NewEnergyNews: THE HAPPENINGS IN HYDROKINETIC ENERGY

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

NewEnergyNews was interviewed recently on NPR-affiliate KPCC’s Off-Ramp (hosted by John Rabe). Listen at Solar Power for the People?

YESTERDAY

  • HEADLINE: THE POWER OF WIND AND SOLAR TOGETHER
  • MORE NEWS, 11-19: BUILDING EMISSIONS IS BIG BIZ; GEOTHERMAL BREAKS NEW GROUND; BIG TEST FOR TIDAL TECH; ECONOMY SLOWS BUT NOT EMISSIONS
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • HEADLINE: 1.9 MILLION JOBS IN NEW ENERGY
  • MORE NEWS, 11-18: THE CHINA CHALLENGE IN SUN AND WIND; CHINA’S BIG AZ SUN PLANS; CHINA BUILDS U.S. WIND; A REVIEW OF U.S. ENERGY SUBSIDIES
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • HEADLINE: CAP&TRADE IS GOOD FOR THE FARMERS – STUDY
  • MORE NEWS, 11-17: UK BIZ WANTS PEAK OIL REVIEW; OBAMA ENERGY DEPT BOOSTS ALGAE BIOFUELS; SOLAR SHINGLE NAMED BEST INVENTION; EXOTIC PIEZO BREAKTHROUGH
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • HEADLINE: THE GOOD THING ABOUT THE RECESSION (IF YOU WANT SOLAR ENERGY)
  • MORE NEWS, 11-16: MORE WIND IS EASY; GAS VS. NEW ENERGY IN CA; AIR FORCE TO BUILD NEW ENERGY LAB; TAKE WIND TO WORK AND HOME
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • SUNDAY WORLD- JAPAN SURGES IN RACE FOR SPACE-BASED SUN
  • SUNDAY WORLD- WIND ON SALE IN BRAZIL
  • SUNDAY WORLD- INDIA TO MEET THE CHINA SUN CHALLENGE
  • SUNDAY WORLD- AUSTRALIA INVESTS IN WAVES
  • SUNDAY WORLD- BULGARIAN WIND BOOM
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • Saturday Video: The Ultimate Climate Change Debate
  • Saturday Video: Collapse, The Movie
  • Saturday Video: Song For The Universe
  • --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of DAILY CAMERA, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

    -------------------

  • The wind for new energy is stiffening
  • Anne B. Butterfield, October 26, 2009 (NewEnergyNews)

    In Colorado, we're at the leading edge of a clean-energy revolution… We've created a model strategy for every state in the country to follow. We've built a template for a comprehensive national strategy that marries energy policy with climate policy….

    On the beautiful and gusty Monday, October 19, Governor Ritter appeared in Boulder at the wind site of the National Renewable Energy Laboratories to celebrate the commissioning of the new Siemens 2.3 megawatt wind turbine, installed as a test facility in our nation’s largest government-industry cooperative venture for wind energy.

    At over 40 stories high and moving gently with the wind, the turbine seemed natural in its setting, a giant redwood of the plains or a leviathan of the air. Its grandeur was cited by most of the dignitaries as a sign of Colorado’s accomplishments in the renewable energy field.

    But Henry Kelly, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Department of Energy, warned of the magnitude of our nation’s energy predicament in which we to seek to reduce our emissions by 80 percent by 2050, saying, “We will need to be incredibly bold and audacious. And even to reach 20 percent wind power by 2030, we will need to learn a lot.” Looking every bit the bureaucrat in his white shirt with dark tie and suit, Kelly used language you’d expect from a race car driver: “One would generally wish a fair wind at the back of a new venture such as this, but in these times this test turbine should face winds that rip at its foundation, torture its blades and baffle its controls.”

    On the next day at Colorado’s New Energy Economy Conference, the Governor did not mention that there was any test of character in store for people and commerce, but instead he kept to sunny superlatives: In Colorado, we're at the leading edge of a clean-energy revolution… We've created a model strategy for every state in the country to follow. We've built a template for a comprehensive national strategy that marries energy policy with climate policy…

    In spite of the Governor’s enthusiasm there was a slightly suppressed feeling to the conference, as if everyone was going through the motions. In none of the sessions did anyone mention the elephant in the middle of Colorado’s New Energy Economy: Comanche3, the 750 megawatt new coal plant coming online perhaps as soon as next month.

    To capture this travesty, one needs Henry Kelly’s way with metaphor: Comanche 3 is not just the elephant stomping on the Governor’s New Energy Economy, it’s also the proverbial white elephant, that gift from Hindu lore that’s part sacred cow and part trophy wife to make the perfect gift that keeps on taking.

    We don’t need it. Comanche 3’s energy in the first years of operation will be excess capacity through 2015, as much as 500 megawatts above the 16 percent margin, according to Xcel’s formal notice to the Public Utilities Commission in early 2009.

    Still, we Xcel ratepayers of Colorado will have to feed that white elephant through elevated base and fuel charges (known as the ECA on your bill), even customers having 100 percent subscription to Windsource. This was explained last week at the Meadows Library by Steve Mudd, Manager for Windsource.

    Meanwhile, by Xcel’s own numbers the cost of newly installed renewable energy, particularly a “wind heavy” mix as analyzed in the 2009 “All Source Solicitation 120-Day Report”, is forecast to bring real savings to Xcel’s service as soon as 2013.

    Still, with the logic of shopaholics , Xcel and Governor Ritter continue to defend Comanche 3’s contribution as “low cost energy”.

    It just so happens the National Academy of Sciences doesn’t agree with this “low cost” notion in its book-length study just released: “Hidden Costs of Energy: Unpriced Consequences of Energy Production and Use”. It sums up the unpaid costs of fossil fuels at about $120 billion per year.

    Shouldering an extra $120 billion every year can add up to real money – exactly the kind that has been breaking our nation’s health care system and state and federal budgets. The costs the NAS report finds are mostly health related.

    Henry Kelly got it. We are facing a wind that is ripping at our foundations and baffling our controls. The process is well underway.

    Full disclosure; Anne Butterfield’s husband is the Chief Engineer for NREL’s wind program and was instrumental in bringing Siemens’ test program to Colorado. Email her: annebbutterfield@yahoo.com

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • The wind for new energy is stiffening (October 26, 2009)
  • Necessary but not sufficient (October 14, 2009)
  • Tort reform: Go big, Obama! (September 14, 2009)
  • Xcel takes aim at Boulder’s solar (July 27, 2009)
  • Selfishly seeking clean energy (July 12, 2009)
  • The big ka-ching in our health care wallet (June 19, 2009)
  • It takes a Governor (May 24, 2009)
  • Want a job? Think Wind. (May 10, 2009)
  • Just Say No to Xcess Energy (April 28, 2009)
  • NREL’s history of fickle funding (April 12, 2009)
  • Wagons firmly circled: Governance at REA’s and Tri-State (March 26, 2009)
  • A new migratory pattern: Colorado youth go to Washington (March 12, 2009)
  • Even coal is in for a revolution (February 22, 2009)
  • High Flyers and the Commons (February 11, 2009)
  • Come on Baby, Sit by Me (January 25, 2009)
  • A return on investment (January 3, 2009)
  • Mr. Secretary, we're watching you (December 28, 2008)
  • Canary in the Coal Mine (December 13, 2008)
  • Crash test dummies (November 16, 2008)
  • Needless markup (November 2, 2008)
  • The flap about 58 (October 19, 2008)
  • Hip towns and a clever measure (October 7, 2008)
  • Are we afraid of change? Still? (September 21, 2008)
  • Cheney in a chignon (September 7, 2008)
  • Don't tick off the blonde (August 10, 2008)
  • Buying us time on global warming (July 27, 2008)
  • Hint from Heloise - It's the pH, Stupid! (July 13, 2008)
  • Nukes: the position ridiculous and the expense damnable (June 29, 2008)

    -------------------

    Name: Herman K. Trabish
    Location: La Crescenta, CA

    *Doctor with my hands *Author of the "OIL IN THEIR BLOOD" series with my head *Student of New Energy with my heart

    -------------------

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • -------------------
  • Wednesday, July 08, 2009

    THE HAPPENINGS IN HYDROKINETIC ENERGY

    How to Invest in Ocean Wave and Hyrdopower Sustainable Energy
    James Rickman, June 8, 2009 (Seeking Alpha)

    SUMMARY
    Hydro = water. Kinetics = motion. Hydrokinetics = the motion of water. Hydrokinetic energy = energy from the motion of water.

    The ocean is the biggest solar system in the world, transforming surface heat into deeper cold. It translates the planetary force of the moon into tides. And it is the biggest wind energy system in the world, transforming winds into waves. The mechanical force of waves can be captured and transformed into electricity, as can the mechanical force of the tides and the temperature differential between the ocean surface and the ocean’s depths.

    Nevertheless, there are fewer than 12 megawatts of installed ocean energy capacity in the world.

    A series of reports to the the International Energy Agency (IEA) in the first half of 2009 summarize the state of Ocean Energy Systems (OES) development worldwide. The reports include (2) The International Energy Agency Implementing Agreement on Ocean Energy Systems 2008 Annual Report, (2) Ocean Energy: Global Technology Development Status, (3) Potential opportunities and differences associated with integration of ocean wave and marine current energy plants, in comparison to wind energy and (4) Key features and identification of improvement needs to the existing relevant interconnection guidelines for facilitating integration of ocean energy pilot projects.

    click to enlarge

    Worldwide research and development of ocean energies is expected to reach $2 billion over the next 3 years, driving the installation of prototypes and pilot projects around the world.

    Tidal energies are present at coastlines around the world and considered highly accessible for energy capture. The turbines to harvest tidal energy are frequently described as very like wind turbines placed in any strong tidal flow. The only obstacle to success so far has been turbine sturdiness.

    Because the flow of water is calculated to be 800 times denser than the flow of wind, ocean and tidal energy turbines have to be heavier and more expensive but can capture more energy for the effort and cost.

    click to enlarge

    Wave energy is even more widespread than tidal energy and represents even greater potential. On the energy-rich Pacific Northwest coast of the U.S., waves could generate 40–70 kilowatts (kW) of electricity per meter (3.3 feet) of coastline. Worldwide, analysts believe there is enough wave energy to generate 2 terawatts (2 trillion watts) of electricity.

    The biggest obstacle, at present, to wave energy development is its many, many competitive technologies. Without a single agreed-on technology (like wind energy’s 3-blade turbine) or technologies (like the solar industry’s few competing versions of solar panels and its handful of competing solar power plant designs), there can be no directed incentives, no production technologies at utility scale, no volume to bring costs down.

    Right now, the best UK wave energy technology in place is producing power at something like 6.7 cents per kilowatt-hour.

    Settling on a set of technologies, moving them toward efficient performance and building them in commercial quantities to develop economies of scale would, it is estimated, bring the cost of wave energy-generated electricity down near the cost of wind power-generated electricity, ~4.5 cents per kilowatt-hour.

    click to enlarge

    Big coal plants, already built and operating on the expense basis of the last generation of energy sources, produce electricity at ~2.6 cents per kilowatt-hour (according to some estimates). New coal plants cannot be built at costs allowing for electricity to be generated that cheaply and few new coal plants are, in fact, being licensed in industrial nations because governments are holding off in the empty hope of a breakthrough in “clean” coal technology.

    New natural gas plants, the biggest source of new power generation in the U.S. and most developed countries, can get costs down to ~3 cents per kilowatt hour but it is usually closer to 5 cents per kilowatt-hour and higher.

    And the cost of electricity from both coal and natural gas will rise as the price on greenhouse gas emissions rises, as it inevitably will when society begins charging fossil fuels for the harm they do. That is why there is so much interest in the New Energies in general and in the hydrokinetic energies in particular.

    The U.S., Brazil, Scotland, Germany, Portugal, Canada and France are all aggressively developing wave energy projects. The expectation is of 30+% growth over the next 5 years.

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) recently awarded $18+ million in grants for Advanced Water Power Projects in 3 categories, (1) Technology Development, (2) Market Acceleration and (3) National Marine Energy Centers. This significant public investment should contribute to the technologies' maturation.

    click to enlarge

    COMMENTARY
    The DOE grants went to the outstanding names in ocean energy. It is likely the names on the DOE grant list will be the companies that will lead in the field.

    For Technology Development, awards of up to $600,000 over up to 2 years, went to:
    (1) Electric Power Research Institute, Inc, (EPRI) for fish-friendly hydropower turbine development & deployment.
    (2) Verdant Power Inc., for improved structure and fabrication of large, high-power kinetic hydropower systems rotors.
    (3) Public Utility District #1 of Snohomish County (SnoPUD), for a Puget Sound tidal energy in-water testing and development project.
    (4) Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) for in-water testing and development of the WaveConnect Wave Energy Project.
    (5) Concepts ETI, Inc, for the development and demonstration of an Ocean Wave Converter (OWC) power system.
    (6) Lockheed Martin Corporation for an advanced composite Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) cold water pipe validation test project.

    click to enlarge

    For Market Acceleration, awards of up to $500,000 went to:
    (1) EPRI, for wave energy resource assessment and GIS database development for the U.S.
    (2) Georgia Tech Research Corporation, for the assessment of energy production potential from tidal streams in the U.S.
    (3) Re Vision Consulting, LLC, for the study of best siting practices for marine and hydrokinetic technologies with respect to environmental and navigational impacts.
    (4) Pacific Energy Ventures, LLC, for the writing of siting protocols for marine and hydrokinetic energy projects.
    (5) PCCI, Inc., for the identification of potential navigational impacts and mitigation measures of marine and hydrokinetic renewable energy technologies.
    (6) Science Applications International Corporation, for international standards development for marine and hydrokinetic renewable energy.

    click to enlarge

    For National Marine Energy Centers, awards of up to $1.25 million over up to 5 years, went to:
    (1) Oregon State University, and University of Washington - Northwest National Marine Renewable Energy Center, to further develop the Northwest National Marine Renewable Energy Center with a full range of capabilities to support wave and tidal energy development in the U.S.
    (2) University of Hawaii National Renewable Marine Energy Center to further facilitate the development and implementation of commercial wave energy systems and to assist the private sector in moving ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC) systems beyond proof-of-concept to pre-commercial long-term testing.

    There are companies that come up repeatedly in every summary of ocean energy technology. They are the companies to watch:

    (1) Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E). Its troubled Finavera Renewables AquaBouy 2.0 wave energy installation in Northern California could eventually be the first working U.S. project, perhaps in 2010.
    (2) Siemens AG. Voith Siemens Hydro Power Generation owns Wavegen, Scotland's first wave power company. Wavegen is an oscillating water column (OWC) which, as a stable device near the shoreline, has to take less punishment from the harsh ocean environment. A small device is already connected to Scotland’s grid and they are planning another for Northern Spain.
    (3) Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. OPT's PowerBuoy is used to supply wave energy-generated electricity. Iberdrola is paying for a PowerBuoy station off Santona, Spain, is talking with French oil major Total about a project off the French coast and is developing plans for England, Scotland, Hawaii, and Oregon.
    (4) Pelamis Wave Power, formerly known as Ocean Power Delivery. A groundbreaking Scottish technology, Pelamis has won funding from General Electric Energy and Norsk Hydro, among others, and is being watched by Chevron. Pelamis Wave Power may put Scotland at the forefront of Europe's New Energy sector.

    click to enlarge

    (5) Endesa SA ADS. Endesa is the Spanish electric utility that partnered with Pelamis, the world’s first full scale commercial wave power installation off Aguçadoura, Portugal. Though the first phase failed in the harsh ocean conditions and was towed ashore last fall, a second phase could be as big as 20+ megawatts and change the wave energy game.
    (6) RWE AG ADR. A German management holding company, RWE has 6 power and energy divisions and is developing wave power stations in Siadar Bay on the Isle of Lewis off the coast of Scotland.
    (7) Oceanlinx. Its oscillating wave column design has been funded by RWE and it is planning projects in Australia, the U.S., South Africa, Mexico, and Britain.
    (7) Alstom. In a sign of things to come, the multinational power and utility giant has begun developing wave and tidal projects.

    click to enlarge

    The Future of Ocean Energy:
    - Tidal technologies are on the verge of maturity.
    - River current energy pilot projects are proceeding successfully but ocean current pilot projects have been defeated by the elements.
    - Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) projects are purely experimental.
    - The potential of wave energy is impressive.
    - There are potential wave energy development sites worldwide.
    - Site selection will be one key for wave energy: (1) Enviromental impacts, thought to be benign, remain unsettled and will slow development. (2) The fishery industries must be accommodated. (3) Ocean recreation must be accommodated. (4) Shipping and Naval concerns must be addressed.
    - Cost competitiveness is in doubt and will remain in doubt until the technology matures.
    - To mature, ocean energy technology must prove sturdy enough to endure the intensely harsh ocean environment.
    - Environmental hardening must be done cost competitively and the technology maturation that is necessary for cost competitiveness has not been achieved.
    - Once built, operation and maintenance costs of adequately sturdy devices will be low and fuel will be – FREE.

    click to enlarge

    QUOTES
    - Gary Shanahan, Deputy Director, Severn Tidal Power: “There are a number of technologies that can be used to generate power from the tidal range – the difference between high and low tides – of an estuary, bay or river. When the water level outside the impoundment changes relative to the water level inside, the head created enables the production of power from turbines…The most well understood technology is a tidal barrage in which a barrage spans the estuary, bay or river, which can then be considered in a similar way to a hydroelectric dam. Other technologies that are being considered for exploitation of energy from a tidal range are tidal lagoons, tidal fences and tidal reefs…”

    click to enlarge

    - Stated vision of the IEA-OES: “To realise, by 2020, the use of cost-competitive, environmentally sound ocean energy on a sustainable basis to provide a significant contribution to meeting future energy demands.”
    - Stated mission of the IEA-OES: “To facilitate and co-ordinate ocean energy research, development and demonstration through international co-operation and information exchange, leading to the deployment and commercialisation of sustainable, efficient, reliable, cost-competitive and environmentally sound ocean energy technologies.
    - From the Introduction to Ocean Energy: Global Technology Development Status: “The energy in the ocean waves is a form of concentrated solar energy that is transferred through complex wind-wave interactions. The effects of earth’s temperature variation due to solar heating, combined with a multitude of atmospheric phenomena, generate wind currents in global scale. Ocean wave generation, propagation and direction are directly related to these wind currents. On the other hand, ocean tides are cyclic variations in seawater elevation and flow velocity as a direct result of the earth’s motion with respect to the moon and the sun and the interaction of their gravitational forces. A number of phenomena relating to earth rotational tilt, rate of spinning, and interaction among gravitational and rotational forces cause the tide conditions to vary significantly over time. Tide conditions are more apparent in coastal areas where constrained channels augment the water flow and increase the energy density. The forms of ocean renewable sources can be broadly categorized into: (a) Tides (b) Wave (c) Marine Current (d) Temperature Gradient, and (e) Salinity Gradient…”

    1 Comments:

    At 11:55 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

    I have invented (patent pending) a radical new blade design of underwater and wind
    horizontal axis turbines.

    At http://www.b2b.bg/jettidalturbines.html
    You can download and see videos of animations and scaled lab models in operation.

    If you interested in my JET blade design, please contact me.

    George Tonchev
    www.tonchev.org

     

    Post a Comment

    << Home