NewEnergyNews: TODAY’S STUDY: A YEAR IN SUN

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

Every day is Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • Holiday Weekend Reading: NEW ENERGY IN CHINA
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: INTEGRATING NEW ENERGY
  • QUICK NEWS, May 24: SO AFRICA TO BUILD A GIGAWATT OF WIND; LUCKY CORRIDOR FOR NEW MEXICO NEW ENERGY; MEGAWATT TEST OF CIGS THIN FILM
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE BENEFITS OF WIND AND SOLAR TOGETHER
  • QUICK NEWS, May 23: AN ‘UNPRECEDENTED’ MOVE TO NEW ENERGY; BRAINTRUST GOES AFTER SOLAR PRICE; INTERIOR APPROVES WIND ON INDIAN LAND
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: EUROPE’S PV TO 2016
  • QUICK NEWS, May 22: APPLE TURNS TO SUN; EU WIND CAN LEAD ECONOMIC RECOVERY; CHINA’S NEW GRID MAY ONLY MEET OLD NEEDS
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: BANKS ON COAL
  • QUICK NEWS, May 21: A FIGHT FOR SUN IN TEXAS; NRG LAYOFFS HERALD FADING PTC HOPES; WHAT WORRIES GRID OPERATORS MOST
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- CHINA STARTS WORLD’S BIGGEST TRANSMISSION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- SOLAR’S IMPACT ON GERMAN OCEAN WIND
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- INDIA WIND GETS A GOLDMAN SACHS BILLION
  • SUNDAY WORLD HEADLINE- HOW KOREA IS LIKE DENMARK
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Anne Butterfield (Huffington Post via New EnergyNews)

    Eventually those local moratoriums against fracking will expire in Boulder, Longmont and Erie. And residents will worry anew about toxic fracking operations inching up on schools and neighborhoods in pursuit of a product that goes "poof" the instant it's used. Nice value ~ not.

    And it's timely that the University of Colorado at Denver School of Public Health just announced a study which finds that air pollution within a half mile of frack-ops have toxic emissions five times over federal safety standards, causing elevated life time cancer risks and respiratory and neurological effects for nearby residents. Rep. Diana DeGette is now urging the Environmental Protection Agency to consider Colorado's study as they finalize air standards for fracking.

    It has also just come out that fracking is inching up on agriculture to compete for Colorado's water. Taking only .08 of a percent per year, it's a smidge for sure, but that water gets so polluted it must be disposed in a way that removes it from the hydrologic cycle. And that's not pretty when we're looking down the craw of a new drought kicked off with an historic climate change induced heat wave plus a horrifying wildfire this season.

    Permanently voiding precious Colorado water out of the hydrologic cycle feels even worse in view the fact such water can be lost for naught when the depletion rate on fracking wells is 63-85 percent in the first year, according to Dave Hughes of the Geological Survey of Canada. This can mean fruitless water waste when drilling down the slippery slope of diminishing marginal returns.

    But Colorado will need all the more gas, as the Clean Air Clean Jobs Act requires Xcel Eenrgy in Colorado to soon retire 900 megawatts of coal burning capacity. The act also requires that the natural gas used for recouping that coal-fired capacity comes from in state (see page 18 here). That puts upward pressure on fracking all over the state. This means more tangles between fracking and populated areas, and more permanent loss of precious Colorado water. It seems like Colorado may have backed itself into a box canyon, where residents are cornered with fracking risks to land, air, water and health.

    But there's an elegant pathway to reducing Colorado's need for natural gas -- by using the sun in a familiar technology that is at least two times more efficient than solar photovoltaics. It's good old fashioned solar thermal - those rooftop panels that heat water.

    Colorado could amend the CACJA to promote solar thermal as a jobs intensive domestic energy supply that works with natural gas to heat homes, buildings, water and industrial processes. This could free drilling companies to sell excess Colorado gas out of state for much higher prices (see page 8 here), possibly gaining crucial industry support for this intrusion of renewables into their market. Higher profitability, less contentious drilling and more renewable energy jobs is the hope.

    In all of North American, Colorado is "ground zero" for the best conditions for producing huge benefits from solar thermal. It's the sunshine, cold ground water, high heating loads, renewables-savvy population and existing industry that can, if the state takes on robust targets, lead the nation in an industry that swaps jobs and skills in place of burning money. And burning money is what we do when we burn costly fuels that go poof the instant they're used.

    A robust Colorado plan for solar thermal could put the clean air and clean jobs back into the so-called, gas-friendly Clean Air Clean Jobs Act.

    And in case anyone has forgotten ~ there are huge economic risks with shale gas, a.k.a. the fracking boom, as the resource is almost certainly not as profitable, resourceful or as clean as hyped by industry. On deeper review, it's promising to be an economic bubble.

    Fracking is supposedly going to make our nation 100 years of cheap gas, as, amnesiac members of Congress and the President are wont to say. But various geological experts such as the Potential Gas Committe have poured cold water all over that flaming hype, detailing how the supply could be as little as 21 or even 11 years. And Arthur Berman, a widely regarded petro-geologist has commented that the industry reminds him of the sub prime mortgage mess and wrote, "U.S. shale plays share many characteristics with the gold rushes.... Both phenomena result from extreme promotion. Anyone can join. Every participant believes that they will get rich. Great amounts of capital are destroyed as entrants try to get a position. The bonanza is exhausted sooner than most expected and few profit in the end."

    So if you are one of the thousands of Coloradans who are waking up to the nightmare of fracking in your community - go online and read the Colorado Solar Thermal Roadmap. Then find every political leader you can to talk about it. Colorado would be wise to use its natural solar resources to hedge against an over-reliance on gas, one that shall expand as the CACJA requires. And coal with its rising prices is on the wane nationwide as well, which means the demand for gas will be a pressure cooker loaded with risk for our energy security, economy, and environment.

    Author's note: Want to support my work? Please "fan" me at Huffpost Denver, here (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-butterfield). Thanks.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Tuesday, January 24, 2012

    TODAY’S STUDY: A YEAR IN SUN

    2010 Solar Technologies Market Report
    Kristen Ardani, Robert Margolis, et.al., November 2011 (U.S. Department of Energy/Energy, Efficiency & Renewable Energy)

    Executive Summary

    This report focuses on solar market trends through December 31, 2010; it provides an overview of the U.S. solar electricity market, including photovoltaic (PV) and concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies, identifies successes and trends within the market from both global and U.S. perspectives, and offers a general overview of the state of the solar energy market. The report is organized into five chapters. Chapter 1 provides a summary of global and U.S. installation trends. Chapter 2 presents production and shipment data, material and supply chain issues, and solar industry employment trends. Chapter 3 presents cost, price, and performance trends. Chapter 4 discusses policy and market drivers such as recently passed federal legislation, state and local policies, and developments in project financing. Chapter 5 closes the report with a discussion on private investment trends and near-term market forecasts.

    Highlights of this report include:

    Global installed PV capacity increased by 16.6 gigawatts (GW) in 2010, a 131% increase from the year before and nearly seven times the amount (2.4 GW) that was installed in 2007. The 2010 addition brought global cumulative installed PV capacity to nearly 40 GW. Leaders in 2010 capacity additions were Germany, with 7.4 GW, and Italy, with 2.3 GW installed, followed by the Czech Republic and Japan with approximately 1.5 GW and 990 megawatts (MW) installed, respectively. Germany maintained its lead in cumulative installed capacity in 2010 with 17 GW, followed by Spain at 3.8 GW, Japan at 3.6 GW, and Italy at 3.5 GW.

    The United States installed approximately 918 MW of PV capacity in 2010, a 84% increase over the 477 MW installed in 2009. The 2010 addition brought U.S. cumulative installed PV capacity to 2.5 GW. California continued to dominate the U.S. market with nearly 252 MW installed in 2010, bringing cumulative installations in that state to 1.02 GW, or 47% of the U.S. market. New Jersey followed with 132 MW installed in 2010, bringing cumulative capacity to 259 MW, or 12% of the U.S. market.

    click to enlarge

    Globally, there was approximately 1,318 MW of cumulative installed CSP capacity by the end of 20101 with nearly 20 GW2 in the pipeline (GTM Research 2011). In 2010, there were 3 CSP plants installed in the United States, totaling 78 MW, and 9 CSP facilities installed in Spain, totaling 450 MW. Outside of the United States, 814 MW of CSP was under construction by the end of 2010, with 10 GW in the U.S. pipeline.

    Global PV cell production continues to demonstrate impressive growth, with global cell production capacity increasing at a 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 66%. A majority (59%) of all PV cells were produced in China and Taiwan in 2010, which also retains 62% of global cell production capacity. Europe maintained its position as the second largest cell producer, with 13% of global production. Japan held a 9% share of the market, while North America was in fourth with 5% of PV cells produced globally in 2010.

    click to enlarge

    Thin-film PV technologies have grown faster than crystalline silicon (c-Si) over the past 5 years, with a 5-year CAGR of 94% for thin-film shipments and a 5-year CAGR of 63% for c-Si, from 2005 to 2010. Globally, thin-film technology shipments grew by 72% in 2010 compared to 2009, despite the fact that thin films overall market share decreased from 17% in 2009 to 13% in 2010.

    Global average PV module prices continued to drop in 2010 due to increased supply competition. As manufacturers lowered prices to compete in the global market, average module prices reached all-time lows despite robust demand and tight raw materials supplies during the second half of the year. In 2010, the average module price for a mid range buyer dropped 16%, to $2.36/WP ([peak]w) from $2.82/WP in 2009.

    Global venture capital (VC) and private equity (PE) investment in solar totaled $2.3 billion in 2010, representing a 58% CAGR from 2004 to 2010. Some of the notable transactions completed during 2010 included BrightSource Energy’s $150 million series D VC transaction, Abound Solar’s $110 million series D VC transaction, and Amonix’s $64 million series B VC transaction.

    click to enlarge

    Federal legislation, including the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA, October 2008) and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA, February 2009), is providing unprecedented levels of support for the U.S. solar industry. The EESA and ARRA provide extensions and enhancements to the federal investment tax credits (ITCs), including allowing utilities to claim the ITC, the removal of the residential cap on the ITC, a new 30% manufacturing ITC for solar and other clean energy technologies, and an option that allows grants in lieu of tax credits for taxpaying corporate entities. The $787 billion ARRA package includes funds for the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Loan Guarantee Program, DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) programs, and other initiatives. In addition to federal support, state and local policies, incentives, rules and regulations, as well as financing developments, these programs continue to encourage deployment of solar energy technologies…

    click to enlarge

    Solar Market Forecasts, PV and CSP

    The ongoing expansion of the solar market continued to attract the attention of numerous financial institutions and research and consulting firms seeking to provide analysis and forecasts for the PV and CSP sectors. This section analyzes these projections, both to identify the expected path of the industry and to recognize the substantial variance in market forecasts. Key trends and uncertainties for the solar market in the next several years are also discussed.

    click to enlarge

    PV Market Forecasts

    This section focuses on PV market projections made in late 2010 to early 2011.65 The global economic crisis that became apparent in late 2008 reduced overall demand for PV and continues to hinder the availability of funds for capital investment. Because of these financial changes, some analysts revised their forecasts in early 2009 from forecasts released in mid-to-late 2008. Some of those changes have carried over as financial markets continue to remain uncertain.

    Figure 5.6 illustrates the forecasted size and composition of PV production through 2013, while Figure 5.7 depicts global thin-film PV module supply forecasts. For total production, the median estimate increases from 6.0 GW in 2008 to 26.2 GW in 2013, a 5-year CAGR of 34.1%. Growth is expected to be relatively consistent through 2013 for both the c-Si and the thin-film segments, with the median estimate indicating thin films will likely maintain 88% and 82% of the PV module market. In addition to the growth of the median estimate, the range of estimates is significant. In 2013, the high estimates for c-Si and thin films are roughly twice that of the low estimates. Uncertainty in these projections is likely due to differing opinions about demand for PV, the ability to expand production sufficiently for each part of the PV supply chain, and technological and cost improvements of c-Si and thin films.

    click to enlarge

    Regarding thin-film versus c-Si production, the median projection indicates thin-film production is expected to grow at the same rate overall during the next several years, with a median forecasted 2008 to 2013 CAGR for thin-film PV and c-Si of 34%. However, c-Si is still expected to be the dominant technology for the next several years, accounting for 87% of total projected PV production in 2013. There is a reasonable level of disagreement among analysts about the future PV market share of c-Si versus thin film, demonstrated by a range of 74% to 91% for 2013 c-Si market share. To better describe the thin-film sector, Figure 5 presents the projected rise in thin-film PV module production by technology through 2010. The divergent range of supply estimates is reasonable given that thin-film PV continues to face technology and scale-up risks, in addition to overall market uncertainty for PV in general. Despite these uncertainties, median estimates for thin-film technologies imply growth, with 2008 to 2013 CAGRs of 43% for CdTe, 35% for a-Si, and 81% for CIGS production.

    The a-Si market includes established producers such as Energy Conversion Devices, Sharp, Signet Solar, and Kaneka, as well as numerous new entrants. New producers had previously indicated plans to enter the market through the purchase of turnkey systems from Applied Materials or Oerlikon. However, given the capital expenditures necessary for the purchase of turnkey production lines, expansion of a-Si production from new entrants continues to be curtailed by the tight credit market. In addition, as PV module prices have fallen faster than system prices, non-module costs have increased as a proportion of total system costs. Because non-module costs-per-watt rise as module efficiency declines, a-Si (which has the lowest efficiency of any of the principal PV technologies) has become less attractive.

    click to enlarge

    CIGS module production started from a very low base, a median 2008 estimate of just 59 MW, but is expected to grow substantially in the near term. The median projection for 2013 is 1.1 GW, with a low estimate of about 570 MW and a high estimate of about 1.7 GW. The enormous range in estimates reflects substantial scale-up and technology risks encountered by companies such as MiaSole, Nanosolar, and Solyndra as they expand commercial production.

    Figure 5.8 shows the demand projections for solar PV modules by location. Median global demand is expected to grow from 6 GW in 2008 to 22.3 GW in 2013, a 5-year CAGR of 30%. Europe is expected to remain the largest region for solar energy through 2012, at which time the United States is presently expected to become the largest PV market in the world. The U.S. market is expected to grow at a 68% CAGR between 2008 and 2013, while Germany will grow at 1% over the same period due to the expected peak and then decline of German PV demand. As with the production projections, there is tremendous range in the demand estimates resulting from uncertainties about policy incentives, electricity prices, cost reductions of PV systems, and the price elasticity of PV demand.

    Figure 5.9 shows forecasted global module and system prices through 2013. Module prices are expected to decrease from $3.93/WDC, to $1.09/WDC in 2013, a 5-year CAGR of −23%.

    click to enlarge

    CSP Market Forecasts

    CSP differs markedly from PV with respect to history, installation size, permitting and construction duration, and technological readiness. Whereas PV has had a history of consistent annual installations, 350 MW of CSP were built in the 1980s with no subsequent installations in the United States until 2005. Installation sizes on the order of tens of megawatts and up to 4-year permitting and construction durations contribute to the difference in deployment patterns between CSP and PV. Only one CSP technology (parabolic troughs) has been demonstrated long term on a fully commercial scale, although there are a growing number of planned CSP systems that are dish engine, power tower, and linear Fresnel technologies. In 2009, three new plants totaling 12 MW of new generation capacity were added, including the first power tower in the United States (the Sierra SunTower), the first CSP facility in Hawaii (a trough system named Holaniku), and a linear Fresnel system in California (Kimberlina) (SEIA 2010). Spain also saw remarkable growth in 2009, with the installation of seven CSP facilities totaling 320 MW.

    click to enlarge

    In 2010, three CSP plants came online in the United States, totaling 78 MW (GTM Research 2011), and nine CSP plants came online in Spain, totaling 450 MW (Protermo Solar 2010). Outside of the United States, 814 MW of CSP was under construction by the end of 2010, as broken down earlier in the report in Table 1.2 (NREL 2010). The number of plants under construction is dwarfed by the estimated number of planned plants. In the United States alone there was 10.8 GW of proposed CSP capacity by the end of the year (GTM Research 2011).

    While different sources report planned projects differently, Tables 5.1 and 5.2 attempt to represent the amount and location of global-planned CSP installations through 2015 (GTM Research 2011). Table 5.1 lists CSP projects as planned and under construction, by country, while table 5.2 depicts the respective market share of each country. Of the estimated 19 GW in the global CSP pipeline, 57% are in the United States, 21% are in Spain, 13% are in China, about 6% are in the MENA region, and the remaining 3% are dispersed across India, Greece, South Africa, Italy, and France. It should be noted that the projects in the global pipeline are by no means guaranteed. Several major factors could prevent many of these projects from being completed, resulting in a pipeline that will likely be reshaped on a continual basis.

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home