NewEnergyNews: AT THE BRINK OF THE ENERGY BILL FIGHT

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

Every day is Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • Holiday Weekend Reading: NEW ENERGY IN CHINA
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: INTEGRATING NEW ENERGY
  • QUICK NEWS, May 24: SO AFRICA TO BUILD A GIGAWATT OF WIND; LUCKY CORRIDOR FOR NEW MEXICO NEW ENERGY; MEGAWATT TEST OF CIGS THIN FILM
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE BENEFITS OF WIND AND SOLAR TOGETHER
  • QUICK NEWS, May 23: AN ‘UNPRECEDENTED’ MOVE TO NEW ENERGY; BRAINTRUST GOES AFTER SOLAR PRICE; INTERIOR APPROVES WIND ON INDIAN LAND
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: EUROPE’S PV TO 2016
  • QUICK NEWS, May 22: APPLE TURNS TO SUN; EU WIND CAN LEAD ECONOMIC RECOVERY; CHINA’S NEW GRID MAY ONLY MEET OLD NEEDS
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: BANKS ON COAL
  • QUICK NEWS, May 21: A FIGHT FOR SUN IN TEXAS; NRG LAYOFFS HERALD FADING PTC HOPES; WHAT WORRIES GRID OPERATORS MOST
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- CHINA STARTS WORLD’S BIGGEST TRANSMISSION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- SOLAR’S IMPACT ON GERMAN OCEAN WIND
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- INDIA WIND GETS A GOLDMAN SACHS BILLION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- HOW KOREA IS LIKE DENMARK
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Anne Butterfield (Huffington Post via New EnergyNews)

    Eventually those local moratoriums against fracking will expire in Boulder, Longmont and Erie. And residents will worry anew about toxic fracking operations inching up on schools and neighborhoods in pursuit of a product that goes "poof" the instant it's used. Nice value ~ not.

    And it's timely that the University of Colorado at Denver School of Public Health just announced a study which finds that air pollution within a half mile of frack-ops have toxic emissions five times over federal safety standards, causing elevated life time cancer risks and respiratory and neurological effects for nearby residents. Rep. Diana DeGette is now urging the Environmental Protection Agency to consider Colorado's study as they finalize air standards for fracking.

    It has also just come out that fracking is inching up on agriculture to compete for Colorado's water. Taking only .08 of a percent per year, it's a smidge for sure, but that water gets so polluted it must be disposed in a way that removes it from the hydrologic cycle. And that's not pretty when we're looking down the craw of a new drought kicked off with an historic climate change induced heat wave plus a horrifying wildfire this season.

    Permanently voiding precious Colorado water out of the hydrologic cycle feels even worse in view the fact such water can be lost for naught when the depletion rate on fracking wells is 63-85 percent in the first year, according to Dave Hughes of the Geological Survey of Canada. This can mean fruitless water waste when drilling down the slippery slope of diminishing marginal returns.

    But Colorado will need all the more gas, as the Clean Air Clean Jobs Act requires Xcel Eenrgy in Colorado to soon retire 900 megawatts of coal burning capacity. The act also requires that the natural gas used for recouping that coal-fired capacity comes from in state (see page 18 here). That puts upward pressure on fracking all over the state. This means more tangles between fracking and populated areas, and more permanent loss of precious Colorado water. It seems like Colorado may have backed itself into a box canyon, where residents are cornered with fracking risks to land, air, water and health.

    But there's an elegant pathway to reducing Colorado's need for natural gas -- by using the sun in a familiar technology that is at least two times more efficient than solar photovoltaics. It's good old fashioned solar thermal - those rooftop panels that heat water.

    Colorado could amend the CACJA to promote solar thermal as a jobs intensive domestic energy supply that works with natural gas to heat homes, buildings, water and industrial processes. This could free drilling companies to sell excess Colorado gas out of state for much higher prices (see page 8 here), possibly gaining crucial industry support for this intrusion of renewables into their market. Higher profitability, less contentious drilling and more renewable energy jobs is the hope.

    In all of North American, Colorado is "ground zero" for the best conditions for producing huge benefits from solar thermal. It's the sunshine, cold ground water, high heating loads, renewables-savvy population and existing industry that can, if the state takes on robust targets, lead the nation in an industry that swaps jobs and skills in place of burning money. And burning money is what we do when we burn costly fuels that go poof the instant they're used.

    A robust Colorado plan for solar thermal could put the clean air and clean jobs back into the so-called, gas-friendly Clean Air Clean Jobs Act.

    And in case anyone has forgotten ~ there are huge economic risks with shale gas, a.k.a. the fracking boom, as the resource is almost certainly not as profitable, resourceful or as clean as hyped by industry. On deeper review, it's promising to be an economic bubble.

    Fracking is supposedly going to make our nation 100 years of cheap gas, as, amnesiac members of Congress and the President are wont to say. But various geological experts such as the Potential Gas Committe have poured cold water all over that flaming hype, detailing how the supply could be as little as 21 or even 11 years. And Arthur Berman, a widely regarded petro-geologist has commented that the industry reminds him of the sub prime mortgage mess and wrote, "U.S. shale plays share many characteristics with the gold rushes.... Both phenomena result from extreme promotion. Anyone can join. Every participant believes that they will get rich. Great amounts of capital are destroyed as entrants try to get a position. The bonanza is exhausted sooner than most expected and few profit in the end."

    So if you are one of the thousands of Coloradans who are waking up to the nightmare of fracking in your community - go online and read the Colorado Solar Thermal Roadmap. Then find every political leader you can to talk about it. Colorado would be wise to use its natural solar resources to hedge against an over-reliance on gas, one that shall expand as the CACJA requires. And coal with its rising prices is on the wane nationwide as well, which means the demand for gas will be a pressure cooker loaded with risk for our energy security, economy, and environment.

    Author's note: Want to support my work? Please "fan" me at Huffpost Denver, here (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-butterfield). Thanks.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Thursday, July 22, 2010

    AT THE BRINK OF THE ENERGY BILL FIGHT

    The Energy Fight Coming to the Senate; The renewable energies are fighting for their lives and environmental groups are fighting for the planet
    Herman K. Trabish, July 12, 2010 (Greentech Media)

    (NewEnergyNews was on assignment yesterday, chasing down interviews about the crucial fight scheduled to begin on the Senate floor this coming Monday (July 26). Below is a profile of the fight. A version of it originally appeared at Greentech Media.)

    “This is such an important time for the industry,” was the first thing Acciona Energy North America CFO Susan Nickey, fresh from meetings in Washington, D.C., said.

    It’s an important time because the Gulf oil spill has revived hope for the once lost-cause energy-climate legislation and because the renewable energy industries are desperately in need of such legislation.

    After sustaining growth in 2009, some of the renewables’ most important incentives are set to expire at the end of this year. Nickey’s meetings with Republicans revealed there are Republican votes for new legislation – IF.

    “There is bipartisan support both on the Senate and House sides to pass a Renewable Energy Standard [RES] to create long-term growth and to also extend the grant-in-lieu of ITC program to maintain last year’s expansion,” Nickey said. But, she stressed, only if the administration and the Democratic leadership forego action on greenhouse gas emissions.

    click to enlarge

    A national RES would require regulated U.S. utilities to obtain 20-to-25% of their power from renewable sources by 2020 or 2025. The Treasury’s grant program allows unused tax credits to be exchanged for federal grants.

    Nickey is in a unique position to see the legislative dilemma clearly. Because Acciona, one of the biggest players in U.S. solar and wind, has a major manufacturing facility in Iowa, Nickey had meetings with the staffs of Iowa Democratic Senator Tom Harkin and Iowa Republican Senator Chuck Grassley, as well as other Republicans. Iowa is a wind powerhouse and one of the first states to pass an RES. But it is also a conservative state and not inclined toward climate change-fighting cap and trade legislation.

    The cap and trade plan would limit the greenhouse gas emissions (GhGs) emitted by major power producers and users determined by climate scientists to be the cause of global climate change. It would also create a market mechanism to facilitate the emitters’ ability to meet their caps. Seen by many environmentalists as vital to the fight against climate change, cap and trade has been successfully branded a too-complicated stealth tax by its opponents.

    What Nickey learned in D.C. is the very real news that Republican senators could support energy-only legislation and an RES. Grassley, she said, has long supported the wind industry and “helped put together the production tax credit [PTC] a long time ago.”

    The PTC is the key incentive with which the wind industry built its 2005-to-2009 “boom” but it is a short-term incentive and responsible, when it was withdrawn, for wind’s three “bust” years (2000, 2002, and 2004).

    Having a long-term incentive like the RES will thrill the renewable energy industries but some environmental groups will not be pleased if Congress is unable to pass climate change provisions along with it.

    click to enlarge

    "The Bingaman bill would do more harm than good, by promoting more off-shore and ultra-deepwater oil and gas drilling in the Gulf, as well as other dirty energy industries such as nuclear power, coal with carbon sequestration and 'biomass' incineration," according to Mike Ewall of the Energy Justice Network. "The bill's main selling point – the Renewable Electricity Standard (RES) – does nothing that the similar existing policies in 30 states would not already accomplish and it is riddled with loopholes. We support addressing climate change with good energy policy that isn't full of dirty energy subsidies, but our corporate-controlled Congress is not up to the task."

    “A bundle of energy policies alone cannot accomplish the three-fold task of curbing pollution, creating jobs, cutting our dependence on foreign oil,” wrote David Doniger of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). “An integrated bill will reduce global warming pollution, while a piecemeal ‘energy only’ bill could make carbon emissions worse.”

    But Nickey, fresh from D.C. and impressed with the Republican senators insistence there are not enough Senate votes for a bill with climate provisions, nevertheless sees something very valuable in the compromise measure.

    Acciona has, since 2006, invested a billion dollars in the U.S. wind and solar sectors and has created more than 2,300 direct and indirect jobs. It sources more than 60% of its turbine components domestically and could grow U.S. manufacturing far more with the extension of the Treasury grant program and the long-term RES that may be within the reach of this divided Congress, despite election-year tensions.

    “We’re supportive of carbon legislation,” Nickey said. “But it’s a complicated policy.”

    “They,” meaning the Republicans she met with, “were supportive of a bill that had a Renewable Energy Standard like the Bingaman bill. And we also focused on not just having 20% or 25% by 2020 or 2025 but also an increase in the Renewable Energy Standard in the near-term, the 10% by 2012, because its about creating momentum, investment and jobs today.”

    click to enlarge

    Congress-watchers say the floor fight must happen by the week of July 19 if it is going to happen before the August recess. Nickey said the key will be whether the Democratic leadership is willing move off comprehensive carbon legislation.

    [Update: Senate Majority Leader Reid moved introduction of the legislation to July 26. There is, reportedly, an ongoing fight among Democratic Senators over whether to retain a climate component. Capitol Hill veterans say the Senate is now unlikely to be able to move fast enough to pass the bill.]

    To Nickey, such legislation would be no defeat. “In the U.S. market, we start out with wind under 2% of our energy portfolio,” Nickey concluded. “With a mandate to get 25% of our energy from renewables by 2025, we’ll create a large and growing industry opportunity.”

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home