NewEnergyNews: SOLAR POWER PLANTS VS. DISTRIBUTED GENERATION

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

NewEnergyNews was interviewed recently on NPR-affiliate KPCC’s Off-Ramp (hosted by John Rabe). Listen at Solar Power for the People?

YESTERDAY

  • Saturday Video: This Is It!
  • Saturday Video: Coal – Don’t Pick It Up
  • Saturday Video: The Cap&Trade Controversy
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

    THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT FRIDAY, 11-20:

  • TTTA Friday- OIL NOT PEAKING…
  • TTTA Friday-…OR IS IT?
  • TTTA Friday- THE REAL ANSWER: ELECTRIC TRANSPORT
  • TTTA Friday- CAP&TRADE – TOXIC OR TERRIFIC (1)?
  • TTTA Friday- CAP&TRADE – TOXIC OR TERRIFIC (2)?
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • HEADLINE: THE POWER OF WIND AND SOLAR TOGETHER
  • MORE NEWS, 11-19: BUILDING EMISSIONS IS BIG BIZ; GEOTHERMAL BREAKS NEW GROUND; BIG TEST FOR TIDAL TECH; ECONOMY SLOWS BUT NOT EMISSIONS
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • HEADLINE: 1.9 MILLION JOBS IN NEW ENERGY
  • MORE NEWS, 11-18: THE CHINA CHALLENGE IN SUN AND WIND; CHINA’S BIG AZ SUN PLANS; CHINA BUILDS U.S. WIND; A REVIEW OF U.S. ENERGY SUBSIDIES
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • HEADLINE: CAP&TRADE IS GOOD FOR THE FARMERS – STUDY
  • MORE NEWS, 11-17: UK BIZ WANTS PEAK OIL REVIEW; OBAMA ENERGY DEPT BOOSTS ALGAE BIOFUELS; SOLAR SHINGLE NAMED BEST INVENTION; EXOTIC PIEZO BREAKTHROUGH
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • HEADLINE: THE GOOD THING ABOUT THE RECESSION (IF YOU WANT SOLAR ENERGY)
  • MORE NEWS, 11-16: MORE WIND IS EASY; GAS VS. NEW ENERGY IN CA; AIR FORCE TO BUILD NEW ENERGY LAB; TAKE WIND TO WORK AND HOME
  • --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of DAILY CAMERA, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

    -------------------

  • Boulder Start-up to Profit on Atmospheric CO2 in Manufacturing
  • Anne B. Butterfield, November 11, 2009 (NewEnergyNews)

    Everyone loves chemistry; it's the difference between Pero and real coffee, Morton's and sea salt. It's the magic between Tracy and Hepburn.

    But on the larger scale, we take chemistry for granted and it's killing us. The earth has an insidious chemical change going on throughout vast majority of its surface area where the oceans meet, belly to belly, with the sky. Our skies, now laden with unusually high and accelerating levels of carbon dioxide, are tainting our oceans with carbonic acid in a process called acidification. It's a reaction we learned about in high school chemistry class, so there's no real debate about it. And some forms of sea life are already beginning to falter.

    In the Monaco Declaration, marine scientists revealed that in as little as four decades our oceans may be too acidic to support the formation of shells, or even the plankton and corals on which our oceans' food webs rely.

    Our problem with burning fossil fuels really is the carbon dioxide, not just the climate havoc it creates, and this harm cannot be mitigated by much ballyhooed notions of geo-engineering.

    Now, aren't you ready for a little good news?

    How about a plan to reduce atmospheric CO2 at industrial scale in a safe and economically attractive scheme? At New Sky Energy, a new start-up here in Boulder, a Fairview High graduate named Deane Little has developed a technology for converting waste salt (from agricultural runoff or flue gas desulfurization), processing it with water electrolysis to yield oxygen, hydrogen, a strong acid and a strong base. That last one is the key -- the base naturally attracts CO2 out of the air and traps it in crystals which can be used as high-value filler for countless common products like glass, plastics, dry wall, bricks, asphalt and concrete. Those crystals can make products which are up to 40 percent stored CO2.

    NewSky's CO2 collection comes with the production of four marketable products. The sale of the oxygen, acid and base (and its CO2 compounds) can subsidize the production of the hydrogen to one-third of the price point goal set by the Department of Energy, according to Little.

    And hydrogen is the Holy Grail of a clean energy economy, that liquid energy storage device able to power cars and motors without emitting pollution.

    All the New Sky plan needs for perfection is clean electricity to power its reactor. Fortunately, as many grid operators will glumly tell you when discussing DOE's plan for 20 percent wind by 2030, there are times when there is too much wind power for the grid to happily accept. That is when operators do something called "curtailment" of the turbines, and that is when New Sky's technology can and should run.

    Wouldn't we like to have the problem of excess carbon-free power on the grid to clean up brackish waste water, recycle batteries, sequester CO2 and store energy?

    It's a virtuous cycle, one that Little says "seizes on a missed opportunity that's been sitting right in front of us." And it has come just as our atmospheric level of CO2 has gone well past the level of 350 parts per million that can safeguard healthy climate and oceans.

    Policy makers should be considering CO2-reduction technologies like New Sky's (and like Natural Terrestrial Sequestration another Boulder brand of atmospheric CO2 reduction that your humble scribe has covered). Both beat the scheme known as carbon capture and storage, or CCS, as touted by the coal industry.

    The Natural Resources Defense Council and the Center for American Progress are pressuring the Obama Administration to push money into CCS, the abstruse plan to draw CO2 out of smokestacks, pressurize it into a liquid and inject it into stone formations over a mile underground, a process that requires up to one-third extra coal-fired energy and leaves communities vulnerable to explosions, earthquakes and leaks of CO2 which can produce fouled waters and asphyxiate humans and animals.

    Oh, and CCS is really expensive, too, and most CCS proposals have been shelved for that reason. Nonetheless there is a proposal for a new 750 megawatt coal plant in Linden, New Jersey, with a plan to pipe its CO2 70 miles offshore to be injected into the seabed.

    If it leaks, it leaks into the ocean, acidifying it, perhaps catastrophically, at astonishing cost to rate and tax payers.

    Because underwater leaks of CO2 are likely to go undetected, a CCS installation near any ocean is the apex of stupidity.

    Carbon dioxide should be stored as a solid not a liquid. Now that is better living through chemistry.

    New Sky's technology does not lessen our need to decommission coal plants as soon as possible. It just gives us a hope to get our atmospheric CO2 levels which are now at 390 parts per million back below 350ppm as Dr. James Hansen has strongly urged.

    New Sky Energy has been named as a finalist for the Rocky Mountain Clean Tech Open. We wish them well and hope they'll be up against many other terrific problem solving ideas. We need all we can get.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Boulder Start-up to Profit on Atmospheric CO2 in Manufacturing (November 11, 2009)
  • The wind for new energy is stiffening (October 26, 2009)
  • Necessary but not sufficient (October 14, 2009)
  • Tort reform: Go big, Obama! (September 14, 2009)
  • Xcel takes aim at Boulder’s solar (July 27, 2009)
  • Selfishly seeking clean energy (July 12, 2009)
  • The big ka-ching in our health care wallet (June 19, 2009)
  • It takes a Governor (May 24, 2009)
  • Want a job? Think Wind. (May 10, 2009)
  • Just Say No to Xcess Energy (April 28, 2009)
  • NREL’s history of fickle funding (April 12, 2009)
  • Wagons firmly circled: Governance at REA’s and Tri-State (March 26, 2009)
  • A new migratory pattern: Colorado youth go to Washington (March 12, 2009)
  • Even coal is in for a revolution (February 22, 2009)
  • High Flyers and the Commons (February 11, 2009)
  • Come on Baby, Sit by Me (January 25, 2009)
  • A return on investment (January 3, 2009)
  • Mr. Secretary, we're watching you (December 28, 2008)
  • Canary in the Coal Mine (December 13, 2008)
  • Crash test dummies (November 16, 2008)
  • Needless markup (November 2, 2008)
  • The flap about 58 (October 19, 2008)
  • Hip towns and a clever measure (October 7, 2008)
  • Are we afraid of change? Still? (September 21, 2008)
  • Cheney in a chignon (September 7, 2008)
  • Don't tick off the blonde (August 10, 2008)
  • Buying us time on global warming (July 27, 2008)
  • Hint from Heloise - It's the pH, Stupid! (July 13, 2008)
  • Nukes: the position ridiculous and the expense damnable (June 29, 2008)

    -------------------

    Name: Herman K. Trabish
    Location: La Crescenta, CA

    *Doctor with my hands *Author of the "OIL IN THEIR BLOOD" series with my head *Student of New Energy with my heart

    -------------------

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • -------------------
  • Monday, July 13, 2009

    SOLAR POWER PLANTS VS. DISTRIBUTED GENERATION

    Politics may make future of solar energy "small"
    Peter Henderson (w/Braden Reddall, Nichola Groom, Christoph Steitz and Lisa Shumaker) July 9, 2009 (Reuters)

    SUMMARY
    Transmission is urgently needed, transmission isn’t happening. Deal with it.

    One way to deal with it is distributed generation. Rooftop solar systems are one of the most common types of distributed generation. A system on the roof needs no new transmission system, it plugs into existing wires and it sends power into the grid during the hottest part of the afternoon, just when demand is peaking.

    Some argue the answer to global climate change, at least in the near future, is not big wind installations and solar power plants but aggressively improved Energy Efficiency and massively ramped up distributed generation.

    Much of the money to build solar energy in the short term is going to come from utilities. The question being asked everywhere in the solar energy world right now is whether the utilities will be investing in solar power plant builders like BrightSource Energy, Sterling Energy Systems, Ausra and Abengoa Solar or whether they will be investing in solar panel makers like SunPower Corp, Suntech Holding and First Solar.

    California's distributed rooftop generation is moving ahead fast. (click to enlarge)

    California is, as usual, at the cutting edge of the controversy. One obvious reason: California has the sun. A less obvious reason: California’s Renewable Electricity Standard comes due in less than 18 months.

    By the end of 2010, California’s utilities must be getting, or at least have contracts in place to get, 20% of their power from New Energy sources. Early investments in residential rooftop systems gave way to big buys into solar power plants when it became clear homeowners weren’t buying rooftop systems fast enough to meet the RES deadline.

    The environmental and regulatory hurdles required to get circumscribed chunks of the desert approved for solar power plants were daunting but the builders were managing to deal with them when a much more troublesome obstacle emerged.

    Getting solar energy-generated electricity from those circumscribed desert acres to populous demand centers necessitates lines running from transmission switching stations to the generation locations. In many cases, it also necessitates new lines from the substations to the population centers. Those new lines traverse everything multivarious California contains from innocent suburban neighborhoods to nefarious private properties to desolate wastelands to the habitat of rare birds, lizards and worms. Getting permissions and approvals to cross all that has become a nightmarish maze from which few of the needed transmission proposals has emerged.

    Even this year, with all its financial difficulties. (click to enlarge)

    Utilities now have another better idea: "Clean" coal. No, just kidding. The idea is to lease rooftops big and small, distributed throughout the populous cities and languishing under the same sun as the deserts, and construct their own systems in partnership with the rooftop owners and solar system installers.

    The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) recently completed 33% Renewables Portfolio Standard Implementation Analysis…, a study on how the state can realize its next RES which – if policymakers have their way – will require utilities to get 33% of their power from New Energy sources by 2020.

    Given the regulatory obstructions and political roadblocks to the needed transmission, a massive build out of distributed generation has a lot of appeal. With a global fall-off in the price of silicon, panel prices are dropping and may sooner or later be cost-competitive, though they are at present more expensive than solar power plants even with the cost of transmission added to the power plant price. Rooftop installations, on the other hand, create more jobs than building solar power plants and can be put into service much more rapidly.

    Utilities are driving the growth. (click to enlarge)

    The photovoltaic (PV) panels in distributed rooftop installations capture the sun’s light and turn it into electricity. Solar power plants capture the sun’s heat and use it to boil water to drive a turbine that generates electricity.

    The one very special and unique advantage solar power plants offer over distributed generation is the potential for large-scale storage capacity. Rooftop systems generate when the sun is shining and, unless there is a costly battery system available, are of no service when the sun is down or blocked. The newest power plant installations are proving the concept of using molten salts to hold the heat they capture. Theoretically, enough extra heat can be captured and stored to keep the water boiling and the turbine generating throughout the night.

    The question of solar power plants versus distributed PV generation is much more than a California controversy. Congress may before the end of the year institute a national RES and every state with sun will have to decide which kind of solar energy is best in its circumstances. If a state chooses the less costly solar power plant option with its promise of storage, that state must remember one thing: Although the energy bill provides some incentives for new transmission, it does not eliminate the challenges of regulatory and environmental obstacles to needed transmission.

    Germany’s world-leading installed solar capacity could be an example of how effective distributed generation is. With a landmark feed-in tariff as the incentive driving uptake, 90% of Germany’s installed capacity is rooftop solar distributed generation.

    Solar power plant technolgy is ready. (click to enlarge)

    COMMENTARY
    It is challenging to get past environmental regulations governing the building of big wind installations and solar power plants but it is much much more challenging to get past environmental regulations governing new transmission infrastructure.

    Transmission to us interruptus, case in point: Sunrise Powerlink. San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) has been planning a major Sterling Energy System solar power plant for years. The power purchase agreement (PPA) for 1300 megawatts was finalized in 2007. The power was to be delivered from the central California deserts to the San Diego Bay area by Sunrise Powerlink, a new transmission branch specifically designated for the solar installation. None of the otherworldly Stirling generators have been installed. The technology is ready but the transmission system remained, until a few months ago, suspended in the regulatory approvals process. Now that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) of the Department of the Interior (DOI) and the CPUC have approved, the obtaining of rights of way can proceed and, eventually, the lines can be built.

    Budiling transmission can be problematic. (click to enlarge)

    Distributed generation, case in point: Edison International's Southern California Edison (SCE) got approval from the CPUC a few months ago for what will be 500 megawatts of distributed rooftop systems. Installation of a pilot project, using First Solar thin film panels, has already begun. SCE will eventually put something like 4 square miles of panels on 300 big rooftops across California. At current rates of progress, SCE may complete its ambitious plans before the transmission needed for California’s many solar power plants every carry an electron.

    33%, case in point: 33% Renewables Portfolio Standard Implementation Analysis…, by the CPUC, shows California cannot get 33% of its power from New Energy sources in 2020 (or anytime) without a lot of new transmission AND a lot of distributed generation.

    Ausra's unique technology and other solar power plant technologies offer the promise of solar energy storage and 24/7 generation (click to enlarge)

    QUOTES
    - Bob Fishman, CEO, Ausra: "You'd be amazed at the number of people who come out against solar projects…'Not-in-my-backyard' rejection of solar projects rivals opposition to fossil fuel plants…Nobody wants to give up electricity, but nobody wants to see it get made…"
    - Judith Ikle, program manager for procurement of renewables and climate mitigation, CPUC: "We really may be in a paradigm shift…"
    - Jaclyn Marks, utilities commission analyst and author of the CPUC 33% report: "Distributed generation has a lot of potential. A lot of potential. But the price has to come down, there are potential issues of grid integration that we need to better understand,"
    - Gil Alexander, spokesman, SCE: "It's more power where it's needed more rapidly…"
    - Jim Rogers, CEO, Duke Energy: "They're not really serious about the transmission…Nobody's really said the emperor's has no clothes on, but you're getting the worst of both…"

    1 Comments:

    At 10:12 AM, Blogger Peter said...

    "Rooftop systems generate when the sun is shining and, unless there is a costly battery system available, are of no service when the sun is down or blocked."
    While this is literally true, since no energy can be created without the sun, it is a non-issue for the home/business owner who is attached to the grid. The vast majority of solar systems being installed in urban areas are attached to the grid, connected to a net meter, and can therefore generate enough electricity to meet all of their owner’s needs AT NO COST and without any battery back-up at all. By “at no cost” I mean the owner of an adequately sized solar system will not pay their local utility a penny for the energy their panels are creating no matter what time of day or night the owner needs to use that energy.
    This article raises some great questions. I’m especially anxious to see if Congress institutes a national RES.

     

    Post a Comment

    << Home