NewEnergyNews: CHINA VS. NEW ENERGY FREE MARKETS

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

YESTERDAY

  • TODAY’S STUDY: HOW IBM WOULD SPREAD THE WORD ON THE EFFICIENCY
  • QUICK NEWS, February 27: PRES WANTS PERMANENT PTC; FEDS BACK SUN R&D; THE DONALD (TRUMP) VS. OCEAN WIND
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- MORE THAN A THIRD OF GERMANY’S POWER BY 2020
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- IRELAND AND CHINA PARTNER ON WIND FOR CHILE
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- CHINA MOVES ON SOLAR PRICE
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- JAPAN BUYS MEXICAN WIND
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • Saturday Video: Time To Blot Out The Sun
  • Saturday Video: The Hand Of Man
  • Saturday Video: Trust
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TTTA Friday- COMING SOON TO NEW ENERGY
  • TTTA Friday-LEGO BUILDING OFFSHORE WIND
  • TTTA Friday-NO-ELECTRIC-BILL HOMES
  • TTTA Friday- INSTALLING SMART METERS SAVES
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: BRINGING ENERGY EFFICIENCY HOME
  • QUICK NEWS, February 23: NEW ENERGY COULD CONSOLIDATE; MONEY FOR NEW ENERGY, THE OUTLOOK; GERMANY SPEEDS F-I-T CUT
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: ALL ABOUT THE FUTURE FOR FUEL CELLS
  • QUICK NEWS, February 22: ANTELOPE VALLEY SOLAR GETS GO; CHICAGO BULLS & BLACKHAWKS POWERED BY WIND; ANTI-KEYSTONE HAS FUNDERS, TOO
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • Anne Butterfield (Daily Camera via New EnergyNews)

    It's been an explosive week for women's reproductive health with two events reaching new depths of outrageousness and a third prompting pundits to call on a silent voting bloc to defend its practices on contraception.

    The biggest story of the week was the Susan G. Komen Foundation stripping Planned Parenthood of its grants for breast cancer screening on the stated reason of Planned Parenthood undergoing a Congressional investigation. Komen's new vice president, Karen Handel, is a known conservative political force who swore opposition to Planned Parenthood for its 3 percent of services going to abortion.

    Yet, before week's end we who were outraged at Komen and vocal about it saw a reversal of the decision. Komen announced that their new policy will sanction only those facing "criminal and conclusive investigations."

    If only Republicans advocating for smaller government would heed such pared down parameters. In five state houses Republicans have passed laws that should make critics of Obamacare blush: requirements for vaginal-probe sonograms on women on the day ahead of abortions. This is rationalized as an informed consent measure, though I for one have not seen this degree of intrusion before for my two lung surgeries, and a call to an abortion counselor (asking to be unnamed) revealed that the vast majority of abortions have no medical need of a vaginal ultrasound (as topical ultrasounds are routine). So this measure smacks of the long arm of the law reaching into a woman's most private place to deliver ideology, with the doctor also being used against medical tradition and practice. American women, ask: whose uterus do these small government folks think it is -- the woman's or the state's?

    Since this drama has reached Kafkaesque absurdity, state senator Janet Howell of Virginia attached a protest amendment to a sonogram bill moving through her state house, a measure requiring men also to undergo a bodily probe ahead of getting erectile dysfunction medication. Her amendment lost by an impressively small margin with 13 male senators in support.

    All's fair in love and war, so social conservatives are also feeling the pain, due to the Obama Administration's Department of Health and Human Services having stated that Catholic institutions serving and employing the public must adhere equally to rules of the Affordable Care Act granting women equal access to birth control with no co-pays.

    The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops had asked for a conscience clause, complaining that they cannot be made to pay for birth control. Meanwhile 98 percent of sexually active Catholics are said by the Guttmacher Institute to use birth control, meaning that the laity and the clergy of the church have radically opposing views of how to populate a family and maintain women's health.

    Catholic leaders doth protest too much in squawking on behalf of their religious freedom, suggests Jon O'Brien of Catholics for Choice -- whose stand is that the conscience of women rules. The church has failed to convince Catholics in the pews, so the clergy should own that failure rather than attempt to control distribution channels that impute extra costs to insured women who are often not even Catholic.

    On the politics, Chris Matthews on "Hardball," said that Catholics like him are swing voters and Obama has blown his chance with them. However Jon O'Brien says his group and its allies "expended a huge amount of resources mobilizing the public on this pivotal issue" of no co-pay birth control. And with Joan Walsh of Salon advising fellow Catholics to "preach what they practice" and defend the president, we shall see if Catholics defend their widespread practices or remain hiding in the shadows.

    Crises are times for taking action when comfortable practices can no longer be taken for granted. Planned Parenthood was gifted with nearly a million dollars in 24 hours of the Komen news, and also won a reversal -- good. More importantly we all need to see that protecting women's health where it intersects with reproductive freedom (not to mention a sound doctor-patient relationship) is no longer a spectator sport. We need to be activists, because as the right wing dreams of personhood amendments, flirts with banning birth control, and legislates body probes, we see that the American Taliban wears a prim sweater vest and expensive suits, with hopes to attract million-dollar super PAC's.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, La Crescenta, CA., Doctor with my hands, Author with my head, Student of New Energy with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Sunday, January 31, 2010

    CHINA VS. NEW ENERGY FREE MARKETS

    Is clean tech China's moon shot?; So far, wind turbines are not Sputnik. But one day they could be.
    Gerard Wynn (w/Chris Buckley, Larry Aragon, Peter Henderson, Jim Impoco and Sara Ledwith), January 27, 2010 (Reuters)

    "The global race to develop clean technology is not just about who can build the best solar parks or wind farms. It is also shaping up as a contest between Chinese-style capitalism and the more market-oriented approach fancied by the United States and Europe…[W]ill China's highly capitalized command-and-control economy trump laissez-faire in a low-carbon shift that is widely portrayed as the next industrial revolution?

    "…[The] Chinese are coming on strong…Beijing's top leaders have made clear their intention to have their nation dominate this new industry, up and down the value ladder…[T]hey are not burdened by concerns facing their Western counterparts -- such as the impact of wind turbines on landscapes, higher energy prices for consumers, or investor returns…The recession has made it tougher for Europe and America to effect meaningful climate policy change...[P]oliticians likely will find it harder to earmark additional voter money for clean technology…Instead, recession-hit Western economies are hoping the private sector can plug an estimated worldwide $150 billion annual funding gap to avoid more extreme droughts and floods."


    Unhesitating growth. (click to enlarge)

    "But investors almost always follow the returns, and if the performance is not there, they are not likely to risk their capital…[P]ension funds -- which are as influential as they are big -- [may not invest more because fund managers must answer] to pension holders…Since a trough in global equities last March, energy efficiency stocks have risen 126 percent and clean energy and technology by 88 percent, compared with wider global stocks' 70 percent...But there are limited opportunities for investors. Oil majors, for example, dwarf the asset value of green companies, and cleantech funds can't move the dial for the big funds…

    "The global wind industry highlights diverging tactics between China and the West in developing important new markets…China is leapfrogging global wind power rankings with a combination of aggressive growth targets and domestic support. It has doubled its entire installed capacity each year since 2005…This month, the British government announced plans for 32 gigawatts of offshore wind by 2020…[but the plan] depends on 100 billion pounds of increasingly finicky private capital. And this is an election year…British policymakers have to make a choice: either create bigger incentives for investors to underwrite offshore wind power or impose additional taxes on fossil fuels, which would make carbon-based energy less profitable."


    Hesitating growth. (click to enlarge)

    "…China has its own distinct advantages. First and foremost is…[cooperation] between state-owned utilities, grid companies and banks…China is expected to announce a target soon for about 150 gigawatts of wind power by 2020, which it would hit if it simply maintained present annual capacity growth…The country also has two turbine makers, Sinovel and Goldwind, in the world top 10…[China’s] next five-year development plan [will] run from the start of 2011..[and] the state banks and state power companies will support and foster the New Energy industries]…

    "How fast wind power develops in the United States depends on a climate and energy bill…But China has been on a tear…Some Western analysts still believe a markets-oriented approach works best and will ultimately prevail…They argue that subsidized inputs will result in a less efficient industry, more focused on volume than cost and quality…[N]ew capacity has also run ahead of grid connections…[Many] believe the United States still has an advantage in innovation…[O]f 41 U.S. venture capital investors, more than three-quarters [told Reuters] the United States would be the best market for cleantech over the next five years, and 88 percent believed America was the best [base]...China ranked as the second best market…

    "An undeniable edge for China is its huge pile of foreign exchange reserves…[and] Beijing's aggressive economic stimulus, which included funds for energy-efficient buildings…[A]n overheating Chinese economy may turn that tap down...Western economies are expected to spend much of their green recovery cash this year and next…In recession-battered Western nations, and in China, the prime motives for promoting clean technology are jobs, profits and energy security -- not climate change…An estimated $150 billion invested globally last year was only about half what is required annually by 2015 to avoid dangerous climate change..."


    Can the turmoil of a free market match this commanded, controlled growth? (click to enlarge)

    "If over the next 20 years the world is to boost renewable power, build greener buildings and roll out more fuel-scrimping cars including hybrid and electric models, it must invest more than an additional $500 billion annually…Many forms of renewable power are expected to be more expensive than their fossil fuel counterparts for at least another decade…Given the incompatibility of communist-style targets with western democracies, how can free markets mobilize more green technology cash?

    "…Western nations could boost clean investor returns with a tax on fossil fuels or guaranteed higher prices for renewable power. And...governments could adopt standards...requiring homes to install smart meters, for example...[but this] doesn't seem politically palatable at the moment…But pension funds and other institutional investors can do more. Even if they don't put more of their own money into clean tech, they can use their clout to encourage more conventional energy companies to clean up…A discouraging sign...is the cloudy future of cap-and-trade plans…Opposition to cap-and-trade among U.S. Republicans and some Democrats could block the roll-out of a federal trading scheme…[and] last month's U.N. summit in Copenhagen [did not advance an international system]… Does all this suggest China is destined to win the clean tech race? Hardly, though it does seem to have a little more forward momentum...But it's still very early goings, and there's more at stake than business success."

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home