NewEnergyNews: SUN SHINES BRIGHTER IN TOUGH TIMES

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

Every day is Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • Holiday Weekend Reading: NEW ENERGY IN CHINA
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: INTEGRATING NEW ENERGY
  • QUICK NEWS, May 24: SO AFRICA TO BUILD A GIGAWATT OF WIND; LUCKY CORRIDOR FOR NEW MEXICO NEW ENERGY; MEGAWATT TEST OF CIGS THIN FILM
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE BENEFITS OF WIND AND SOLAR TOGETHER
  • QUICK NEWS, May 23: AN ‘UNPRECEDENTED’ MOVE TO NEW ENERGY; BRAINTRUST GOES AFTER SOLAR PRICE; INTERIOR APPROVES WIND ON INDIAN LAND
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: EUROPE’S PV TO 2016
  • QUICK NEWS, May 22: APPLE TURNS TO SUN; EU WIND CAN LEAD ECONOMIC RECOVERY; CHINA’S NEW GRID MAY ONLY MEET OLD NEEDS
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: BANKS ON COAL
  • QUICK NEWS, May 21: A FIGHT FOR SUN IN TEXAS; NRG LAYOFFS HERALD FADING PTC HOPES; WHAT WORRIES GRID OPERATORS MOST
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- CHINA STARTS WORLD’S BIGGEST TRANSMISSION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- SOLAR’S IMPACT ON GERMAN OCEAN WIND
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- INDIA WIND GETS A GOLDMAN SACHS BILLION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- HOW KOREA IS LIKE DENMARK
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Anne Butterfield (Huffington Post via New EnergyNews)

    Eventually those local moratoriums against fracking will expire in Boulder, Longmont and Erie. And residents will worry anew about toxic fracking operations inching up on schools and neighborhoods in pursuit of a product that goes "poof" the instant it's used. Nice value ~ not.

    And it's timely that the University of Colorado at Denver School of Public Health just announced a study which finds that air pollution within a half mile of frack-ops have toxic emissions five times over federal safety standards, causing elevated life time cancer risks and respiratory and neurological effects for nearby residents. Rep. Diana DeGette is now urging the Environmental Protection Agency to consider Colorado's study as they finalize air standards for fracking.

    It has also just come out that fracking is inching up on agriculture to compete for Colorado's water. Taking only .08 of a percent per year, it's a smidge for sure, but that water gets so polluted it must be disposed in a way that removes it from the hydrologic cycle. And that's not pretty when we're looking down the craw of a new drought kicked off with an historic climate change induced heat wave plus a horrifying wildfire this season.

    Permanently voiding precious Colorado water out of the hydrologic cycle feels even worse in view the fact such water can be lost for naught when the depletion rate on fracking wells is 63-85 percent in the first year, according to Dave Hughes of the Geological Survey of Canada. This can mean fruitless water waste when drilling down the slippery slope of diminishing marginal returns.

    But Colorado will need all the more gas, as the Clean Air Clean Jobs Act requires Xcel Eenrgy in Colorado to soon retire 900 megawatts of coal burning capacity. The act also requires that the natural gas used for recouping that coal-fired capacity comes from in state (see page 18 here). That puts upward pressure on fracking all over the state. This means more tangles between fracking and populated areas, and more permanent loss of precious Colorado water. It seems like Colorado may have backed itself into a box canyon, where residents are cornered with fracking risks to land, air, water and health.

    But there's an elegant pathway to reducing Colorado's need for natural gas -- by using the sun in a familiar technology that is at least two times more efficient than solar photovoltaics. It's good old fashioned solar thermal - those rooftop panels that heat water.

    Colorado could amend the CACJA to promote solar thermal as a jobs intensive domestic energy supply that works with natural gas to heat homes, buildings, water and industrial processes. This could free drilling companies to sell excess Colorado gas out of state for much higher prices (see page 8 here), possibly gaining crucial industry support for this intrusion of renewables into their market. Higher profitability, less contentious drilling and more renewable energy jobs is the hope.

    In all of North American, Colorado is "ground zero" for the best conditions for producing huge benefits from solar thermal. It's the sunshine, cold ground water, high heating loads, renewables-savvy population and existing industry that can, if the state takes on robust targets, lead the nation in an industry that swaps jobs and skills in place of burning money. And burning money is what we do when we burn costly fuels that go poof the instant they're used.

    A robust Colorado plan for solar thermal could put the clean air and clean jobs back into the so-called, gas-friendly Clean Air Clean Jobs Act.

    And in case anyone has forgotten ~ there are huge economic risks with shale gas, a.k.a. the fracking boom, as the resource is almost certainly not as profitable, resourceful or as clean as hyped by industry. On deeper review, it's promising to be an economic bubble.

    Fracking is supposedly going to make our nation 100 years of cheap gas, as, amnesiac members of Congress and the President are wont to say. But various geological experts such as the Potential Gas Committe have poured cold water all over that flaming hype, detailing how the supply could be as little as 21 or even 11 years. And Arthur Berman, a widely regarded petro-geologist has commented that the industry reminds him of the sub prime mortgage mess and wrote, "U.S. shale plays share many characteristics with the gold rushes.... Both phenomena result from extreme promotion. Anyone can join. Every participant believes that they will get rich. Great amounts of capital are destroyed as entrants try to get a position. The bonanza is exhausted sooner than most expected and few profit in the end."

    So if you are one of the thousands of Coloradans who are waking up to the nightmare of fracking in your community - go online and read the Colorado Solar Thermal Roadmap. Then find every political leader you can to talk about it. Colorado would be wise to use its natural solar resources to hedge against an over-reliance on gas, one that shall expand as the CACJA requires. And coal with its rising prices is on the wane nationwide as well, which means the demand for gas will be a pressure cooker loaded with risk for our energy security, economy, and environment.

    Author's note: Want to support my work? Please "fan" me at Huffpost Denver, here (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-butterfield). Thanks.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Tuesday, August 11, 2009

    SUN SHINES BRIGHTER IN TOUGH TIMES

    Weak economy makes solar panels more affordable to homeowners; Price cuts by manufacturers, tax credits, California incentives and innovative financing ease the cost of going solar.
    Marla Dickerson, August 1, 2009 (LA Times)
    and
    Half of All Solar Panels Made This Year Won’t Be Installed in 2009
    August 10, 2009 (iSuppli)

    SUMMARY
    Installing a home solar system has never been more affordable. Prices are falling, state and federal incentives are rising and ownership opportunities in the form of financing deals and lease or lease-like deals are expanding.

    The cost depends on 4 factors: (1) System size; (2) Panel price; (3) State rebate; (4) Federal Investment Tax Credit.

    Solar panel prices are falling because there is an oversupply of panels and silicon. It is a truly glutted market. One manufacturer predicts more than half of the panels made in 2009 won’t be used this year. It also predicts the glut will last into 2012 and has decided to cut its planned production all the way through 2013.

    click to enlarge

    Total world solar panel production will grow 14.3% this year to 7.5 gigawatts. (Total world solar panel production in 2008 was 6.5 gigawatts.) Only 3.9 gigawatts of solar panels will be installed in 2009. In other words, almost 1 of every 2 panels will be inventoried.

    To sell panels and clear their inventories, manufacturers are lowering prices. It doesn’t take a degree in economics to come to the conclusion that the price for solar panels has never been and may not again be so low.

    The U.S. wholesale price for top-quality crystalline silicon modules is less than half what it was last year, ~$2.40 per watt. The retail price of an installed system, before subsidies and tax credits, is down from $9-to-$10 per watt to ~$7.50 per watt. Volume buys warrant even lower, below-retail prices.

    click to enlarge

    California’s “million solar roofs” solar initiative (SB1) is an exemplary state program that provides rebates to buyers. Like many states, California’s rebate can put a significant dent in the cost of a system. (Every state’s program is outlined in detail at DSIRE)

    The federal stimulus bill that was passed in October 2008 extended an investment tax credit (ITC) of a full 30% of the entire system cost to every purchase of a solar system.

    click to enlarge

    A typical home rooftop solar system is 3-to-5 kilowatts (3,000-to-5,000 watts). The cost of panels constitutes about half the system’s cost. In addition to the panels, homeowners must pay for installation (labor, permits, taxes) and an inverter to transform the direct current created by the panels into the alternating current required to run home electronics.

    A well-built, well-installed, well-designed rooftop solar system should last 25-to-30 years and significantly reduce the utility bill.

    After all the rebates and incentives, the price for a typical system is likely to be around $20,000. That’s like prepaying the utility bill for a quarter century. It may or may not be the right decision for a homeowner.

    There are other really interesting and exciting new options that make a lot of sense and will help make the use of solar energy more accessible. They include (1) volume buying, (2) power purchase agreements (PPAs), and (3) publicly-funded plans.

    (1) Volume Buying
    (a) SolarCity is a northern California-based business slowing spreading to other U.S. areas. SolarCity attacks affluent chunks of cities, organizing them for group solar system installations through which each homeowner in the group gets access to volume solar panel purchase discounts.

    click to enlarge

    (b) One Block Off the Grid (1BOG) is part of a national community solar movement in which groups of 100 or more homeowners self-organize for the same kinds of volume discounts SolarCity gets for its clients.

    The key for both SolarCity and 1BOG is effective community organizing. It slows the process and limits individual choices but, when effective and in big enough volumes, has brought the cost down to $6.05 per watt installed. That cuts $5,000+ from a 5-kilowatt system.

    (2) PPAs
    Even with the advantage of a volume discount and all the subisidies and tax credits, the upfront cost of a solar system is intimidatingly high. A way to avoid almost all upfront costs and still benefit from the long-term lowered price of electricity that solar systems provide is the power purchase agreement (PPA). It is like a lease.

    A company with solar system expertise and financial backing (like SunRun) buys, installs and maintains the system on a person’s house. The homeowner signs an agreement to purchase the power for an extended period approximating the life of the solar system at a guaranteed, below market rate.

    click to enlarge

    The homeowner can obtain such an agreement at virtually nothing down or can get better rates with a larger down payment. Most homeowners begin with rates 10-to-15% below the retail cost of electricity and can expect, a decade or more into the future when power prices are likely to be much much higher, to pay what will seem like bargain-basement utility rates (compared to a non-solar system owning neighbor, if there is such a thing in a decade).

    The PPA-holding company makes its money on the low cost and eventually free electricity it continues selling to the homeowner as the solar system pays itself off.

    In addition to its group purchase business, SolarCity also does PPA deals, as do solar industry giant SunEdison and many other finance companies and even some utilities, like the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and Duke Energy. Bank loan departments and solar installers can steer interested parties in the right direction.

    click to enlarge

    The newest, hottest idea in beating the upfront cost of a solar system was born in the city of Berkeley, California, and was therefore known for some time as The Berkeley Plan. It was legalized statewide in 2008 as AB 811.

    AB 811 grants municipalies and counties the right to offer low-interest loans to residents for the purchase of rooftop solar systems and arrange for repayment through assessments that appear on the residents’ property tax bills.

    It could hardly be more convenient for the homeowner. The municipality/county handles everything, from site selection and installation to maintenance. If the house is sold, the assessments transfer to the new owner.

    Berkeley, Palm Desert and Sonoma County have programs. San Diego is planning one. Golden, Colorado, has its own version and cities around the U.S. and around the world are exploring the idea.

    Communities can obtain very low-cost loans for putting large amonts of money to work in what can only be perceived as very safe investments. The collateral is, after all, overseen by city and county governments. Palm Desert offers a 7% fixed rate in its program. A $30,000 system over 20 years raises a homeowner's property tax bill ~$3,000 a year. At the same time, the homeowner is saving perhaps as much or more on electricity.

    COMMENTARY
    Until last year, solar panel prices were elevated by a scarcity of silicon, a vital semiconductor ingredient. Demand was greater than supply because the refined material supply was inadequate and, at the same time, Spain radically ramped its demand up with a very generous feed-in tariff (FiT). Silicon refining and panel manufacturing capacities were ratcheted up. Then, the burden of the FiT became too great for Spanish ratepayers, especially in the context of the global financial meltdown. Spain lowered the amount of megawatts on which it would pay the subsidized tariff. Demand immediately dropped off. Prices followed.

    click to enlarge

    Even with the lower prices for panels, not all houses are good places to install rooftop systems. Ones with high utility bills and sunny, south-facing roofs are best. Even those houses can take 8-to-10 years to return enough in utility bill savings to pay off the installation. A good installer will provide a thorough assessment. Back-of-the-envelope sketches are available from any number of good website calculators, including a list of reliable ones at Go Solar California and the state of California Clean Power Estimator.

    An atypical but substantive way of thinking about an investment in a rooftop solar system is that in comparison to all the uncertainties associated with other investments, putting money into a guaranteed energy bill reduction could be the smartest use of present money against future returns.

    click to enlarge

    Whether now is the best time to buy requires a full and careful evaluative process. Panel prices are down but a lot of state incentives, like California’s, have fallen and may continue falling either because the rising volumes they were designed to drive have started to be realized or because the recession has made it necessary for states to hesitate on incentive programs.

    The California Solar Initiative is a 10-year, $3-billion program. Launched in 2007, it is funded by California utility ratepayers. Designed to drive volume, the amount of the rebate drops as the state’s installations reach progressively higher levels of total megawatts. For big utility customers, the rebate started at $2.50 per watt. It is now $1.55 ($1.90 for SCE customers) and will shrink to 20 cents per watt by 2016, the last year of the program. On that schedule, the sooner a system purchase is made, the better. The difference between a 2007 purchase of a 5-kilowatt system and a 2016 purchase is $11,500.

    click to enlarge

    Many states have or will be adopting such programs, especially those whose state Renewable Electricity Standards (RESs) have carve-outs requiring specific portions of the standard to be met with solar energy.

    Many U.S. utilities also have their own solar rebate and New Energy incentive programs. That information is invariably prominent at a utility’s website and is usually featured as part of the communications the company has with its ratepayers (like in the billing statement).

    The federal investment tax credit was, until last fall, a limited incentive that covered perhaps a quarter of the sytem’s value and, dependent as it was on the political winds that whipped Washington, D.C., was never very certain. All that changed with the bailout package.

    Homeowners now get federal tax credits for 30% of the total cost of the system (after deducting the state rebate). A bigger rooftop system can have an after-state rebate value of $30,000, making the tax credits worth nearly $10,000. That’s a big deal.

    click to enlarge

    QUOTES
    - Nathaniel Bullard, solar analyst, New Energy Finance: "It's really a precipitous drop [in the price of solar panels]…The mood in the industry is grim."
    - Henning Wicht, senior director/principal photovoltaics analyst, iSuppli: “The solar industry in 2009 has been undermined by collapse in demand due to the decision by Spain—which accounted for 50 percent of worldwide installations in 2008—to change its feed-in-tariff policies…This demand drop led to a massive buildup of inventory throughout the supply chain, from the raw material polysilicon, to Photovoltaic (PV) cells, to complete solar systems. Despite this, solar panel makers have continued to increase capacity and production, exacerbating the inventory buildup.”
    - Wicht, iSuppli, on the duration of low panel prices: “This inventory glut will have a long-term impact on the solar business, with panels set to remain in a state of oversupply until 2012…After that year, fast-growing demand for solar installations will be able to absorb global panel production and inventory…iSuppli’s updated forecast now shows supplier production flattening for the years from 2011 through 2013 compared to the old forecast.”

    click to enlarge

    - Ron Kenedi, vice president, Sharp Solar Energy Solutions Group: "Jobs are very competitive, and that's translating into lower prices…This is the perfect time to buy solar."
    - Dorothy and Walter Harris, community solar system purchasers, 1BOG: "They presented things clearly . . . and made the whole process easy…"
    Ned Araujo, homeowner, SunRun PPA signatory: "Anything that happens [to the system], it's their responsibility…"

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home