NewEnergyNews: QUICK NEWS, 7-15: SENATE TO GO FOR UTILITY CAP; NEW COALITION FOR OFFSHORE WIND; FOR NEW ENERGY INVESTORS; VC NEW ENERGY SPENDING UP

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

Every day is Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • Holiday Weekend Reading: NEW ENERGY IN CHINA
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: INTEGRATING NEW ENERGY
  • QUICK NEWS, May 24: SO AFRICA TO BUILD A GIGAWATT OF WIND; LUCKY CORRIDOR FOR NEW MEXICO NEW ENERGY; MEGAWATT TEST OF CIGS THIN FILM
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE BENEFITS OF WIND AND SOLAR TOGETHER
  • QUICK NEWS, May 23: AN ‘UNPRECEDENTED’ MOVE TO NEW ENERGY; BRAINTRUST GOES AFTER SOLAR PRICE; INTERIOR APPROVES WIND ON INDIAN LAND
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: EUROPE’S PV TO 2016
  • QUICK NEWS, May 22: APPLE TURNS TO SUN; EU WIND CAN LEAD ECONOMIC RECOVERY; CHINA’S NEW GRID MAY ONLY MEET OLD NEEDS
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: BANKS ON COAL
  • QUICK NEWS, May 21: A FIGHT FOR SUN IN TEXAS; NRG LAYOFFS HERALD FADING PTC HOPES; WHAT WORRIES GRID OPERATORS MOST
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- CHINA STARTS WORLD’S BIGGEST TRANSMISSION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- SOLAR’S IMPACT ON GERMAN OCEAN WIND
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- INDIA WIND GETS A GOLDMAN SACHS BILLION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- HOW KOREA IS LIKE DENMARK
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Anne Butterfield (Huffington Post via New EnergyNews)

    Eventually those local moratoriums against fracking will expire in Boulder, Longmont and Erie. And residents will worry anew about toxic fracking operations inching up on schools and neighborhoods in pursuit of a product that goes "poof" the instant it's used. Nice value ~ not.

    And it's timely that the University of Colorado at Denver School of Public Health just announced a study which finds that air pollution within a half mile of frack-ops have toxic emissions five times over federal safety standards, causing elevated life time cancer risks and respiratory and neurological effects for nearby residents. Rep. Diana DeGette is now urging the Environmental Protection Agency to consider Colorado's study as they finalize air standards for fracking.

    It has also just come out that fracking is inching up on agriculture to compete for Colorado's water. Taking only .08 of a percent per year, it's a smidge for sure, but that water gets so polluted it must be disposed in a way that removes it from the hydrologic cycle. And that's not pretty when we're looking down the craw of a new drought kicked off with an historic climate change induced heat wave plus a horrifying wildfire this season.

    Permanently voiding precious Colorado water out of the hydrologic cycle feels even worse in view the fact such water can be lost for naught when the depletion rate on fracking wells is 63-85 percent in the first year, according to Dave Hughes of the Geological Survey of Canada. This can mean fruitless water waste when drilling down the slippery slope of diminishing marginal returns.

    But Colorado will need all the more gas, as the Clean Air Clean Jobs Act requires Xcel Eenrgy in Colorado to soon retire 900 megawatts of coal burning capacity. The act also requires that the natural gas used for recouping that coal-fired capacity comes from in state (see page 18 here). That puts upward pressure on fracking all over the state. This means more tangles between fracking and populated areas, and more permanent loss of precious Colorado water. It seems like Colorado may have backed itself into a box canyon, where residents are cornered with fracking risks to land, air, water and health.

    But there's an elegant pathway to reducing Colorado's need for natural gas -- by using the sun in a familiar technology that is at least two times more efficient than solar photovoltaics. It's good old fashioned solar thermal - those rooftop panels that heat water.

    Colorado could amend the CACJA to promote solar thermal as a jobs intensive domestic energy supply that works with natural gas to heat homes, buildings, water and industrial processes. This could free drilling companies to sell excess Colorado gas out of state for much higher prices (see page 8 here), possibly gaining crucial industry support for this intrusion of renewables into their market. Higher profitability, less contentious drilling and more renewable energy jobs is the hope.

    In all of North American, Colorado is "ground zero" for the best conditions for producing huge benefits from solar thermal. It's the sunshine, cold ground water, high heating loads, renewables-savvy population and existing industry that can, if the state takes on robust targets, lead the nation in an industry that swaps jobs and skills in place of burning money. And burning money is what we do when we burn costly fuels that go poof the instant they're used.

    A robust Colorado plan for solar thermal could put the clean air and clean jobs back into the so-called, gas-friendly Clean Air Clean Jobs Act.

    And in case anyone has forgotten ~ there are huge economic risks with shale gas, a.k.a. the fracking boom, as the resource is almost certainly not as profitable, resourceful or as clean as hyped by industry. On deeper review, it's promising to be an economic bubble.

    Fracking is supposedly going to make our nation 100 years of cheap gas, as, amnesiac members of Congress and the President are wont to say. But various geological experts such as the Potential Gas Committe have poured cold water all over that flaming hype, detailing how the supply could be as little as 21 or even 11 years. And Arthur Berman, a widely regarded petro-geologist has commented that the industry reminds him of the sub prime mortgage mess and wrote, "U.S. shale plays share many characteristics with the gold rushes.... Both phenomena result from extreme promotion. Anyone can join. Every participant believes that they will get rich. Great amounts of capital are destroyed as entrants try to get a position. The bonanza is exhausted sooner than most expected and few profit in the end."

    So if you are one of the thousands of Coloradans who are waking up to the nightmare of fracking in your community - go online and read the Colorado Solar Thermal Roadmap. Then find every political leader you can to talk about it. Colorado would be wise to use its natural solar resources to hedge against an over-reliance on gas, one that shall expand as the CACJA requires. And coal with its rising prices is on the wane nationwide as well, which means the demand for gas will be a pressure cooker loaded with risk for our energy security, economy, and environment.

    Author's note: Want to support my work? Please "fan" me at Huffpost Denver, here (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-butterfield). Thanks.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Thursday, July 15, 2010

    QUICK NEWS, 7-15: SENATE TO GO FOR UTILITY CAP; NEW COALITION FOR OFFSHORE WIND; FOR NEW ENERGY INVESTORS; VC NEW ENERGY SPENDING UP

    SENATE TO GO FOR UTILITY CAP
    Reid warms to July climate vote
    Darren Samuelsohn (w/Coral Davenport and Kendra Marr), July 13, 2010 (Politico)

    "Senate Democratic leaders are set to roll the dice this month on a comprehensive energy and climate bill, including a cap on greenhouse gases from power plants, even though they don’t yet have the 60 votes…Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) confirmed… he would gamble on the high-stakes legislation …[in] a full Senate debate as early as the week of July 26.

    "Reid confirmed the bill will have four parts: an oil spill response; a clean-energy and job-creation title based on work done in the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee; a tax package from the Senate Finance Committee; and a section that deals with greenhouse gas emissions from the electric utility industry…"


    Senator Bingaman has just released details of his utility-only caps. (click to enlarge)

    "Proposals for tackling emissions from power plants are emerging from several Senate offices…Reid insisted that the proposal he will introduce in about 10 days should not be called a cap-and-trade plan or even a cap on emissions…Besides vocal opposition from nearly all Senate Republicans, he faces concerns from liberal Democrats that the legislation is too weak and strong skepticism from moderate Democrats who would rather stay away from any type of mandatory carbon limits…

    "Environmental groups, though, welcomed Reid’s decision to pencil in plans for the floor debate and insisted they’re prepared to weather attacks from their opponents…"


    This picture of Senator Reid came after he shepherded the 2007 energy bill to passage. Democrats are hoping experience counts. (click to enlarge)

    "Democrats are making their push without any clear sense of how industry will respond to their plans…[and] the Edison Electric Institute, the trade group for most investor-owned power companies…[still is] without any clear picture of where Reid would take the climate debate…Support from the power companies is critical for the climate legislation to pass…[and that] could be possible, given the industry’s experience in a cap-and-trade system for acid rain, which was signed into law by President George H.W. Bush as part of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments…

    "Reid and the Democrats can be sure they won’t have support from all Republicans…Anticipating the GOP attacks, Lieberman told reporters that the push toward the 60 votes would require more effort from President Barack Obama and his top advisers…Obama administration officials are already in the middle of the fight…"



    NEW COALITION FOR OFFSHORE WIND
    AWEA Announces New Offshore Wind Coalition; Initiative demonstrates growing interest in offshore wind energy
    July 14, 2010 (American Wind Energy Association)

    "The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA)…[announced] the formation of the Offshore Wind Development Coalition (OffshoreWindDC), which will focus on advocacy and education efforts to promote offshore wind energy. The new coalition, which will be based in Washington, DC, will be headed up by Jim Lanard, formerly Managing Director for Deepwater Wind."

    [Denise Bode, CEO, AWEA:] “The creation of this coalition demonstrates the growing interest in offshore wind energy in the U.S…Offshore wind provides a great opportunity…thanks to the strong and steady winds that blow off our shores and proximity to electricity demand centers, particularly along the Eastern Seaboard. Offshore wind energy is proven in Europe, and will soon be hard at work here in America, powering our economy, protecting our environment, and creating jobs.”

    click to enlarge

    "The U.S. has vast offshore wind resources, particularly off the Eastern seaboard and in the Great Lakes. Offshore wind projects totaling more than 5,000 megawatts (MW) have been proposed and are in the planning or development stages in the U.S. The U.S. Department of Energy estimates that of the 300,000 MW of wind power that could generate 20% of U.S. electricity by 2030, 50,000 MW would likely be offshore.

    "…OffshoreWindDC will both expand and sharpen the focus of the [rapidly maturing offshore wind industry’s] efforts already underway through AWEA. For example, AWEA is currently working to secure long-term tax policy for offshore wind and shorten the permitting timeline for projects. The effort will involve AWEA, offshore wind developers, and other stakeholders in states such as Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, Michigan, Illinois and Ohio."


    click to enlarge

    "Founding members and contributors to the Offshore Wind Development Coalition, in addition to AWEA, include Apex Wind, Cape Wind, Deepwater Wind, Fishermen’s Energy, NRG Bluewater Wind, OffshoreMW, and Seawind Renewable."

    [Jim Lanard, President, OffshoreWindDC:] “We are delighted to join with AWEA to advocate for policies that will support the development of this well-established technology. Our joint efforts will lead to job creation, significant economic development opportunities and environmental and energy security for our country.”


    FOR NEW ENERGY INVESTORS
    Ten Clean Energy Stocks for 2010: Q2 Update; The dismal performance of renewable energy stocks so far this year is likely to lead to great buying opportunities in the rest of the year.
    Tom Konrad, July 12, 2010 (Renewable Energy World)

    "In the six months since I published my annual clean energy mini-portfolio, it has far outperformed my industry benchmark, the Powershares Wilderhill Clean Energy Index (PBW). 2010 is the third year in a row that I've published a list of ten renewable and energy efficiency stocks that I expect to perform well…These stocks are intended for small investors wanting to put some money in the sector, but not satisfied with the performance or holdings of clean energy mutual funds or clean energy exchange traded funds (ETFs)

    "…[There are] two versions of the my Ten Clean Energy Stocks for 2010 mini-portfolio…[In the diagram’s outer ring is a] portfolio of ten stocks, including three energy efficiency stocks, three electric grid stocks, three alternative transportation stocks, and one biomass/waste to energy stock. The inner ring denotes a simplified portfolio, which substitutes the Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) for the three electric grid stocks and the Powershares Global Progressive Transport ETF (PTRP) for the three alternative transportation stocks…"


    chart from Konrad - click to enlarge

    "Since December 27th…the Powershares Wilderhill Clean Energy Index (PBW) has fallen 21.7%… trailing the broad market by less than 2%, while outperforming the industry benchmark by almost 16%…the ten stocks for 2010 [are -5.21%]…the four stocks plus two ETFs for 2010 [are -5.34%]…

    "…[M]ost investors would have probably been happier if they had simply stayed out of the market, or hedged their market exposure so far this year, which is exactly what I've been urging readers to do…I saw some brief buying opportunities in clean energy at the end of May (I picked up a little Exide (XIDE) at $3.85 and US Geothermal (HTM) at $0.70) …[but] those opportunities were short-lived, and probably do not represent the market bottom for clean energy."


    chart from Konrad - click to enlarge

    "If the year continues to progress as I expect, the broad market will continue to decline, as will the clean energy sector…Buying opportunities in clean energy are likely to lead buying opportunities in the market as a whole, because the rapid decline of the whole clean energy sector over the last year is already producing great valuations…I personally am still maintaining an overall short position in the market, but expect to be buying clean energy stocks with a focus on profitable micro-cap companies opportunistically.

    "Since these ten stocks have held up better than clean energy as a whole, we're liable to find fewer than average great buying opportunities… C&D Technologies (CHP), currently trading at $0.95 is the best value I see…Portec Rail Products (PRPX)…is the subject of a takeover bid from LB Foster (FSTR) [and could be a short-term gain opportunity]…At some point, I hope to be able to say it's time to buy this portfolio as a whole, but I think that time is not yet…Now is still a time to remain mostly in cash, while keeping an eye out for individual buying opportunities…"



    VC NEW ENERGY SPENDING UP
    Venture Capital Activity Update
    Tom Burton and Steve Rafferty, July 1, 2010 (Mintz Levin/Clean Tech Quarterly)

    "Clean tech venture capital financing continued its upward trend in the second quarter of 2010, with investments totaling over $2 billion worldwide for the second consecutive quarter…After the global financial crisis drove investment in the space down in 2009—$4.85 billion invested following a record $7.6 billion in 2008—venture capital appears to be flowing to clean tech companies at pre-crisis levels.

    "…[V]enture capital investment data from the second quarter reveals important trends to watch…The first is that nearly a third of North American dollars were concentrated in three companies…Geographically, the lion’s share (67%) of North American investment was concentrated in California, followed well behind by Massachusetts at 8%."


    click to enlarge

    "…[T]here appears to be a resurgence of interest in the solar sector…[V]enture capitalists poured $811 million into the sector in the second quarter [after the first quarter’s $311 million]. Noteworthy deals…[were] BrightSource Energy’s $150 million Series D financing in May and Solyndra’s $175 million shortly before the quarter’s end.

    "…[T]he case of Solyndra is also reflective of the continuation of a less welcome trend to watch in the second half of 2010: the uncertain state of the clean tech IPO market…Solyndra pulled its plans to go public in June…[O]nly two [companies] have followed through with their IPO plans…However, Tesla Motors’ successful $226 million initial public offering bucked the trend and we believe will be a harbinger…"


    click to enlarge

    "…[E]nergy efficiency proved to be the most popular sector for investment for the second consecutive quarter, with 31 funding rounds producing $147 million…[E]nergy efficiency remains an important sector to watch as investors seek less capital-intensive business models offering faster paths to profits. Funding for energy efficiency projects rose from $253 million in 39 deals in 2006 to $803 million in 93 deals in 2009. Expect this trend to continue into the second half of 2010 and beyond.

    "The first half of 2010 appears to have marked the return to greener pastures for clean tech companies seeking venture capital investment (at least in California), while the much anticipated IPO market for clean tech is promising but still unclear."

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home