NewEnergyNews: Holiday Reading: Is the US Building Transmission Fast Enough or Too Fast? The 2006 federal order 679 giving incentives for new lines may be out of control.

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

The new challenge: To make every day Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • TODAY’S STUDY: HOW THE OBAMA EMISSIONS CUTTING PLAN CAN PROTECT SAFE ELECTRICITY DELIVERY
  • QUICK NEWS, April 27: THE POPE’S CLIMATE CHANGE MOVE; FIRST SOLAR GOES INTO COMMUNITY SOLAR; WHAT WIND CAN DO
  • THE DAY BEFORE

  • Weekend Video: Jon Stewart Celebrates Earth Day
  • Weekend Video: A Climate Scientist’s Fight
  • Weekend Video: This Is Happening. Now
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-GLOBAL BANKING GIANT SEES WORLD HEATING UP
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-FRENCH NEW ENERGY CAN BEAT ITS NUKES
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-CHINA'S ANSWER TO TESLA
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-SO. AFRICA LOOKS TO SOLAR
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

    THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT THURSDAY, April 23:

  • TTTA Thursday-CLIMATE CHANGE HITS WOMEN HARDEST
  • TTTA Thursday-WIRELESS EV CHARGING
  • TTTA Thursday-WIND COULD BE GREAT ON THE GREAT LAKES
  • TTTA Thursday-THE CHANGE NEW ENERGY NEEDS
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: THE NEW GUIDE TO THE NATION'S BEST SOLAR POLICIES — AND HOW TO EMULATE THEM
  • QUICK NEWS, April 22: EARTH DAY PROGRESS REPORT; EARTH – WHAT NASA SEES; FROM THE SUN, FOR THE EARTH
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: HOW MUCH NEW ENERGY CAN CHINA BUILD?
  • QUICK NEWS, April 21: HOW TO DECIDE ON SOLAR; NEW ENERGY’S PROPERTY VALUE; THE EPA CLEAN POWER PLAN, JOBS, AND THE ECONOMY
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, is an occasional contributor to NewEnergyNews

    -------------------

    Some of Anne's contributions:

  • Another Tipping Point: US Coal Supply Decline So Real Even West Virginia Concurs (REPORT), November 26, 2013
  • SOLAR FOR ME BUT NOT FOR THEE ~ Xcel's Push to Undermine Rooftop Solar, September 20, 2013
  • NEW BILLS AND NEW BIRDS in Colorado's recent session, May 20, 2013
  • Lies, damned lies and politicians (October 8, 2012)
  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    Your intrepid reporter

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Wednesday, January 02, 2013

    Holiday Reading: Is the US Building Transmission Fast Enough or Too Fast? The 2006 federal order 679 giving incentives for new lines may be out of control.

    Holiday Reading: Is the US Building Transmission Fast Enough or Too Fast? The 2006 federal order 679 giving incentives for new lines may be out of control.

    Herman K. Trabish, July 23, 2012 (Greentech Media)

    With the approval of Congress, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an order in 2006 providing an array of incentives for building new transmission.

    FERC’s Order 679 seemed like a good idea at the time. Congress had just passed the landmark Energy Policy Act of 2005 that opened the door to a lot of new generation capacity -- renewable as well as traditional.

    And, as the FERC order noted at the time, the U.S. load had doubled between 1975 and 1998 while its investment in transmission dropped significantly. Though transmission infrastructure investment increased after 1998, the FERC order added, it was still less in 2003 than it had been in 1975.

    Order 679 was “intended to encourage transmission infrastructure investment.” It created “incentive-based (including performance-based) rate treatments for the transmission of electric energy in interstate commerce by public utilities.” New transmission, the order said, would benefit consumers “by ensuring reliability and reducing the cost of delivered power by reducing transmission congestion.”

    It worked. Transmission infrastructure spending, according to the Edison Electric Institute (EEI), grew from $7.5 billion in 2005 to $10.2 billion in 2010. In its 2011 report, the EEI projected spending of $54 billion from 2011 to 2014, a 43 percent increase over spending from 2007 to 2010.

    TransmissionHub just reported that spending for the 2012 to 2016 period of close to $23 billion has been applied for under the Order 679 “incentive rate treatment.” That, the report said, would bring 2008 to 2016 total investment to $36.2 billion.

    The 2012 incentive rate treatment is estimated at $4.2 billion. The peak of spending for incentive rate treatment infrastructure investment through 2016 is expected to come in 2013 at $5.4 billion, followed by $5.2 billion in 2014, $4.5 billion in 2015 and $3.6 billion in 2016.

    Total spending for the new North American transmission infrastructure that will come on line between 2012 and 2016, the TransmissionHub report estimated, will be $68.6 billion. The 2012 to 2020 total investment was estimated at $169.7 billion.

    Total spending in 2012, for some 3,100 miles of mostly 230-kilovolt lines, was projected to approach $7 billion.

    Spending was projected to be twice that for both 2013 ($15.4 billion for 5,600 miles of lines) and 2014 ($15.3 billion for 6,100 miles of lines).

    Spending in 2015 will double again, TransmissionHub projected, to $31 billion for 9,700 miles of lines.

    North American transmission investment from 2016 to 2020 was projected to be $101.2 billion, with $74.3 billion of the spending coming from 2016 to 2018.

    The leading builders of transmission projects scheduled to go into service between 2012 and 2016, according to TransmissionHub, are Edison International (NYSE:EIX) subsidiarySouthern California Edison ($4.9 billion), Dominion Resources subsidiary Virginia Electric Power ($

    The success of the Order 679 incentives has raised questions. Representative Edward Markey (D-MA), as Chair of the House Subcommittee on Energy and Environment in 2009, asked then FERC Chair Jon Wellinghoff if the program was too big.

    More recently regulators have characterized the incentives as excessive and questioned the lucrative compensation building transmission infrastructure. In response, FERC issued a notice of inquiry (NOI) in May 2011 which asked for reform proposals.

    Order 679 allowed incentives in the forms of (1) an incentive-based return on equity (ROE), (2) construction work in progress (CWIP), (3) a hypothetical capital structure, (4) accelerated depreciation, (5) recovery of prudently incurred costs, (6) deferred cost recovery or (7) single-issue ratemaking.

    Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley filed a complaint with FERC in September 2011 arguing that the base ROE for New England transmission should be lowered from 11.14 percent to 9.2 percent. Representative Markey supported her filing.

    Transmission builders like Northeast Utilities (NYSE:NU), National Grid, and United Illuminating, responded that the New England base ROE meets FERC's “just and reasonable” standard.

    Other NOI comments from utilities, government and non-governmental organizations have noted aspects of Order 679 that could be reconsidered. The use of CWIP, which allows transmission builders to bill ratepayers while the infrastructure is under construction, is an especially controversial type of incentive. Opponents say it shifts risk to rate payers. Advocates say it facilitates new transmission and lower rates by improving cash flows, debt ratings and capital costs for builders.

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home