here (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-butterfield). Thanks.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Thursday, June 11, 2009

    THE NEW ENERGY ECONOMY MEANS BUSINESS

    Study: Jobs in fledgling green sector growing
    Chris Kahn and Sandy Shore (w/Tali Arbel), June 10, 2009 (AP)

    SUMMARY
    The Clean Energy Economy; Repowering Jobs, Businesses and Investments Across America from the Pew Charitable Trusts shows that the New Energy economy is growing and generating jobs in every state and at all skill and education levels. Continued growth is anticipated, especially as the result of supportive federal and state policies.

    From 1998 to 2007, New Energy economy jobs grew 9.1% nationally while economy-wide jobs grew only 3.7%.

    In 2007, 68,200+ New Energy businesses across all 50 states and the District of Columbia provided 770,000+ jobs, despite a decade of inadequate and intermittent policy support.

    click to enlarge

    The Pew report is based on privately collected data and took Pew researchers a year to accurately evaluate. They were cautious and conservative in defining what constituted a New Energy job. The largest proportion were in the category Pew calls Conservation and Pollution Mitigation. (Examples: environmental engineering firms, pollution specialists, etc.) The fastest growing New Energy job areas were Clean Energy, Energy Efficiency and Environmentally Friendly Production. (Examples: solar and wind energy industry workers, hybrid diesel bus makers, traffic monitoring software designers, liquid biofuels refiners, etc.)

    The private sector, seeing opportunity in New Energy, has been stoking the fires of growth for the last few years. Venture capital investment reached $1 billion in 2005 and was ~$12.6 billion by the end of 2008. In 2008, ~$5.9 billion went into U.S. New Energy business, a 48% increase over the preceding year.

    With the economic downturn, private sector investment has receded but the public sector now sees opportunity. Federal and state lawmakers are funding New Energy as a means of stimulating economic recovery while protecting the environment. States will be recipients of major American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds and every state offers some kind of New Energy financial incentive.

    click to enlarge

    California, Texas, Florida, and New York employ the most people in New Energy. The biggest New Energy job growth rates have been in Idaho, Nebraska, South Dakota and Wyoming. Michigan lost hundreds of thousands of manufacturing jobs but had a 10.7% increase in New Energy jobs from 1998 to 2007. Texas leads in wind and VC investment. Tennessee leads in recycling, waste treatment and water management jobs. 38 states and the District of Columbia had more New Energy job growth than total traditional job growth between 1998 and 2007.

    Not surprisingly, Pew predicts supportive policies will drive future New Energy job growth. Such policies include comprehensive energy plans, Renewable Electricity Standards (RESs), energy efficiency measures, alternative fuels standards, job retraining and waste reduction efforts.

    click to enlarge

    Pew's state data:

    46 states have tax incentives for New Energy or Energy Efficiency investment.

    33 states finance residential, commercial and industrial loans for buying New Energy or Energy Efficiency systems or equipment.

    22 states and D.C. offer rebates for solar water heating or solar panel systems.

    29 states and D.C. have RESs requiring regulated utilities to obtain a portion of their power from New Energy sources by a date certain.

    click to enlarge

    19 states have Energy Efficiency Resource Standards (EERSs) for energy generation, transmission and use.

    23 states participate in the 3major regional emissions reduction initiatives.

    14 states and D.C. (and 3 pending) have adopted the California vehicle emissions standard which President Obama established as the national standard last month.

    click to enlarge

    COMMENTARY
    According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, energy sector jobs generally grew faster than the economy in the last few years. From 2003 to 2009, coal industry jobs grew 16% and oil&gas industry jobs grew 28%. But those industries, a century or more old with well-established infrastructure and recruitment systems, would be expected to grow with growing energy demand. That New Energy expanded dramatically is indicative of a shift driven not by habit and momentum but by choice a rising clamor for better answers.

    The New Energy industries have weathered the economic downturn better than most others, significantly better than the fossil fuel industries. They have proven themselves sustainable. The New Energies have not yet achieved anything like the scale of the Old Energies but they are clearly where investment and growth are migrating. New Energy jobs do not necessarily have the pay or the benefits of union jobs, but they are emerging.

    click to enlarge

    Example: Biotechnology, which is essentially a brand new field, employed ~200,000 in 2007, ~0.1% of the economy. But the Old Energies (utilities, coal mining and oil&gas) employed only ~1.27 million workers total in 2007, ~1% of the economy’s jobs.

    Based on labor-intensive research and input from New Energy and job experts (including the report’s advisory panel), Pew came to a working definition for the jobs it counted: “A clean energy economy generates jobs, businesses and investments while expanding clean energy production, increasing energy efficiency, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, waste and pollution, and conserving water and other natural resources.”

    click to enlarge

    The Pew definition covers 5 categories: (1) Clean Energy; (2) Energy Efficiency; (3) Environmentally Friendly Production; (4) Conservation and Pollution Mitigation; and (5) Training and Support.

    Pew acknowledges that specific jobs, energies and industries will change but believes the categories will continue to apply.

    65% of New Energy jobs are presently in the Conservation and Pollution Mitigation category. But the Clean Energy, Energy Efficiency and Environmentally Friendly Production categories are growing much faster. ~80% of venture capital investments in 2008 were in Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency, implying that jobs and businesses in those categories will grow more over time as energy demand grows. Jobs in Conservation and Pollution Mitigation won’t disappear but will not grow.

    Federal policies change things. 1960s and 1970s laws helped develop the recycling, waste reduction and waste management industries.

    The EPA’s Energy Star and Water Sense certification and labeling initiatives changed consumers’ choices.

    Recent energy bills spurred the liquid vehicle fuel program and drove New Energy growth with tax credits. The most recent stimulus bill will do more.

    Enacted in February 2009, ARRA — the federal stimulus bill — includes an array of provisions. $85 billion in the package goes to energy- and transportation-related spending.

    click to enlarge

    $21 billion goes to extending tax incentives for wind, solar and other New Energies.

    $30+ billion goes to New Energy programs, including $11 billion to upgrade the national transmission grid, $2 billion for advanced battery technology, $6+ billion for state and local Energy Efficiency, $5 billion for weatherization of low-income homes, $500 million for New Energy job training and $300 million to buy new, fuel-efficient federal fleet vehicles from U.S. auto companies.

    Coming energy and climate legislation will do more still.

    click to enlarge

    QUOTES
    - Bob Mamo, former director of business development, Michigan auto parts supplier and present vice president of manufacturing, hydropower company Free Flow Power: "[The auto industry] just looked like it was going in the wrong direction…Green energy is definitely on the upswing. Green energy was what I was really after."
    - Kil Huh, director, Pew study: "Our numbers are probably conservative…If we couldn't identify as part of green energy, it wasn't part of our count… The explosive growth is really in clean energy..."

    click to enlarge

    - From the Pew report: “Like all other sectors, the clean energy economy has been hit by the recession, but investments in clean technology have fared far better in the past year than venture capital overall. Looking forward, the clean energy economy has tremendous potential for growth, as investments continue to flow from both the government and private sector and federal and state policy makers increasingly push for reforms that will both spur economic renewal and sustain the environment.”
    - From the Pew report: “Three quarters of a million jobs represent half a percent of all jobs in the United States today. But Pew’s research shows that between 1998 and 2007, clean energy economy jobs—a mix of white and blue-collar positions, from scientists and engineers to electricians, machinists and teachers—grew by 9.1 percent, while total jobs grew by only 3.7 percent. And although we expect job growth in the clean energy economy to have declined in 2008, experts predict the drop in this sector will be less severe than the drop in U.S. jobs overall.”


    - Nicholas Parker, executive chairman, Cleantech Group: “It’s important not to miss the forest for the trees…In 2008, there was a quantum leap in talent, resources and institutional appetite for clean technologies. Now, more than ever, clean technologies represent the biggest opportunities for job and wealth creation.”
    - 2007 National Governors Association report: “While our economic engine has for years been powered by relatively inexpensive energy, there is evidence that this era is coming to a close…Meanwhile, we are increasingly aware of the serious impacts of global climate change—and how America’s consumption of fossil fuels is contributing to a warming Earth.”

    2 Comments:

    At 12:48 PM, Blogger ECD Fan said...

    Wow! Somebody forgot to tell these people that the bubble has burst. I wonder what such studies were showing in late 2000, just after the dot com bubble had burst. Growth of 100%+ is my guess. By 2003, most of those "new" jobs were gone.

    Now, if US is successfull in devaluing the dollar to such an extent that oil shoots up back to $150 a gallon, then yes, a few "green" jobs may be created, but not for long - they will be soon crushed, together with the whole economy.

     
    At 7:09 AM, Blogger ECD Fan said...

    Sorry: $150 a barrel would suffice. But $150 a gallon will be even better!

     

    Post a Comment

    << Home