NewEnergyNews: TODAY’S STUDY: SUN RIGHT NOW

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

Every day is Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • Holiday Weekend Reading: NEW ENERGY IN CHINA
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: INTEGRATING NEW ENERGY
  • QUICK NEWS, May 24: SO AFRICA TO BUILD A GIGAWATT OF WIND; LUCKY CORRIDOR FOR NEW MEXICO NEW ENERGY; MEGAWATT TEST OF CIGS THIN FILM
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE BENEFITS OF WIND AND SOLAR TOGETHER
  • QUICK NEWS, May 23: AN ‘UNPRECEDENTED’ MOVE TO NEW ENERGY; BRAINTRUST GOES AFTER SOLAR PRICE; INTERIOR APPROVES WIND ON INDIAN LAND
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: EUROPE’S PV TO 2016
  • QUICK NEWS, May 22: APPLE TURNS TO SUN; EU WIND CAN LEAD ECONOMIC RECOVERY; CHINA’S NEW GRID MAY ONLY MEET OLD NEEDS
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: BANKS ON COAL
  • QUICK NEWS, May 21: A FIGHT FOR SUN IN TEXAS; NRG LAYOFFS HERALD FADING PTC HOPES; WHAT WORRIES GRID OPERATORS MOST
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- CHINA STARTS WORLD’S BIGGEST TRANSMISSION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- SOLAR’S IMPACT ON GERMAN OCEAN WIND
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- INDIA WIND GETS A GOLDMAN SACHS BILLION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- HOW KOREA IS LIKE DENMARK
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Anne Butterfield (Huffington Post via New EnergyNews)

    Eventually those local moratoriums against fracking will expire in Boulder, Longmont and Erie. And residents will worry anew about toxic fracking operations inching up on schools and neighborhoods in pursuit of a product that goes "poof" the instant it's used. Nice value ~ not.

    And it's timely that the University of Colorado at Denver School of Public Health just announced a study which finds that air pollution within a half mile of frack-ops have toxic emissions five times over federal safety standards, causing elevated life time cancer risks and respiratory and neurological effects for nearby residents. Rep. Diana DeGette is now urging the Environmental Protection Agency to consider Colorado's study as they finalize air standards for fracking.

    It has also just come out that fracking is inching up on agriculture to compete for Colorado's water. Taking only .08 of a percent per year, it's a smidge for sure, but that water gets so polluted it must be disposed in a way that removes it from the hydrologic cycle. And that's not pretty when we're looking down the craw of a new drought kicked off with an historic climate change induced heat wave plus a horrifying wildfire this season.

    Permanently voiding precious Colorado water out of the hydrologic cycle feels even worse in view the fact such water can be lost for naught when the depletion rate on fracking wells is 63-85 percent in the first year, according to Dave Hughes of the Geological Survey of Canada. This can mean fruitless water waste when drilling down the slippery slope of diminishing marginal returns.

    But Colorado will need all the more gas, as the Clean Air Clean Jobs Act requires Xcel Eenrgy in Colorado to soon retire 900 megawatts of coal burning capacity. The act also requires that the natural gas used for recouping that coal-fired capacity comes from in state (see page 18 here). That puts upward pressure on fracking all over the state. This means more tangles between fracking and populated areas, and more permanent loss of precious Colorado water. It seems like Colorado may have backed itself into a box canyon, where residents are cornered with fracking risks to land, air, water and health.

    But there's an elegant pathway to reducing Colorado's need for natural gas -- by using the sun in a familiar technology that is at least two times more efficient than solar photovoltaics. It's good old fashioned solar thermal - those rooftop panels that heat water.

    Colorado could amend the CACJA to promote solar thermal as a jobs intensive domestic energy supply that works with natural gas to heat homes, buildings, water and industrial processes. This could free drilling companies to sell excess Colorado gas out of state for much higher prices (see page 8 here), possibly gaining crucial industry support for this intrusion of renewables into their market. Higher profitability, less contentious drilling and more renewable energy jobs is the hope.

    In all of North American, Colorado is "ground zero" for the best conditions for producing huge benefits from solar thermal. It's the sunshine, cold ground water, high heating loads, renewables-savvy population and existing industry that can, if the state takes on robust targets, lead the nation in an industry that swaps jobs and skills in place of burning money. And burning money is what we do when we burn costly fuels that go poof the instant they're used.

    A robust Colorado plan for solar thermal could put the clean air and clean jobs back into the so-called, gas-friendly Clean Air Clean Jobs Act.

    And in case anyone has forgotten ~ there are huge economic risks with shale gas, a.k.a. the fracking boom, as the resource is almost certainly not as profitable, resourceful or as clean as hyped by industry. On deeper review, it's promising to be an economic bubble.

    Fracking is supposedly going to make our nation 100 years of cheap gas, as, amnesiac members of Congress and the President are wont to say. But various geological experts such as the Potential Gas Committe have poured cold water all over that flaming hype, detailing how the supply could be as little as 21 or even 11 years. And Arthur Berman, a widely regarded petro-geologist has commented that the industry reminds him of the sub prime mortgage mess and wrote, "U.S. shale plays share many characteristics with the gold rushes.... Both phenomena result from extreme promotion. Anyone can join. Every participant believes that they will get rich. Great amounts of capital are destroyed as entrants try to get a position. The bonanza is exhausted sooner than most expected and few profit in the end."

    So if you are one of the thousands of Coloradans who are waking up to the nightmare of fracking in your community - go online and read the Colorado Solar Thermal Roadmap. Then find every political leader you can to talk about it. Colorado would be wise to use its natural solar resources to hedge against an over-reliance on gas, one that shall expand as the CACJA requires. And coal with its rising prices is on the wane nationwide as well, which means the demand for gas will be a pressure cooker loaded with risk for our energy security, economy, and environment.

    Author's note: Want to support my work? Please "fan" me at Huffpost Denver, here (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-butterfield). Thanks.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Monday, December 19, 2011

    TODAY’S STUDY: SUN RIGHT NOW

    U.S. Solar Market Insight Report Q3 2011
    December 14, 2011 (Greentech Media Research and Solar Energy Industries Association)

    Introduction

    Through the third quarter of 2011, the U.S. solar market installed more than 1 gigawatt (GW) of grid-connected photovoltaics (PV) on the year, far surpassing the 2010 annual total of 887 megawatts (MW). The third quarter of 2011 was also the largest quarter for installations ever seen in the U.S., supported by utility-scale project completions and rapidly declining prices for PV modules. Module prices have plummeted due to massive oversupply on a global scale. This is a result of tepid demand in leading European markets combined with substantial manufacturing capacity expansions. While this has been a boon for domestic installations, it has also resulted in an extraordinarily difficult year for PV manufacturers worldwide. In addition to uncertainty surrounding module pricing, the 1603 Treasury Program is scheduled to expire at the end of the year. Unless the program is extended, we anticipate a tax-equity bottleneck in 2012, stifling some large-scale utility, commercial, and third-party owned residential projects. In short, the U.S. PV market continues to boom, but considerable risks lie ahead. This report captures and analyzes trends in the U.S. solar market and seeks to demystify the current landscape for U.S. solar installations.

    click to enlarge

    Key Findings:

    Photovoltaics (PV):

    Grid-connected PV installations in Q3 2011 grew 39% over Q2 2011 and 140% over Q3 2010 to reach 449.2 MW, making it the largest quarter in the history of the U.S. market.

    More than 1 GW of PV was installed in the first three quarters of 2011, the first time the U.S. has surpassed 1 GW annually.

    Cumulative grid-connected PV in the U.S. has now reached 3.1 GW, which is ten times the size of the U.S. solar capacity in 2005.

    After two quarters of consecutive declines, the residential market grew 21% over Q2 2011.

    The utility market alone installed over 200 MW in Q3 2011, more than the entire market in every quarter through Q3 2010.

    The non-residential market shrank substantially in Q3 2011 as a result of downturns in California, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Arizona.

    Major questions remain regarding the shape of the 2012 market, including the impacts of the potential 1603 Treasury Program expiration, potential import duties on Chinese cells/modules, and whether module prices will continue to fall…

    click to enlarge

    Concentrating Solar Power (CSP and CPV):

    Financing was secured in Q3 for four concentrating solar projects representing over 600 MW of capacity.

    Over 1,200 MW of concentrating solar projects are under construction.

    A project pipeline of over 4,000 MW of concentrating solar projects with signed PPAs is down from 6,000 MW as the pipeline of one the major CSP developers was sold and will switch to PV.

    Photovoltaics

    Photovoltaics (PV), which convert sunlight directly to electricity, continue to be the largest component of solar market growth in the U.S.

    click to enlarge

    Installations

    The U.S. installed 449.2 MW in Q3 2011, up 39% over Q2 2011 and 140% over Q3 2010. This makes Q3 2011 the largest quarter in the history of the U.S. PV market, surpassing Q4 2010 by nearly 90 MW. Still, growth across market segments was anything but uniform. While the utility market installed more than ever before, the residential market grew incrementally and the non-residential market shrank to the lowest level since 2010.

    Today, the U.S. market faces more uncertainty than at any time in recent history. On one hand, module prices are falling precipitously and system prices have never been lower. On the other hand, the market faces substantial risks in the form of legislative, financing, political, and market barriers. We identify three key questions facing the market:

    1. With major markets trending downward, how much can emerging state markets ramp up?...2. What will be the impact of potential 1603 cash grant expiration?...3. How will the trade petition impact market dynamics, both in the immediate term and if duties are ultimately imposed?...

    click to enlarge

    Adding to the uncertainty already facing the U.S. market, there is the potential imposition of import duties on PV cells and modules originating in China. To briefly recap the issue: SolarWorld Americas, Inc. and six other unnamed petitioners, representing the newly formed Coalition for American Solar Manufacturing (CASM), filed a petition with the U.S. International Trade Commission and the Department of Commerce on October 19, 2011. The petition alleges that Chinese manufacturers of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells have benefitted from unfair government subsidies and that they have been “dumping” product into the U.S. market. It asks for the imposition of import duties of 100% or more on the wholesale cost of Chinese cells and modules. There are two questions to be asked here in relation to both the upstream and downstream segments of the U.S. solar market: one, what will be the near-term impact as the process plays out, and two, what would be the longer-term impact if tariffs are ultimately imposed? …

    The makeup and size of the U.S. market in 2012 is a moving target. A number of factors that are currently in flux could substantially impact market growth for next year. We divide those factors into three major categories, with two subcategories in each. Figure 2-2 contains our assessment of the potential impact (positive or negative) that these factors could have on demand.

    click to enlarge

    After 2012, the market is even more difficult to predict, particularly in light of potential tariffs on Chinese cells/modules. The impact of these tariffs would depend on their magnitude; small tariffs might have a negligible market impact, while large tariffs would drastically alter the makeup of the supply picture. In addition, by 2013 the larger Chinese manufacturers would have time to shift some manufacturing capacity to other countries (Taiwan, Philippines, Malaysia, and the U.S. are all possibilities) and continue serving the U.S. market. In recent years, the U.S. market has been driven primarily by the non-residential sector, which accounted for over 50% of total installations through 2008. However, the utility sector has been gaining ground (28% market share in 2010) while residential remained relatively steady around 30% of total installations. In the longer term, the U.S. market has the potential to share three vibrant, growing market segments, each contributing a meaningful share of total demand.

    Residential installations grew 21% quarter-over-quarter in Q3 2011…Non-residential installations fell 24% in Q3 2011…Utility installations grew 325% over Q2 2011, by far the largest growth of any segment…

    The U.S. PV market remains relatively concentrated in a few key states, although the market has been experiencing rapid geographic expansion over the past few years.

    Whereas California accounted for around 80% of total installations in 2004-2005, by 2010 it was less than 30% of the national market. Figure 2-4 examines the state of market diversification. California’s market share in Q3 increased to 44% as a result of its strong showing in utility installations. Meanwhile, New Jersey lost substantial share as its market shrank while the rest of the national market grew. On the whole, the top seven states increased their share from 81% in Q2 to 89% in Q3.

    click to enlarge

    Installed Price

    Quarter-over-quarter, the national weighted-average system price fell by 14.4% from Q2 2011 to Q3 2011, from $5.20/W to $4.45/W. The average price is heavily impacted by the large volume of utility-scale systems installed July through September…RESIDENTIAL system prices fell by 2.7% from Q2 2011 to Q3 2011, with the national average installed price decreasing from $6.41/W to $6.24/W…NON-RESIDENTIAL system prices fell by 4.9% from Q2 2011 to Q3 2011, from $5.20/W to $4.94/W…UTILITY system prices declined for the seventh consecutive quarter in a row, dropping from $3.75/W in Q2 2011 to $3.45/W in Q3 2011…

    click to enlarge

    Manufacturing

    In general, the persistent global wafer, cell, and module oversupply and inventory buildup have had the following impact on manufacturers:

    1. Starting in Q3, plant utilization rates have been lowered significantly.

    2. Significant amounts of existing capacity have been taken offline, either temporarily or permanently. In conjunction with this, a number of firms have announced worker layoffs.

    3. For the most part, capacity expansions that were planned for 2011 and 2012 have been placed on hold, postponed, or canceled.

    4. In an attempt to generate short-term cash flow and stay solvent, many lower-tier manufacturers have been selling products on the spot market at prices below cash costs, which has placed more established producers, especially those in high-cost locations, under severe pressure. The free-fall in prices has resulted in significant margin erosion and heavy net losses for most manufacturers in Q3; wafer and cell firms have been most adversely affected, although module manufacturers have struggled as well.

    5. Some less competitive plants have been closed, and a number of smaller, less established firms have exited the market.

    click to enlarge

    In short, the manufacturing industry has entered a consolidation phase…

    The cooling off of historically prominent feed-in tariff markets (Germany, Italy, France) in 2011 has forced manufacturers to look towards other regional markets for sales, and as a relatively mature market that has been growing rapidly in recent quarters, the U.S. is at the top of most manufacturers’ lists…

    Domestic module production in Q3 2011 amounted to 316 MW (capacity utilization of 62%), 5% below Q2 2011 output of 332 MW and 4% below Q3 2010 output of 329 MW…

    Domestic inverter manufacturing capacity continues to climb upwards, which, as usual, necessitates the warning that manufacturing capacity is a poor gauge for the actual growth of the U.S. inverter industry. Owing primarily to the completion of Siemens’ annualized 850 MWac facility in Illinois, quarterly U.S. inverter manufacturing capacity jumped from just under 1.4 GWac to 1.5 GWac from Q2 to Q3…Production jumped to 439 MWac for the third quarter, implying a utilization rate of below 30%...

    Venture capital and general investment continues to pour into the distributed optimization space…

    click to enlarge

    Market Outlook

    Our 2011 installation forecast has been revised downward from 1.8 GW to 1.7 GW. As we had anticipated, Q3 installations in the U.S. were propped up by a number of utility market completions. However, the downturn in major commercial markets (California, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania) occurred slightly faster than we had anticipated. While the residential market looks to be stable for Q4, the commercial market continues to experience woes in larger states. We continue to anticipate a boom in utility installations in Q4 that will drive annual growth up to 89%, but we no longer expect a doubling of the U.S. market.

    On the whole, the U.S. remains one of the strongest growth markets for PV. This is reflected both in the numbers and in the chatter from global suppliers, distributors, and developers, all of whom are bullish on near-term U.S. demand – if concerned about the risks already mentioned. By the end of 2011, the U.S. market has the potential to nearly double its global market share.

    click to enlarge

    Concentrating Solar

    Concentrating solar includes both concentrating solar power (CSP) plants, which convert thermal energy to electricity, and concentrating photovoltaic (CPV) systems. Whereas CSP systems concentrate sunlight to heat water or another fluid that subsequently generates steam to power a turbine, CPV systems focus the sun’s light on a photovoltaic cell to generate electricity directly. In the U.S., concentrating solar experienced a burst of project activity in California in the 1980s, and then went quiet for two decades. But there is great potential for concentrating solar in the U.S., which is reflected in the project pipeline of more than 6 GW (both with and without PPAs) that is now under development. Should the growth of concentrating solar continue, the U.S. could once again be at the top of the global market, retaking the title from Spain, which has led all others in installations in recent years.

    click to enlarge

    Installations

    While there were three CPV projects completed in Q2 2011, in Q3 2011 there were no CPV or CSP projects completed. However, during the quarter, there was additional progress on several of the large concentrating solar projects under development.

    While there were no concentrating solar installations in Q3 2011, some significant developments occurred:

    • Solar Trust of America sold its 2.25 GW CSP pipeline to Solarhybrid – who plans to use PV for the four projects

    Several concentrating solar projects closed DOE loan guarantees in Q3 including:

    250 MW Mojave Solar trough CSP project

    110 MW Crescent Dunes tower CSP project

    250 MW Genesis trough CSP project

    30 MW Alamosa CPV project

    click to enlarge

    Outlook

    In 2011, it is expected that 57 MW of CSP and CPV projects will come online in the U.S., down from 78 MW in 2010. Most of the capacity expansion will come from the 30 MW CPV Alamosa Solar project and 5 MW CSP University of Arizona Solar Tech Park project.

    It should be noted that we have significantly reduced our concentrating solar forecast in light of the announcement that Blythe would be switched from trough to PV for economic reasons. The dramatic improvements in PV panel costs has put trough at a significant cost disadvantage, and puts many of the planned trough projects at risk, as they may be difficult to finance or fail to receive regulatory approval.

    2012 should see the completion of at least one of BrightSource’s Ivanpah towers, and in 2013, several large plants are scheduled to come online. In later years, greater uncertainty regarding financing, permitting and approvals surrounds the pipeline. The current pipeline of concentrating solar projects is over 6,000 MW, of which more than 4,000 MW have signed PPAs.

    click to enlarge

    Solar Heating and Cooling

    The solar heating and cooling (SHC) category comprises two distinct markets: solar water and space heating (SWH) and solar pool heating (SPH). The domestic SWH market has grown on an annual basis since 2004. The SPH market hit a peak in 2006, and while it shrank significantly from 2007-2009, it made a slight recovery in 2010 with indications that this upward trend will continue through the end of the year.

    click to enlarge

    Market Update

    As 2011 unfolds, it is the commercial side of the SWH industry that has been carrying the mantle. Despite generous residential incentives, including the relatively new CSI Thermal initiative in California, it has been business owners recognizing the value of solar thermal. In particular, users of large quantities of hot water, such as hotels, food processing facilities and universities, have been seeking out SWH applications.

    As mentioned in previous iterations of the SEIA/GTM Research U.S. Solar Market Insight report, third party ownership of SWH systems has been an emerging trend. A few SWH development firms have pushed heavily into the space, recruiting investors to fund projects and then selling the hot water to an end user at a lower rate than natural gas, heating oil, or propane can provide. Massachusetts, which released a pilot residential program earlier in the year, has now implemented a pilot commercial program that will fund a feasibility study up to $10,000 with no requirement to actually install the system. Construction grants up to $30,000 came online late in Q3. With the 30% ITC still available, increased interest from states, and SWH systems fulfilling some states’ RPS goals (AZ, MD, NC, NV, NY, and Washington D.C.), we should see continued growth in the non-residential SWH market.

    Interest in the domestic market is also growing amongst foreign manufacturers, which is a good sign for improving market health. Established European players and Chinese start-ups have had a greater presence at U.S. tradeshows. Chinese manufacturers, in particular, have been importing a large quantity of evacuated-tube collectors, touting the technology as superior to flat-plate collectors, which have remained relatively unchanged since the 1970s. In practice, the relative merits of each technology are project specific. U.S. installers have been slow to adopt these foreign products, preferring to source components from a small group of domestic manufacturers that owns a lion’s share of the market.

    The main competitor to SWH, however, is the price of natural gas. For as long as the price of natural gas remains low, it is difficult for many to see the long term value in installing a system.

    1 Comments:

    At 3:33 PM, Anonymous green investing said...

    Its great news for the current, but its difficult to predict what might happen in the future, especially with the Republicans on the warpath after Solyndra. I also think not enough attention is paid to the massive subsidies Chinese solar panel manufactures receive in the form of free land and cheap credit from state owned banks. This has been decimating the panel manufacturing industry in both the US and in some countries in Europe as well.

     

    Post a Comment

    << Home