NewEnergyNews: TODAY’S STUDY: WIND BEATS OIL IN THE ATLANTIC

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

The challenge now: To make every day Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • TODAY’S STUDY: A Way For New Energy To Meet Peak Demand
  • QUICK NEWS, December 5: Trial Of The Century Coming On Climate; The Wind-Solar Synergy; The Still Rising Sales Of Cars With Plugs
  • THE DAY BEFORE

  • Weekend Video: Trump Truth And Climate Change
  • Weekend Video: The Daily Show Talks Pipeline Politics
  • Weekend Video: Beyond Polar Bears – The Real Science Of Climate Change
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Aussie Farmers Worrying About Climate Change
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-The Climate Change Solution At Hand, Part 1
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-The Climate Change Solution At Hand, Part 2
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-New Energy And Historic Buildings In Europe
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

    THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT THURSDAY, December 1:

  • TTTA Thursday-First Daughter Ivanka May Fight For Climate
  • TTTA Thursday-Low Profile High Power Ocean Wind Energy
  • TTTA Thursday-A Visionary Solar Power Plant
  • TTTA Thursday-EVs Have A Growth Path
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: How The Clean Power Plan Drove The Utility Power Mix Transition
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: How Utilities Are Answering The Distributed Energy Resources Challenge
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Looking At New Rates To Unlock The Utility Of The Future
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: The Power Potential Of Personal Wind
  • QUICK NEWS, November 29: Climate Change Forces Hard Choices In Alaska; New Energy To Utilities-“Can’t-Beat-Us-So-Join-Us”; Fact-Checking Trump Hot Air On Wind
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, f is an occasional contributor to NewEnergyNews

    -------------------

    Some of Anne's contributions:

  • Another Tipping Point: US Coal Supply Decline So Real Even West Virginia Concurs (REPORT), November 26, 2013
  • SOLAR FOR ME BUT NOT FOR THEE ~ Xcel's Push to Undermine Rooftop Solar, September 20, 2013
  • NEW BILLS AND NEW BIRDS in Colorado's recent session, May 20, 2013
  • Lies, damned lies and politicians (October 8, 2012)
  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • TODAY AT NewEnergyNews, December 6:

  • TODAY’S STUDY: How To Balance Competing Solar Interests
  • QUICK NEWS, December 6: Sliver Of Hope? Al Gore In Climate Change Meet With Donald Trump; The Opportunity In New Energy; Google Seizing New Energy Opportunity

    Monday, February 02, 2015

    TODAY’S STUDY: WIND BEATS OIL IN THE ATLANTIC

    Offshore Energy by the Numbers; An Economic Analysis of Offshore Drilling and Wind Energy in the Atlantic

    Andrew Menaquale, January 2015 (Oceana)

    Executive Summary

    The oil industry has been pushing to expand offshore drilling to the Atlantic Ocean. The industry claims that opening the Atlantic to drilling will lead the United States towards energy independence, generate millions of dollars in revenue for states, and create thousands of jobs in the process.1 However, many of the arguments made about the benefits of offshore drilling do not stand up to scrutiny, and the benefits of offshore wind prove to be greater and available over a longer period of time.

    For instance, the oil and gas resources that industry claims will contribute to domestic energy independence would not be extracted until 2026 at the earliest, based on industry’s own estimates.2 This is due to the extensive time it takes to survey proposed areas, conduct exploratory drilling, and build a massive network of infrastructure necessary to conduct large-scale drilling. In addition, industry includes oil and gas resources that are not economically feasible to extract, incorporates inaccurate resources multipliers, and assumes a non-existent revenue-sharing system. All of these assumptions result in exaggerated job creation figures. The industry itself projects that the overwhelming bulk of the jobs promised will not be created for at least another decade,3 mainly because commercial production would not begin until 2026. Additionally, the industry and some offshore drilling proponents argue that states will benefit from funding that would come from a revenue-sharing system that currently does not exist.4 As a result, the revenue figures promised are not guaranteed. At the same time, if the U.S. moves forward with the expansion of offshore drilling, there could likely be very real and detrimental impacts to the environment and coastal economies.

    On the other hand, developing even a modest amount of available offshore wind resources would be a far better strategy to lead the U.S. toward energy independence, while generating hundreds of thousands of new jobs. Unlike offshore drilling, offshore wind provides power directly to coastal communities without resulting in pollution, carbon dioxide emissions or spills. The oil industry’s estimates are often based on unrealistic assumptions about the job growth potential of developing oil and gas. This report compares economically recoverable oil and gas development to conservative estimates of offshore wind development to allow an “apples-to-apples” comparison of the energy and jobs that could be created by each.

    Key Findings

    • A modest and gradual development of offshore wind on the East Coast could generate up to 143 gigawatts of power over the next 20 years, which is enough to power over 115 million households;

    • In the next 20 years, offshore wind could create about 91,000 more jobs than offshore drilling, which is about double the job creation potential;

    • Based on government estimates, if all of the economically recoverable offshore oil and gas in the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) were extracted and used, oil demand would only be met for 132 days and gas demand would only be met for 283 days, at current consumption rates;

    • For comparison purposes, the energy created by 20 years of offshore wind in the Atlantic could produce five billion barrels of oil equivalents (BOE) more than that of all the economically recoverable oil and gas in the same area;

    • In just 13 years of producing energy, offshore wind could generate more energy than could be provided by all of the economically recoverable offshore oil and gas resources;

    • Along the Atlantic coast, nearly 1.4 million jobs and over $95 billion in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) rely on healthy ocean ecosystems, mainly through fishing, tourism and recreation;

    • Offshore wind offers more environmental benefits and fewer detrimental environmental impacts than offshore drilling;

    • In all seven states where offshore drilling is proposed, offshore wind could produce more jobs than offshore drilling; and

    • North Carolina has the highest wind resource and job creation potential of any state in the targeted offshore drilling zone on the Atlantic coast.

    A modest development of our domestic offshore wind resource would offer benefits that cannot be matched by offshore drilling. Offshore wind has the potential to generate more jobs, produce more power, and lead to a higher degree of energy independence than offshore drilling for oil and gas. In addition, offshore winds blow strongest during the day and at other times of peak demand, providing a critical clean energy power source to the grid when it is needed the most. Perhaps most importantly, however, offshore wind development could help the U.S. transition away from fossil fuels and toward clean and renewable energy, a necessary shift given the widespread adverse impacts of offshore drilling, including those related to climate change. The oil and gas industry advocates strongly for more drilling in undeveloped areas, promising strong benefits for job creation and energy development.

    This report provides a realistic picture of what offshore drilling could provide for the East Coast by comparing the oil and gas industry’s projections to similar projections for what could instead be provided by offshore wind. We demonstrate here that the development of offshore wind benefits the economy, coastal communities and the environment more than the development of offshore oil and gas resources in the same region. Specifically, wind could create more than twice as many jobs, and in 20 years, it could produce more than twice the energy, as measured in billions of barrels of oil equivalent (BOE), as would offshore drilling (Tables 1 and 2).

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home

  • >