Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

While the OFFICE of President remains in highest regard at NewEnergyNews, this administration's position on climate change makes it impossible to regard THIS president with respect. Below is the NewEnergyNews theme song until 2020.

The challenge now: To make every day Earth Day.


  • TODAY’S STUDY: A Plan To Help Utilities Perform Better
  • QUICK NEWS, July 25: Climate Change In The Not-So-Funny Funnies; The Truth About Wind, Birds, And Bats; How Goes For 100% New Energy

  • TODAY’S STUDY: Comparing Old Energy And New Energy For The Grid
  • QUICK NEWS, July 24: It’s A Plastic World; How This President Rewards Scientists Who Speak Truth To Power; Intro To Community Choice Electricity

  • Weekend Video: How To Know It’s Getting Hotter
  • Weekend Video: Sea Level Rise To Follow Soon
  • Weekend Video: Buildings That Can Benefit The Climate

  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Facing A Mass Extinction
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-China Takes Over The Solar World
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Pakistan Turning To Wind
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-30X Growth In Distributed Storage Over The Next Decade


  • TTTA Thursday-Al Gore Goes Deep On Climate
  • TTTA Thursday-Ready To Hit The Solar Road
  • TTTA Thursday-Wind In The Cities – The Cleveland Example
  • TTTA Thursday-20X Growth For Global Grid Scale Storage In Next Decade

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: The Solar Market Transformation
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: A Close Look At Hawaii’s Plan To Get To 100% New Energy
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: The Big Plan To Get Energy Storage Paid What It’s Worth
  • --------------------------


    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, f is an occasional contributor to NewEnergyNews


    Some of Anne's contributions:

  • Another Tipping Point: US Coal Supply Decline So Real Even West Virginia Concurs (REPORT), November 26, 2013
  • SOLAR FOR ME BUT NOT FOR THEE ~ Xcel's Push to Undermine Rooftop Solar, September 20, 2013
  • NEW BILLS AND NEW BIRDS in Colorado's recent session, May 20, 2013
  • Lies, damned lies and politicians (October 8, 2012)
  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns


    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart




      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.


    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • TODAY AT NewEnergyNews, July 26:

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: The Best Way To Do Community Solar
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: What U.S. DER Can Learn Down Under
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Solar’s Newest Arizona Challenge

    Monday, February 02, 2015


    Offshore Energy by the Numbers; An Economic Analysis of Offshore Drilling and Wind Energy in the Atlantic

    Andrew Menaquale, January 2015 (Oceana)

    Executive Summary

    The oil industry has been pushing to expand offshore drilling to the Atlantic Ocean. The industry claims that opening the Atlantic to drilling will lead the United States towards energy independence, generate millions of dollars in revenue for states, and create thousands of jobs in the process.1 However, many of the arguments made about the benefits of offshore drilling do not stand up to scrutiny, and the benefits of offshore wind prove to be greater and available over a longer period of time.

    For instance, the oil and gas resources that industry claims will contribute to domestic energy independence would not be extracted until 2026 at the earliest, based on industry’s own estimates.2 This is due to the extensive time it takes to survey proposed areas, conduct exploratory drilling, and build a massive network of infrastructure necessary to conduct large-scale drilling. In addition, industry includes oil and gas resources that are not economically feasible to extract, incorporates inaccurate resources multipliers, and assumes a non-existent revenue-sharing system. All of these assumptions result in exaggerated job creation figures. The industry itself projects that the overwhelming bulk of the jobs promised will not be created for at least another decade,3 mainly because commercial production would not begin until 2026. Additionally, the industry and some offshore drilling proponents argue that states will benefit from funding that would come from a revenue-sharing system that currently does not exist.4 As a result, the revenue figures promised are not guaranteed. At the same time, if the U.S. moves forward with the expansion of offshore drilling, there could likely be very real and detrimental impacts to the environment and coastal economies.

    On the other hand, developing even a modest amount of available offshore wind resources would be a far better strategy to lead the U.S. toward energy independence, while generating hundreds of thousands of new jobs. Unlike offshore drilling, offshore wind provides power directly to coastal communities without resulting in pollution, carbon dioxide emissions or spills. The oil industry’s estimates are often based on unrealistic assumptions about the job growth potential of developing oil and gas. This report compares economically recoverable oil and gas development to conservative estimates of offshore wind development to allow an “apples-to-apples” comparison of the energy and jobs that could be created by each.

    Key Findings

    • A modest and gradual development of offshore wind on the East Coast could generate up to 143 gigawatts of power over the next 20 years, which is enough to power over 115 million households;

    • In the next 20 years, offshore wind could create about 91,000 more jobs than offshore drilling, which is about double the job creation potential;

    • Based on government estimates, if all of the economically recoverable offshore oil and gas in the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) were extracted and used, oil demand would only be met for 132 days and gas demand would only be met for 283 days, at current consumption rates;

    • For comparison purposes, the energy created by 20 years of offshore wind in the Atlantic could produce five billion barrels of oil equivalents (BOE) more than that of all the economically recoverable oil and gas in the same area;

    • In just 13 years of producing energy, offshore wind could generate more energy than could be provided by all of the economically recoverable offshore oil and gas resources;

    • Along the Atlantic coast, nearly 1.4 million jobs and over $95 billion in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) rely on healthy ocean ecosystems, mainly through fishing, tourism and recreation;

    • Offshore wind offers more environmental benefits and fewer detrimental environmental impacts than offshore drilling;

    • In all seven states where offshore drilling is proposed, offshore wind could produce more jobs than offshore drilling; and

    • North Carolina has the highest wind resource and job creation potential of any state in the targeted offshore drilling zone on the Atlantic coast.

    A modest development of our domestic offshore wind resource would offer benefits that cannot be matched by offshore drilling. Offshore wind has the potential to generate more jobs, produce more power, and lead to a higher degree of energy independence than offshore drilling for oil and gas. In addition, offshore winds blow strongest during the day and at other times of peak demand, providing a critical clean energy power source to the grid when it is needed the most. Perhaps most importantly, however, offshore wind development could help the U.S. transition away from fossil fuels and toward clean and renewable energy, a necessary shift given the widespread adverse impacts of offshore drilling, including those related to climate change. The oil and gas industry advocates strongly for more drilling in undeveloped areas, promising strong benefits for job creation and energy development.

    This report provides a realistic picture of what offshore drilling could provide for the East Coast by comparing the oil and gas industry’s projections to similar projections for what could instead be provided by offshore wind. We demonstrate here that the development of offshore wind benefits the economy, coastal communities and the environment more than the development of offshore oil and gas resources in the same region. Specifically, wind could create more than twice as many jobs, and in 20 years, it could produce more than twice the energy, as measured in billions of barrels of oil equivalent (BOE), as would offshore drilling (Tables 1 and 2).


    Post a Comment

    << Home