NewEnergyNews: ORIGINAL REPORTING: Utility-scale solar booms as costs drop

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

The challenge now: To make every day Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT THURSDAY, December 8:

  • TTTA Thursday- The Record Of The New EPA Head
  • TTTA Thursday-The Undeveloped New Energy
  • TTTA Thursday-Walking On New Energy
  • TTTA Thursday-Electric Tractor For Emissions-Free.Farming
  • THE DAY BEFORE

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Turning Distributed Energy From Threat To Opportunity
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Solar Policy Action Heats Up
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Maine’s Almost Solar Policy Breakthrough
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: How To Balance Competing Solar Interests
  • QUICK NEWS, December 6: Sliver Of Hope? Al Gore In Climate Change Meet With Donald Trump; The Opportunity In New Energy; Google Seizing New Energy Opportunity
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: A Way For New Energy To Meet Peak Demand
  • QUICK NEWS, December 5: Trial Of The Century Coming On Climate; The Wind-Solar Synergy; The Still Rising Sales Of Cars With Plugs
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • Weekend Video: Trump Truth And Climate Change
  • Weekend Video: The Daily Show Talks Pipeline Politics
  • Weekend Video: Beyond Polar Bears – The Real Science Of Climate Change
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Aussie Farmers Worrying About Climate Change
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-The Climate Change Solution At Hand, Part 1
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-The Climate Change Solution At Hand, Part 2
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-New Energy And Historic Buildings In Europe
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of Daily Camera and Huffington Post, f is an occasional contributor to NewEnergyNews

    -------------------

    Some of Anne's contributions:

  • Another Tipping Point: US Coal Supply Decline So Real Even West Virginia Concurs (REPORT), November 26, 2013
  • SOLAR FOR ME BUT NOT FOR THEE ~ Xcel's Push to Undermine Rooftop Solar, September 20, 2013
  • NEW BILLS AND NEW BIRDS in Colorado's recent session, May 20, 2013
  • Lies, damned lies and politicians (October 8, 2012)
  • Colorado's Elegant Solution to Fracking (April 23, 2012)
  • Shale Gas: From Geologic Bubble to Economic Bubble (March 15, 2012)
  • Taken for granted no more (February 5, 2012)
  • The Republican clown car circus (January 6, 2012)
  • Twenty-Somethings of Colorado With Skin in the Game (November 22, 2011)
  • Occupy, Xcel, and the Mother of All Cliffs (October 31, 2011)
  • Boulder Can Own Its Power With Distributed Generation (June 7, 2011)
  • The Plunging Cost of Renewables and Boulder's Energy Future (April 19, 2011)
  • Paddling Down the River Denial (January 12, 2011)
  • The Fox (News) That Jumped the Shark (December 16, 2010)
  • Click here for an archive of Butterfield columns

    -------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • WEEKEND VIDEOS, December 10-11:

  • A Climate Change Denier’s Lies Exposed
  • The Good News Numbers On The EV Boom
  • “This Is Just The Beginning”

    Wednesday, July 20, 2016

    ORIGINAL REPORTING: Utility-scale solar booms as costs drop

    Utility-scale solar booms as costs drop, challenging gas on price; The total cost of a new project fell more than 50% from 2007 to 2014, a new LBNL study finds.

    Herman K. Trabish, October 8, 2015 (Utility Dive)

    The utility-scale solar sector is maturing right before our eyes. The resource's prices are falling so fast, it's on the verge of edging out natural gas on cost, according to the industry's latest progress report from the Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory(LBNL).

    “Utilities should take another look at utility-scale solar because they may be surprised at how much prices have come down. Prices from just two years ago are now grossly out of date,” noted Research Scientist Mark Bolinger, co-author of LBNL’s recent report, “Utility-Scale Solar 2014; An Empirical Analysis of Project Cost, Performance, and Pricing Trends.”

    Solar may now be a better choice to protect utility ratepayers from price hikes than natural gas, he added, because the prices in solar contracts are generally fixed, while fossil fuel plants are at the mercy of market prices for their fuels.

    Growth up, prices down

    One set of numbers tells the story of how quickly utility-scale solar is emerging:

    The first projects fitting LBNL’s definition of a utility-scale photovoltaic solarfacility — any ground-mounted array of 5 MW or greater — were installed in 2007, and there were 194 such projects online at the end of 2014. Of the 6,236 MW the projects comprised, more than half of that capacity — 3,218 MW — went online in 2014 alone.

    That breakneck pace of growth shows little sign of slowing in the short term. Installation increased by 729 MW in Q2 2015 alone, according to the "Q2 2015 U.S. Solar Market Insight Report" from the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and GTM Research. It was the ninth consecutive quarter that the utility-scale market segment grew by at least 500 MW, and the sector is widely expected to continue its growth pattern until the potential sunset of the 30% federal investment tax credit for solar at the end of 2016.

    But while those growth numbers are impressive, utility-scale PV's cost figures are more eye-popping.

    The median price in power purchase agreements (PPAs) fell to $3.10/watt (AC) in 2014, a 50% fall from the average price from 2007 to 2009, and a 37% drop from the price in 2010. The lowest prices were at $2.00/watt.

    The least expensive 20% of the prices sampled went from $3.20/watt in 2013 to $2.30/watt in 2014.

    Utilities have taken advantage of the new, lower prices.

    NV Energy recently reported signing a PPA for the 100 MW output of First Solar’s Playa Solar 2 installation at $0.0387/kWh after paying at $0.046/kWh for the output of SunPower’s 100 MW Boulder Solar installation last year. The utility bought utility-scale solar power for an average of $0.1377 per kWh for solar generation over the course of 2014.

    Austin Energy recently received record low bids below $0.04/kWh in response to its 2015 request for proposals (RFP). Those bids were 20% lower than the contract it signed with Recurrent Energy in 2014 for $0.045/kWh and only 25% of the $0.16/kWh it paid for the 30 MW Webberville project, the utility's first large installation.

    Deep Market

    The price declines represent more than just a few exceptional PPAs, Bolinger said.

    “The responses to utility solicitations show quite a bit of capacity priced very similarly to the winning bids in the RFPs, and that confirms this pricing is real," he said.

    LBNL’s survey of developer responses to solicitations found concrete evidence of a deep market.

    The Austin Energy RFP for 600 MW of solar received 149 unique proposals representing 7,976 MW from 33 different bidders. “Almost 1,300 MW were reportedly bid at levelized prices of $45/MWh or less,” LBNL reports.

    A Southwestern Public Service 2014 RFP for 200 MW of utility-scale PV received 112 project bids representing 5,250 MW. Some 2,958 MW were bid at levelized prices ranging from $40/MWh to $50/MWh, and 1,782 were bid at levelized prices ranging from $50/MWh to $60/MWh.

    Of the 2,537 MW of renewable resources bid into the 2015 NV Energy RFP, more than 90% were solar. LBNL did not get pricing information for the non-winning bids, but several hundred MW of shortlisted capacity were reportedly bid at prices very similar to the winning bids. In addition, the solar bids were priced lower than wind or geothermal bids, according to the utility.

    The LBNL study found such responses suggestive of "a significant amount of utility-scale PV capacity capable (at least with the 30% ITC) of selling electricity at very low prices in the Southwest,” the LBNL study reports.

    Financial cash flow models using real world parameters produce hypothetical PPA prices that match current market prices, Bolinger said. “There isn’t much question the current solar technologies are viable and these projects should be profitable, even at the new low PPA prices.”

    New highs in capacity factors

    Technology advances are also allowing utility-scale PV installations to generate more power for every MW of nameplate capacity. That means higher project capacity factors. And higher capacity factors enable low PPA prices, Bolinger explained.

    “The highest capacity factors in our sample are up around 35%, which is comparable in the Southwest to wind power,” he said. “That may surprise some people because the sun only shines during the day whereas wind could come around the clock.”

    The four key drivers of a project’s capacity factor are the strength of the solar resource, whether the panels are fixed or track the sun, the inverter loading ratio, and the module type, Bolinger said.

    “Module type does not have much impact," he said, "but the other three variables have a strong influence.”

    Capacity enhancement factors may increase the cost per MW of the project, but they can reduce the cost per MWh of production even more, Bolinger said.

    Unsurprisingly, projects sited in stronger solar resource areas have substantially higher capacity factors, all else being equal, the study reports. There is an average 8% advantage to being in the highest resource area versus being in the lowest resource area, though that difference may be affected by a project’s tracking technology and inverter loading ratio.

    Single-axis tracking ups the average capacity factor by 3% to 4% over projects that used fixed-tilt racking.

    An increase in the inverter loading ratio, which means adding more panels to the array but keeping the same size inverter, alters the array’s average capacity factor between 1% and 6%, depending on the solar resource.

    The differences in project-level capacity factors by module type are generally smaller than for the other variables and exhibit few patterns beyond that there seems to be a strong preference by developers of thin-film projects for fixed-tilt racking, the study reports.

    “Tracking has become a lot more reliable and the cost has dropped so the developers will get extra MWh by shifting to it,” Bolinger explained. The new numbers may simply reflect the recent purchase by First Solar, one of the world’s biggest usPV developers, of tracking technology provider RayTracker.

    One of the big drivers for choosing First Solar’s cadmium telluride thin filmmodules for Southwestern desert projects is their thermal coefficent, Bolinger said. “When you have that strong a resource, it makes sense to track it.”

    Low prices have the South rising

    In addition to the capacity factor drivers, Bolinger said, the planned sunset of federal tax incentives at the end of next year is spurring short-term growth.

    "We are heading into 2016 and developers are bidding aggressively to get contracts in place so they can build their projects ahead of the reversion of the ITC," he said.

    The federal investment tax credit (ITC) was raised to 30% in 2006 to support solar growth, after having long been at 10%. Congress is expected to allow it to revert to 10% when the increase now in place expires at the end of 2016.

    The ITC may have been successful enough as an incentive for the utility-scale sector to sustain strong growth beyond the reversion, Bolinger said.

    Modeling with aggressive parameters and a 30% ITC produced a levelized PPA price of about $43 per MWh. The same modeling with a 10% ITC only increased it to about $54 per MWh, he said.

    “There have been a lot of contracts signed at that level and it is not clear to me demand will suddenly dry up if we go back to a 10% ITC in 2017,” Bolinger said.

    He also anticipates further installed cost reductions.

    “The CEO of First Solar recently essentially promised their installed prices would be below $1/watt in 2017,” Bolinger said.

    The result of the lower prices is an expansion of utility-scale PV to regions beyond the Southwest, particularly in Southeast, Bolinger said.

    “We are seeing contracts in the $50/MWh to $60/MWh range in states like Arkansas and Alabama that haven’t seen solar development," he said.

    Of LBNL’s 8.7 GW of sample projects, 96% were in the Southwestern states of California (68%), Nevada (11%), Arizona (11%), Texas (4%), and New Mexico (3%).

    Even so, “there have been a number of notable announcements over the past year about new utility-scale solar PPAs being signed at competitive prices in several southeastern states,” the study reports. They include:

    -Georgia Power long-term PPAs signed in Oct. 2014 for 545 MW at an estimated average PPA price of $65/MWh or less

    -A Feb. 2015 Tennessee Valley Authority PPA for 80 MW at a price of $61/MWh

    -An April 2015 Entergy Arkansas PPA for 81 MW at a price just above $50/MWh

    -An Amazon Web Services PPA for 80 MW at an undisclosed price

    -A July 2015 Orlando Utilities Commission PPA for 13 MW at $70/MWh, less than half the $194/MWh price of its 2011 project

    The trend is especially noteworthy “because the Southeast has historically not seen much renewable energy development,” the study explains.

    “If people in the Southeast see they will not be on the losing end of the Clean Power Plan and other policies proposed to combat global warming, there might be less resistance there,” Bolinger added.

    Solar's competitive advantages

    At the new low PPA price levels, “solar can compete head on with wind power in terms of both price and generation profile,” the LBNL study also finds.

    Both renewable resources, because their PPAs lock in cost over long contractual periods, offer a hedge value against the volatility of fossil fuel prices, Bolinger said.

    Competition for PPAs is emerging between wind and solar in the Southwest and Texas, he said.

    “It would be difficult to build wind in the $50 per MWh to $60 per MWh range in many places in the Southeast. And the solar resource is more widespread," Bolinger said.

    Solar has several advantages over wind. It is available more often during the day, closer to peak demand periods, and has less risk in the form of moving parts and annual resource variation.

    “All in all, it is a more predictable resource,” Bolinger said. “If they can get a solar PPA at a similar price as a wind PPA, nine times out of ten they will choose solar.”

    More significantly, PPA prices for utility-scale PV are starting to match the fuel costs of natural gas power generation, Bolinger said. “Even if the utility doesn’t need new generation capacity for the next five or ten years, solar could allow a utility to back off the gas plant and save on fuel costs.”

    And, Bolinger added, if solar can compete with the fuel cost of natural gas generation now, without considering any fixed capital cost recovery for the gas plant, it is likely to be an even better investment going forward because “it is a good bet gas prices aren’t going much lower.”

    “Most solar PPAs have no escalator," Bolinger said. "That means the price declines over time in real dollar terms. Natural gas price projections tend to increase over time in real dollar terms."

    The LBNL report is a high-level cost measurement and doesn't break down cost factors for specific utilities to compare costs. Even so, the nationwide drop in utility-scale PV prices, especially combined with the freedom from fuel costs, is still “a good reason for utilities to take another look at solar,” Bolinger said.

    "Solar is a little more expensive than natural gas at current prices but looking out a few years solar gets cheaper pretty quickly,” he said.

    IFTTT Recipe: Share new blog posts to Facebook connects blogger to facebook

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home

  • >