NewEnergyNews: ORIGINAL REPORTING: INSIDE MAINE'S VALUATION DEBATE; A STUDY FINDS SOLAR HAS GREAT VALUE

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

While the OFFICE of President remains in highest regard at NewEnergyNews, this administration's position on climate change makes it impossible to regard THIS president with respect. Below is the NewEnergyNews theme song until 2020.

The challenge now: To make every day Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • Weekend Video: Colbert On The Newest Climate Fiasco
  • Weekend Video: Consumer Reports’ Tesla Vs. Bolt Face-Off
  • Weekend Video: All About The Eclipse And The Power Grid
  • THE DAY BEFORE

  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Is ‘Game Of Thrones’ About Climate Change?
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Surprises In The New Global Solar Rankings
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Denmark’s Vestas Wins Mexico’s Biggest Wind Deal
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Supervolcanoes Could Grow Cars With Plugs
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

    THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT THURSDAY, August 17:

  • TTTA Thursday-Is The White House Hiding DOE’s Grid Study?
  • TTTA Thursday-Will The White House Hide The Climate Report?
  • TTTA Thursday-Crucial Transmission Line For Wind Denied
  • TTTA Thursday-Wind And Solar Are Saving Lives
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Organizing California’s Distributed Energy Efforts
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: A Deep Look At Evolving U.S. Efforts To Support Solar
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: Big Growth In Customer-Sited Wind
  • QUICK NEWS, August 15: New Forest To Offset Bad U.S. Climate Policies Has 120,000 Pledges; Wind Becoming The Go-To Power; 88,000 Jobs And The Fight Over Solar Imports
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: The Work On Tomorrow’s Grid So Far
  • QUICK NEWS, August 14: Climate Is The Elephant In The Room; Long-Term, NatGas Is Not The Answer; Why Wind Is Such A Good Choice
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Founding Editor Herman K. Trabish

    --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Research Associate and Contributing Editor Jessica R. Wunder

    --------------------------

    --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • TODAY AT NewEnergyNews, August 21:

  • TODAY’S STUDY: The Wind Market Now
  • QUICK NEWS, August 21: Gore’s ‘Inconvenient Sequel’ Is A ‘Teaching Tool’; Target Targets Big Wind Buy; Michigan Grows Its Solar Garden

    Wednesday, September 16, 2015

    ORIGINAL REPORTING: INSIDE MAINE'S VALUATION DEBATE; A STUDY FINDS SOLAR HAS GREAT VALUE

    Is solar worth $0.33 per kWh? Inside Maine's valuation debate; A study finds solar has great value, concerning the state's utilities

    Herman K. Trabish, March 19, 2015 (Utility Dive)

    Solar’s real and whole value could be over $0.33 per kilowatt-hour (kWh), according to an extensive new study done for Maine’s legislature.

    That number means that, according to the study, solar energy priced at or below the $0.33 per kWh mark would deliver societal benefits and should be purchased, but the applied value will not be certain until Maine’s legislators and regulators decide which solar costs and benefits should be in the final valuation.

    “The biggest takeaway is not that regulators should create a $0.33 per kWh offset value,” explained Pace Energy and Climate Center Executive Director Karl Rabago, co-author of the "Maine Distributed Solar Valuation Study."

    “The study creates a menu of values," he said. "It tells you that if you can get solar for less than $0.33 per kWh, then from this estimation of the values, you will be getting a good deal and a lot of benefits.”

    The study and how it can be used

    The statutorily-mandated study’s menu is made up of 13 cost-benefit factors in five categories.

    The first eight are Avoided Market Costs and are relatively straightforward bill factors:

    Avoided Energy Cost, Avoided Generation Capacity Cost, Avoided Residential Generation Capacity Cost, Avoided Natural Gas Pipeline Cost, Solar Integration Cost, Transmission Delivery, Avoided Transmission Capacity Cost, Avoided Distribution Capacity Cost, and Voltage Regulation.

    The last five are Societal Benefits more commonly regarded as externalized factors but they are emerging as important parts of the solar value equation: Net Social Cost of Carbon, Net Social Cost of SO2, Net Social Cost of NOx, Market Price Response, and Avoided Fuel Price Uncertainty.

    The study provides a calculated one-year value and a 25-year levelized valuefor CMP customers. Avoided Market Costs are valued at $0.09 per kWh for one year and at $0.138 if levelized over 25 years. The Societal Benefits are valued at $0.092 per kWh for one year and at $0.199 per kWh over 25 years. That puts the one-year total value at $0.182 per kWh and the 25-year value at $0.337 per kWh.

    “If legislators believe that $0.33 per kWh number is the big picture, whether or not it is appropriate for ratemaking, then they can be confident solar at less than that will bring net benefits to Maine and, over the long run, put downward pressure on rates and on the state budget,” Rabago said. “If they can get a $0.33 per kWh item for $0.13 per kWh, they should buy it all day long.”

    $0.13 per kWh is the typical Maine electricity rate.

    The study also offers legislators an opportunity to move electricity policy andrate making forward, he added. “Up to $0.33 per kWh could be offered as an incentive if that is the preferred way to get things for society like clean air from solar.”

    Conservatives are likely to take issue with the Societal Benefits, Rabago said.

    “For some reason the lungs of our children are what people quibble about," he said. "But just moving Market Price Response and Avoided Fuel Price Uncertainty higher in the table make the solar value better than a breakeven number.”

    Rabago, a former Austin Energy executive and Texas utility regulator, was referring to the table of 25-year values, though he is aware traditional utility calculations are based on one-year values.

    “Solar is a long run asset,” he explained. “Using a one-year avoided cost instead of the 25-year levelized avoided cost will always produce a smaller number. But a short term view is irresponsible and inappropriate with long-lived assets with long-lived impacts.”

    Central Maine Power’s concerns

    With such a high valuation for solar Central Maine Power (CMP), the state’s dominant deliverer of electricity, has concerns.

    CMP is owned by Iberdrola USA, a subsidiary of global wind giant Iberdrola, said USA Director of Communications John Carroll. The company strongly believes in renewables and long term energy solutions. But, he added, there are important questions about Maine’s value of solar study.

    How will it be used? He asked. And who will pay if the remuneration for net metering is increased and overall program costs increase as more solar is built?

    CMP is Maine’s biggest utility and delivers about 80% of the state’s load, Carroll explained. But it is purely a transmission and distribution (T&D) utilityand owns no generation.

    "We are completely agnostic by law as to where the energy comes from and we have no dog in any fight over energy supply,” he said.

    The very low values assigned to T&D by the study means CMP should be unaffected, Carroll acknowledged.

    “But, if solar is valued at $0.33 per kWh, that is a big cost shift to our customers who are non-solar owners from solar owners," he said. "It is an equity issue.”

    Carroll recommended talking to Natural Resource Council of Maine Clean Energy Policy Director Dylan Voorhees to further clarify this point.

    “The study did not include a solar benefit for T&D costs because the Maine Public Utilities Commission accepted the utility logic that Maine’s load is not presently growing and therefore solar will not presently offset infrastructure costs,” Voorhees said.

    “But it is ludicrous to think that over the next 25 years Maine will not invest in T&D infrastructure,” he explained. “Second, the biggest factor in the need for grid infrastructure is peak load. Solar can reduce that. The calculation is complicated and the PUC did not take it on but previous CMP rate cases showed their peak usage drives a significant portion, over half, of their costs."

    And, finally, if this is about customers," Voorhees said, "the study makes it really clear CMP customers will benefit from more solar.”

    What the study means for Maine's politics

    “It was recognized there would be legislation from solar advocates this year and there are a number of bills in already,” Carroll said. “This study will be front and center in the debates.”

    The study shows solar offers a lot of value and that raises the question of what lawmakers will do, Voorhees agreed.

    Polling on climate change-related issues and factors that aren’t typically part of electricity rates shows people in Maine think it is time to act, Voorhees said. The state’s participation in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative has accustomed them to thinking about the connection between emissions and electricity rates.

    “I don’t think anyone will put a policy on the table that says we should pay net metered solar owners $0.33 per kWh,” he said. But the legislature will probably consider a 2% by 2021 solar mandate on top of the state’s current 10% renewables by 2017 mandate.

    Because of the study, there will probably not be serious attacks on net metering, he added.

    “The current electricity rate is about $0.13 per kWh and clearly the value of solar is well in excess of that even if environmental and other societal benefits are left out,” he said.

    Legislators are also likely to consider expanding the current 660 KW limit on net metered systems to 1 MW or 2 MW, an augmenting Maine’s net metered community solar programs, Voorhess speculated.

    “This study shows solar is a much better value than people think,” said Maine House of Representatives Assistant Majority Leader Sara Gideon (D).

    It will be especially helpful, she added, because “our Governor is not very keen on solar and focused only on lowest cost energy, no matter what it is. Even if you were to back out the societal costs, we are still looking at a solar value that is higher than the retail value of electricity in Maine.”

    A political compromise?

    With a Republican Governor and Senate and a Democrat controlled House, Gideon said, it will be “a somewhat heavy lift to get enough compromise to pass something with adequate Republican support to weather the Governor’s pushback.”

    But Maine has traditionally been able to find compromise on energy, Gideon said. “I’m sure we will not end this session with, for example, solar policies like Massachusetts, but I am hopeful we can find a path.”

    From recent solar industry numbers, Voorhees said, it is clear Maine is losing out to surrounding states and the rest of the country.

    “Solar is going gangbusters and prices are falling and a lot of the states around us have policies to encourage it and they are reaping a lot of benefits,” he said. “Now we have evidence that solar offers a lot of value. It should greenlight policies that will bring Maine into the modern solar world.”

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home