NewEnergyNews: NUCLEAR IS NOT A MEMBER

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

Every day is Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • Holiday Weekend Reading: NEW ENERGY IN CHINA
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: INTEGRATING NEW ENERGY
  • QUICK NEWS, May 24: SO AFRICA TO BUILD A GIGAWATT OF WIND; LUCKY CORRIDOR FOR NEW MEXICO NEW ENERGY; MEGAWATT TEST OF CIGS THIN FILM
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE BENEFITS OF WIND AND SOLAR TOGETHER
  • QUICK NEWS, May 23: AN ‘UNPRECEDENTED’ MOVE TO NEW ENERGY; BRAINTRUST GOES AFTER SOLAR PRICE; INTERIOR APPROVES WIND ON INDIAN LAND
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: EUROPE’S PV TO 2016
  • QUICK NEWS, May 22: APPLE TURNS TO SUN; EU WIND CAN LEAD ECONOMIC RECOVERY; CHINA’S NEW GRID MAY ONLY MEET OLD NEEDS
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: BANKS ON COAL
  • QUICK NEWS, May 21: A FIGHT FOR SUN IN TEXAS; NRG LAYOFFS HERALD FADING PTC HOPES; WHAT WORRIES GRID OPERATORS MOST
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- CHINA STARTS WORLD’S BIGGEST TRANSMISSION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- SOLAR’S IMPACT ON GERMAN OCEAN WIND
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- INDIA WIND GETS A GOLDMAN SACHS BILLION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- HOW KOREA IS LIKE DENMARK
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Anne Butterfield (Huffington Post via New EnergyNews)

    Eventually those local moratoriums against fracking will expire in Boulder, Longmont and Erie. And residents will worry anew about toxic fracking operations inching up on schools and neighborhoods in pursuit of a product that goes "poof" the instant it's used. Nice value ~ not.

    And it's timely that the University of Colorado at Denver School of Public Health just announced a study which finds that air pollution within a half mile of frack-ops have toxic emissions five times over federal safety standards, causing elevated life time cancer risks and respiratory and neurological effects for nearby residents. Rep. Diana DeGette is now urging the Environmental Protection Agency to consider Colorado's study as they finalize air standards for fracking.

    It has also just come out that fracking is inching up on agriculture to compete for Colorado's water. Taking only .08 of a percent per year, it's a smidge for sure, but that water gets so polluted it must be disposed in a way that removes it from the hydrologic cycle. And that's not pretty when we're looking down the craw of a new drought kicked off with an historic climate change induced heat wave plus a horrifying wildfire this season.

    Permanently voiding precious Colorado water out of the hydrologic cycle feels even worse in view the fact such water can be lost for naught when the depletion rate on fracking wells is 63-85 percent in the first year, according to Dave Hughes of the Geological Survey of Canada. This can mean fruitless water waste when drilling down the slippery slope of diminishing marginal returns.

    But Colorado will need all the more gas, as the Clean Air Clean Jobs Act requires Xcel Eenrgy in Colorado to soon retire 900 megawatts of coal burning capacity. The act also requires that the natural gas used for recouping that coal-fired capacity comes from in state (see page 18 here). That puts upward pressure on fracking all over the state. This means more tangles between fracking and populated areas, and more permanent loss of precious Colorado water. It seems like Colorado may have backed itself into a box canyon, where residents are cornered with fracking risks to land, air, water and health.

    But there's an elegant pathway to reducing Colorado's need for natural gas -- by using the sun in a familiar technology that is at least two times more efficient than solar photovoltaics. It's good old fashioned solar thermal - those rooftop panels that heat water.

    Colorado could amend the CACJA to promote solar thermal as a jobs intensive domestic energy supply that works with natural gas to heat homes, buildings, water and industrial processes. This could free drilling companies to sell excess Colorado gas out of state for much higher prices (see page 8 here), possibly gaining crucial industry support for this intrusion of renewables into their market. Higher profitability, less contentious drilling and more renewable energy jobs is the hope.

    In all of North American, Colorado is "ground zero" for the best conditions for producing huge benefits from solar thermal. It's the sunshine, cold ground water, high heating loads, renewables-savvy population and existing industry that can, if the state takes on robust targets, lead the nation in an industry that swaps jobs and skills in place of burning money. And burning money is what we do when we burn costly fuels that go poof the instant they're used.

    A robust Colorado plan for solar thermal could put the clean air and clean jobs back into the so-called, gas-friendly Clean Air Clean Jobs Act.

    And in case anyone has forgotten ~ there are huge economic risks with shale gas, a.k.a. the fracking boom, as the resource is almost certainly not as profitable, resourceful or as clean as hyped by industry. On deeper review, it's promising to be an economic bubble.

    Fracking is supposedly going to make our nation 100 years of cheap gas, as, amnesiac members of Congress and the President are wont to say. But various geological experts such as the Potential Gas Committe have poured cold water all over that flaming hype, detailing how the supply could be as little as 21 or even 11 years. And Arthur Berman, a widely regarded petro-geologist has commented that the industry reminds him of the sub prime mortgage mess and wrote, "U.S. shale plays share many characteristics with the gold rushes.... Both phenomena result from extreme promotion. Anyone can join. Every participant believes that they will get rich. Great amounts of capital are destroyed as entrants try to get a position. The bonanza is exhausted sooner than most expected and few profit in the end."

    So if you are one of the thousands of Coloradans who are waking up to the nightmare of fracking in your community - go online and read the Colorado Solar Thermal Roadmap. Then find every political leader you can to talk about it. Colorado would be wise to use its natural solar resources to hedge against an over-reliance on gas, one that shall expand as the CACJA requires. And coal with its rising prices is on the wane nationwide as well, which means the demand for gas will be a pressure cooker loaded with risk for our energy security, economy, and environment.

    Author's note: Want to support my work? Please "fan" me at Huffpost Denver, here (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-butterfield). Thanks.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Wednesday, July 01, 2009

    NUCLEAR IS NOT A MEMBER

    Should renewable energy include nuclear? The US, China, and dozens of other countries are meeting today in Egypt to chart the course of a new international agency aimed at promoting renewable energy.
    Lily Riahi and Lisa Desai, June 29, 2009 (Christian Science Monitor)
    and
    Ms. Hélène Pelosse becomes Interim Director-General/New Home of IRENA
    June 29, 2009 (IRENA)

    SUMMARY
    The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) officially launches July 1. 136 signatory countries, including the U.S., will use IRENA guidance on how to transition to New Energy.

    China is expected to add itself as an IRENA signatory nation in the near future.

    At the second session of its Preparatory Commission in Sharm El Shaikh, Egypt, Ms. Hélène Pelosse was named the first Interim Director-General of IRENA.

    click to enlarge

    She is currently Deputy Head of Staff for international affairs in the Private Office of the French Minister for Ecology, Energy, Sustainable Development, and Town and Country Planning. She managed Climate and Energy negotiations with the EU for France, with a particular focus on New Energy. She headed the design of France’s Renewable Energy Plan. She participated in several international climate negotiations and worked intimately with international organisations (ex: IEA, UNEP and UNDP) on energy issues.

    The Preparatory Commission also chose Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), as its interim headquarters city.

    Among the controversial issues at the top of IRENA’s agenda is the concern that the international nuclear energy industry will attempt to impose itself as a New Energy solution.

    click to enlarge

    New Energy advocates in IRENA are concerned that France’s nuclear energy establishment has a close relationship with the UAE. They fear that Pelosse’s selection will leave IRENA "nuclear tainted" and strengthen the French nuclear energy industry’s attempt to define itself as a “renewable” energy. France's nuclear establishment claims this on the grounds that nuclear energy electricity generation is free of greenhouse gas emissions (GhGs).

    The European Union (EU) rejected the French nuclear energy industry’s attempt to so classify itself.

    France continues to advocate powering the Mediterranean region with its "low-carbon technology."

    The IRENA pushback against the nuclear industry also comes in response to nuclear power cooperation agreements between the UAE, IRENA’s newly-named headquarters nation, and the U.S., Japan, Britain, and France.

    Not yet out of its interim phase, IRENA has run headlong into one of the most challenging controversies at the heart of the energy world. How the world’s diplomats manage it may be a preview of the crucial December summit in Copenhagen on climate change.

    click to enlarge

    COMMENTARY
    France obtains almost 80% of its electricity from nuclear energy. Its industry is one of the biggest nuclear technology and nuclear expertise sellers in the world. In 2008 and 2009, French President Nicolas Sarkozy signed multibillion-dollar nuclear deals with the UAE, Qatar, Algeria, Libya, and Morocco.

    France lags behind the rest of its European neighbors in the development of installed wind power and solar energy capacities. Insiders blame the French nuclear energy establishment for blocking New Energy development.

    click to enlarge

    As IRENA and EU members point out, nuclear energy cannot be considered “renewable” because it relies on a mined, unreplenishable fuel (uranium) and because it produces waste. These are characteristics of the Old Energies (coal, oil, natural gas). The New Energies use fuels that are limitless (sun, wind, waves) or replenishable (crops) and generally produce no more waste, such as GhGs or spent radioactive substances, than they consume to generate energy.

    IRENA’s biggest backers say the relationship its leadership is crafting with the UAE is designed to support reliance on nuclear energy and to secure UAE oil supplies, things that contradict the founding purpose of the new organization created to bring to life an international New Energy economy.

    click to enlarge

    The UAE is also, however, the home of Masdar, probably the most ambitious New Energy undertaking ever conceived. Masdar will be, when complete, a zero-carbon city fueled entirely by New Energy and designed to maximize efficiency without compromising a modern lifestyle. The UAE also aims to obtain 7% of its total power from New Energy but says its ability to survive in its desert environment depends on obtaining electricity generated by nuclear energy as well.

    Many founders wanted IRENA to be headquartered in Germany or Denmark, nations that have banned nuclear energy and moved dramatically to New Energy. Germany, where solar energy pioneer Dr. Hermann Scheer started the movement to establish IRENA in the 1990s, leads the world in the development of New Energy incentives. Its feed-in tariff has made it the world's leader in installed solar capacity. Denmark gets over 20% of its power from wind energy, a world standard.

    click to enlarge

    QUOTES
    - Dr. Doerte Fouquet, Director, European Renewable Energy Federation: "Advocates of nuclear try to avoid these essential differences by linking these two forms of energy under the umbrella term 'low-carbon technology'…People forget that emitting zero CO2 is only one of the characteristics that defines a renewable source of energy."
    - IIda Tetsunari, Japanese Minister of Environment advisor and executive director, Institute for Sustainable Energy Policies: "Their support for Abu Dhabi as IRENA's headquarters is linked to these agreements and a secure supply of oil…"

    click to enlarge

    - Dr. Eric Martinot, New Energy energy market expert, former World Bank energy officer: "Are the original goals of IRENA being co-opted so that renewables get pushed aside by a nuclear agenda – 'sprinkling some renewables on top of our nuclear power'?"
    - Hermann Scheer, solar pioneer, IRENA founder and member of the German Parliament: "Since the 1970s, scientists have shown that renewable energy can satisfy the energy needs of the entire world, but these studies get systematically ignored. IRENA will change this…This was the only way to avoid the veto power of countries with strong nuclear or fossil interests, who have stopped IRENA in the past…IRENA could be designed as a lame duck or it could promote renewable energy acceleration everywhere. This is the case for decision."

    1 Comments:

    At 6:49 PM, Anonymous Roger from Solar Power Facts said...

    The supply of Uranium is limited, like all other natural resources and so therefore we cannot call it a renewable energy source. We can call it clean, and perhaps even green, certainly by way of comparison to coal and oil.

    However nuclear power (fission) must eventually also need to be replaced. Nuclear fusion, on the other hand, is definitely an infinite power source as long as we can get it going.

     

    Post a Comment

    << Home