NewEnergyNews: MORE NEWS, 12-9: SCANDAL IN HOPENHAGEN?; SEMPER FI FOR SOLAR; HIGHER ED DIGS DOWN FOR GEOTHERMAL; PAPER BATTERY FOR CHEAP POWER

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

Every day is Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • Holiday Weekend Reading: NEW ENERGY IN CHINA
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: INTEGRATING NEW ENERGY
  • QUICK NEWS, May 24: SO AFRICA TO BUILD A GIGAWATT OF WIND; LUCKY CORRIDOR FOR NEW MEXICO NEW ENERGY; MEGAWATT TEST OF CIGS THIN FILM
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE BENEFITS OF WIND AND SOLAR TOGETHER
  • QUICK NEWS, May 23: AN ‘UNPRECEDENTED’ MOVE TO NEW ENERGY; BRAINTRUST GOES AFTER SOLAR PRICE; INTERIOR APPROVES WIND ON INDIAN LAND
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: EUROPE’S PV TO 2016
  • QUICK NEWS, May 22: APPLE TURNS TO SUN; EU WIND CAN LEAD ECONOMIC RECOVERY; CHINA’S NEW GRID MAY ONLY MEET OLD NEEDS
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: BANKS ON COAL
  • QUICK NEWS, May 21: A FIGHT FOR SUN IN TEXAS; NRG LAYOFFS HERALD FADING PTC HOPES; WHAT WORRIES GRID OPERATORS MOST
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- CHINA STARTS WORLD’S BIGGEST TRANSMISSION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- SOLAR’S IMPACT ON GERMAN OCEAN WIND
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- INDIA WIND GETS A GOLDMAN SACHS BILLION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- HOW KOREA IS LIKE DENMARK
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Anne Butterfield (Huffington Post via New EnergyNews)

    Eventually those local moratoriums against fracking will expire in Boulder, Longmont and Erie. And residents will worry anew about toxic fracking operations inching up on schools and neighborhoods in pursuit of a product that goes "poof" the instant it's used. Nice value ~ not.

    And it's timely that the University of Colorado at Denver School of Public Health just announced a study which finds that air pollution within a half mile of frack-ops have toxic emissions five times over federal safety standards, causing elevated life time cancer risks and respiratory and neurological effects for nearby residents. Rep. Diana DeGette is now urging the Environmental Protection Agency to consider Colorado's study as they finalize air standards for fracking.

    It has also just come out that fracking is inching up on agriculture to compete for Colorado's water. Taking only .08 of a percent per year, it's a smidge for sure, but that water gets so polluted it must be disposed in a way that removes it from the hydrologic cycle. And that's not pretty when we're looking down the craw of a new drought kicked off with an historic climate change induced heat wave plus a horrifying wildfire this season.

    Permanently voiding precious Colorado water out of the hydrologic cycle feels even worse in view the fact such water can be lost for naught when the depletion rate on fracking wells is 63-85 percent in the first year, according to Dave Hughes of the Geological Survey of Canada. This can mean fruitless water waste when drilling down the slippery slope of diminishing marginal returns.

    But Colorado will need all the more gas, as the Clean Air Clean Jobs Act requires Xcel Eenrgy in Colorado to soon retire 900 megawatts of coal burning capacity. The act also requires that the natural gas used for recouping that coal-fired capacity comes from in state (see page 18 here). That puts upward pressure on fracking all over the state. This means more tangles between fracking and populated areas, and more permanent loss of precious Colorado water. It seems like Colorado may have backed itself into a box canyon, where residents are cornered with fracking risks to land, air, water and health.

    But there's an elegant pathway to reducing Colorado's need for natural gas -- by using the sun in a familiar technology that is at least two times more efficient than solar photovoltaics. It's good old fashioned solar thermal - those rooftop panels that heat water.

    Colorado could amend the CACJA to promote solar thermal as a jobs intensive domestic energy supply that works with natural gas to heat homes, buildings, water and industrial processes. This could free drilling companies to sell excess Colorado gas out of state for much higher prices (see page 8 here), possibly gaining crucial industry support for this intrusion of renewables into their market. Higher profitability, less contentious drilling and more renewable energy jobs is the hope.

    In all of North American, Colorado is "ground zero" for the best conditions for producing huge benefits from solar thermal. It's the sunshine, cold ground water, high heating loads, renewables-savvy population and existing industry that can, if the state takes on robust targets, lead the nation in an industry that swaps jobs and skills in place of burning money. And burning money is what we do when we burn costly fuels that go poof the instant they're used.

    A robust Colorado plan for solar thermal could put the clean air and clean jobs back into the so-called, gas-friendly Clean Air Clean Jobs Act.

    And in case anyone has forgotten ~ there are huge economic risks with shale gas, a.k.a. the fracking boom, as the resource is almost certainly not as profitable, resourceful or as clean as hyped by industry. On deeper review, it's promising to be an economic bubble.

    Fracking is supposedly going to make our nation 100 years of cheap gas, as, amnesiac members of Congress and the President are wont to say. But various geological experts such as the Potential Gas Committe have poured cold water all over that flaming hype, detailing how the supply could be as little as 21 or even 11 years. And Arthur Berman, a widely regarded petro-geologist has commented that the industry reminds him of the sub prime mortgage mess and wrote, "U.S. shale plays share many characteristics with the gold rushes.... Both phenomena result from extreme promotion. Anyone can join. Every participant believes that they will get rich. Great amounts of capital are destroyed as entrants try to get a position. The bonanza is exhausted sooner than most expected and few profit in the end."

    So if you are one of the thousands of Coloradans who are waking up to the nightmare of fracking in your community - go online and read the Colorado Solar Thermal Roadmap. Then find every political leader you can to talk about it. Colorado would be wise to use its natural solar resources to hedge against an over-reliance on gas, one that shall expand as the CACJA requires. And coal with its rising prices is on the wane nationwide as well, which means the demand for gas will be a pressure cooker loaded with risk for our energy security, economy, and environment.

    Author's note: Want to support my work? Please "fan" me at Huffpost Denver, here (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-butterfield). Thanks.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Wednesday, December 09, 2009

    MORE NEWS, 12-9: SCANDAL IN HOPENHAGEN?; SEMPER FI FOR SOLAR; HIGHER ED DIGS DOWN FOR GEOTHERMAL; PAPER BATTERY FOR CHEAP POWER

    SCANDAL IN HOPENHAGEN?
    Copenhagen: Leaked draft deal widens rift between rich and poor nations; Climate talks are in disarray barely days into the summit, putting at risk international unity to fight global warming
    John Vidal, 9 December 2009 (UK Guardian)

    "[A just-leaked, so-called Danish text] is a draft proposal for the final political agreement that should be signed by national leaders…at the end of the Copenhagen summit on 18 December. It was prepared in secret by a group of individuals known as "the circle of commitment" but understood to include the US and Denmark…"

    [Lumumba Di-Aping, Sudanese chairman, G77 plus China group of 132 developing countries:] "The text robs developing countries of their just and equitable and fair share of the atmospheric space. It tries to treat rich and poor countries as equal…This text destroys both the UN convention on climate change and the Kyoto protocol. This is aimed at producing a new treaty, a new legal initiative that throws away the basis of [differing] obligations between the poorest and most wealthy nations in the world…"

    click to enlarge

    [Yvo de Boer, Executive Director, UN FCCC:] "This was an informal paper ahead of the conference given to a number of people for the purposes of consultations. The only formal texts in the UN process are the ones tabled by the chairs of this Copenhagen conference at the behest of the parties [involved]."

    "But the representatives of developing nations felt betrayed by the intent of the proposals in the draft…The existing [Kyoto Protocol] is the only global agreement that legally obliges rich countries to reduce their emissions…[but has seemed vulnerable to being voided] since the climate negotiations were effectively taken over by [the developed countries and] conducted outside the UN, the only forum in which poor countries feel they are equally represented."

    click to enlarge

    "The text is now likely to be withdrawn because of its reception by China, India and many other developing countries [in G77]…Few numbers are included in the text, because these would be filled in later after negotiation by world leaders…[I]t does seek to hold global temperature rises to 2C, the safe limit according to scientists, and it mentions the sum of $10bn a year in aid to help poor countries cope with climate change, starting in 2012…[T]he G77 reaction was seen by some developed world analysts as an exaggerated but fundamentally correct response to the way that the US, the UK and other rich countries have sought to negotiate…Over the next days several new texts will emerge…[The rich countries can expect fresh assaults from the Africa group of countries, the least developed countries group, and the association of small island states]."

    [Lumumba Di-Aping, Sudanese chairman, G77 plus China group of 132 developing countries:] "We will not walk out of the talks at this late hour, because we will not allow the failure of Copenhagen. But we will not sign an inequitable deal; we will not accept a deal that condemns 80% of the world population to further suffering and injustice. We call ordinary people to put the utmost pressure on politicians to come to their senses…"


    SEMPER FI FOR SOLAR
    Solar energy powers Marines on battlefield
    December 8, 2009 (Office of Naval Research via PhysOrg)

    "…A year ago, U.S. Marines operating in the Arabian Desert only viewed the sun as the source of the region's relentless heat. Recently, the Office of Naval Research (ONR) Advanced Power Generation Future Naval Capabilities program introduced technology that allows the Marines to harness some of that sunshine to help power their field equipment.

    "Fueled by the sun, the Ground Renewable Expeditionary ENergy System (GREENS) is a 300-watt, photovoltaic/battery system that provides continuous power…ONR began exploring the GREENS idea in fall 2008 in response to a Marine Corps requirement from Iraq for an expeditionary renewable power system…By reducing the logistical supply chain for fuel, GREENS, and other projects like it, will help cut fuel use, cost and the associated threats to vehicle resupply convoys in Afghanistan and Iraq…"


    click to enlarge

    "…[GREENS has] two pieces…One…is a hybrid photovoltaic battery system…The other…is a tool kit…[so] a Marine can enter into the GREENS computer what their expected mission profile is, and it will tell them which components of the GREENS system…[will] provide their renewable power needs…

    "Approval for the GREENS project was expedited through the ONR Future Naval Capability…and technical execution took less than six months…The entire project, from concept to transition, took just over a year…"


    click thru for complete brochure

    "The Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division (NSWCCD), developed and tested the GREENS prototype…The GREENS system has undergone continuous power testing at Naval Air Warfare Center, China Lake, Calif., where ambient temperatures exceeded 116 degrees Fahrenheit. Even under the extreme temperatures, the system provided 85 percent of the rated energy. This performance exceeded expectations, prompting rapid development and accelerating procurement of the final design.

    "GREENS was a featured program at the ONR-sponsored Naval Energy Forum…and is just one of the many innovative ways the future battlefield will be powered. The deployment of this technology will equip the Marine Corps with new capability and knowledge of how renewable energy can make a difference…"



    HIGHER ED DIGS DOWN FOR GEOTHERMAL
    Drive for geothermal power heats up on US campuses
    Dinesh Ramde, December 6, 2009 (AP via Seattle Post Intelligencer)

    "While solar and wind power get most of the headlines, geothermal power is quietly gaining traction on college campuses [from Wisconsin to New Mexico] where energy costs can siphon millions each year from the budget…There are 46 schools divvying up millions in federal stimulus dollars to advance technology that uses the temperature of the Earth, rather than coal-fired power plants, to heat and cool buildings…So far this year, the Department of Energy has announced $400 million in grants to advance [such] geothermal projects…

    "Geothermal technology has been around for decades, it works and it's increasingly affordable. At colleges that must maintain dozens of large buildings, the savings are magnified…[Decision-makers seek] to use less coal-fired power, although the schools also…save money [justifying] the move."


    Types of conventional geothermal, 1 (click to enlarge)

    "The technology is a natural fit for schools like Boise State that sit atop geothermal springs…[It] expects to save as much as $80,000 per year in heating costs…[and] even more as the project expands. Yet schools in the Midwest and East are also turning to geothermal power using a different type of technology…[in which] the system draws heat from a hot building [on a warm day] and pumps it underground where the soil absorbs it. On a cold day the process reverses - the system extracts heat from the earth and returns it to the building.

    "The process is so efficient that even though the underground temperature remains about a constant 55 degrees, the system can be used to chill water to 45 degrees or heat it to 170 degrees…Ball State University…is upgrading all of its 45 buildings to geothermal technology, at a cost of $65 million to $70 million. The state contributed about $40 million, and because the system is expected to cut energy costs by $2 million per year, it should pay for itself in 12 to 15 years…The savings won't translate directly into tuition breaks…but will ease the school's pressure to find funding for other operational expenses."


    Types of conventional geothermal, 2 (click to enlarge)

    "Students have been advocating for a shift in campus energy sources for years. The increased investment in geothermal comes as students launch a national campaign intended to pressure schools into using less energy from coal-fired power plants. Students began protests late this year, specifically targeting 60 campuses that have their own coal-burning power plants.

    "There are several variations of geothermal installations…[but geothermal] may not be the best choice for every school…Urban schools may not be spacious enough to install the pipes where they can be accessed easily for maintenance and repair…[U]nforeseen regulatory issues…can drive the initial cost [too high]…[They tripled the cost for the] Theological Seminary in New York City…[from an] initial estimate of $6 million to upgrade 18 buildings…to about $20 million, to be paid over five to 10 years…[but with just five buildings upgraded so far, the seminary has already saved about $200,000 in heating and cooling costs last year."



    PAPER BATTERY FOR CHEAP POWER
    Dip Ordinary Paper Into Ink Infused With Nanotubes and Nanowires to Create an Instant Battery
    December 8, 2009 ("Highly Conductive Paper for Energy Storage Devices" in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences via Science Daily)

    "Stanford scientists are harnessing nanotechnology to quickly produce ultra-lightweight, bendable batteries and supercapacitors in the form of everyday paper.

    "Simply coating a sheet of paper with ink made of carbon nanotubes and silver nanowires makes a [low-cost] highly conductive storage device…such as batteries and simple supercapacitors…Like batteries, capacitors hold an electric charge, but for a shorter period of time…[though] capacitors can store and discharge electricity much more rapidly than a battery…"


    click to enlarge

    "…[N]anomaterial energy storage devices [had previously been created] using plastics…[N]ew research shows that a paper battery is more durable because the ink adheres more strongly to paper (answering the question, "Paper or plastic?"). What's more, you can crumple or fold the paper battery, or even soak it in acidic or basic solutions, and the performance does not degrade…[Burning has not yet been tested]…"

    click to enlarge

    "The flexibility of paper allows for many clever applications…[Researchers have] demonstrated the battery…by connecting it to an LED (light-emitting diode), which glowed brightly.

    "A paper supercapacitor may be especially useful for applications like electric or hybrid cars, which depend on the quick transfer of electricity. The paper supercapacitor's high surface-to-volume ratio gives it an advantage…[as a] low-cost, flexible electrode for any electrical device...[T]he biggest impact may be in large-scale storage of electricity on the distribution grid. Excess electricity generated at night, for example, could be saved for peak-use periods during the day. Wind farms and solar energy systems also may require storage…"

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home