NewEnergyNews: MORE SUNDAY WORLD, 7-5 (PAKISTAN WILL BRING SUN POWER; UK UNFURLS; ACTION SLOW AT IRAQ OIL AUCTION)

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

NewEnergyNews was interviewed recently on NPR-affiliate KPCC’s Off-Ramp (hosted by John Rabe). Listen at Solar Power for the People?

YESTERDAY

  • Saturday Video: Tick Tick Tick
  • Saturday Video: We Are All Connected
  • Saturday Video: Climate Crock Of The Week
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

    THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT FRIDAY, 11-27:

  • TTTA Friday- THE COPENHAGEN DEAL
  • TTTA Friday- THE FORCES OF RUIN, OUT TO RUIN THE COPENHAGEN DEAL
  • TTTA Friday- ENERGY STORAGE GETS HOT, 1
  • TTTA Friday- ENERGY STORAGE GETS HOT, 2
  • TTTA Friday- ENERGY STORAGE GETS HOT, 3
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • THANKSGIVING - A Word Of Thanks
  • THANKSGIVING - For The Cause
  • THANKSGIVING - If You See Somebody Today You’d Like To Hit With A Turkey, Don’t
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • HEADLINE: NUCLEAR ENERGY IS SIMPLY COUNTERPRODUCTIVE (& NEW ENERGY IS THE BEST BUY)
  • MORE NEWS, 11-25: HOUSES W/O UTILITY BILLS; HEARTLAND WIND FROM ENEL, WINDSTREAM; THE SUCCESS OF NET METERING; UTILITIES AND SOLAR POWER PLANTS
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • HEADLINE: ASIA, THE U.S. AND THE NEW ENERGY RACE
  • MORE NEWS, 11-24: CONGRESS POSTPONES CLIMATE CHANGE; $4 BIL FOR U.S. WIND JOBS; NEW ENERGY POLISHES RUST; COAL AND THE DAMAGE DONE
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • HEADLINE: GREEN BUILDINGS RISING
  • MORE NEWS, 11-23: CHINA VS. U.S. IN NEW ENERGY ; GREENPEACE LIKES EU SMART GRID; GAS DRILLING POISONS WATER; NUKES DON’T STAND UP TO REASON
  • --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of DAILY CAMERA, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

    -------------------

  • The first rule of holes - Stop digging
  • Anne B. Butterfield, November 21, 2009 (NewEnergyNews)

    “The supply of cheap coal is no longer abundant. Seventy percent of Colorado`s electricity comes from coal plants and that is too much today, and over time it will become an impediment to economic growth.” - Tom Sanzillo.

    Most experienced investors know that the way to invest safely is through a diversified portfolio of stocks picked across a variety of market sectors, with options to keep money in cash, bonds, metals or land. That`s diversity. It spreads the risk and allows flexibility to respond to changing market conditions.

    If any stockbroker saw that your portfolio on which you will utterly depend in the future, were 70 percent in one sector, that would be the fist thing he would tell you to change. Too much exposure. Too risky. Too rigid.

    Now look at Colorado`s power generation: it comes 70 percent from one fuel type: coal, a fuel source documented by the United States Geological Survey, plus the Departments of Energy, Agriculture and Interior, have all estimated our days of cheap coal ending in as little as two decades.

    In Colorado, vaunted as a "coal state" by so many politicians, production of the black rock peaked in 2004 and fell off about one-fifth in four years, according to the Energy Information Administration. On top of that, documents from Xcel Energy show that four mines in Colorado entered "force majeure" status in the past eighteen months meaning they were hampered by exogenous difficulties that freed them from contractual obligations.

    The coal situation is a sword of Damocles over Colorado`s prosperity, particularly because when XcelEnergy fires up its new 750 megawatt coal plant soon in Pueblo, it will increase the utility`s coal burn by 25 percent on coal brought in from Wyoming. That means exporting our dollars on fuel we don`t need.

    Sending our fuel dollars out of state adds insult to the basic injury of our largest utility increasing its basic rates on people already being disconnected at 5,000 per month, plus passing on coal costs that are will jump by 25 percent this year, both in cost and volume.

    Up at our northern fuel source, Wyoming`s Powder River Basin is now producing 40 percent of our nation`s coal from mines that mostly have life spans of less than twenty years. The PRB`s future mine sites shall be much deeper underground than today`s mines, that means escalating costs. Generally all other states producing coal have gotten past their peak production.

    "What`s not understood is how expensive it`s going to be to get that coal out of the ground," says Tom Sanzillo, the former acting Comptroller of the State of New York who was responsible for his state`s pension plans, some of the nation`s largest. He made it his calling after retirement to examine the investment case for coal fired power and he now he gives testimony to numerous states` governments. His testimony is that investing in coal power generation in general, and in Colorado in particular, is a sinking ship.

    Sanzillo has seen a side of the coal industry that occasionally burps out truth. Attending the World Coal Conference in London in late October, he saw coal executives respond to mini instant polls in which they used hand clickers to vote anonymously. To one question "Do you believe coal reserve assessments to be accurate?" their answer was "No" -- to the tune of 89 percent.

    No one is thinking that coal reserves are underestimated, but no one in the business is discussing the problem aloud, either. Sanzillo explains: "It takes a while for people to wrap their heads around this knowledge which means decades of common wisdom being overturned."

    And here we are, increasing instead of reducing Colorado`s 70 percent coal profile while the climate bill coming out of the U.S. Congress proposes to intensify our nation`s investment in coal through carbon capture and storage schemes.

    That`s sending good money after bad. You don`t invest in a costly, unproven infrastructure to service a fuel source that is fast depleting anymore than you put fancy improvements onto a house that`s been claimed by eminent domain.

    Fortunately this week, twenty Colorado state lawmakers asked the U.S. Senate to limit funding for coal and nuclear energy in the energy bill so as not to prevent diversification into efficiency, wind and solar, which even Xcel`s own projections have shown can pay off in savings in as little as four years.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • The first rule of holes - Stop digging (November 21, 2009)
  • Boulder Start-up to Profit on Atmospheric CO2 in Manufacturing (November 11, 2009)
  • The wind for new energy is stiffening (October 26, 2009)
  • Necessary but not sufficient (October 14, 2009)
  • Tort reform: Go big, Obama! (September 14, 2009)
  • Xcel takes aim at Boulder’s solar (July 27, 2009)
  • Selfishly seeking clean energy (July 12, 2009)
  • The big ka-ching in our health care wallet (June 19, 2009)
  • It takes a Governor (May 24, 2009)
  • Want a job? Think Wind. (May 10, 2009)
  • Just Say No to Xcess Energy (April 28, 2009)
  • NREL’s history of fickle funding (April 12, 2009)
  • Wagons firmly circled: Governance at REA’s and Tri-State (March 26, 2009)
  • A new migratory pattern: Colorado youth go to Washington (March 12, 2009)
  • Even coal is in for a revolution (February 22, 2009)
  • High Flyers and the Commons (February 11, 2009)
  • Come on Baby, Sit by Me (January 25, 2009)
  • A return on investment (January 3, 2009)
  • Mr. Secretary, we're watching you (December 28, 2008)
  • Canary in the Coal Mine (December 13, 2008)
  • Crash test dummies (November 16, 2008)
  • Needless markup (November 2, 2008)
  • The flap about 58 (October 19, 2008)
  • Hip towns and a clever measure (October 7, 2008)
  • Are we afraid of change? Still? (September 21, 2008)
  • Cheney in a chignon (September 7, 2008)
  • Don't tick off the blonde (August 10, 2008)
  • Buying us time on global warming (July 27, 2008)
  • Hint from Heloise - It's the pH, Stupid! (July 13, 2008)
  • Nukes: the position ridiculous and the expense damnable (June 29, 2008)

    -------------------

    Name: Herman K. Trabish
    Location: La Crescenta, CA

    *Doctor with my hands *Author of the "OIL IN THEIR BLOOD" series with my head *Student of New Energy with my heart

    -------------------

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • -------------------
  • Sunday, July 05, 2009

    MORE SUNDAY WORLD, 7-5 (PAKISTAN WILL BRING SUN POWER; UK UNFURLS; ACTION SLOW AT IRAQ OIL AUCTION)

    PAKISTAN WILL BRING SUN POWER
    7,000 villages to be electrified through solar energy: minister
    July 2, 2009 (The New International)

    "The government has set a target to electrify 7,000 villages, which cannot be electrified by grid, through solar energy in the next five years, says Federal Minister for Water and Power Raja Pervaiz Ashrraf…He was addressing the representatives of more than 120 countries in the second session of the preparatory commission of IRENA, held in resort city of Sharm el-Sheikh…

    "The minister said that the world needs to develop global financial mechanism that responds to the special requirements of the renewable energy sector. ‘Pakistan feels that if level playing field is provided to the renewable energy sector, they are the least expensive, environment friendly and the most sustainable resources of energy.’"


    One thing Pakistan has is sun. (click to enlarge)

    "He said that Pakistan has also set high targets for itself including renewable energies to add 5% (approximately 10,000 MW) of the electricity generation on grid by year 2030 and the replacement of 5% diesel with bio-diesel by year 2015 and 10% by 2025.

    "He extended full support of Pakistan to the newly perceived International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA)…[and] took part in the voting proceedings for the selections of the place for Headquarter of IRENA and the election of its Director General."



    UK UNFURLS
    Britain Could Be Wind and Wave Titan
    James Kanter, July 3, 2009 (NY Times)

    "Britain could become the largest producer of electricity from offshore wind by the end of the next decade, according to the Carbon Trust, a group funded by the British government.

    "With carefully targeted subsidies and regulations, Britain could build 29 gigawatts of capacity compared to a global total of 66 gigawatts by 2020, giving it 45 percent of the offshore power market, said the Carbon Trust. By comparison, Germany would have 12 gigawatts by 2020…"


    Britain has already begun exploiting its remarkable offshore wind assets. (click to enlarge)

    "[Carbon Trust] also noted that a quarter of all wave power technologies are being developed in Britain and that the country ‘could be the “natural owner” of the global wave power market’ this century.

    "Britain could generate up to $114 billion for the economy and almost 250,000 jobs from offshore wind and wave power…"


    It may have even bigger wave energy assets. (click to enlarge)

    "David McVeigh, an executive from a heavy industries division of Harland and Wolff, the company that built vast passenger liners including Titanic before the decline of British shipbuilding over the last century, said he could ‘recognize a great opportunity’ in marine power…

    "Even so marine environments are notoriously harsh and have posed additional challenges for renewable power developers such as how to prevent corrosion and conduct repairs efficiently."



    ACTION SLOW AT IRAQ OIL AUCTION
    Few Bidders to Develop Iraqi Oil and Gas Fields
    Timothy Williams (w/Campbell Robertson, Alissa J. Rubin, Abeer Mohammed and Keith Bradsher), June 30, 2009 (NY Times)

    "The Iraqi government stumbled once again… in its frequently delayed effort to award development rights to its most valuable oil fields…[A public auction] largely failed to attract the lucrative offers it sought from dozens of international oil companies invited to the bidding.

    "After the daylong event [held in a heavily secured ballroom at the Rashid Hotel in Baghdad’s Green Zone], which was broadcast live on national television [to combat allegations of widespread corruption], the government came away with just a single deal struck from among the six giant oil fields and two gas fields it had put up for bid."


    The Rumaila fields are the far south, near Basra. (click to enlarge)

    "The single successful contract [pending further negotiations] went to a joint venture of BP and the China National Petroleum Corporation for the largest field offered: Rumaila, near the southern city of Basra, which has proven reserves of more than 17 billion barrels. [Now producing a million barrels of oil a day, the government says Rumaila should produce 1.75 million barrels and the oil companies say they can get 2.85 million barrels]…

    "The auction, celebrated by the Iraqi government as a milestone for the fledgling democracy, came on the same day as the deadline for American combat troops to pull out of Iraqi cities.

    "It is the most significant attempt to open up the country’s oil industry since it was nationalized by Saddam Hussein in 1972, and the centerpiece of a plan to raise oil production to 6 million barrels a day by 2015, from the current level of 2.4 million [but the country lacks the money to rebuild the industry that accounts for almost all of its foreign earnings]...[Iraq owns 9% of the world’s crude oil, the world's third largest oil reserves after Saudi Arabia and Iran, but its pipelines and other infrastructure are aged and decaying]..."


    click to enlarge

    "Instead of garnering an infusion of foreign cash [from attendees such as Exxon Mobil, Lukoil, Japex, Royal Dutch Shell, Total, the Korea Gas Corporation and others] to rebuild and to prop up its limping economy, however, the auction of fields that contain about 80 percent of Iraq’s oil output appeared to further polarize the country. Four of the eight oil and gas fields…received only a single bid from oil corporations, and an undeveloped gas field in violence-plagued Diyala Province in northwest Iraq received none…

    "…[O]bservers said the event could be deemed a success only if viewed strictly in populist political terms, because foreign presence in Iraq’s oil industry is a contentious issue. Many believe the 2003 American-led invasion was carried out to wrest away Iraq’s enormous oil reserves...Ruba Husari, editor of the Iraq Oil Forum,…said what remained unresolved was how Iraq was to modernize its oil industry without giving in to the desires of oil companies, which prefer owning a share of the oil they pump. Iraq has so far rejected such arrangements, which are known as production sharing agreements."

    1 Comments:

    At 11:55 AM, Blogger robotsoul said...

    According to this: http://www.newsy.com/videos/iraq_s_black_gold part of the reason why there were so few contracts awarded at the Iraqi auction may be the contracts themselves. Many, felt that the terms of the contracts were too narrowly defined. As they are now, they disproportionately benefit the Iraqi's which seems only reasonable in a country that is notoriously skeptical about oil deals. There is a large push within the country to retain oil rights since the reason has few alternative sources of revenue.

     

    Post a Comment

    << Home