NewEnergyNews: MORE NEWS, 7-13 (U.S. TAXPAYERS INVEST $3 BIL IN NEW ENERGY; WIND, WAVE & TIDAL REPLACE WHALING; BIOFUELS TRADE WAR BREWING)

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

NewEnergyNews was interviewed recently on NPR-affiliate KPCC’s Off-Ramp (hosted by John Rabe). Listen at Solar Power for the People?

YESTERDAY

  • Saturday Video: This Is It!
  • Saturday Video: Coal – Don’t Pick It Up
  • Saturday Video: The Cap&Trade Controversy
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

    THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT FRIDAY, 11-20:

  • TTTA Friday- OIL NOT PEAKING…
  • TTTA Friday-…OR IS IT?
  • TTTA Friday- THE REAL ANSWER: ELECTRIC TRANSPORT
  • TTTA Friday- CAP&TRADE – TOXIC OR TERRIFIC (1)?
  • TTTA Friday- CAP&TRADE – TOXIC OR TERRIFIC (2)?
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • HEADLINE: THE POWER OF WIND AND SOLAR TOGETHER
  • MORE NEWS, 11-19: BUILDING EMISSIONS IS BIG BIZ; GEOTHERMAL BREAKS NEW GROUND; BIG TEST FOR TIDAL TECH; ECONOMY SLOWS BUT NOT EMISSIONS
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • HEADLINE: 1.9 MILLION JOBS IN NEW ENERGY
  • MORE NEWS, 11-18: THE CHINA CHALLENGE IN SUN AND WIND; CHINA’S BIG AZ SUN PLANS; CHINA BUILDS U.S. WIND; A REVIEW OF U.S. ENERGY SUBSIDIES
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • HEADLINE: CAP&TRADE IS GOOD FOR THE FARMERS – STUDY
  • MORE NEWS, 11-17: UK BIZ WANTS PEAK OIL REVIEW; OBAMA ENERGY DEPT BOOSTS ALGAE BIOFUELS; SOLAR SHINGLE NAMED BEST INVENTION; EXOTIC PIEZO BREAKTHROUGH
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • HEADLINE: THE GOOD THING ABOUT THE RECESSION (IF YOU WANT SOLAR ENERGY)
  • MORE NEWS, 11-16: MORE WIND IS EASY; GAS VS. NEW ENERGY IN CA; AIR FORCE TO BUILD NEW ENERGY LAB; TAKE WIND TO WORK AND HOME
  • --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of DAILY CAMERA, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

    -------------------

  • Boulder Start-up to Profit on Atmospheric CO2 in Manufacturing
  • Anne B. Butterfield, November 11, 2009 (NewEnergyNews)

    Everyone loves chemistry; it's the difference between Pero and real coffee, Morton's and sea salt. It's the magic between Tracy and Hepburn.

    But on the larger scale, we take chemistry for granted and it's killing us. The earth has an insidious chemical change going on throughout vast majority of its surface area where the oceans meet, belly to belly, with the sky. Our skies, now laden with unusually high and accelerating levels of carbon dioxide, are tainting our oceans with carbonic acid in a process called acidification. It's a reaction we learned about in high school chemistry class, so there's no real debate about it. And some forms of sea life are already beginning to falter.

    In the Monaco Declaration, marine scientists revealed that in as little as four decades our oceans may be too acidic to support the formation of shells, or even the plankton and corals on which our oceans' food webs rely.

    Our problem with burning fossil fuels really is the carbon dioxide, not just the climate havoc it creates, and this harm cannot be mitigated by much ballyhooed notions of geo-engineering.

    Now, aren't you ready for a little good news?

    How about a plan to reduce atmospheric CO2 at industrial scale in a safe and economically attractive scheme? At New Sky Energy, a new start-up here in Boulder, a Fairview High graduate named Deane Little has developed a technology for converting waste salt (from agricultural runoff or flue gas desulfurization), processing it with water electrolysis to yield oxygen, hydrogen, a strong acid and a strong base. That last one is the key -- the base naturally attracts CO2 out of the air and traps it in crystals which can be used as high-value filler for countless common products like glass, plastics, dry wall, bricks, asphalt and concrete. Those crystals can make products which are up to 40 percent stored CO2.

    NewSky's CO2 collection comes with the production of four marketable products. The sale of the oxygen, acid and base (and its CO2 compounds) can subsidize the production of the hydrogen to one-third of the price point goal set by the Department of Energy, according to Little.

    And hydrogen is the Holy Grail of a clean energy economy, that liquid energy storage device able to power cars and motors without emitting pollution.

    All the New Sky plan needs for perfection is clean electricity to power its reactor. Fortunately, as many grid operators will glumly tell you when discussing DOE's plan for 20 percent wind by 2030, there are times when there is too much wind power for the grid to happily accept. That is when operators do something called "curtailment" of the turbines, and that is when New Sky's technology can and should run.

    Wouldn't we like to have the problem of excess carbon-free power on the grid to clean up brackish waste water, recycle batteries, sequester CO2 and store energy?

    It's a virtuous cycle, one that Little says "seizes on a missed opportunity that's been sitting right in front of us." And it has come just as our atmospheric level of CO2 has gone well past the level of 350 parts per million that can safeguard healthy climate and oceans.

    Policy makers should be considering CO2-reduction technologies like New Sky's (and like Natural Terrestrial Sequestration another Boulder brand of atmospheric CO2 reduction that your humble scribe has covered). Both beat the scheme known as carbon capture and storage, or CCS, as touted by the coal industry.

    The Natural Resources Defense Council and the Center for American Progress are pressuring the Obama Administration to push money into CCS, the abstruse plan to draw CO2 out of smokestacks, pressurize it into a liquid and inject it into stone formations over a mile underground, a process that requires up to one-third extra coal-fired energy and leaves communities vulnerable to explosions, earthquakes and leaks of CO2 which can produce fouled waters and asphyxiate humans and animals.

    Oh, and CCS is really expensive, too, and most CCS proposals have been shelved for that reason. Nonetheless there is a proposal for a new 750 megawatt coal plant in Linden, New Jersey, with a plan to pipe its CO2 70 miles offshore to be injected into the seabed.

    If it leaks, it leaks into the ocean, acidifying it, perhaps catastrophically, at astonishing cost to rate and tax payers.

    Because underwater leaks of CO2 are likely to go undetected, a CCS installation near any ocean is the apex of stupidity.

    Carbon dioxide should be stored as a solid not a liquid. Now that is better living through chemistry.

    New Sky's technology does not lessen our need to decommission coal plants as soon as possible. It just gives us a hope to get our atmospheric CO2 levels which are now at 390 parts per million back below 350ppm as Dr. James Hansen has strongly urged.

    New Sky Energy has been named as a finalist for the Rocky Mountain Clean Tech Open. We wish them well and hope they'll be up against many other terrific problem solving ideas. We need all we can get.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Boulder Start-up to Profit on Atmospheric CO2 in Manufacturing (November 11, 2009)
  • The wind for new energy is stiffening (October 26, 2009)
  • Necessary but not sufficient (October 14, 2009)
  • Tort reform: Go big, Obama! (September 14, 2009)
  • Xcel takes aim at Boulder’s solar (July 27, 2009)
  • Selfishly seeking clean energy (July 12, 2009)
  • The big ka-ching in our health care wallet (June 19, 2009)
  • It takes a Governor (May 24, 2009)
  • Want a job? Think Wind. (May 10, 2009)
  • Just Say No to Xcess Energy (April 28, 2009)
  • NREL’s history of fickle funding (April 12, 2009)
  • Wagons firmly circled: Governance at REA’s and Tri-State (March 26, 2009)
  • A new migratory pattern: Colorado youth go to Washington (March 12, 2009)
  • Even coal is in for a revolution (February 22, 2009)
  • High Flyers and the Commons (February 11, 2009)
  • Come on Baby, Sit by Me (January 25, 2009)
  • A return on investment (January 3, 2009)
  • Mr. Secretary, we're watching you (December 28, 2008)
  • Canary in the Coal Mine (December 13, 2008)
  • Crash test dummies (November 16, 2008)
  • Needless markup (November 2, 2008)
  • The flap about 58 (October 19, 2008)
  • Hip towns and a clever measure (October 7, 2008)
  • Are we afraid of change? Still? (September 21, 2008)
  • Cheney in a chignon (September 7, 2008)
  • Don't tick off the blonde (August 10, 2008)
  • Buying us time on global warming (July 27, 2008)
  • Hint from Heloise - It's the pH, Stupid! (July 13, 2008)
  • Nukes: the position ridiculous and the expense damnable (June 29, 2008)

    -------------------

    Name: Herman K. Trabish
    Location: La Crescenta, CA

    *Doctor with my hands *Author of the "OIL IN THEIR BLOOD" series with my head *Student of New Energy with my heart

    -------------------

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • -------------------
  • Monday, July 13, 2009

    MORE NEWS, 7-13 (U.S. TAXPAYERS INVEST $3 BIL IN NEW ENERGY; WIND, WAVE & TIDAL REPLACE WHALING; BIOFUELS TRADE WAR BREWING)

    U.S. TAXPAYERS INVEST $3 BIL IN NEW ENERGY
    U.S. makes $3 billion available for renewable energy
    Tom Doggett (w/David Gregorio), July 9, 2009 (Reuters)

    "The Obama administration…[has] unveiled guidelines that will allow companies to apply for some $3 billion in government funds to boost development of renewable energy projects around the country, creating jobs.

    "The funding will help meet the White House's goal to double U.S. renewable energy production over the next three years and also provide companies with easier financing than many can obtain in the private sector where credit remains tight."


    click to enlarge

    "The money, from the economic stimulus package, will provide direct payments to companies in lieu of tax credits to support an estimated 5,000 bio-mass, solar, wind and other renewable energy production facilities.

    "The Treasury and Energy Departments announced the funding guidelines, which would provide each project with an average $600,000."


    click to enlarge

    "Previously energy companies could file for a tax credit to cover a portion of the costs of a renewable energy project. Under the new program, companies would forgo the tax credits in favor of an immediate reimbursement of a portion of the property expense, making funds available almost immediately…

    "Energy companies will be able to apply for the money in coming weeks. Until then, the administration made available the program's terms and conditions, guidance and
    a sample application…"


    WIND, WAVE & TIDAL REPLACE WHALING
    A place off Massachusetts to test wind, wave and tidal energy
    Beth Daley, July 6, 2009 (Boston Globe)

    "…[T]he New England Marine Renewable Energy Center is busy getting ready for the next generation of energy from the sea by hoping to use a rectangular ocean swath south of Martha's Vineyard [where whaling ships once came and went] as a testing ground.

    "The University of Massachusetts Dartmouth-based center just received $950,000 from the US Department of Energy to develop better technologies for offshore wind, waves and tides. The center is already working with the towns of Edgartown and Nantucket to develop a tidal energy project in Muskeget Channel between the two islands known for its fierce currents."


    Governor Patrick's Oceans Act of 2008 turned Massachusetts into a potential New Energy powerhouse. (click to enlarge)

    "But center researchers also hope to get permission to use a piece of ocean from the channel extending 30 miles south for energy entrepreneurs to use as an experiment center at the full mercy of deep waters and tough ocean conditions.

    "Scientists are just in the research stages now but if the site pans out it will be wired to allow energy developers to test their systems at a fraction of what it would cost if they had to pay for it on their own."


    More on the Oceans Act of 2008. (click to enlarge)

    "Wave, tidal and deeper water wind farm technology is still fledging, center director Miller says, and many kinks need to be worked out. Yet he predicts some tidal energy projects could be operational within five years, with wave energy and wind turbines in deeper waters following soon after. The center, which links researchers from UMass, MIT, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and the University of Rhode Island, is hoping to do what Europe has done - pool together resources so developers can research technology and get it to the market as soon as possible."


    BIOFUELS TRADE WAR BREWING
    EU slaps 5-year import duties on US biofuel
    Aoife White, July 7, 2009 (AP via Forbes)

    "The European Union [the world's biggest user and producer of crop-based fuels] extended import fees on U.S. biodiesel…to protect European producers from unfair American subsidies [to Archer Daniels Midland Co., Cargill Inc. and several others] and below-cost selling…

    "The EU's 27 nations said in a joint statement that they were extending for five years temporary fees they imposed in March… after a trade investigation said that U.S. producers sold biodiesel to Europe far below the real costs of production [even lower price than the vegetable oil raw materials purchased by the EU industry] and received federal tax credits and state subsidies."


    They call it "splash and dash." (click to enlarge)

    "EU officials said this helped U.S. exporters increase their share of the EU market for biodiesel from 0.4 percent in 2005 to more than 17 percent from April 2007 to March 2008…The United States is the EU's biggest foreign supplier of biodiesel, providing euro700 million ($976 million) worth of fuel to a total market worth euro5 billion.

    "The European Biodiesel Board said the new import fees would help re-establish a level playing field for European producers, claiming unfair U.S. competition [for more than two years] has already caused some companies to go bankrupt or to quit biodiesel production…Biodiesel is usually mixed with mineral fuel to power diesel cars, trucks, buses and trains. It can also be used as a heating fuel."


    But why? (click to enlarge)

    "The EU plans to use far more biofuels in the coming years, setting a target to replace 10 percent of transport oil with biofuel by 2020 - or 33 million metric tons of oil…EU biofuel output in 2006 was 6 million metric tons and it will likely have to increase output rapidly and import far more to meet its goals…

    "This biofuel target has come under fire from environmentalists and others who claim that it will see land taken away from food production and put pressure on natural reserves - especially in developing countries."

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home