NewEnergyNews: WHAT CAN HAPPEN IN SUN AND WIND

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

Every day is Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • Holiday Weekend Reading: NEW ENERGY IN CHINA
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: INTEGRATING NEW ENERGY
  • QUICK NEWS, May 24: SO AFRICA TO BUILD A GIGAWATT OF WIND; LUCKY CORRIDOR FOR NEW MEXICO NEW ENERGY; MEGAWATT TEST OF CIGS THIN FILM
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE BENEFITS OF WIND AND SOLAR TOGETHER
  • QUICK NEWS, May 23: AN ‘UNPRECEDENTED’ MOVE TO NEW ENERGY; BRAINTRUST GOES AFTER SOLAR PRICE; INTERIOR APPROVES WIND ON INDIAN LAND
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: EUROPE’S PV TO 2016
  • QUICK NEWS, May 22: APPLE TURNS TO SUN; EU WIND CAN LEAD ECONOMIC RECOVERY; CHINA’S NEW GRID MAY ONLY MEET OLD NEEDS
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: BANKS ON COAL
  • QUICK NEWS, May 21: A FIGHT FOR SUN IN TEXAS; NRG LAYOFFS HERALD FADING PTC HOPES; WHAT WORRIES GRID OPERATORS MOST
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- CHINA STARTS WORLD’S BIGGEST TRANSMISSION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- SOLAR’S IMPACT ON GERMAN OCEAN WIND
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- INDIA WIND GETS A GOLDMAN SACHS BILLION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- HOW KOREA IS LIKE DENMARK
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Anne Butterfield (Huffington Post via New EnergyNews)

    Eventually those local moratoriums against fracking will expire in Boulder, Longmont and Erie. And residents will worry anew about toxic fracking operations inching up on schools and neighborhoods in pursuit of a product that goes "poof" the instant it's used. Nice value ~ not.

    And it's timely that the University of Colorado at Denver School of Public Health just announced a study which finds that air pollution within a half mile of frack-ops have toxic emissions five times over federal safety standards, causing elevated life time cancer risks and respiratory and neurological effects for nearby residents. Rep. Diana DeGette is now urging the Environmental Protection Agency to consider Colorado's study as they finalize air standards for fracking.

    It has also just come out that fracking is inching up on agriculture to compete for Colorado's water. Taking only .08 of a percent per year, it's a smidge for sure, but that water gets so polluted it must be disposed in a way that removes it from the hydrologic cycle. And that's not pretty when we're looking down the craw of a new drought kicked off with an historic climate change induced heat wave plus a horrifying wildfire this season.

    Permanently voiding precious Colorado water out of the hydrologic cycle feels even worse in view the fact such water can be lost for naught when the depletion rate on fracking wells is 63-85 percent in the first year, according to Dave Hughes of the Geological Survey of Canada. This can mean fruitless water waste when drilling down the slippery slope of diminishing marginal returns.

    But Colorado will need all the more gas, as the Clean Air Clean Jobs Act requires Xcel Eenrgy in Colorado to soon retire 900 megawatts of coal burning capacity. The act also requires that the natural gas used for recouping that coal-fired capacity comes from in state (see page 18 here). That puts upward pressure on fracking all over the state. This means more tangles between fracking and populated areas, and more permanent loss of precious Colorado water. It seems like Colorado may have backed itself into a box canyon, where residents are cornered with fracking risks to land, air, water and health.

    But there's an elegant pathway to reducing Colorado's need for natural gas -- by using the sun in a familiar technology that is at least two times more efficient than solar photovoltaics. It's good old fashioned solar thermal - those rooftop panels that heat water.

    Colorado could amend the CACJA to promote solar thermal as a jobs intensive domestic energy supply that works with natural gas to heat homes, buildings, water and industrial processes. This could free drilling companies to sell excess Colorado gas out of state for much higher prices (see page 8 here), possibly gaining crucial industry support for this intrusion of renewables into their market. Higher profitability, less contentious drilling and more renewable energy jobs is the hope.

    In all of North American, Colorado is "ground zero" for the best conditions for producing huge benefits from solar thermal. It's the sunshine, cold ground water, high heating loads, renewables-savvy population and existing industry that can, if the state takes on robust targets, lead the nation in an industry that swaps jobs and skills in place of burning money. And burning money is what we do when we burn costly fuels that go poof the instant they're used.

    A robust Colorado plan for solar thermal could put the clean air and clean jobs back into the so-called, gas-friendly Clean Air Clean Jobs Act.

    And in case anyone has forgotten ~ there are huge economic risks with shale gas, a.k.a. the fracking boom, as the resource is almost certainly not as profitable, resourceful or as clean as hyped by industry. On deeper review, it's promising to be an economic bubble.

    Fracking is supposedly going to make our nation 100 years of cheap gas, as, amnesiac members of Congress and the President are wont to say. But various geological experts such as the Potential Gas Committe have poured cold water all over that flaming hype, detailing how the supply could be as little as 21 or even 11 years. And Arthur Berman, a widely regarded petro-geologist has commented that the industry reminds him of the sub prime mortgage mess and wrote, "U.S. shale plays share many characteristics with the gold rushes.... Both phenomena result from extreme promotion. Anyone can join. Every participant believes that they will get rich. Great amounts of capital are destroyed as entrants try to get a position. The bonanza is exhausted sooner than most expected and few profit in the end."

    So if you are one of the thousands of Coloradans who are waking up to the nightmare of fracking in your community - go online and read the Colorado Solar Thermal Roadmap. Then find every political leader you can to talk about it. Colorado would be wise to use its natural solar resources to hedge against an over-reliance on gas, one that shall expand as the CACJA requires. And coal with its rising prices is on the wane nationwide as well, which means the demand for gas will be a pressure cooker loaded with risk for our energy security, economy, and environment.

    Author's note: Want to support my work? Please "fan" me at Huffpost Denver, here (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-butterfield). Thanks.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Thursday, June 25, 2009

    WHAT CAN HAPPEN IN SUN AND WIND

    Report Examines Potential Of Wind And Solar Electricity; New Policies Needed to Spur Significant Growth in Wind, Solar in U.S.
    June 23, 2009 (Pew Center on Global Climate Change)

    SUMMARY
    Wind and Solar Electricity: Challenges and Opportunities, a new report from the Pew Center on Global Climate Change authored by Dr. Paul Komor of the University of Colorado at Boulder, examines the urgent need for the New Energies (especially wind and solar power) and the obstacles that must be overcome to transition to them. The report breaks little new ground and is quite conservative in its calculations, yet cannot avoid reporting that the New Energies can be and likely will be crucial to a hopeful future.

    The starting place: Electricity production generates a third of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions (GhGs). In the absence of measures reducing U.S. GhGs, climate change impacts could be severe, even crippling or disasterous, and certainly will be very costly.

    New Energies, excluding hydroelectric power, provide only 2% of U.S. electricity and have the potential to provide much more electricity and reverse the impending impacts of climate change.

    click to enlarge

    There are 3 major barriers to the New Energies becoming a greater part of the U.S. electricity generation mix: the higher costs of solar and wind generated electricity, insufficient transmission to deliver the electricity from the remote areas where it tends to be most plentiful to the population centers where it is most in demand, and the management of intermittency in the wind and solar energy potentials for electricity output.

    Policies can drive changes that will bring these barriers down. In the absence of such policies, New Energy could be as little as 8% of U.S. power generation in 2030.

    A national Renewable Electricity Standard (RES) requiring regulated utilities to obtain 20% of their electricity from New Energy sources by 2030 would drive development by necessitating increased manufacturing capacity and deployment. No new technology would be necessary. It would likely force spending on new transmission and result in technology advancements like new storage strategies.

    click to enlarge

    Pew predicts that the costs of meeting a national RES obligation would add 4-to-6% to the price of wind energy-generated electricity. The necessary transmission to meet a national RES obligation would add 20% to the price of wind energy-generated electricity. These costs would boost the price of wind energy-generated electricity higher than the cost of natural gas-generated electricity, though it would remain less expensive than the cost of electricity generated by a new nuclear plant or a new coal plant equipped with a (hypothetical) carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) capability.

    Any legislation establishing a cost for the GhGs generated by burning fossil fuels, which now is paid by the public (in the form of things like health care costs and climate change mitigations), would make even natural gas-generated electricity more expensive than wind energy-generated electricity.

    Solar energy-generated electricity will remain more expensive longer. Solar power plant (SPP) technology will likely achieve a large enough volume to bring costs down to a competitive level before PV solar will do so.

    click to enlarge

    COMMENTARY
    Wind energy is at present cost competitive with natural gas, especially when Congress provides reasonable subsidies (like the production tax credit) and when the fluctuating price of natural gas rises (as it is expected to over the coming decades of high energy demand).

    Solar energy-generated electricity, both from photovoltaic (PV) and solar power plant (SPP) sources is more expensive. Subsidies like the investment tax credit will help bring it down. Improvements in the technologies will help further. Significant market penetration will come when economies of scale are achieved and costs approach parity with the costs of fossil fuel electricity generation sources.

    Among the most important technology breakthroughs needed for solar energy are improvements in PV cell production methods that facilitate high-volume, low-cost PV manufacturing.

    click to enlarge

    The extraordinary abundance and omnipresence of the sun’s light and heat mean that when solar energy achieves price parity it will revolutionize electricity.

    The abundance of wind and the great potential for economy-wide Energy Efficiency implementations means there will not, in the short term, be adequate emphasis on solar energy to drive innovation and create the economies of scale that would drive the cost of solar energy-generated electricity down to competitive levels soon.

    The places where wind is most abundant and most readily harvested are (mostly) far from population centers where demand is expected to grow. For wind to make a larger contribution to U.S. power generation, new transmission infrastructure will be essential.

    click to enlarge

    New transmission costs $2-to-$4 million per mile. Regulatory obstacles and Not-In-My-BackYard (NIMBY) objections make new transmission very difficult to site. There are, however, potential solutions. Innovative financing that include new opportunities to entrepreneurs, electricity consumers and landowners could easily resolve the cost obstacle. Breakthroughs in storage could reduce the need for transmission. Streamlined regulation, especially in the areas of state and federal planning and siting guidelines, could speed infrastructure development.

    The intermittency of wind and solar require grid operators to learn how to integrate and manage energy sources without compromising system reliability by using a 3-part strategy: (1) Flexibility in power plants, with ready source-switching capacity and contractual arrangements for varying energy sources and electricity supplies; (2) Flexibility to manage demand, with demand response capability; and (3) Electricity storage and the ability to integrate stored electricity.

    click to enlarge

    QUOTES
    - Eileen Claussen, President, Pew Center on Global Climate Change. “Wind and solar power are two of our most promising renewable energy technologies, but without a price on carbon – they will face significant barriers to widespread market penetration…Acting now to regulate carbon through a cap-and-trade system and changing the way we plan and manage our electricity grid can help to make these cleaner energy sources a more significant part of the climate solution.”
    - From the Pew report’s conclusion: “Renewables currently play a small but growing role in the U.S. electricity system. However, legislation now under consideration, such as a national renewable portfolio standard…and GHG cap-and-trade program, could lead to a significantly larger role for renewable electricity. Wind and solar could play a larger role, as wind and solar resources are plentiful and wind and solar technologies are commercially available…”

    click to enlarge

    - From the Pew report’s conclusion: “There appears to be no fundament technical, resource, or manufacturing barrier to achieving roughly 20 percent wind by 2030. While uncertain, the available evidence suggests the costs for doing so are not enormous…Solar, in contrast, has quite high first costs, and adding variability and new transmission costs makes solar not economically competitive at current prices. Significant cost reductions in solar, however, could bring costs down to where solar could play a role in meeting future electricity needs.”

    2 Comments:

    At 11:59 AM, Blogger ECD Fan said...

    Look at this spreadsheet:

    http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/excel/figure_6data.xls

    World electricity generation is 20 trillion KWHs, of which renewables (basically, hydro) is 4 trillion KWHs. Now, let's say cumulative PV installed capacity is 15GWs. Those 15GWs, working only during the day, generate about 15 billion KWHs a year, or 0.015 trillion KWHs. Thus, solar electricity generation is just 0.4% of the renewables electricity generation. Not surprising, given that PV is a very expensive way of generating electricity as PV is nowhere near grid parity today.

    The countries (and their citizens) who do not see through the great swindle will pay the price of high electricity costs and slower "natural" economic growth. Germany is a prime example.

     
    At 11:08 PM, Blogger kerena said...

    Hi,

    We have just added your latest post "WHAT CAN HAPPEN IN SUN AND WIND " to our Directory of Environment . You can check the inclusion of the post here . We are delighted to invite you to submit all your future posts to the directory for getting a huge base of visitors to your website and gaining a valuable backlink to your site.


    Warm Regards

    greenatmos.com Team

    http://www.greenatmos.com

     

    Post a Comment

    << Home