NewEnergyNews: ORIGINAL REPORTING: The Critical Factor for California Customer Choice

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

While the OFFICE of President remains in highest regard at NewEnergyNews, this administration's position on climate change makes it impossible to regard THIS president with respect. Below is the NewEnergyNews theme song until 2020.

The challenge now: To make every day Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-A Climate Crisis Choice Worth Wrestling With
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-New Energy Around The World
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-New Energy Needs New Policy
  • THE DAY BEFORE

    THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT THURSDAY, July 18:

  • TTTA Thursday-U.S. Could Get Very Hot
  • TTTA Thursday-New York Needs Ocean Wind
  • TTTA Thursday-New York Needs Rooftop Solar
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Taking Energy Storage To The Markets
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: Energy Storage Solutions For Medically Vulnerable Households In Power Outages
  • QUICK NEWS, July 16: What We Have Here Is A Failure To Communicate; EVs As Energy Storage
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: The Cost Of Wind
  • QUICK NEWS, July 15: Key To The Climate Crisis Fight; Economics Send Red States To New Energy
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Founding Editor Herman K. Trabish

    --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • WEEKEND VIDEOS, July 20-21:

  • The Boom In 100% New Energy Cities
  • The New Big New Energy Buyers
  • Even Newer New Energy

    Wednesday, March 13, 2019

    ORIGINAL REPORTING: The Critical Factor for California Customer Choice

    California customer choice at a crossroads: Regulators to weigh 3 key issues next week; The California Public Utilities Commission will consider two proposals Sept. 27 on how to calculate the price customers moving from IOUs to CCAs must pay.

    Herman K. Trabish, Sept. 18, 2018 (Utility Dive)

    Editor’s note: The turmoil in California’s power sector caused by the rise of customer choice continues.

    California regulators continue to work on how to calculate the exit fee charged to customers moving away from California’s investor-owned utilities (IOUs) to new electricity providers. The calculation could determine the near-term viability of California’s budding customer choice movement. Regulators face three big questions on how to calculate the Power Charge Indifference Adjustment (PCIA), a small per-kWh amount added to the bill of a departing customer that compensates the utility for investments made in anticipation of serving that customer. The first question is whether the PCIA should include the cost of high-priced utility-owned generation the IOUs might long ago have sold off. The second question is whether it should include the cost of somewhat newer but still high-priced utility-owned generation added to IOU portfolios largely for reliability purposes. And, finally, regulators must decide how, if at all, to limit the size of changes in the value of the PCIA.

    The answers could make the PCIA too high for new customer choice-inspired load serving entities (LSEs), including Community Choice Aggregators (CCAs) and direct access providers, to fulfill commitments to deliver cleaner energy at a lower cost. Or it could put the state's IOUs at financial risk. Two approaches to updating the PCIA calculation were laid out in a proposed decision by California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Administrative Law Judge Stephen C. Roscow and an alternate proposed decision by CPUC Commissioner Carla Peterman. Both found that the CPUC's current PCIA methodology cannot prevent cost shifts between customers. The final ruling between them left many of the questions raised by them undecided until the next phase of the process… click here for more

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home