NewEnergyNews: EU WIND'S ADMIRABLE INITIATIVE

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

Every day is Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • Holiday Weekend Reading: NEW ENERGY IN CHINA
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: INTEGRATING NEW ENERGY
  • QUICK NEWS, May 24: SO AFRICA TO BUILD A GIGAWATT OF WIND; LUCKY CORRIDOR FOR NEW MEXICO NEW ENERGY; MEGAWATT TEST OF CIGS THIN FILM
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE BENEFITS OF WIND AND SOLAR TOGETHER
  • QUICK NEWS, May 23: AN ‘UNPRECEDENTED’ MOVE TO NEW ENERGY; BRAINTRUST GOES AFTER SOLAR PRICE; INTERIOR APPROVES WIND ON INDIAN LAND
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: EUROPE’S PV TO 2016
  • QUICK NEWS, May 22: APPLE TURNS TO SUN; EU WIND CAN LEAD ECONOMIC RECOVERY; CHINA’S NEW GRID MAY ONLY MEET OLD NEEDS
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: BANKS ON COAL
  • QUICK NEWS, May 21: A FIGHT FOR SUN IN TEXAS; NRG LAYOFFS HERALD FADING PTC HOPES; WHAT WORRIES GRID OPERATORS MOST
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- CHINA STARTS WORLD’S BIGGEST TRANSMISSION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- SOLAR’S IMPACT ON GERMAN OCEAN WIND
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- INDIA WIND GETS A GOLDMAN SACHS BILLION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- HOW KOREA IS LIKE DENMARK
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Anne Butterfield (Huffington Post via New EnergyNews)

    Eventually those local moratoriums against fracking will expire in Boulder, Longmont and Erie. And residents will worry anew about toxic fracking operations inching up on schools and neighborhoods in pursuit of a product that goes "poof" the instant it's used. Nice value ~ not.

    And it's timely that the University of Colorado at Denver School of Public Health just announced a study which finds that air pollution within a half mile of frack-ops have toxic emissions five times over federal safety standards, causing elevated life time cancer risks and respiratory and neurological effects for nearby residents. Rep. Diana DeGette is now urging the Environmental Protection Agency to consider Colorado's study as they finalize air standards for fracking.

    It has also just come out that fracking is inching up on agriculture to compete for Colorado's water. Taking only .08 of a percent per year, it's a smidge for sure, but that water gets so polluted it must be disposed in a way that removes it from the hydrologic cycle. And that's not pretty when we're looking down the craw of a new drought kicked off with an historic climate change induced heat wave plus a horrifying wildfire this season.

    Permanently voiding precious Colorado water out of the hydrologic cycle feels even worse in view the fact such water can be lost for naught when the depletion rate on fracking wells is 63-85 percent in the first year, according to Dave Hughes of the Geological Survey of Canada. This can mean fruitless water waste when drilling down the slippery slope of diminishing marginal returns.

    But Colorado will need all the more gas, as the Clean Air Clean Jobs Act requires Xcel Eenrgy in Colorado to soon retire 900 megawatts of coal burning capacity. The act also requires that the natural gas used for recouping that coal-fired capacity comes from in state (see page 18 here). That puts upward pressure on fracking all over the state. This means more tangles between fracking and populated areas, and more permanent loss of precious Colorado water. It seems like Colorado may have backed itself into a box canyon, where residents are cornered with fracking risks to land, air, water and health.

    But there's an elegant pathway to reducing Colorado's need for natural gas -- by using the sun in a familiar technology that is at least two times more efficient than solar photovoltaics. It's good old fashioned solar thermal - those rooftop panels that heat water.

    Colorado could amend the CACJA to promote solar thermal as a jobs intensive domestic energy supply that works with natural gas to heat homes, buildings, water and industrial processes. This could free drilling companies to sell excess Colorado gas out of state for much higher prices (see page 8 here), possibly gaining crucial industry support for this intrusion of renewables into their market. Higher profitability, less contentious drilling and more renewable energy jobs is the hope.

    In all of North American, Colorado is "ground zero" for the best conditions for producing huge benefits from solar thermal. It's the sunshine, cold ground water, high heating loads, renewables-savvy population and existing industry that can, if the state takes on robust targets, lead the nation in an industry that swaps jobs and skills in place of burning money. And burning money is what we do when we burn costly fuels that go poof the instant they're used.

    A robust Colorado plan for solar thermal could put the clean air and clean jobs back into the so-called, gas-friendly Clean Air Clean Jobs Act.

    And in case anyone has forgotten ~ there are huge economic risks with shale gas, a.k.a. the fracking boom, as the resource is almost certainly not as profitable, resourceful or as clean as hyped by industry. On deeper review, it's promising to be an economic bubble.

    Fracking is supposedly going to make our nation 100 years of cheap gas, as, amnesiac members of Congress and the President are wont to say. But various geological experts such as the Potential Gas Committe have poured cold water all over that flaming hype, detailing how the supply could be as little as 21 or even 11 years. And Arthur Berman, a widely regarded petro-geologist has commented that the industry reminds him of the sub prime mortgage mess and wrote, "U.S. shale plays share many characteristics with the gold rushes.... Both phenomena result from extreme promotion. Anyone can join. Every participant believes that they will get rich. Great amounts of capital are destroyed as entrants try to get a position. The bonanza is exhausted sooner than most expected and few profit in the end."

    So if you are one of the thousands of Coloradans who are waking up to the nightmare of fracking in your community - go online and read the Colorado Solar Thermal Roadmap. Then find every political leader you can to talk about it. Colorado would be wise to use its natural solar resources to hedge against an over-reliance on gas, one that shall expand as the CACJA requires. And coal with its rising prices is on the wane nationwide as well, which means the demand for gas will be a pressure cooker loaded with risk for our energy security, economy, and environment.

    Author's note: Want to support my work? Please "fan" me at Huffpost Denver, here (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-butterfield). Thanks.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Tuesday, June 15, 2010

    EU WIND'S ADMIRABLE INITIATIVE

    Wind Energy: Action Plan for the new European Commission and Parliament
    and
    The European Wind Initiative; Wind power research and development of the next ten years
    June 2010 (European Wind Energy Association)

    THE POINT
    There are two worlds of wind. The one inhabited by the manufacturers and developers of Europe and Asia is abuzz with growth and planning. The one inhabited by U.S. manufacturers and developers is planning and floundering.

    As pointed out in As Wind Soars, Will U.S. Fall Behind?, the difference is in the policies.

    The Chinese central leadership has established clear and ambitious national New Energy goals. Smbitious entrepreneurs in the command and control economy have responded aggressively, achieving a pace of growth never seen before in the New Energy economy.

    Free-marketeers in the U.S. have fought to keep the New Energies largely unsupported by strong, consistent long-term policies and goals at the federal level. As a result, the New Energy industries have suffered boom and bust as production and investment tax credits and their usefulness have waxed and waned.

    Europe, meanwhile, has pioneered a third way. That their makers and doers are part of the first, thriving world of New Energy is a tribute as much to innovative policy as it is to aggressive entrepreneurship. EU policy - and what European Union policymakers are looking at going forward - is therefore worth taking note of.

    click to enlarge

    The first thing EU policymakers are looking at is economic trouble. The burden Greek travials have imposed on their more financially stable compatriots has been front-page fodder. The potential of such challenges spreading to the other members of the EU PIIGS (Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece, Spain) is widely feared.

    The next thing European leaders are looking at is a rising need for new sources of power generation. It is estimated that new demand and old capacity will produce a need for 360 gigawatts of new electricity generating capacity by 2020. That’s half of all the generation the EU is now capable of.

    Two more powerful forces are driving EU thinking: (1) The urgency of developing an alternative to dependence on Russian and Middle East natural gas and (2) the dark foreboding of global climate change.

    EU planners see one opportunity in all these challenges: Wind. It provided 60,000 new direct jobs between 2002 and 2007. It earned Europe 60% of the €36 billion world turbine market in 2008. Growth was equally big in 2009. Wind was the biggest source of new generation in Europe in 2008 and 2009.

    click to enlarge

    The EU’s Renewable Energy Directive, passed in 2009 and nicknamed the “triple 20,” calls for member nations to get an average of 20% of their power from New Energy sources – as well as reduce their greenhouse gas emissions (GhGs) 20% and improve efficiency by 20% – by 2020. Prgressive elements are clamoring for 30% goals.

    Because there is still great unused potential in Europe’s wind resources – especially offshore – political and wind industry leaders have now begun pushing for more ambitious and far-reaching policies. By putting the right policies in place, they believe, wind development will be able to provide enough domestically-generated electricity to meet 3 times Europe’s expected 2020 demand and 7 times its expected 2030 demand.

    The European Wind Energy Association (EWEA) believes Europe can build 230 gigawatts of wind, over 15% of it offshore, by 2020. It is calling for a €6 billion R&D effort, half financed by the private sector, to (1) maintain technology leadership, (2) make onshore wind the most competitive energy source by 2020 and offshore the most competitive by 2030, and (3) generate 20% of Europe’s electricity from wind in 2020, 33% in 2030, and 50% in 2050.

    EWEA believes 5 priorities will achieve these things: (1) New turbines and components, (2) offshore technology, (3) grid integration, (4) resource assessment and (5) spatial planning.

    click to enlarge

    THE DETAILS
    EU wind created 60,000+ new direct jobs from 2002 to 2007, an average of 33 new jobs a day. European manufacturers had a 60% share of the €36 billion 2008 global wind turbine market. 36% of the EU’s new electricity generation capacity in 2008, more than any other type of power generation, was wind.

    Worldwide, there were 38.3 gigawatts of new wind installed in 2009, bringing the world’s total installed capacity to 158.5 gigawatts.

    New EWEA targets for 2020: 230 gigawatts of installed capacity, 40 gigawatts of it offshore, producing 14%-to-17% of EU electricity.

    Europe’s newest action plan calls for growth based on 6 key research activities that will support achievment of the 3 goals (technology leadership, competitive onshore and offshore prices, and taking on increasing portions of the electricity supply) and emphasize the 5 priorities (New turbines and components, offshore technology, grid integration, resource assessment and spatial planning):
    (1) Improved design and layout of wind installations,
    (2) Increased turbine reliability, accessibility and efficiency, (3) optimized offshore turbine maintenance, assembly and installation,
    (3) demonstrating a 10-to-20 megawatt offshore wind turbine prototype and the capability of more widespread offshore interconnection capability,
    (4) newer, better grid management methods that allow higher levels of wind on the transmission system, and
    (5) better spatial planning standards.

    click to enlarge

    The European Commission’s Strategic Energy Technology Plan (SET-Plan) initiated continent-wide policy development in 2007 and is now aiming at a €71.5 billion budget, out of which €6 billion would go to wind.

    For 2020, the SET-Plan provides policies to drive the achievement of the EU’s Renewable Energy Directive, passed in 2009 and nicknamed the “triple 20,” that calls for member nations to get an average of 20% of their power from New Energy sources, reduce their greenhouse gas emissions (GhGs) 20% and improve efficiency by 20% by 2020.

    For 2050, the SET-Plan provides policies to drive the achievement of the EU’s target of cutting its greenhouse gas emissions (GhGs) 80%-to-95% below 1990 levels so as to limit the global average temperature rise to no more than 2°C.

    These policies would be supported by the Strategic Research Agenda in the European Wind Energy Technology Platform (TPWind). In its Phase 1 for 2020, its policies would bring wind costs down and see the development of 230 gigawatts of installed capacity with 40 gigawatts from offshore development. This would be ~20% of EU electricity. In its Phase 2 for 2030, its policies would bring wind costs down to grid competitive levels and support 400 gigawatts of installed capacity. Half of the yearly development of 20 gigawatts would be offshore. This would provide a third of EU electricity and see Europe exporting wind-generated electricity. In its Phase 3 for 2030-to-2050, the primary source of wind would be offshore and repowering, exports would be “substantial” and Europe could get half its electricity from wind

    click to enlarge

    TPWind, a network and R&D forum of ~150 wind energy researchers and experts, is financed by the European Commission and coordinated by the European Wind Energy Association (EWEA). It evolved out of the 2002 Barcelona European Council’s commitment to increased R&D and a 3-phase program. It led to the SET-Plan, the European Wind Initiative and the Wind Energy Roadmap (WER) Implementation Plan
    for 2010 – 2012.

    The European Wind Initiative (EWI) commits the industry to a high-tech roadmap to lower costs. It is designed to drive wind energy technology development with testing facilities and streamlined manufacturing processes.

    EWI intends to create 250,000+ skilled jobs through meeting 3 goals: (1) maintain technology leadership, (2) make onshore wind the most competitive energy source by 2020 and offshore the most competitive by 2030, and (3) make wind 20% of Europe’s electricity in 2020, 33% in 2030, and 50% in 2050.

    EWI’s 5 priorities: (1) New turbines and components, (2) offshore technology, (3) grid integration, (4) resource assessment and (5) spatial planning.

    click to enlarge

    The EWI research objectives: (1) Ease site assessment, (2) gather onshore and offshore wind data, (3) advance turbine manufacturing technology and specifically prove a 10-to-20 megawatt offshore turbine, (4) advance the offshore wind industry, (5) enable large-scale grid integration of onshore and offshore wind, and (6) design cost-effective spatial planning instruments.

    The EWI published its Wind Energy Roadmap (WER) in the summer of 2009. The first WER Implementation will be in 2010-to-2012. There are 18 priority activities in 4 strategic technology areas.

    The WER will require €600 million per year in public and private resources, a €6 billion total investment by 2020. 15%-to-24% will finance the 2010-to-2012 implementation, regardless of the effectiveness of the European Economic Recovery Plan (EERP). 52% of of the 2010-to-2012 budget should come from the private sector, 31% from the EU, and 17% from Member States.

    The EWI is specific about sources of funding. It also contains an extensive list of short, medium and long-term recommendations for the achievement of the goals. The recommendations stress the development of new electricity infrastructure and ‘smart grids.’

    click to enlarge

    Because the European Commission finds that a $20 increase in the oil price increases Europe’s yearly gas import bill $15 billion, the increase in oil’s price in the 1st decade of the 21st century from $20 to $80 has added $45 billion to the EU energy bill – to say nothing of the cost when oil went to $147 in June 2008. Because wind offsets natural gas use, this makes investment in wind a tremendous bargain. Wind avoided €5.4 billion in EU fuel costs and and €2.4 billion in EU CO2 costs in 2008.

    Direct employment in the wind energy sector increased by 125%, an average of 33 new jobs every day, between 2002 and 2007. EWEA expects the wind sector to grow 450,000+ direct and indirect jobs by 2020. There were 160,000 direct and indirect wind jobs in 2008.

    Wind can relieve the EU’s energy security of its current 54% of imported energy and its predicted 70% of imported energy in 2030. The reports also describe wind’s significant contribution to the EU’s efforts against climate change and to sustain and increase the EU’s economic competitiveness.

    click to enlarge

    QUOTES
    - From the Action Plan: “Wind generation produces no greenhouse gas emissions and replaces traditional, polluting power sources. It emits no toxic pollutants such as mercury, nor any conventional air pollutants such as smog-forming nitrogen dioxide, and it prevents serious water pollution or depletion. Wind energy has the lowest lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of all the energy production technologies. A turbine reimburses the energy used and CO2 produced to build it in just three to six months.”

    click to enlarge

    - From the Action Plan: “Wind power can reduce the electricity price because it has a low marginal cost, and therefore pushes out more expensive power generating technologies on the electricity market. When the electricity price is lowered, this is beneficial to all power consumers, since the reduction in price applies to all electricity traded – not only to electricity generated by wind power. What is more, investing in wind in Europe means that money that would have gone to fuel-exporting nations is put to work at home, helping consolidate Europe’s leadership in the field of wind energy technology and pave the way for exports to third countries.”

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home