NewEnergyNews: QUICK NEWS, 6-7: SCRUB SCRUB SCRUB; THE OIL SPILL – CHENEY’S KATRINA; POWERDISH & CPV TESTED; WIND & WHAT EVERYBODY TALKS ABOUT IT

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

Every day is Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • Holiday Weekend Reading: NEW ENERGY IN CHINA
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: INTEGRATING NEW ENERGY
  • QUICK NEWS, May 24: SO AFRICA TO BUILD A GIGAWATT OF WIND; LUCKY CORRIDOR FOR NEW MEXICO NEW ENERGY; MEGAWATT TEST OF CIGS THIN FILM
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE BENEFITS OF WIND AND SOLAR TOGETHER
  • QUICK NEWS, May 23: AN ‘UNPRECEDENTED’ MOVE TO NEW ENERGY; BRAINTRUST GOES AFTER SOLAR PRICE; INTERIOR APPROVES WIND ON INDIAN LAND
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: EUROPE’S PV TO 2016
  • QUICK NEWS, May 22: APPLE TURNS TO SUN; EU WIND CAN LEAD ECONOMIC RECOVERY; CHINA’S NEW GRID MAY ONLY MEET OLD NEEDS
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: BANKS ON COAL
  • QUICK NEWS, May 21: A FIGHT FOR SUN IN TEXAS; NRG LAYOFFS HERALD FADING PTC HOPES; WHAT WORRIES GRID OPERATORS MOST
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- CHINA STARTS WORLD’S BIGGEST TRANSMISSION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- SOLAR’S IMPACT ON GERMAN OCEAN WIND
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- INDIA WIND GETS A GOLDMAN SACHS BILLION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- HOW KOREA IS LIKE DENMARK
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Anne Butterfield (Huffington Post via New EnergyNews)

    Eventually those local moratoriums against fracking will expire in Boulder, Longmont and Erie. And residents will worry anew about toxic fracking operations inching up on schools and neighborhoods in pursuit of a product that goes "poof" the instant it's used. Nice value ~ not.

    And it's timely that the University of Colorado at Denver School of Public Health just announced a study which finds that air pollution within a half mile of frack-ops have toxic emissions five times over federal safety standards, causing elevated life time cancer risks and respiratory and neurological effects for nearby residents. Rep. Diana DeGette is now urging the Environmental Protection Agency to consider Colorado's study as they finalize air standards for fracking.

    It has also just come out that fracking is inching up on agriculture to compete for Colorado's water. Taking only .08 of a percent per year, it's a smidge for sure, but that water gets so polluted it must be disposed in a way that removes it from the hydrologic cycle. And that's not pretty when we're looking down the craw of a new drought kicked off with an historic climate change induced heat wave plus a horrifying wildfire this season.

    Permanently voiding precious Colorado water out of the hydrologic cycle feels even worse in view the fact such water can be lost for naught when the depletion rate on fracking wells is 63-85 percent in the first year, according to Dave Hughes of the Geological Survey of Canada. This can mean fruitless water waste when drilling down the slippery slope of diminishing marginal returns.

    But Colorado will need all the more gas, as the Clean Air Clean Jobs Act requires Xcel Eenrgy in Colorado to soon retire 900 megawatts of coal burning capacity. The act also requires that the natural gas used for recouping that coal-fired capacity comes from in state (see page 18 here). That puts upward pressure on fracking all over the state. This means more tangles between fracking and populated areas, and more permanent loss of precious Colorado water. It seems like Colorado may have backed itself into a box canyon, where residents are cornered with fracking risks to land, air, water and health.

    But there's an elegant pathway to reducing Colorado's need for natural gas -- by using the sun in a familiar technology that is at least two times more efficient than solar photovoltaics. It's good old fashioned solar thermal - those rooftop panels that heat water.

    Colorado could amend the CACJA to promote solar thermal as a jobs intensive domestic energy supply that works with natural gas to heat homes, buildings, water and industrial processes. This could free drilling companies to sell excess Colorado gas out of state for much higher prices (see page 8 here), possibly gaining crucial industry support for this intrusion of renewables into their market. Higher profitability, less contentious drilling and more renewable energy jobs is the hope.

    In all of North American, Colorado is "ground zero" for the best conditions for producing huge benefits from solar thermal. It's the sunshine, cold ground water, high heating loads, renewables-savvy population and existing industry that can, if the state takes on robust targets, lead the nation in an industry that swaps jobs and skills in place of burning money. And burning money is what we do when we burn costly fuels that go poof the instant they're used.

    A robust Colorado plan for solar thermal could put the clean air and clean jobs back into the so-called, gas-friendly Clean Air Clean Jobs Act.

    And in case anyone has forgotten ~ there are huge economic risks with shale gas, a.k.a. the fracking boom, as the resource is almost certainly not as profitable, resourceful or as clean as hyped by industry. On deeper review, it's promising to be an economic bubble.

    Fracking is supposedly going to make our nation 100 years of cheap gas, as, amnesiac members of Congress and the President are wont to say. But various geological experts such as the Potential Gas Committe have poured cold water all over that flaming hype, detailing how the supply could be as little as 21 or even 11 years. And Arthur Berman, a widely regarded petro-geologist has commented that the industry reminds him of the sub prime mortgage mess and wrote, "U.S. shale plays share many characteristics with the gold rushes.... Both phenomena result from extreme promotion. Anyone can join. Every participant believes that they will get rich. Great amounts of capital are destroyed as entrants try to get a position. The bonanza is exhausted sooner than most expected and few profit in the end."

    So if you are one of the thousands of Coloradans who are waking up to the nightmare of fracking in your community - go online and read the Colorado Solar Thermal Roadmap. Then find every political leader you can to talk about it. Colorado would be wise to use its natural solar resources to hedge against an over-reliance on gas, one that shall expand as the CACJA requires. And coal with its rising prices is on the wane nationwide as well, which means the demand for gas will be a pressure cooker loaded with risk for our energy security, economy, and environment.

    Author's note: Want to support my work? Please "fan" me at Huffpost Denver, here (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-butterfield). Thanks.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Monday, June 07, 2010

    QUICK NEWS, 6-7: SCRUB SCRUB SCRUB; THE OIL SPILL – CHENEY’S KATRINA; POWERDISH & CPV TESTED; WIND & WHAT EVERYBODY TALKS ABOUT IT

    SCRUB SCRUB SCRUB
    Bird washers hard at work as Gulf spill toll grows
    Anna Driver (w/Sarah Irwin, Ros Krasny and Paul Simao), June 5, 2010 (Reuters)

    "…The number of birds brought to the Fort Jackson Bird Rehabilitation Center in Venice, Louisiana, where workers hired by BP wash the birds, has jumped…as a huge oil slick edges closer to vital nesting and breeding grounds.

    "A total of 157 birds found in state waters have been treated at the center, where they receive a vigorous scrubbing, since the oil started leaking…But 66 birds, mostly brown pelicans, arrived [June 4 and 5], raising alarm bells. The brown pelican is Louisiana's state bird and only was taken off the endangered species list just last year amid attempts to restore its population…"


    From GreenpeaceMagazine via YouTube

    "The birds brought to the center are plucked from oil soaked waters that now ring Louisiana's fragile barrier islands and marshes. The feathers of oiled birds become matted and separate, leaving them vulnerable to heat or cold…They also try to preen, or clean their feathers with their beak or bill, risking a sickening or fatal ingestion of oil.

    "The marshy areas around the rehabilitation center are so far untouched by the slick, and are teeming with birds. Snowy-white egrets peck at the ground or scan shallow waters for food, while gulls and terns fly overhead…But on [June 5], brisk winds pushed oil over some of the containment booms meant to keep the crude away from the coast, ringing a nearby brown pelican rookery and leaving the birds standing in a watery crude oil soup…"


    click thru to the NY Times for the interactive map

    "Once brought to the center, the birds are treated for dehydration and other conditions and fed before the difficult clean-up operation begins…Because the crude that clings to the pelicans' feathers is so sticky, they are first bathed in warmed vegetable oil…In the next step, workers armed with toothbrushes and dishwashing liquid scrub the birds for about 45 minutes. The brown pelicans, which have wingspans as wide as 8 feet (2.44 meters) typically struggle during the process...After the birds are dried and receive a health check, they are banded for identification purposes and flown to Florida by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service...

    "The spill's toll on the Gulf coast bird population will not be known for some time...[S]ome rehabilitated birds may survive but might not breed again…According to the [June 5] report issued by the U.S. government…547 birds across the Gulf coast have been collected dead, but not all of those animals showed signs of contact with oil…But the government's numbers tell only part of the story…[because some birds sink into the water and are never counted]…"



    THE OIL SPILL – CHENEY’S KATRINA
    BP Disaster Is Cheney’s Katrina; Bush Administration Actions Created Unsafe Circumstances
    Rebecca Lefton, June 2, 2010 (Center for American Progress)

    "BP’s oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico is without a doubt former Vice President Dick Cheney’s Katrina. President George W. Bush and Cheney consistently catered to Big Oil and other special interests to undercut renewable energy and energy efficiency initiatives that would set the United States on a more secure clean energy path.

    "Oil companies raked in record profits while benefitting from policies they wrote for themselves. These energy policies did nothing for our national security and left consumers to pay the price at the pump and on their energy bills, which rose more than $1,100 during the Bush administration…"


    From the Center for American Progress (click to enlarge)

    "2001…The Bush administration released the National Energy Policy Report on May 16…[It] was based on recommendations provided to Cheney from coal, oil, and nuclear companies and related trade groups…[which] secretly met with the Cheney and his staff as part of a task force to develop the country’s energy policy…Only 7 of the 105 recommendations in the plan involved renewable energy… [T]the fiscal year 2002 budget… included steep cuts for clean energy research and development…[The]
    House energy bill [had] $33.5 billion in tax breaks for dirty energy…2002…[The] Senate clean energy bill…[passed] but was not reconciled with the House bill that closely followed the Cheney dirty energy task force proposal…[There were further renewable] energy budget cuts…

    "…2003…[The] House energy bill [had] $23.5 billion in tax breaks for dirty energy…[There were further] renewable energy budget cuts…2004…[The] House [passed a] bill allowing companies to build oil refineries in minority communities…"


    click to enlarge

    "…2005…[There were further] renewable energy budget cuts…[The] Energy Policy Act of 2005…closely resembled Cheney’s 2001 plan and gave $27 billion to coal, oil and gas, and nuclear, and only $6.4 billion for renewable energy… Regulations [were put in place permiting] oil and gas industry to regulate itself… 2006…President Bush [stated] in the State of the Union Address…that, “America is addicted to oil.” …A House-passed bill [allowed] drilling in Arctic Refuge…[but] Arctic Refuge development was once again blocked in the Senate because drilling proponents were unable to muster the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster…[There were further] budget cuts for renewable energy…"

    "2007…Investigators from the Interior Department…found that the Minerals Management Service [were informed of but failed to collect $865 million owed in oil and gas royalties due to a legal mistake]…[There were further] cuts for renewable energy… President Bush [blocked] the Energy Independence and Security Act because it included a renewable electricity standard and renewable energy tax credits funded by the elimination of many tax subsidies for major oil companies…2008…President Bush [proposed] a 27 percent cut for Department of Energy efficiency and renewable energy programs…opposed House passage of [a strong energy bill and]…lifted the executive moratorium on offshore drilling…Minerals Management Service officials [were found to have] accepted gifts, engaged in drug use and illicit sex with employees from energy firms, and showed favoritism in handling contracts…Gasoline prices soared to more than $4.00 per gallon, and oil set an all-time record high price of $147 per barrel…"



    POWERDISH & CPV TESTED
    SDG&E Unveils New Solar Power Demonstration Projects; Projects Concentrate Solar Heat/Light to Boost Power Efficiency
    June 2, 2010 (Marketwire via MarketWatch)

    "San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E)…[placed] two new solar power demonstration installations that concentrate the light and heat from the sun to generate power in two distinctively different ways.

    "…The PowerDish(TM), built by Infinia of Kennewick, Wash., a mirrored disc 15 feet in diameter that concentrates and focuses the sun's energy onto a compact Stirling engine that converts that energy into electricity. Each PowerDish produces up to 3,000 watts of electricity, enough to power a typical home…"


    From ThePowerDish via YouTube

    "…Concentrator Photovoltaic (CPV) Technology, built by SolFocus of Mountain View, Calif., uses a reflective optical system to concentrate sunlight 650 times onto very high-efficiency photovoltaic cells up to twice as efficient as traditional silicon PV cells. The rectangular system is 24 feet wide, 18 feet tall and is capable of generating 8,400 watts, enough to power three homes…

    "The total cost for both projects is $80,000 and will be funded by SDG&E's research and development group…"


    From WMSMedia via YouTube

    "The demonstrations are expected to continue for 12 to 18 months, after which SDG&E will share the results with the manufacturers.

    "…[The projects support] SDG&E's plan to develop green technologies, meet its renewable energy goals and reduce greenhouse-gas emissions. The company has voluntarily agreed to obtain 33 percent of its electricity portfolio from renewables by 2020…"



    WIND & WHAT EVERYBODY TALKS ABOUT IT
    Learning Curve Continues in Use of Wind Forecasting Technologies: NREL-Funded Paper
    Carl Levesque, June 4, 2010 (Wind Energy Weekly)

    "As utilities and RTOs put wind forecasting through its paces and become more familiar with how to use it, they continue to rely on it primarily for ensuring grid reliability, according to a recently released paper…

    "…
    Status of Centralized Wind Power Forecasting in North America, was produced by Kevin Porter and Jennifer Rogers of Columbia, Md.-based Exeter Associates with funding from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and U.S. Department of Energy…[It] explains how different regions use wind power forecasting."

    click to enlarge

    "In addition to reviewing the advantages and disadvantages of wind power forecasting, the paper explores each program individually, noting when they came into operation, or expect to do so, and which wind power forecast vendor and model the organizations chose to provide the service. The tools and techniques used by the vendor to procure the forecasts are detailed in the paper, along with what data wind projects are required to submit in each region.

    "… [O]ne conclusion reached…is that there is increasing interest in using centralized forecasting systems. But perhaps the most salient point…is that the wind forecasting space remains at a stage of cautious experimentation, with day-ahead forecasts still used first and foremost for reliability planning but not in the area believed to have the greatest impact on power prices—that is, for market decisions, such as when to bring online gas-fired plants and when to ramp them down. Such uses, assert an ever-growing catalogue of wind integration studies, can be the source for significant cost benefits through easing of pressure on natural gas and power prices…"

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home