NewEnergyNews: ORIGINAL REPORTING: Waiting For The Million-Dollar Compromise In Arizona


Gleanings from the web and the world, condensed for convenience, illustrated for enlightenment, arranged for impact...

While the OFFICE of President remains in highest regard at NewEnergyNews, this administration's position on climate change makes it impossible to regard THIS president with respect. Below is the NewEnergyNews theme song until 2020.

The challenge now: To make every day Earth Day.


  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Record Numbers In Student Climate Crisis Strike
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-Access To Electricity And New Energy Are Growing
  • FRIDAY WORLD HEADLINE-China Accelerates New Energy Move


  • TTTA Thursday-High Water Rising
  • TTTA Thursday-Climate Crisis Driving New Energy Boom

  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: California utilities prep nation's biggest time-of-use rate roll out
  • ORIGINAL REPORTING: PacifiCorp and other analyses point to more coal shutdowns as replacement demands rise

  • TODAY’S STUDY: Disappearing Species – The Numbers
  • QUICK NEWS, May 21: Extinction And The Climate Crisis; Tomorrow’s Solar Today

  • TODAY’S STUDY: World Wind Now
  • QUICK NEWS, May 20: Designers On The Climate Crisis; The Secret To More New Energy
  • --------------------------


    Founding Editor Herman K. Trabish



    Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart




      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.


    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • WEEKEND VIDEOS, May 25-26:

  • Bill Maher Talks Climate Crisis Economics
  • Denier Transformed
  • The New Nuclear Question

    Wednesday, May 08, 2019

    ORIGINAL REPORTING: Waiting For The Million-Dollar Compromise In Arizona

    APS spent millions defeating Prop 127. Is a clean energy compromise ahead? The utility beat the push for 50% renewables, but now there's talk of an 80% clean energy standard.

    Herman K. Trabish, Nov. 14, 2018 (Utility Dive)

    Editor’s note: The recent endorsement by Arizona regulators of a Clean Peak Standard could move policymakers toward a compromise.

    Both sides of Arizona's bitter Proposition 127 debate argued the state could benefit from more renewables, indicating there may be a path to compromise now that the election is behind them. While the dispute over increasing Arizona's renewable energy mandate found little common ground, both sides accepted the inevitability of nuclear power from the Palo Verde Generating Station making up a big part of the state's electricity generation for decades. That could be the foundation on which they build a compromise for a clean energy mandate. An agreement of that kind could support financial stability for the utility that led the charge against Proposition 127, as well as the large infusion of renewables that the proposition's supporters fought for.

    The ballot measure, which would have increased the state's renewables mandate from 15% by 2025 to 50% by 2030, lost 69.3% to 30.7%. Yet 86% of Arizona voters support investing in renewables, according to a non-partisan June 2018 poll. APS, the dominant investor-owned electric utility (IOU) in the state, provided almost $30.3 million of the $30.7 million spent to defeat Proposition 127, through corporate parent Pinnacle West. NextGen Climate Action, backed by billionaire climate change activist Tom Steyer, spent $23.2 million supporting the initiative in the most expensive ballot measure campaign in Arizona history. Controversy remains over why voters seemed to contradict themselves, but not over the need to grow Arizona renewables. The two still-unresolved key points in the debate about the proposed increase in Arizona's current mandate, which it calls the Renewable Energy Standard and Tariff — its impact on Palo Verde and its cost to ratepayers… click here for more



    Post a Comment

    << Home