NewEnergyNews: SOLAR NEWS FROM THE AUTHORITY

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

Every day is Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • Holiday Weekend Reading: NEW ENERGY IN CHINA
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: INTEGRATING NEW ENERGY
  • QUICK NEWS, May 24: SO AFRICA TO BUILD A GIGAWATT OF WIND; LUCKY CORRIDOR FOR NEW MEXICO NEW ENERGY; MEGAWATT TEST OF CIGS THIN FILM
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE BENEFITS OF WIND AND SOLAR TOGETHER
  • QUICK NEWS, May 23: AN ‘UNPRECEDENTED’ MOVE TO NEW ENERGY; BRAINTRUST GOES AFTER SOLAR PRICE; INTERIOR APPROVES WIND ON INDIAN LAND
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: EUROPE’S PV TO 2016
  • QUICK NEWS, May 22: APPLE TURNS TO SUN; EU WIND CAN LEAD ECONOMIC RECOVERY; CHINA’S NEW GRID MAY ONLY MEET OLD NEEDS
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: BANKS ON COAL
  • QUICK NEWS, May 21: A FIGHT FOR SUN IN TEXAS; NRG LAYOFFS HERALD FADING PTC HOPES; WHAT WORRIES GRID OPERATORS MOST
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- CHINA STARTS WORLD’S BIGGEST TRANSMISSION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- SOLAR’S IMPACT ON GERMAN OCEAN WIND
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- INDIA WIND GETS A GOLDMAN SACHS BILLION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- HOW KOREA IS LIKE DENMARK
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Anne Butterfield (Huffington Post via New EnergyNews)

    Eventually those local moratoriums against fracking will expire in Boulder, Longmont and Erie. And residents will worry anew about toxic fracking operations inching up on schools and neighborhoods in pursuit of a product that goes "poof" the instant it's used. Nice value ~ not.

    And it's timely that the University of Colorado at Denver School of Public Health just announced a study which finds that air pollution within a half mile of frack-ops have toxic emissions five times over federal safety standards, causing elevated life time cancer risks and respiratory and neurological effects for nearby residents. Rep. Diana DeGette is now urging the Environmental Protection Agency to consider Colorado's study as they finalize air standards for fracking.

    It has also just come out that fracking is inching up on agriculture to compete for Colorado's water. Taking only .08 of a percent per year, it's a smidge for sure, but that water gets so polluted it must be disposed in a way that removes it from the hydrologic cycle. And that's not pretty when we're looking down the craw of a new drought kicked off with an historic climate change induced heat wave plus a horrifying wildfire this season.

    Permanently voiding precious Colorado water out of the hydrologic cycle feels even worse in view the fact such water can be lost for naught when the depletion rate on fracking wells is 63-85 percent in the first year, according to Dave Hughes of the Geological Survey of Canada. This can mean fruitless water waste when drilling down the slippery slope of diminishing marginal returns.

    But Colorado will need all the more gas, as the Clean Air Clean Jobs Act requires Xcel Eenrgy in Colorado to soon retire 900 megawatts of coal burning capacity. The act also requires that the natural gas used for recouping that coal-fired capacity comes from in state (see page 18 here). That puts upward pressure on fracking all over the state. This means more tangles between fracking and populated areas, and more permanent loss of precious Colorado water. It seems like Colorado may have backed itself into a box canyon, where residents are cornered with fracking risks to land, air, water and health.

    But there's an elegant pathway to reducing Colorado's need for natural gas -- by using the sun in a familiar technology that is at least two times more efficient than solar photovoltaics. It's good old fashioned solar thermal - those rooftop panels that heat water.

    Colorado could amend the CACJA to promote solar thermal as a jobs intensive domestic energy supply that works with natural gas to heat homes, buildings, water and industrial processes. This could free drilling companies to sell excess Colorado gas out of state for much higher prices (see page 8 here), possibly gaining crucial industry support for this intrusion of renewables into their market. Higher profitability, less contentious drilling and more renewable energy jobs is the hope.

    In all of North American, Colorado is "ground zero" for the best conditions for producing huge benefits from solar thermal. It's the sunshine, cold ground water, high heating loads, renewables-savvy population and existing industry that can, if the state takes on robust targets, lead the nation in an industry that swaps jobs and skills in place of burning money. And burning money is what we do when we burn costly fuels that go poof the instant they're used.

    A robust Colorado plan for solar thermal could put the clean air and clean jobs back into the so-called, gas-friendly Clean Air Clean Jobs Act.

    And in case anyone has forgotten ~ there are huge economic risks with shale gas, a.k.a. the fracking boom, as the resource is almost certainly not as profitable, resourceful or as clean as hyped by industry. On deeper review, it's promising to be an economic bubble.

    Fracking is supposedly going to make our nation 100 years of cheap gas, as, amnesiac members of Congress and the President are wont to say. But various geological experts such as the Potential Gas Committe have poured cold water all over that flaming hype, detailing how the supply could be as little as 21 or even 11 years. And Arthur Berman, a widely regarded petro-geologist has commented that the industry reminds him of the sub prime mortgage mess and wrote, "U.S. shale plays share many characteristics with the gold rushes.... Both phenomena result from extreme promotion. Anyone can join. Every participant believes that they will get rich. Great amounts of capital are destroyed as entrants try to get a position. The bonanza is exhausted sooner than most expected and few profit in the end."

    So if you are one of the thousands of Coloradans who are waking up to the nightmare of fracking in your community - go online and read the Colorado Solar Thermal Roadmap. Then find every political leader you can to talk about it. Colorado would be wise to use its natural solar resources to hedge against an over-reliance on gas, one that shall expand as the CACJA requires. And coal with its rising prices is on the wane nationwide as well, which means the demand for gas will be a pressure cooker loaded with risk for our energy security, economy, and environment.

    Author's note: Want to support my work? Please "fan" me at Huffpost Denver, here (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-butterfield). Thanks.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Wednesday, March 03, 2010

    SOLAR NEWS FROM THE AUTHORITY

    Solar Forum: Where are we going and how will we get there?
    Paula Mints, February 17, 2010 (Rahus Institute Solar Forum presentation)

    SUMMARY
    Are all the sunny reports of growth and jobs in the solar energy industry reliable?

    Paula Mints, the Principal Analyst for the Navigant Consulting PV Services Program, only tells what the Sinatra/Rat Pack boys used to call the “ehmess.” That’s Hebrew for “truth” and the Mints/Navigant data is only ehmess. The word everywhere in the New Energy world is that if Paula Mints reports it, take it to the bank.

    Mints says the solar photovoltaic industry left a lot of panels on the shelf in 2008 and 2009.

    The 2008/09 production far outstripped demand and, as a result, installations in 2009 were greater than panel sales. The result is the lowerst cost per watt (peak) ever.

    click to enlarge

    The industry, which has shifted dramatically in the last decade from remote, off-grid systems to urban and suburban grid-connected systems as it grew from the megawatt level to the gigawatt level, is also driving toward lower costs both with its increased production capacity and with innovative financing and incentive plans that are bringing the cost of an installed system down.

    In 2009, the bulk of the manufacturing of photovoltaic panels – over half – was in China, Asia and the non-U.S., non-European, non-Japanese parts of the world. On the other hand, the demand for PV – over 80% – was in Europe.

    Thin film manufacturers/installers continued to gain market share, largely as a result of First Solar’s growth. First Solar became the leading solar panel shipper in 2009, the first time a thin film manufacturer has led the PV marketplace.

    Mints' forecast is for continued growth in 2010, compromised by some reduced incentives (especially in Europe), a hesitantly recovering world economy and the need for new transmission (among other factors). She sees much bigger growth for solar PV in the 2011-thru-2013 period.

    click to enlarge

    COMMENTARY
    Mints and Navigant take very seriously their role as suppliers of data and insight to the New Energy industries. They specialize in market research based on primary data that can be used to identify important trends.

    The oversupply of panels in 2009 was reflected in the PV industry’s capacity utilization of 47% (i.e., it was using less than half of its total production capacity). The capacity figure could be as low as 29% if it was based on the announcements of production capacity by the various PV manufacturers, the reliabilty of which Mints somewhat discounts.

    Nevertheless, companies did withhold production and were conservative in building new capacity in 2009. Commercial capacity still increased by 29%, due largely to plans already in motion. Because of excess inventory, the volume of solar panels installed was larger than the volume of panels shipped by manufacturers.

    click to enlarge

    Some basics about U.S. PV incentives:
    (1) There is a system of multiple incentives from various sources. It begins with tax credits that discount up front costs for installations and for manufacturing, as well as state Renewable Electricity Standards (RESs) that require a solar carve-out to significantly impact demand for solar.
    (2) There is an emerging feed-in tariff (FiT) model. The FiT is an above market return to those who install systems for the electricity they sell to the grid. The emerging U.S. FiT will be more complicated and less profitable than Europe's FiTs.
    (3) 16 states and D.C have RESs with solar carve-outs.
    (4) The federal incentives are tax credits, grants and loans.
    (5) 42 states have solar incentives (tax credits, tax waivers, rebates, etc.). There are 10 states with 10 or more different kinds of solar incentives.
    (6) California has the most ambitious RES, requiring 20% of its power to come from New Energy sources by the end of this year and 33% by 2020. It also has 47 solar incentive programs.

    click to enlarge

    How incentives drive the solar market:
    (1) Even where there is grid parity (i.e., the price of electricity is at or above the price of solar-generated electricity), the market is small without other incentives, likely because there is little profit to be made from a solar system without an FiT and because there are high upfront capital costs for installation.
    (2) California’s incentive program wins over 60% of the U.S. PV market but could run into trouble as the state expends its grid capacity and runs short of funds.
    (3) New business models for financing PV systems are emerging that are expected to eliminate the high upfront cost obstacle and drive growth but there is not enough data to assure the success of these models. Such models include plans to allow private partners to finance and lease systems to homeowners as well as plans that allow homeowners to take municipal financing for systems and pay for them through their property tax assessments.

    PV solar has 5 major applications: (1) Off grid homes, (2) Off grid industrial, (3) Power (such as military uses), (4) Grid connected home, commercial and utility scale systems, and (5) consumer indoor systems (like watches and cell phones). The industry grew at 8% per year in the 1980s, largely through off grid installations and consumer indoor systems, but has matured to the point where 90% of sales are now from grid connected systems.

    click to enlarge

    From 1999 to 2009, the solar PV industry had a 42% compound annual growth rate (CAGR)!

    PV manufacturing has moved to the lowest-cost regions (Asia, especially China) but the industry still depends for demand on Europe, and especially on Germany which, in 2009, represented 71% of PV market demand.

    Of the 55% of the PV manufacturing done by the non-U.S., non-European, non-Japanese parts of the world, 30% was done in China.

    Thin film materials began claiming a significant share of the market in 2007. In 2009, sales of First Solar’s cadmium telluride thin film product was the leading single component of the PV market, the first time thin film has led the PV sector.

    click to enlarge

    Soft demand and an incomplete reaction by suppliers has put total module prices at an average of $3.00/Wp. Power modules (smaller buyers, wattage >150-watts), are less expensive ($2.25/Wp, average). Larger buyers are paying an average of $1.85/Wp. The market’s high price is $3.75/Wp and low price is $1.40/Wp.

    The 2009 accelerated forecast, though it looked unlikely at mid-year, turned out to be accurate. Germany’s move to cut its FiT should drive early demand as buyers scramble to get the higher rate before it is terminated (in June). That should eat up some excess supply. This means the accelerated forecast is again the most likely one for 2010. The movement of the industry in 2011 will depend on how much growth there is in the U.S. market and how Germany reacts to its reduced rate.

    The U.S. market has great potential but could be hampered by slow incentive growth and/or a slow economic recovery and it could run into the limits of the antiquated U.S. transmission system.

    click to enlarge

    QUOTES
    - Paula Mints, Principal Analyst, Navigant Consulting PV Services Program: “Market research is the objective study of a subject using data gathered through primary research to characterize, analyze and forecast demand and supply for, in this case, the photovoltaic industry…Market research makes use of data to identify trends and customers, and analyze competitors…Primary research is direct contact with the person buying and selling…The purpose is to provide an objective analysis that managers and executives can use for business planning purposes…it analyzes raw material through to the end user…”

    click to enlarge

    - Paula Mints, Principal Analyst, Navigant Consulting PV Services Program: “New business models are emerging in the U.S. that eliminate the need to own the means of production out of the electricity consumers hands … as renting electricity remains the paradigm this is good news. Leasing, utility ownership of systems on customer’s rooftops area all being explored…Innovative financing options such as PACE, Policy for new home construction, will make it easier for homeowners to make a commitment to solar, but time (and an improved economy) will tell how much of a market stimulus this will add…”

    click to enlarge

    - Paula Mints, Principal Analyst, Navigant Consulting PV Services Program: “We’ve come so far, and we have far to go.”

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home