NewEnergyNews: TODAY’S STUDY: The Potential Of Solar To Float

NewEnergyNews

Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

While the OFFICE of President remains in highest regard at NewEnergyNews, this administration's position on climate change makes it impossible to regard THIS president with respect. Below is the NewEnergyNews theme song until 2020.

The challenge now: To make every day Earth Day.

YESTERDAY

  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Polls Show U.S. Still Split On Climate Change
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-New Energy Offers $160 Trillion Opportunity
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-World Energy Demand Doubled In 2018
  • THE DAY BEFORE

    THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT THURSDAY, April 18:

  • TTTA Thursday-Young Republican Breakaways To Fight Climate Change
  • TTTA Thursday-Storing More Energy Cheaper And Faster Than Batteries
  • TTTA Thursday-Power-To-Go With The Solar Suitcase
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Making the 'cold hard economic case' against coal
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: Virtual contracts driving a boom in corporate renewables buys
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • TODAY’S STUDY: The Cost Of Resilience
  • QUICK NEWS, April 16: Extinction Rebellion Joins The Climate Fight; Beating Climate Change With A New Energy Grid
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • TODAY’S STUDY: The Way To Handle Wildfire Costs
  • QUICK NEWS, April 15: Climate Change’s “Extreme Pollen” Ups Allergy Struggles; Solar Breaking Through In The Southeast
  • --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Founding Editor Herman K. Trabish

    --------------------------

    --------------------------

    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

    email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • WEEKEND VIDEOS, April 20-21:

  • Bill Maher’s New Climate Change Solution
  • Beyond Batteries
  • Professor Mark Jacobson On The Economics Of Carbon Capture

    Tuesday, April 02, 2019

    TODAY’S STUDY: The Potential Of Solar To Float

    Floating Photovoltaic Systems: Assessing the Technical Potential of Photovoltaic Systems on Man-Made Water Bodies in the Continental United States

    Robert S. Spencer, Jordan Macknick, Alexandra Aznar, Adam Warren, and Matthew O. Reese, (National Renewable Energy Laboratory)

    Abstract

    Floating photovoltaic (FPV) systems, also called floatovoltaics, are a rapidly growing emerging technology application in which solar photovoltaic (PV) systems are sited directly on water. The water-based configuration of FPV systems can be mutually beneficial: Along with providing such benefits as reduced evaporation and algae growth, it can lower PV operating temperatures and potentially reduce the costs of solar energy generation. Although there is growing interest in FPV, to date there has been no systematic assessment of technical potential in the continental United States. We provide the first national-level estimate of FPV technical potential using a combination of filtered, large-scale datasets, site-specific PV generation models, and geospatial analytical tools. We quantify FPV co-benefits and siting considerations, such as land conservation, coincidence with high electricity prices, and evaporation rates. Our results demonstrate the potential of FPV to contribute significantly to the U.S. electric sector, even using conservative assumptions. A total of 24 419 man-made water bodies, representing 27% of the number and 12% of the area of man-made water bodies in the contiguous United States, were identified as being suitable for FPV generation. FPV systems covering just 27% of the identified suitable water bodies could produce almost 10% of current national generation. Many of these eligible bodies of water are in water-stressed areas with high land acquisition costs and high electricity prices, suggesting multiple benefits of FPV technologies.

    INTRODUCTION

    Floating photovoltaic (FPV) systems, also called floatovoltaics, are an emerging technology application in which solar photovoltaic (PV) systems are sited directly on bodies of water instead of land or buildings.1,2 Competing uses for land and recognized co-benefits associated with siting FPV systems on water are driving factors in the development of this niche application.3−6

    To date, FPV has been installed predominantly on manmade bodies of water, such as wastewater storage ponds, reservoirs, remediation and tailing ponds, and agricultural irrigation or retention ponds.1,7 The first FPV installation came online in 2007 at the Far Niente Winery in California, yet the vast majority of existing systems (98%) became operational between 2014 and 2016.1,8 As of 2017, global installed capacity was approximately 198 MW, with additional projects, including what will be the world’s largest FPV system at 70 MW, expected to come online in 2018.9 System sizes vary dramatically across the world, ranging from 4 kW to 40 MW.1,7,9,10 FPV systems have also been installed in more than a dozen countries throughout Southeast Asia, Europe, North America, and the Middle East, but Japan has the majority1 (80%) of FPV installed capacity, including 70 of the largest FPV systems in the world.8,9,11 The United States has seen limited adoption of FPV to date, but institutions such as reservoir operations, water treatment facilities, and residential communities are increasingly exploring its applications.

    FPV adapts modules used in traditional ground-mounted or rooftop PV, with important mounting design and configuration differences to enable flotation. FPV can be flat, tilted, or tracking.7,12−15 Electrical equipment, such as inverters, typically resides on shore, and electricity is transmitted from the FPV system via floating or underwater cables. The buoy structures are anchored or tethered to land or the floor of the water body.7,16 Some FPV systems are designed such that they can rest on the ground when or if the supporting body of water is drained. Systems must be designed to withstand fluctuating water levels, high wind and wave loads, and various extreme weather conditions. Saltwater in some tailings pond and seawater applications may pose additional challenges and require tailored mitigation measures (e.g., corrosion-resistant materials) as a result of the corrosive qualities of water with high salinity.6,12,17

    FPV systems demonstrate unique energy and non-energy cobenefits compared to land-based PV systems. Research surrounding the performance of FPV systems is relatively immature, but existing studies indicate that these systems experience power conversion efficiency gains as a result of lower ambient temperatures underneath the panels…FPV systems reduce water evaporation on reservoirs…FPV systems reportedly have minimal impact on wildlife…purportedly reduces algae growth…Avoidance of land-energy conflicts (e.g., fuel versus food, land for conservation) is another purported benefit…

    Current FPV Projects and Generation Potential.

    The technical potential of FPV systems in the United States was calculated on the basis of assumptions derived from current configurations of existing FPV systems implemented internationally. We calculated an average system capacity density of 10 000 m2 /MW from an evaluation of 51 projects (R2 = 0.994) throughout the world…there are 2 666 741 water bodies spanning the United States. Of these, there are 90 580 dammed water bodies, making up about 3.4% of the total. We identified 24 419 of the dammed water bodies as being feasible for installing FPV… around 1.3% (27 656 ha) of the total surface area (2 196 138 ha) considered for FPV potential…

    …covering the surface area of all 24 419 eligible water bodies in the United States would support 2116 GW of installed FPV; covering only 27% of the surface area of the reservoirs could produce 786 TWh of electricity per year, roughly 9.6% of 2016 electricity production in the United States.39 Generation amounts scale linearly with water body coverage, meaning potential generation would double if 54% of eligible water bodies were to be covered by FPV infrastructure. Varying the tilt angle from 5° to 15° led to a change in annual generation of −4 and +2%, respectively, from the 11° standard assumption, assuming constant capacity for a given area…

    The states with the highest generation potential are relatively dispersed throughout the country…The feasibility and attractiveness of deploying FPV technologies can be dependent upon primary purposes and ownership of water bodies (Figure 3)…

    Potential Co-benefits and Siting Considerations of FPV.

    FPV technologies have the potential to provide additional non-energy benefits…One major benefit of FPV is the opportunity for land conservation, where the implementation of FPV does not compete with lands used for other purposes, such as crop and pasture land in agriculture…Another benefit and siting consideration is the incentive of PV market adoptability to generate electricity within service areas of high local utility costs…

    Limitations

    The field of implementing PV systems over water is a nascent field, with just over 100 projects internationally and seven projects in the United States as of the end of 2017. Most of what we know about FPV is derived from this limited number of projects and has formed the assumptions on which this assessment of its technical potential in the contiguous United States is based. With this limited number of projects (the majority of which are less than 2 years old), there is a lack of empirical data documenting long-term system performance, financial burdens, operations and maintenance, material science, environmental impacts, and other key factors. With the rapid expansion of projects coming online both domestically and internationally and the growing interests in FPV research, we can expect an equally rapid increase in case studies and publicly available data to follow. This burgeoning attention will open the doors to answering questions about realistic expectations for a FPV system. To address these long-term knowledge gaps, research needs to be conducted on the material durability of FPV, such as how these systems may endure in various climates and conditions.

    Although this paper calculates the technical potential for FPV systems using geospatial tools, there are other site-specific limitations that may affect the feasibility of a certain location. The high-level data used and analyzed lacks the resolution for case-by-case feasibility, and the results should only be considered as a starting point for national and regional examinations. This analysis is an approximation and can only be as good as the dataset on which it is based. Further analyses should be conducted to look at the technical potential at the state level with higher fidelity datasets and perform case studies on individual water bodies.

    Along with the need for further analysis to determine the feasibility of implementing FPV, additional research is needed to understand the added benefits of using water-based installations compared to land-based counterparts. For instance, the evaporative losses quantified in this paper are aggregated as a large-scale approximation simply to capture the extent of the potential impact and lack the granularity and precision at the local level. There is uncertainty associated with the extent to which FPV, with varying levels of water body coverage, reduces evaporation in various regions. Furthermore, water markets are complex, with high regional and temporal variability, and attempting to assess the economic impact on the national scale is beyond the scope of this study. Targeted case studies can empirically measure evaporation reductions, water quality improvements, panel efficiency gains, equipment weathering, and other factors while assessing associated impacts in terms of the local economic benefits and trade-offs.

    Using conservative assumptions on available man-made bodies of water, we estimated 2116 GW of FPV could be developed in the continental U.S.; covering 27% of the surface area on these bodies of water has the potential to generate 9.6% of current electricity generation. Relaxing some conservative assumptions on reservoir coverage of FPV systems, available reservoirs, and including natural water bodies could substantially increase this potential. This potential shows that the U.S. could benefit from this rapidly emerging technology and that growing focus on FPV within the domestic research community could be advantageous. This significant opportunity warrants future research into the optimal siting, technology configuration, PV chemistries, and material properties of FPV systems. Additional research into potential co-benefits related to evaporation, algae growth, and panel temperature and output are also needed to fully understand the benefits and potential limitations of this new technology.

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home