NewEnergyNews: ORIGINAL REPORTING: The Challenge In Properly Valuing Solar

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

While the OFFICE of President remains in highest regard at NewEnergyNews, this administration's position on climate change makes it impossible to regard THIS president with respect. Below is the NewEnergyNews theme song until 2020.

The challenge now: To make every day Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Making the 'cold hard economic case' against coal
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Virtual contracts driving a boom in corporate renewables buys
  • THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: The Cost Of Resilience
  • QUICK NEWS, April 16: Extinction Rebellion Joins The Climate Fight; Beating Climate Change With A New Energy Grid
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: The Way To Handle Wildfire Costs
  • QUICK NEWS, April 15: Climate Change’s “Extreme Pollen” Ups Allergy Struggles; Solar Breaking Through In The Southeast
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • Weekend Video: SNL’s Pete Davidson Explains Climate Change
  • Weekend Video: Time To Stop Fracking
  • Weekend Video: The Big Benefits Of Texas Wind
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: Using Existing Coal Costs More Than Buying New Energy
  • QUICK NEWS, April 9: The Climate Change Security Risk; New Energy In Industry
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Founding Editor Herman K. Trabish

    --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT THURSDAY, April 18:

  • Young Republican Breakaways To Fight Climate Change
  • Storing More Energy Cheaper And Faster Than Batteries
  • Power-To-Go With The Solar Suitcase

    Wednesday, November 21, 2018

    ORIGINAL REPORTING: The Challenge In Properly Valuing Solar

    How two value-of-solar studies add up to no clear value of solar; Is rooftop solar really worth 90% less in Montana than in Maryland?

    Herman K. Trabish, May 10, 2018 (Utility Dive)

    Editor’s note: The debate about solar’s value and how it should be compensated continues at state commissions across the country.

    A large disparity in two new solar valuation studies demands explanation. Studies of the value of solar and of distributed energy resources (DER) attempt to quantify their benefits and costs. They have been pivotal, but not decisive, in net energy metering (NEM) debates. A solar valuation study is intended to quantify the cost or benefit each solar owner's array brings to the system. It is calculated in the same volumetric terms as rates, allowing the value to be expressed as a rate of compensation for solar-generated electricity exported to the grid by the solar array owner. Depending on the variables used in the calculation, it may come out above or below the retail rate of system power.

    A March 29 study for Northwestern Energy of its Montana territory showed BTM solar’s levelized 25-year value to be between $0.035/kWh and $0.046/kWh. An April 10 draft study done for Maryland’s Public Service Commission (PSC) showed BTM solar’s 2019 value in the state’s investor-owned utility (IOU) territories to be between about $0.31/kWh and about $0.41/kWh. That's about an 88% difference, but the sun is not 88% brighter in Maryland than in Montana. The biggest single difference impacting these numbers is that the most recent average retail price of electricity for Montana is $0.088/kWh and $0.122/kWh for Maryland. A comparison of these studies shines some light on solar valuation methodologies and best practices. One thing is as clear as the light of day: If these studies stand, the future of Maryland’s solar industry is probably much brighter than the future of Montana’s solar industry… click here for more

    IFTTT Recipe: Share new blog posts to Facebook connects blogger to facebook

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home