NewEnergyNews: TODAY’S STUDY: BRINGING UTILITIES AND CUSTOMERS TOGETHER

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

The challenge now: To make every day Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT THURSDAY, December 1:

  • TTTA Thursday-First Daughter Ivanka May Fight For Climate
  • TTTA Thursday-Low Profile High Power Ocean Wind Energy
  • TTTA Thursday-A Visionary Solar Power Plant
  • TTTA Thursday-EVs Have A Growth Path
  • THE DAY BEFORE

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: How The Clean Power Plan Drove The Utility Power Mix Transition
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: How Utilities Are Answering The Distributed Energy Resources Challenge
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Looking At New Rates To Unlock The Utility Of The Future
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: The Power Potential Of Personal Wind
  • QUICK NEWS, November 29: Climate Change Forces Hard Choices In Alaska; New Energy To Utilities-“Can’t-Beat-Us-So-Join-Us”; Fact-Checking Trump Hot Air On Wind
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: Getting More New Energy On The Grid
  • QUICK NEWS, November 28, 2016: Pope Talks Climate Change At Trump; Solar Comes To The Mall; The Big Possibilities Of Backyard Wind
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • Weekend Video: Why President Trump Can’t Stop New Energy
  • Weekend Video: 7 Things Climate Change Will Mean
  • Weekend Video: Wireless EV Charging Stations
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-A Picture Of Climate Change
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Japan’s Toyota Targets Longer Range EV
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Spain’s Bay of Biscay Wave Harvest
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Morocco’s Green Revolution
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, f is an occasional contributor to NewEnergyNews

    -------------------

    Some of Anne's contributions:

  • Another Tipping Point: US Coal Supply Decline So Real Even West Virginia Concurs (REPORT), November 26, 2013
  • SOLAR FOR ME BUT NOT FOR THEE ~ Xcel's Push to Undermine Rooftop Solar, September 20, 2013
  • NEW BILLS AND NEW BIRDS in Colorado's recent session, May 20, 2013
  • Lies, damned lies and politicians (October 8, 2012)
  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • FRIDAY WORLD, December 2:

  • Aussie Farmers Worrying About Climate Change
  • The Climate Change Solution At Hand, Part 1
  • The Climate Change Solution At Hand, Part 2
  • New Energy And Historic Buildings In Europe

    Monday, February 22, 2016

    TODAY’S STUDY: BRINGING UTILITIES AND CUSTOMERS TOGETHER

    Improving Customer Experience and Efficiency Program Outcomes

    Megan Billingsley, Chris Stratton, Emily Martin Fadrhonc January 2016 (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory)

    Abstract

    Many comprehensive home energy upgrade programs have found that, to convert a high percentage of inquiries into completed upgrades, homeowners need more than just financial incentives. To provide additional support, streamline the home upgrade process, and increase the number, depth, and breadth of energy-saving measures installed, several home energy upgrade programs offer energy advisor services to guide the customer through the home energy upgrade process. These services range from intensive coordination with homeowners to answering questions as needed. In the most involved cases, the energy advisor might provide a full suite of services, including scheduling the initial energy assessment, completing a walkthrough of the home, directly installing simple energy-saving measures, reviewing contractor bids, and performing quality assurance tests after the upgrade has been completed.

    Providing these services offers an opportunity to gain homeowners’ trust, build program credibility, and more actively encourage participants to complete recommended upgrades. These benefits are tempered by the cost of offering advisors’ services. While many of the programs highlighted in this program brief are fairly new, the services provided by energy advisors have already played an important role in facilitating comprehensive home energy upgrades.

    Helping Homeowners Overcome Obstacles to Energy Efficiency

    Homeowners face multiple barriers that can significantly hinder completion of a home energy upgrade. The benefits of lower energy bills, increased comfort, and a healthier indoor environment can be overshadowed by the upfront costs, uncertainty about who to trust with the project, and life’s other priorities. Factor in concerns about the time required to understand and manage an upgrade project, and these obstacles often prevail. Barriers can be broadly categorized as informational (e.g., homeowners are not familiar with the concept of home energy upgrades, the benefits of an upgrade, or how to participate in the program), decision-making (e.g., uncertainty about how to select a contractor or understand a contractor’s scope of work), and transactional (e.g., selecting and scheduling a contractor, filling out program paperwork).

    To help homeowners overcome these challenges, some energy efficiency program administrators have created an energy advisor (EA), or energy coach, role to guide homeowners through the upgrade process. The EA’s primary function is to streamline the upgrade experience for homeowners. EAs are commonly available to answer homeowners’ questions over the phone or in person, review contractor bids, and ensure the quality of work performed. Additionally, some EAs provide outreach service, becoming the face of energy efficiency in the areas they serve and attending community events to present an overview of the home upgrade process and recruit participants. Some programs have also used the EA position to generate leads, provide quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) on completed work, and develop relationships with the local contractor workforce. Table 1 summarizes common barriers that can impede home upgrade activity and effective strategies that programs employing EAs have utilized to overcome them.

    The level of service provided by an EA varies depending on factors such as program goals and budget, locally identified barriers, and the characteristics of the existing contractor pool. Every program discussed here carefully weighed their local circumstances as they designed the EA role, and the unique set of services offered by the EA reflects the programs’ goals and constraints.

    This program brief summarizes the experiences of six residential energy efficiency programs that incorporated EAs, surveys the services that EAs provided and the barriers they sought to overcome, and offers best practice guidance on how a program might incorporate EA services.

    Profiles of Home Upgrade Programs Using Energy Advisor Services

    In 2010, the U.S. Department of Energy’s Better Buildings Neighborhood Program (BBNP) charged state and local governments, nonprofit organizations, and utilities with testing innovative approaches to boost energy efficiency adoption. Many programs leveraged existing utility rebate programs and, depending on the needs of the community and the program’s goals, some added additional services. Some programs created new marketing and outreach strategies to engage homeowners, while others offered additional rebates, financing options, and workforce development programs to support contractors.1 Some BBNP programs added EA services to help homeowners navigate the upgrade process to improve assessment-to-upgrade conversion rates.

    Table 2 summarizes the EA services offered by six such programs and presents performance metrics and a characterization of the communities served.2 In reviewing these metrics, note that the EA is one component of a larger program design. While all program managers interviewed consider EA services critical to their program’s success, a number of other factors can impact program effectiveness.

    Each of the profiled programs developed the EA position to meet their specific needs and goals; however, two commonalities emerge:

    • All EAs worked with homeowners to review their home energy assessment reports, and

    • Almost all EAs reviewed the final scope of work prior to completion of the upgrade.

    Other services—including assisting homeowners with scheduling assessments and upgrades, selecting contractors, conducting QA/QC of completed projects, and providing outreach at public events—varied by program needs.

    The program metrics in Table 2 include the number of Full Time Equivalent (FTE) staff in the EA role and the total program staff, as well as the average number of hours an EA spent on each completed upgrade. These metrics are a proxy for the size of the program and the magnitude of the EA role in the overall program design. The six programs invested in a wide range of EA hours per upgrade completed, from five to twentyperson-hours on average. This metric is affected by multiple factors, including the community’s receptiveness to home energy upgrades, local government policies, and the services offered by the EA. Note that programs with larger grant awards (i.e., Enhabit3 and EnergySmart) had lower average EA person-hours per upgrade, nine hours and five hours respectively, suggesting that there may be economies of scale.

    Using Energy Advisor Services to Overcome Barriers

    The final evaluation of BBNP found that programs which provided multiple assessment pathways and did some direct installation of measures were typically more successful at completing upgrades.5 While the presence of the EA position itself did not necessarily stand out, the programs that offered the services provided by EAs were typically very successful. Given that these services were particularly influential with customers, it is worth examining the specific services the EA provides relative to the barriers these services are designed to overcome…Overcoming Informational Barriers…Program Orientation…Conduct Energy Assessments…Overcoming Decision-Making Barriers…Select a Contractor…Review Assessment Results…Explain Financing Options…

    Key Issues When Considering Energy Advisors

    These six programs have found EA services to be a highly effective way to overcome some of the more intractable barriers in the home energy upgrade process. When considering which EA services to offer, program administrators must determine:

    • Which barriers are most problematic in their community?

    • What subset of these barriers does the program plan to address with EA services?

    The following tips for success can help program administrators use energy advising services strategically. Program budgets, community characteristics, and other local conditions are important issues to take into account.

    Define Responsibilities and Necessary Skills and Hire Accordingly

    EAs often perform a range of tasks, and they must have a flexible skillset. Technical knowledge is critical, but customer service and a personable nature can be equally important. Some programs have stated that hiring for personality and a customer service mindset was even more important, as technical knowledge can be taught. Common backgrounds for EAs include teaching, building science, design, sales, environmental studies, social services, and the building trades. Some programs require professional technical credentials from regional or national trade agencies such as the Residential Energy Services Network (RESNET) or the Building Performance Institute (BPI). Programs considering an EA role should have a clear sense of what duties their EA will perform and what skills are most important to those duties.

    Invest in Well-Defined Contractor-EA Relationships

    All six programs observed that the upgrade process is smoother when contractors and EAs have a consistent understanding of the division of roles and responsibilities. A clearly defined relationship also limits customer confusion during the upgrade process. Furthermore, when all parties present consistent, coordinated information, customers’ trust in both the contractors and the program is significantly increased.

    Developing working relationships between contractors and EAs also saves time during the upgrade process. For example, EAs with the HEAT Squad were initially heavily engaged as intermediaries between customers and contractors. As the demand for upgrades increased, the program found that developing relationships with, and even providing sales training for, contractors helped them improve their business practices and customer relations. The need for EAs to intervene in the upgrade process lessened as the contractor community developed their capacity. Setting clear expectations for scopes of work, bids, and test-out performance levels can also save time and hassle for all parties involved, particularly homeowners.

    Minimize EA Activities that Do Not Translate into Upgrades

    For every program, the person-hours per upgrade was high initially and decreased over time as the program matured. Each program sought to balance quality and homeowner satisfaction with using the program’s labor and financial resources efficiently. All six programs found this balance through a continuous improvement approach. As data accumulated and programs gained experience, program administrators cut back on activities that did not make an upgrade more likely, such as unlimited phone consultations and multiple home visits. To address these time sinks and limit customer demands on advising staff, programs created additional tools that directly or indirectly provided the help that homeowners needed.

    • Invest in Effective Websites. Many programs emphasize the importance of investing in an effective website early because of its time-saving potential. Homeowners can use a well-designed website to:

    o Educate themselves about the upgrade process and about the program and its services, lessening the reliance on advisors for education.

    o Determine if they are eligible for the program services, allowing the advisors to focus on those most likely to undergo an upgrade.

    o Sign up for the program, which can generate a record in the program’s tracking and customer management database and trigger a follow-up by an EA.

    Enhabit reduced the marketing, education, and outreach burden on their EAs by building an accessible, engaging website that enables homeowners to determine their own eligibility for the program, learn about the upgrade process, and run a simple asset rating tool that estimates their home’s savings potential. The program also reduced the time EAs spend monitoring projects by assigning all upgrades associated with one contractor to the same EA. This allowed the EA and contractor to discuss multiple projects during each correspondence and develop a more consistent and personal relationship.

    • Document Frequently Asked Questions to Minimize Bottle Necks. Energize Bedford’s approach of promoting a single, prominent, expert energy coach came with a down side: homeowners participating in the program were hesitant to have any work done on their home without first consulting the energy coach. This demanded significant EA time and often unnecessarily slowed down the upgrade process. To reduce these consultations, the Energize Bedford’s EA created a series of short, publicly-available videos addressing common questions. To further manage time spent on individual customer consultations, Energize Bedford and other programs instituted weekly office hours when homeowners can ask for advice. This structure gave the homeowner access to the EA while putting reasonable and clear constraints on that access.

    Use Data to your Advantage

    Customer relationship management software can help EAs track the progress of upgrades and review past correspondence with homeowners and contractors. By consolidating this information into one database, program staff can identify inefficiencies and areas for process improvement. Before they had developed their excel-based tracking system, STEP cited the absence of a systematized customer database as one of the program’s biggest stumbling blocks. Good information and customer management systems are critical to ensure that EAs can manage upgrades efficiently and effectively.

    Key Takeaways: Incorporating EA Services into Your Program

    All six programs cited their EA services as a key factor in the program’s success; however, an EA position can also increase the costs of program delivery. Before launching the EA role, a number of considerations need to be determined, such as how the EA will interact with contractors and whether there are sufficient information technology resources in place (e.g., FAQ section of program website, customer tracking system) to enable the success of these services. These costs and considerations should be weighed against your specific program’s situation and target population.

    When incorporating energy advisor services into your program design, ensure that you:

    1) Understand the market barriers for your program.

    2) Identify the barriers the EA position and services will be used to overcome.

    3) Define the role and specific responsibilities of the EA position relative to other program staff, contractors, and any program partners. Integrate the EA position into the overall program design.

    4) Continually examine, evaluate, and adapt the role as your program and the market grow, and change over time.

    The six profiled programs used EAs to provide services that address specific barriers hindering completion of home energy upgrades. The barriers include informational barriers, decision-making barriers, and transactional barriers. While an EA is only one component that influences program outcomes, all six programs cited the EAs as a critical component to their program’s success.

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home

  • >