NewEnergyNews: TODAY’S STUDY: A Deeper Look At Utilities – Duke/Progress Energy

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

While the OFFICE of President remains in highest regard at NewEnergyNews, this administration's position on climate change makes it impossible to regard THIS president with respect. Below is the NewEnergyNews theme song until 2020.

The challenge now: To make every day Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • TODAY’S STUDY: The Value Of Transportation Elecrification
  • QUICK NEWS, December 12: The “Fight-Climate-Change” Diet; Market For Advanced EV Batteries To Quadruple By 2026; The Low Lifecycle Costs In New Energy
  • THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: How The New Energy Marketplace Is Growing And Shifting
  • QUICK NEWS, December 11: N.C. Millennial Women Unite For Climate Fight; The White House Threat To New Energy; What’s Bad News In The Tax Bill For New Energy
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • Weekend Video: Tesla Adds World’s Biggest Battery To Aussie Wind
  • Weekend Video: Solar And The Next Utilities
  • Weekend Video: Wind Builders On Wind
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-The Climate Change Gourmet
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-UK Study Says Yes To Solar-Powered Electric Trains
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-First Aussie Ocean Wind Project Gets $8BIL Funding
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-EU Solar Goes Digital To Open New Services
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

    THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT THURSDAY, December 7:

  • TTTA Thursday-City Mayors Unite To Fight Climate Change
  • TTTA Thursday-New Energy And Big Oil Unite Against Subsidies For Coal And Nuclear
  • TTTA Thursday-California Would Sell Only EVs After 2040
  • TTTA Thursday-Utilities In A Time Of Solar
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Founding Editor Herman K. Trabish

    --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • TODAY AT NewEnergyNews, December 13:

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: How California Is Easing Off NatGas With New Energy
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Illinois cloud computing debate could open utility rate reform

    Monday, August 15, 2016

    TODAY’S STUDY: A Deeper Look At Utilities – Duke/Progress Energy

    Duke Energy/Progress Energy

    Nancy LaPlaca, July 2016 (Energy and Policy Institute)

    Summary

    Duke Energy, based in North Carolina, is the largest electric utility in the world. Duke emits more carbon pollution than any other US utility, and ranks first in fossil fuel generation and second in coal-fired generation. The majority of Duke’s business is in regulated, monopoly utilities in six U.S. states (North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida, Indiana, Ohio and Kentucky). While Duke also owns a commercial arm that has invested in wind and solar power that it sells to other utilities, Duke’s electricity customers in its regulated territory receive an electricity mix that contains next to zero renewable energy. The company has shown little appetite for change: regulatory documents show it intends to power with only 4% renewable power in North Carolina, its largest state, by 2029.

    Duke’s fossil and nuclear-dominated strategy have led to a series of scandals in recent years both for its customers and the environment. Duke’s coal ash waste has become a systemic disaster in the Carolinas, culminating in the 2014 coal ash spill on the Dan River. Nuclear construction projects in the Carolinas and particularly Florida have been beset by problems, costing ratepayers billions of dollars.

    Duke has protected itself from stricter oversight in its regulated operations by contributing heavily to the state and federal politicians that control its destiny, pouring millions of dollars into campaign contributions and lobbying. Despite massive pressures facing the electric power sector to adapt to technological change that is ushering in a new wave of energy efficiency, rooftop solar power, and distributed energy storage, Duke has yet to show much of an appetite for change. It has aggressively fought efforts to open up North Carolina’s and Florida’s market to non-utility solar providers in an effort to preserve its monopoly business model.

    Basics

    Duke Energy, headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, is the largest electric power holding company in the U.S. and world as measured by number of customers: 7.4 million meters in the U.S.; and by market value ($52.1 billion as of 2/16/16) and capacity (52.7 GW). (NOTE: if the Pepco-Exelon merger is completed, Duke Energy will then be second largest.)

    Duke Energy completed its $32 billion merger with Progress Energy in 2012, despite “secret side deals” that were not made public. Duke Energy paid $146 million in 2015 to settle lawsuits that arose from the merger.

    Duke Energy:

    -total operating revenues 2015: $23.5 billion

    -total assets (power plants, etc.) 2015: $121 billion

    -total employees: 29,188

    Despite earning $9.2 billion in profits from 2008-2012, Duke Energy had a negative 3.3% tax rate during that time, and received $299 million in tax rebates. A July 2015 study found that Duke Energy is the worst climate offender of all U.S. utilities. Duke Energy was number one for CO2 emissions (136 million tons), and is one of the top SO2 (‘acid rain’) emitters. Duke Energy was #1 in fossil generation, and #2 in coal generation.

    A September 2015 study gave Duke Energy an “F,” which it awarded to only four corporations. The report noted that while Duke Energy touts its clean energy portfolio, it actively opposes the Clean Power Plan, and gutted Florida energy efficiency goals by over 90%.

    In Florida, a group of utilities, including Duke Energy, have spent $4 million to stop a ballot initiative that would expand distributed solar. Duke Energy’s share so far (as of 5/1/16) is $1.2 million. The third-party sales ban is widely recognized as one reason that Florida’s solar market is so underdeveloped.

    In July 2015, the Orlando Utilities Commission (OUC), a municipally owned and operated utility, signed a 20-year contract to purchase solar power at 7 cents/kWh, while gas or coal costs 8 cents/kWh. This is a steep drop from the 19 cents/kWh solar deal the OUC built four years earlier, showing an alternative pathway for Duke Energy if it chose to embrace solar power in Florida…

    DUKE ENERGY’S OVERBLOWN CLEAN ENERGY CLAIMS

    Duke Energy frequently touts the 3,000 MW of clean energy it owns, but Duke Energy Regulated, which is the monopoly that operates in six states (North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida, Indiana, Ohio and Kentucky), owns only 66 MW of clean energy, out of a total of over 50,000 MW of power as of March 31, 2016, while Duke Energy Commercial owns nearly 2,500 MW of solar and wind.

    Duke Energy operates as a monopoly in its regulated states, so that homeowners and businesses can’t purchase electricity from any company or person other than Duke Energy. While Duke Energy purports to own a lot of solar, it only owns 66 MW of solar, while Duke Energy’s unregulated subsidiary, Duke Energy Renewables, owns 2,400 MW of solar and wind. Using the names interchangeably is misleading, since they are legally separate entities.

    NC, SC, FL and KY all limit the use of “third party” solar financing, resulting in Duke Energy’s virtual solar monopoly in these states. (At least 98% of North Carolina’s 2,000 MW of solar is due to a federal law, PURPA, which Duke Energy has fought to limit. Solar development in North Carolina in 2014 and 2015 would have been seriously curtailed if Duke Energy had been successful at the North Carolina Utilities Commission in changing the terms of the solar PURPA contracts by: (1) limiting the contract length to 5 years and (2) standardizing contracts only up to 100 kW rather than the current 5 MW.)

    Duke Energy and Coal Ash… Duke and Natural Gas… Duke Energy’s Nuclear Problems in Florida… Duke Energy’s Money in Politics… DUKE ENERGY INDIANA… Duke Energy and Environmental Justice…

    IFTTT Recipe: Share new blog posts to Facebook connects blogger to facebook

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home