NewEnergyNews: TODAY’S STUDY: ABOUT THE TAXPAYERS’ INVESTMENT IN ENERGY EFFICIENCY

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

Every day is Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • Holiday Weekend Reading: NEW ENERGY IN CHINA
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: INTEGRATING NEW ENERGY
  • QUICK NEWS, May 24: SO AFRICA TO BUILD A GIGAWATT OF WIND; LUCKY CORRIDOR FOR NEW MEXICO NEW ENERGY; MEGAWATT TEST OF CIGS THIN FILM
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE BENEFITS OF WIND AND SOLAR TOGETHER
  • QUICK NEWS, May 23: AN ‘UNPRECEDENTED’ MOVE TO NEW ENERGY; BRAINTRUST GOES AFTER SOLAR PRICE; INTERIOR APPROVES WIND ON INDIAN LAND
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: EUROPE’S PV TO 2016
  • QUICK NEWS, May 22: APPLE TURNS TO SUN; EU WIND CAN LEAD ECONOMIC RECOVERY; CHINA’S NEW GRID MAY ONLY MEET OLD NEEDS
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: BANKS ON COAL
  • QUICK NEWS, May 21: A FIGHT FOR SUN IN TEXAS; NRG LAYOFFS HERALD FADING PTC HOPES; WHAT WORRIES GRID OPERATORS MOST
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- CHINA STARTS WORLD’S BIGGEST TRANSMISSION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- SOLAR’S IMPACT ON GERMAN OCEAN WIND
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- INDIA WIND GETS A GOLDMAN SACHS BILLION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- HOW KOREA IS LIKE DENMARK
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Anne Butterfield (Huffington Post via New EnergyNews)

    Eventually those local moratoriums against fracking will expire in Boulder, Longmont and Erie. And residents will worry anew about toxic fracking operations inching up on schools and neighborhoods in pursuit of a product that goes "poof" the instant it's used. Nice value ~ not.

    And it's timely that the University of Colorado at Denver School of Public Health just announced a study which finds that air pollution within a half mile of frack-ops have toxic emissions five times over federal safety standards, causing elevated life time cancer risks and respiratory and neurological effects for nearby residents. Rep. Diana DeGette is now urging the Environmental Protection Agency to consider Colorado's study as they finalize air standards for fracking.

    It has also just come out that fracking is inching up on agriculture to compete for Colorado's water. Taking only .08 of a percent per year, it's a smidge for sure, but that water gets so polluted it must be disposed in a way that removes it from the hydrologic cycle. And that's not pretty when we're looking down the craw of a new drought kicked off with an historic climate change induced heat wave plus a horrifying wildfire this season.

    Permanently voiding precious Colorado water out of the hydrologic cycle feels even worse in view the fact such water can be lost for naught when the depletion rate on fracking wells is 63-85 percent in the first year, according to Dave Hughes of the Geological Survey of Canada. This can mean fruitless water waste when drilling down the slippery slope of diminishing marginal returns.

    But Colorado will need all the more gas, as the Clean Air Clean Jobs Act requires Xcel Eenrgy in Colorado to soon retire 900 megawatts of coal burning capacity. The act also requires that the natural gas used for recouping that coal-fired capacity comes from in state (see page 18 here). That puts upward pressure on fracking all over the state. This means more tangles between fracking and populated areas, and more permanent loss of precious Colorado water. It seems like Colorado may have backed itself into a box canyon, where residents are cornered with fracking risks to land, air, water and health.

    But there's an elegant pathway to reducing Colorado's need for natural gas -- by using the sun in a familiar technology that is at least two times more efficient than solar photovoltaics. It's good old fashioned solar thermal - those rooftop panels that heat water.

    Colorado could amend the CACJA to promote solar thermal as a jobs intensive domestic energy supply that works with natural gas to heat homes, buildings, water and industrial processes. This could free drilling companies to sell excess Colorado gas out of state for much higher prices (see page 8 here), possibly gaining crucial industry support for this intrusion of renewables into their market. Higher profitability, less contentious drilling and more renewable energy jobs is the hope.

    In all of North American, Colorado is "ground zero" for the best conditions for producing huge benefits from solar thermal. It's the sunshine, cold ground water, high heating loads, renewables-savvy population and existing industry that can, if the state takes on robust targets, lead the nation in an industry that swaps jobs and skills in place of burning money. And burning money is what we do when we burn costly fuels that go poof the instant they're used.

    A robust Colorado plan for solar thermal could put the clean air and clean jobs back into the so-called, gas-friendly Clean Air Clean Jobs Act.

    And in case anyone has forgotten ~ there are huge economic risks with shale gas, a.k.a. the fracking boom, as the resource is almost certainly not as profitable, resourceful or as clean as hyped by industry. On deeper review, it's promising to be an economic bubble.

    Fracking is supposedly going to make our nation 100 years of cheap gas, as, amnesiac members of Congress and the President are wont to say. But various geological experts such as the Potential Gas Committe have poured cold water all over that flaming hype, detailing how the supply could be as little as 21 or even 11 years. And Arthur Berman, a widely regarded petro-geologist has commented that the industry reminds him of the sub prime mortgage mess and wrote, "U.S. shale plays share many characteristics with the gold rushes.... Both phenomena result from extreme promotion. Anyone can join. Every participant believes that they will get rich. Great amounts of capital are destroyed as entrants try to get a position. The bonanza is exhausted sooner than most expected and few profit in the end."

    So if you are one of the thousands of Coloradans who are waking up to the nightmare of fracking in your community - go online and read the Colorado Solar Thermal Roadmap. Then find every political leader you can to talk about it. Colorado would be wise to use its natural solar resources to hedge against an over-reliance on gas, one that shall expand as the CACJA requires. And coal with its rising prices is on the wane nationwide as well, which means the demand for gas will be a pressure cooker loaded with risk for our energy security, economy, and environment.

    Author's note: Want to support my work? Please "fan" me at Huffpost Denver, here (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-butterfield). Thanks.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Monday, January 16, 2012

    TODAY’S STUDY: ABOUT THE TAXPAYERS’ INVESTMENT IN ENERGY EFFICIENCY

    Summary of Ratepayer-Funded Electric Efficiency Impacts, Budgets and Expenditures(2010-2011)
    Adam Cooper and Lisa Wood, January 2012 (Edison Foundation/Institute for Energy Efficiency)

    INTRODUCTION

    In mid-2011 the Consortium for Energy Efficiency (CEE), in coordination with the Institute for Electric Efficiency (IEE) and the American Gas Association (AGA), collected industry-wide data on ratepayer-funded energy impacts, expenditures, and budgets for energy efficiency programs from utility and non-utility administrators in the U.S. and Canada.

    click to enlarge

    This IEE report is focused on U.S. electric efficiency results based on information from 195 organizations – 172 electric and combined utilities, 10 non-utility energy efficiency (EE) administrators, and 13 organizations that declined to release their data at the organizational level. For information on Canadian electric efficiency results and/or gas utility efficiency information please reference the most recent CEE report at www.cee1.org.

    click to enlarge

    MAJOR HIGHLIGHTS INCLUDE:

    U.S. ratepayer-funded electric efficiency budgets totaled over $6.8 billion in 2011, a 25 percent increase from 2010 levels.

    Electric utilities are by far the largest providers of EE in the U.S., with utility budgets comprising 84 percent of the total ratepayer-funded electric efficiency budget nationwide.

    click to enlarge

    Given that state energy efficiency resource standards are established in half of all U.S. states, covering two-thirds of the nation’s population, and that several of these standards have scheduled increases, IEE believes that ratepayer funded electric efficiency budgets are highly likely to exceed the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory’s (LBNL) ―high case‖ scenario projection of $12 billion by 2020.

    The 2011 budgets for six states are more than double their 2010 budgets – Indiana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Virginia, Washington D.C., and West Virginia. Over the next 10 years, as different states develop new and, in some cases, first time programs, we can expect many new states to become leaders in energy efficiency.

    U.S. ratepayer-funded electric efficiency expenditures totaled over $4.8 billion in 2010, a 28 percent increase from 2009 levels. In 10 states, 2010 electric efficiency expenditures more than doubled from their 2009 levels.

    click to enlarge

    Overall, electric efficiency programs saved over 112 TWh in 2010, enough to power over 9.7 million U.S. homes for one year, and avoided the generation of 78 million metric tons of carbon dioxide.2 Electric efficiency savings (including both traditional energy efficiency as well as load control programs) were achieved at an average cost of 4.3 cents per kWh saved in 2010. Focusing on energy efficiency only (excluding and assuming no savings from load control programs), savings were achieved at an average cost of 3.5 cents per kWh saved in 2010. The actual cost is likely between 3.5 and 4.3 cents per kWh saved.

    IEE projects total electric savings from ratepayer-funded electric efficiency programs to meet or exceed 125 TWh in 2011.

    States with regulatory frameworks that support utilities in their efforts to pursue electric efficiency as a sustainable business tend to be leaders in annual electric efficiency expenditures and budgets.

    click to enlarge

    SUMMARY OF IMPACTS

    Based on the CEE/IEE database, Table 6 provides aggregate data for 2010 ratepayer-funded electric efficiency savings by NERC region and sector.

    Overall, EE programs saved over 112 TWh in 2010, enough to power 9.7 million homes for one year, and avoided the generation of 78 million metric tons of carbon dioxide… Electric efficiency savings were achieved at an average cost of 4.3 cents per kWh saved in 2010. Excluding demand response programs, which are aimed at shifting peak demand, EE savings were achieved at an average cost of 3.5 cents per kWh saved.

    click to enlarge

    In 2010, U.S. aggregate electric efficiency impacts increased by nearly 20 TWh, a 21 percent increase in savings from 2009 levels. All U.S. Census regions experienced an increase in electric efficiency savings with the largest percent increases in the Midwest (38.9 percent) and the Northeast (38.5 percent), followed by the South (19.8 percent) and West (5.3 percent). A few reasons for the increased savings include the growth in energy efficiency program spending between 2009 and 2010 along with technological improvements in the products and technologies that are installed to achieve energy savings.

    click to enlarge

    2011 is poised to be a stellar year for ratepayer-funded energy efficiency and demand response programs. As shown in Figure 6, energy efficiency savings are on a growth path in the U.S. The increase in 2011 electric efficiency budgets of roughly $1.4 billion (from $5.4 billion in 2010 to $6.8 billion in 2011) will continue to transform the ways in which electricity is used by households, businesses, and institutions across the U.S. As presented in Figure 6, IEE projects 2011 total electric savings from ratepayer-funded electric efficiency and demand response programs to meet or exceed 125 TWh.

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home